|
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bulgaria. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kostja ( talk) 15:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Paltraw1.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Paltraw2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Aleksd! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 20:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Problem solving, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connectivity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Alek Popov has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Joshua Scott who? 14:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Aleksd -- It was suggested on this article's talk page to rename it to "Cliometrics". I infer from the article's edits of 5 May 2010 that you might want to comment on that. Please do. We can also gather views through relevant WikiProjects. -- Econterms ( talk) 10:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi! First, I'd kindly ask you to remain WP:CIVIL because your comments are clear-cut personal attacks that will get you blocked. It's always a good thing to assume good faith and a friendly attitude towards people who are here for the same purpose as you: to enrich this encyclopedia. As someone who has been here long enough, you ought to know this. Also, forgive my lack of modesty but I do believe I deserve some respect seeing as I've started a large portion of all articles in Category:Sofia...
Second, I don't think I've ever taken terrifying/tragical/depressing images and I haven't seen any of your retouching work. If you really did retouch a photo I took, then thanks, it's always appreciated. If it's not clear enough, only one of the pics in File:Sofia Collage TB.png is my work, the photo of Sofia University.
Now, apparently with your comments you're requesting for my argumentation as to why I selected these images to represent Sofia. Here's the logic I followed:
Here's also my commentary about your changes to my collage:
No offense, but I maintain my opinion that your version of the collage is much worse and does not improve the article. However, if you remain civil and show some respect and good will, I'm confident that we can discuss this issue and reach a consensus. Just make sure you stay on topic and don't resort to incivility next time :) Best, — Toдor Boжinov — 13:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Aleksd, thanks for helping out with the ACTA and the split suggestion. Could you start the discussion in a new section on the talk page on that so we can get things going in a few days (...or not of course... ;-(). L.tak ( talk) 18:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Aleksd, you placed yesterday a Non neutral point of view template. I am eager to hear your input on where the article is in your opinion non-neutral, so that we can discuss/replace and resolve. Could make a statement on the talk page of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement to specify the areas/sections of concern? Thanks! L.tak ( talk) 17:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, please take care with some of the sources you are adding to Organizational culture. Websites such as http://www.1000advices.com are verging on being spam sites and for a standard business topic, there are a wealth of high quality reliable sources to find in any library or via Google Books before resorting to promotional websites such as this. You may find it useful to take another look at reliable source and Primary, secondary and tertiary sources. Thanks -- Fæ ( talk) 11:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't see any edit summaries in your contribution list. I find it helpful if editors leave a brief note about what they did (and why) during an edit session and I'd appreciate it if you would do that. Thanks. Joja lozzo 00:58, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Acadēmica Orientālis formally pushed as Miradre. — ArtifexMayhem ( talk) 23:58, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Aleksd,
I appreciate your section: Organizational culture, Firing on the base of culture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_culture#Firing_on_the_base_of_culture
May I improve the English wording of the title of that section? It would be more idiomatic to title it "Dismissal on the basis of culture" or "Dismissal on grounds of lack of cultural fit" or "Dismissal on grounds of poor cultural fit".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_(employment) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_of_employment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_exit_management
Please comment, Keith — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith Cascio ( talk • contribs) 23:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Aleksd. I wanted to clarify for you why your request at WP:AE was closed as unactionable. It is not a finding that you are correct or incorrect in what you say.
Rather, however, we cannot do anything about the request. Each Wikimedia project operates autonomously from the others. The English Wikipedia has no more authority to take action against an editor or functionary on a Bulgarian project than the editors there have authority to sanction or ban an editor who edits here. Nor could we reverse actions taken by the community on that project, just as they cannot reverse actions undertaken by consensus of our community. So even if we found that wrongdoing had occurred (a difficult thing in itself, given that most if not all of those reading the request are unfamiliar with that project's language, policies, and practices), we couldn't take any action based upon that finding.
The arbitration enforcement page, additionally, has a deliberately narrow scope. It is only for reports of violations that the English Wikipedia arbitration committee have already put in place. Even ArbCom, however, has jurisdiction only over the English Wikipedia. Any rulings it made regarding any other project would be unenforceable there.
You are not blocked or (to my knowledge) sanctioned on the English Wikipedia, so any sanctions against you on another project are irrelevant to that. You are still welcome to edit and participate here. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
I notice you have stopped using edit summaries for a while now. Edits that do not have summaries require other editors to take extra time to review them. Edits without summaries make it difficult to scan the page history to find out what's was going on. I would very much appreciate it if you would make the effort to add edit summaries to every edit. It would be a great favor to all the editors who work with you. Thanks. Joja lozzo 18:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Protests against the Oresharski cabinet. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 22:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to {{POV|date=June 2013}}, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. And could you please stop with your personal attacks? The Banner talk 23:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
I hope you have slept well and that the emotions have settled. As I said last night, anger is seldom a good adviser when you are writing articles for Wikipedia. Articles on Wikipedia needs distance and impartiality, as you write them for history and not for some news service. I know that it is difficult to switch of your emotions when writing in the heat of the moment. Don't bother too much about the English, somebody will correct that anyway. You are correct that my English is also imperfect, my native tongue is Dutch.
