![]() |
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt, I wanted to know if I need to go to the Talk page to change a leader's picture or if I can simply be bold. I found more recent pictures for two of the leaders. I have a new picture for Trudeau that was taken during the G7. It's in the public domain. And I also found campaign pictures for Scheer that are in the public domain. They don't go against what we previously said in the Talk page (a leader looking at another one).
This is the Trudeau one : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:-G7Biarritz_(48622478973).jpg
Here are the Scheer ones : https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewscheer/48859362463/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewscheer/48859697821/
I'm not sure which one is better between the first and second to be honest. Which one do you think is better?
There's also this one, but it's not as good as the two others : https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewscheer/48859595631/
I'm annoyed there isn't anything new for Blanchet, since his picture is 10 years old. Same thing for May, it's annoying that her picture is a bit old now. Bernier's is fine, since it isn't old.
Finally, I found this one for Singh: https://www.flickr.com/photos/usw-metallos/39604732844/in/photolist-WSzuF2-23Swwhs-2eWG4UT-SNSQs3-aHyvVk-QTeiFH-23kJBgs-NCx771-29EG8Mb-29EGacA-2heh3YA-2hb7F63/ It's not as recent as the others I have (it's around the same period as the picture from now, i.e. 2018), but it seems to be a better picture. What do you think? MikkelJSmith ( talk) 20:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
I've replied to you at Talk:Diamond DA20 but I'm not sure the ping worked. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey, since you raised the issue about the flags earlier and you have seniority over me. I was wondering if you could raise the issue about the new Scheer picture in the talk page. Someone put it back to the one with the flags. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 02:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt, as you've probably realized I have a bit more free time right now, which is why I've been catching up on some edits I hadn't done. I was wondering something. There's a story that came out this week and unlike the other stuff that I plan to add I'm not sure if this is noteworthy. So, I wanted to know what you think. We had this information that came out from CPC insiders : https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/2019/10/10/scheer-campaign-faces-leadership-speculation-as-election-day-nears.html https://apple.news/AcoCPYFY3Spah3gxl7IGfzA This one is paywalled but it's a development to the story : https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-despite-leadership-questions-scheer-says-conservatives-are-united/ This also references the development in the paywalled article https://www.nationalnewswatch.com/2019/10/11/despite-leadership-questions-scheer-says-conservatives-are-united-behind-him/ And finally there is this as the final development to the story : https://www.macleans.ca/politics/for-the-tories-peter-mackay-is-more-than-just-a-face-in-the-crowd/ Since we've had all these articles + some journalists asking questions and writing Scheer's response on Twitter I'm leaning towards news but I'm not sure.
What are your thoughts? Does this qualify as news?
MikkelJSmith ( talk) 22:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.
You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark
this link for convenience. For more information, please see
WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. –
Reidgreg (
talk)
20:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
So, I'm trying to update the endorsement section right now and I'm a bit confused by this article. Is Wells endorsing the Liberals here : https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/the-noise-and-the-stakes/? From what I saw online that's the conclusion other readers went to. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 13:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
For your contributions to discussion in the talk page for the People's Party of Canada article. Thank you for upholding Wikipedia's values. CremationLily ( talk) 01:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC) |
Hey Ahunt,
So, I've not edited in a while on the 2019 Canadian election page, but I still look at the edits. And I've realized that there's this guy called Tony removing stuff for "neutrality" even though it's already neutral and misrepresenting sources "due to bias". Is there anything we can do for that? JonathanScotty ( talk) 03:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt, just wanted to know what do you think of an election aftermath section for the 2019 Canadian Election. It was done for previous ones. (I'd prefer if you wrote the answer on the Talk page over there if it's possible)? MikkelJSmith ( talk) 19:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt, I was wondering how do you speedy delete? Someone has made a copy of a part (timeline) of the 2019 Canadian election article and based on consensus people want the page gone, since there's no reason for its existence and it has a load of dead references. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 00:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt - thanks for your WikiWings on my recent Marcel Jurca articles. As you know they are pretty much devoid of images. There are several on the Jurca website that I'd like to use, but I've never uploaded other people's images, and my brain turns to mush when I look at Wikipedia's stuff about copyright.
Here is the Jurca copyright page copied from http://www.marcel-jurca.com/index.php/en-us/copyright-en
I've already sent the announcement email to them, though had no reply yet, but it doesn't state that I need to have a reply.
Could you please tell me which copyright option I should choose when uploading these images to Commons? Lestocq ( talk) 15:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Correct my mistake award |
I am awarding this trophy to thank you for correcting my stupid mistake on the 2019 Canadian election page MikkelJSmith ( talk) 15:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FeatherPad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wayland ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, an editor, with whom I have some unproductive history, recently downgraded the quality rating of Talk:Wind-powered vehicle from B to C, without a substantive explanation. Perhaps you could you could look in on that and see which rating is warranted. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 21:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
So, I was looking at this and the problem is that there's no proof that the picture is in the Creative Commons. The link gives nothing and it's not a person's work from the file description. Contrast this with Singh's new picture which is someone's own work. So, should I remove it from the articles it's in, since we have no proof we can use it? - MikkelJSmith ( talk) 00:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Microsoft has recently launched a new logo for its Edge browser and an user has uploaded that recent logo i.e, File:Microsoft Edge logo.svg.