In short my advice is: don't write on Wikipedia when emotion run high. Sleep a night over it so you have a clear mind.
Good luck with the whole affair and mind your safety. The Banner talk 09:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Protests against the Oresharski cabinet, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. The Banner talk 22:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Protests against the Oresharski cabinet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Banner talk 22:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Aleksd that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 19:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plamen Oresharski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSP ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Protests against the Oresharski cabinet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Banner talk 19:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:Twitter trend has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Aleksd. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 13:07, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with Bulgarian-language external links requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Please see a complaint about your edits at Talk:Protests against the Oresharski cabinet#Protection was requested. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 21:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:The Banner. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 16:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:2013 Bulgarian protests. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please, please, stop with this behaviour. You will only create problems for yourself. The Banner talk 19:30, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey Aleksd
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 21:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't follow Bulgarian politics and I don't really understand everything in your recent additions to the article, but can you, as a first step, reduce it to what is related to Hannes Swoboda? Either to him personally or his political functions in the EU.
Swoboda supported Stanishev in what? If he took a public stance in Bulgarian matters, stating that fact, whom against whom, their political function and a sentence to briefly explain the issue should be enough. Gerald Jarosch ( talk) 23:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Aleksd, I'm contacting you because we need some Bulgarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on bg.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Bulgarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) 20:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
You may be interested in the deletion proposal related to Category: Professionals. Regards, X Ottawahitech ( talk) 03:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Аз съм българин и нямам руски произход (никът ми в Уикипедия бе произволно избран). Не съм влизал в руската Уикипедия, а и не разполагам с нужните познания, за да правя промени в статията за протестите в Украйна. Не смятам, че съм пристрастен (винаги посочвам източниците си като редактирам/добавям материали и се старая да се позовавам на медии, които са що годе неутрални). По принцип не би трябвало да е проблем ако англичани допринасят към статии за България или руснаци участват при доизпипването на статии в българската Уикипедия (стига информацията да не е погрешна или изреченията да са неуместно формулирани). Oleg Morgan ( talk) 11:33, 20 Dеcember 2013 (UTC)
Кое точно от написаното в статията е лъжа (всичко може да бъде проверено съвсем лесно)? Източниците, които цитирам са mediapool.bg, blitz.bg и т.н., които определено не са медии с лява ориентация. Не съм платен (и за да бъде доказано едно такова твърдение трябват сериозни доказателства), а целта ми е да предоставя допълнителна информация във връзка с България. Както и да е - въпросната статия ще бъде прегледана от админите и останалите редактори ще подкрепят истинността на думите ми. Oleg Morgan ( talk) 20:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.27.226 ( talk)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scales of Justice ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
This article was in terrible shape and was not really an article. Even after a major attempt at fixing the flow of the article, I find myself unable to find sources for its content. Can you please help me fix this article so that it does not have to be nominated for deletion?
Thank you for your cooperation. -- Kndimov ( talk) 16:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emotional security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrogance ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geostrategy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Value and Conception. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
In linguistics, "script" means a writing system of any kind, it doesn't have anything to do with programming. It's a broader term than "alphabet" because the latter specifically refers to one kind of script: one that has separate characters for consonants and vowels. This distinguishes it from an abjad (only consonants), abugida (consonants with an inherent vowel + vowel modifiers), syllabary (consonant with vowel combined) and logographic script (encoding meaning directly). In some of the changes you made to Cyrillic alphabets, the change to "alphabet" was not correct as not all the scripts it refers to are in fact alphabets. CodeCat ( talk) 12:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russophobia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages DW and Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cultural identity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for your work on this. I would encourage you to work on this in your user space before putting it in mainspace. The article as it stood was so poor and short that it was not worth linking to or keeping. I have redirected it and removed the link from the main article meantime. -- John ( talk) 20:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Age of medieval Bulgarian culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transcript. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I think the word "intervention" was used as Russia does not acknowledge having any forces inside Ukraine(despite evidence to the contrary); "military invasion" suggests an official operation. As someone who has posted there I can say that the title has been somewhat controversial(some not even wanting to use "intervention") so you may want to discuss your move on the talk page(someone likely will anyway). Just FYI. 331dot ( talk) 10:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Aleksd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign policy of Margaret Thatcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign policy of Margaret Thatcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Nevé – selbert 23:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Communist era. Since you had some involvement with the Communist era redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 04:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aleksd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bulgaria. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kostja ( talk) 15:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Paltraw1.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Paltraw2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Aleksd! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 20:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Problem solving, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connectivity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Alek Popov has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Joshua Scott who? 14:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Aleksd -- It was suggested on this article's talk page to rename it to "Cliometrics". I infer from the article's edits of 5 May 2010 that you might want to comment on that. Please do. We can also gather views through relevant WikiProjects. -- Econterms ( talk) 10:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi! First, I'd kindly ask you to remain WP:CIVIL because your comments are clear-cut personal attacks that will get you blocked. It's always a good thing to assume good faith and a friendly attitude towards people who are here for the same purpose as you: to enrich this encyclopedia. As someone who has been here long enough, you ought to know this. Also, forgive my lack of modesty but I do believe I deserve some respect seeing as I've started a large portion of all articles in Category:Sofia...