Can you please edit the svg image to make it bigger and update the summary section?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4062:186:356A:142E:6AE2:89DF:3DC0 ( talk) 14:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Ahunt
As you probably saw I moved the policy section that was hidden on the 2019 Canadian election page to my sandbox to flesh it out. I realize now that it's going to take a while if I just do it by myself. So, I was wondering, should I post the table back on the page even if it's incomplete? That way multiple editors can work on it and filling it out can go faster.
- MikkelJSmith ( talk) 04:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I lost my previous account after updating the password through a password generator(like LastPass) and forgetting to save it. Also, I had forgotten to add an email to the previous one too.
It's annoying tbh, since I lose my past edits and contributions.
I was really an idiot. I'll try and see if I can salvage it tomorrow (there's a chance I can).
Just wanted to give you a heads up. - MikkelJSmith2 ( talk) 21:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Template:Aircraft manufactured in Canada. I'd hate to see the size of Template:Aircraft manufactured in the United States! - BilCat ( talk) 21:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
In what way was this person being on this exact same aircraft and commenting to his colleague that it was making strange noises... Just a few Hours before it crashed killing several hundred people.... not notable?
Of course I would agree with you that it's not notable from the official viewpoint, or for the purposes of the FAA investigation regarding the actual crash which is why I didn't include it in the actual substance of the article but the "pop culture" references at the bottom.... Where it would become notable and worthy of mention if there are references to verify that it actually happened, which according to the page for Mr. Maertens, there are. I'm just saying if this person truly was on this exact plane, earlier in the day on the day it crashed.... Basically my point is if it's a true story then why not mention it. Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 19:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Forgot to sign Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 19:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Well I can see your point with regular people thinking the plane is crashing.... I mean I've only flown a few dozen times but every time there is even marginal turbulence the entire plane falls silent and people start making their peace with God....but the point I'm making here is that while this person was not an expert in the airline industry he was a professional athlete and professional athletes fly far more often than average people and considering he was on this exact plane the day it crashed this pro athlete likely wouldn't have mentioned to his friend that something sounded wrong/strange/odd unless he felt something legitimately seemed wrong and being a pro athlete who likely flew several hundred times he would probably have a realistic idea if something was out of the ordinary..... Not in the sense of going to make a report as though he was a pilot or a airplane mechanic but again.... If this is a true story, which it seems to be, then I'm just saying it's a legitimate connection to this flight and is an interesting enough side story to be worthy of mentioning near the bottom of article Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Your point is definitely valid as well as it doesn't directly have anything to do with it, except for the sense of the human perspective where there are so many people from so many flights who were about to get on a plane that crashed, or they missed their flight for some reason or they were scheduled on the next flight of a plane etc etc etc.... For sure hindsight bias is a real thing and if he mentioned it immediately upon reaching the terminal that's one thing but if he only mentioned it a week later after learning the plane had crashed then that's the hindsight bias as you say... Then of course it is also possible that other people heard something strange but being average citizens they don't have their own encyclopedia page to add their pov whereas Maertens being a pro athlete, does.... But fair enough, when I have the time at some point I'll look into his actual source material a bit closer & then perhaps bring it up in the talk page Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 14:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
I wanted to send you this barnstar for helping me when I was a newcomer to this site. I don't think I would have enjoyed it as much without you. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 14:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:QuestAircraftLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
I have re-reverted the page and added an additional reference from the Federal Aviation Administration website under the section "How Do I Fly IFR in the SFRA?" it states "NEVER USE 1200" so to me that would be an SOLID indication that anyone who squawks 1200 in the SFRA is in direct violation of the SFRA under the regulations of the FAA and Department of Homeland Security regulations. Can I ask that in the future you please enter into a discussion first on the Talk Page before making any reversions. Thank you. YborCityJohn ( talk) 23:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm glad you find it useful. Note an editor wants it removed as it fails the fair use claim according to him (" the file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding"). I disagree.-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 10:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hobie 33, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acrylic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viking Aircraft Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viking Aircraft Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
I think about unretiring, some overzealous wonk reminds me why. Sigh. - BilCat ( talk) 21:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Ahunt I was checking the CPC leadership page (was going to add footnotes to Kenney and Wall saying they endorsed Ambrose), and I saw that you filled some bare references with ReFill2, what is that exactly? - MikkelJSmith ( talk) 16:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
On 16 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Chilean Air Force C-130 crash, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
In that case, any aircraft capable of single pilot flight has a crew of one, including dedicated trainers, which is silly. However if insist in enforcing this rule, I won't object, I will just step away from the article, as it is clear that my presence is not wanted. Nigel Ish ( talk) 14:15, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, Any ideas you have about making this policy would be most welcomed. - Samf4u ( talk) 14:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Adam, While searching I found Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents/Factors to which you were a major contributor. I'd like to take the draft to RfC and propose it becomes a project wide guideline or policy per Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines#Proposals. I'm asking for your permission to do this and for any ideas you may have to help the process along. Thank you, - Samf4u ( talk) 20:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
~ Happy Holidays ~ |
~ have a peaceful holiday and new year ~ ~mitch~ ( talk) 12:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hi and I am here to remind you that the template {{
Aircraft manufactured in Canada}} (
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Aircraft_manufactured_in_Canada) will need a documentation and a description. You can make the documentation by placing <noinclude>{{Documentation}}</noinclude>
and make the description using User:NicoV/TDE (TemplateDataEditor). --
Bank
Bank Robbery started a robbery (
🚨)
13:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for the award! Much appreciated. Kind regards to you! :) Hill9868 ( talk) 22:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |
FWiW Bzuk (
talk)
02:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, as a seasoned private/civil aviation editor, you might like to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airspeed Aviation. I for one am a bit at a loss to know what is the more encyclopedic way ahead.