Second, I don't think I've ever taken terrifying/tragical/depressing images and I haven't seen any of your retouching work. If you really did retouch a photo I took, then thanks, it's always appreciated. If it's not clear enough, only one of the pics in File:Sofia Collage TB.png is my work, the photo of Sofia University.
Now, apparently with your comments you're requesting for my argumentation as to why I selected these images to represent Sofia. Here's the logic I followed:
Here's also my commentary about your changes to my collage:
No offense, but I maintain my opinion that your version of the collage is much worse and does not improve the article. However, if you remain civil and show some respect and good will, I'm confident that we can discuss this issue and reach a consensus. Just make sure you stay on topic and don't resort to incivility next time :) Best, — Toдor Boжinov — 13:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Aleksd, thanks for helping out with the ACTA and the split suggestion. Could you start the discussion in a new section on the talk page on that so we can get things going in a few days (...or not of course... ;-(). L.tak ( talk) 18:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Aleksd, you placed yesterday a Non neutral point of view template. I am eager to hear your input on where the article is in your opinion non-neutral, so that we can discuss/replace and resolve. Could make a statement on the talk page of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement to specify the areas/sections of concern? Thanks! L.tak ( talk) 17:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, please take care with some of the sources you are adding to Organizational culture. Websites such as http://www.1000advices.com are verging on being spam sites and for a standard business topic, there are a wealth of high quality reliable sources to find in any library or via Google Books before resorting to promotional websites such as this. You may find it useful to take another look at reliable source and Primary, secondary and tertiary sources. Thanks -- Fæ ( talk) 11:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't see any edit summaries in your contribution list. I find it helpful if editors leave a brief note about what they did (and why) during an edit session and I'd appreciate it if you would do that. Thanks. Joja lozzo 00:58, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Acadēmica Orientālis formally pushed as Miradre. — ArtifexMayhem ( talk) 23:58, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Aleksd,
I appreciate your section: Organizational culture, Firing on the base of culture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_culture#Firing_on_the_base_of_culture
May I improve the English wording of the title of that section? It would be more idiomatic to title it "Dismissal on the basis of culture" or "Dismissal on grounds of lack of cultural fit" or "Dismissal on grounds of poor cultural fit".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_(employment) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_of_employment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_exit_management
Please comment, Keith — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith Cascio ( talk • contribs) 23:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Aleksd. I wanted to clarify for you why your request at WP:AE was closed as unactionable. It is not a finding that you are correct or incorrect in what you say.
Rather, however, we cannot do anything about the request. Each Wikimedia project operates autonomously from the others. The English Wikipedia has no more authority to take action against an editor or functionary on a Bulgarian project than the editors there have authority to sanction or ban an editor who edits here. Nor could we reverse actions taken by the community on that project, just as they cannot reverse actions undertaken by consensus of our community. So even if we found that wrongdoing had occurred (a difficult thing in itself, given that most if not all of those reading the request are unfamiliar with that project's language, policies, and practices), we couldn't take any action based upon that finding.
The arbitration enforcement page, additionally, has a deliberately narrow scope. It is only for reports of violations that the English Wikipedia arbitration committee have already put in place. Even ArbCom, however, has jurisdiction only over the English Wikipedia. Any rulings it made regarding any other project would be unenforceable there.
You are not blocked or (to my knowledge) sanctioned on the English Wikipedia, so any sanctions against you on another project are irrelevant to that. You are still welcome to edit and participate here. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
I notice you have stopped using edit summaries for a while now. Edits that do not have summaries require other editors to take extra time to review them. Edits without summaries make it difficult to scan the page history to find out what's was going on. I would very much appreciate it if you would make the effort to add edit summaries to every edit. It would be a great favor to all the editors who work with you. Thanks. Joja lozzo 18:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Protests against the Oresharski cabinet. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 22:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to {{POV|date=June 2013}}, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. And could you please stop with your personal attacks? The Banner talk 23:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
I hope you have slept well and that the emotions have settled. As I said last night, anger is seldom a good adviser when you are writing articles for Wikipedia. Articles on Wikipedia needs distance and impartiality, as you write them for history and not for some news service. I know that it is difficult to switch of your emotions when writing in the heat of the moment. Don't bother too much about the English, somebody will correct that anyway. You are correct that my English is also imperfect, my native tongue is Dutch.
In short my advice is: don't write on Wikipedia when emotion run high. Sleep a night over it so you have a clear mind.
Good luck with the whole affair and mind your safety. The Banner talk 09:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Protests against the Oresharski cabinet, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. The Banner talk 22:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Protests against the Oresharski cabinet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Banner talk 22:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Aleksd that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 19:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plamen Oresharski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSP ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Protests against the Oresharski cabinet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Banner talk 19:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:Twitter trend has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Aleksd. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 13:07, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with Bulgarian-language external links requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Please see a complaint about your edits at Talk:Protests against the Oresharski cabinet#Protection was requested. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 21:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:The Banner. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 16:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:2013 Bulgarian protests. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please, please, stop with this behaviour. You will only create problems for yourself. The Banner talk 19:30, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey Aleksd
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 21:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't follow Bulgarian politics and I don't really understand everything in your recent additions to the article, but can you, as a first step, reduce it to what is related to Hannes Swoboda? Either to him personally or his political functions in the EU.
Swoboda supported Stanishev in what? If he took a public stance in Bulgarian matters, stating that fact, whom against whom, their political function and a sentence to briefly explain the issue should be enough. Gerald Jarosch ( talk) 23:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Aleksd, I'm contacting you because we need some Bulgarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on bg.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Bulgarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) 20:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
You may be interested in the deletion proposal related to Category: Professionals. Regards, X Ottawahitech ( talk) 03:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Аз съм българин и нямам руски произход (никът ми в Уикипедия бе произволно избран). Не съм влизал в руската Уикипедия, а и не разполагам с нужните познания, за да правя промени в статията за протестите в Украйна. Не смятам, че съм пристрастен (винаги посочвам източниците си като редактирам/добавям материали и се старая да се позовавам на медии, които са що годе неутрални). По принцип не би трябвало да е проблем ако англичани допринасят към статии за България или руснаци участват при доизпипването на статии в българската Уикипедия (стига информацията да не е погрешна или изреченията да са неуместно формулирани). Oleg Morgan ( talk) 11:33, 20 Dеcember 2013 (UTC)
Кое точно от написаното в статията е лъжа (всичко може да бъде проверено съвсем лесно)? Източниците, които цитирам са mediapool.bg, blitz.bg и т.н., които определено не са медии с лява ориентация. Не съм платен (и за да бъде доказано едно такова твърдение трябват сериозни доказателства), а целта ми е да предоставя допълнителна информация във връзка с България. Както и да е - въпросната статия ще бъде прегледана от админите и останалите редактори ще подкрепят истинността на думите ми. Oleg Morgan ( talk) 20:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.27.226 ( talk)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scales of Justice ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
This article was in terrible shape and was not really an article. Even after a major attempt at fixing the flow of the article, I find myself unable to find sources for its content. Can you please help me fix this article so that it does not have to be nominated for deletion?
Thank you for your cooperation. -- Kndimov ( talk) 16:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emotional security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrogance ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geostrategy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Value and Conception. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
In linguistics, "script" means a writing system of any kind, it doesn't have anything to do with programming. It's a broader term than "alphabet" because the latter specifically refers to one kind of script: one that has separate characters for consonants and vowels. This distinguishes it from an abjad (only consonants), abugida (consonants with an inherent vowel + vowel modifiers), syllabary (consonant with vowel combined) and logographic script (encoding meaning directly). In some of the changes you made to Cyrillic alphabets, the change to "alphabet" was not correct as not all the scripts it refers to are in fact alphabets. CodeCat ( talk) 12:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russophobia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages DW and Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cultural identity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for your work on this. I would encourage you to work on this in your user space before putting it in mainspace. The article as it stood was so poor and short that it was not worth linking to or keeping. I have redirected it and removed the link from the main article meantime. -- John ( talk) 20:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Age of medieval Bulgarian culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transcript. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I think the word "intervention" was used as Russia does not acknowledge having any forces inside Ukraine(despite evidence to the contrary); "military invasion" suggests an official operation. As someone who has posted there I can say that the title has been somewhat controversial(some not even wanting to use "intervention") so you may want to discuss your move on the talk page(someone likely will anyway). Just FYI. 331dot ( talk) 10:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Aleksd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign policy of Margaret Thatcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign policy of Margaret Thatcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Nevé – selbert 23:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Communist era. Since you had some involvement with the Communist era redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 04:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aleksd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)