Meanwhile, may I wish you the Season's Greetings and all the best from here on in. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 21:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはAhuntたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
03:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Donner60 ( talk) 07:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt,
I wanted to know does deletion holds priority? I'm asking since there were some changes on Media coverage of Bernie Sanders and since there was some lack of consensus on those changes I wanted to revert them. However, I've lurked in the conversations and some editors have stated that even though there is lack of consensus deletion holds priority (the changes I'm looking to revert deleted some content on the page). - MikkelJSmith ( talk) 15:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 18:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Mmmm I see your point. I did flick over the references which have various domains but now on opening them I can see they are nearly all sort of official. I've done some googling and although there are lots of hits again they all seem to be official. Looking at news hits all I found are a bit tangential. This leaves me in a quandary, to my mind the subject is definitely notable but I can't demonstrate this by cites. I think really you should bite the bullet and put it to AFD if you feel it doesn't warrant an article rather than insisting on a maintenance template Lyndaship ( talk) 18:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
...clarifying your position on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rescue of Dustoff 65 into a Keep or Delete vote. thanks Mztourist ( talk) 10:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
please see regarding thanks
Leela52452 ( talk) 14:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
You are Welcome
Rocky 734 (
talk)
15:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
From Leonardo Wins U.S. Navy Helo Trainer Deal, seventh paragraph: "reinforced skids with removable shoes". Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 02:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Ahunt: This page User:GeneralIroh/Userboxes has at least four userboxes that aren't typed up correctly. They are most likely causing trouble for Category:Userboxes, can you spank this naughty page. Catfurball ( talk) 00:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Ahunt: I looked to see if this page was screwing up Category:Userboxes, it couldn't find it in the categories that I looked at. I'm thinking that those userboxes don't have categories yet. But I did find 5 naughty pages that I wasn't looking for. Catfurball ( talk) 18:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thanks for the thanks - I raced j24s for 5 years in the early 00s (Manhattan YC) and raced a j44 to Bermuda in 08. I was surprised there wasn't a page for them and started writing one mid-2019. Yours is vastly better then what I had but I am added some of the stuff I wrote in. Hope you like it and feel free to rewrite as you see fit. Thehornet ( talk) 20:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
the Sailboatdata quote at the end of the history section is GREAT - you should move to to the intro para with the rod j part - also I think its already ready for a new section for history and present Thehornet ( talk) 20:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
sorry about the J/28 35 70 edits, just promoting your work - FYI just fixed the J/88 redirect situation - not sure if you saw where it was going beforehand but I'm pretty sure (1,000,000% sure) it's not what you intended..... Thehornet ( talk) 16:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Almost every blank line (and extra horizontal space) was useful
at some point to some editor – and completely invisible to the reader. Please, either
ask or
ignore them. --
Brogo13 (
talk)
20:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
p.s.
This might interest you. (You are both fastidious and invited.) - User:Brogo13 ( User talk:Brogo13) 06:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Adam, I have some questions on the move of Quest Aircraft to Kodiak Aircraft. There doesn't appear to be a direct source for the new name, and I can't find that name on Daher's Kodiak site, at least currently. Also, Quest Kodiak hasn't been updated on the Daher acquisition at all. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 21:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Done -
BilCat (
talk)
01:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Greetings. I made a few minor additions to California roads articles, using a hard source, but editor Rschen7754 seems to have major issues with it and not only reverted but asked Diannaa to investigate the issue. I may need you to help defend my work, if you are willing. Mark Sublette Mark Sublette ( talk) 00:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Never mind. I have been spanked. Mark Sublette Mark Sublette ( talk) 01:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
This aircraft crashed yesterday killing owner/pilot Guy Beauchemin Godabitibi ( talk) 02:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Not sure I understand your question, I'm french. Godabitibi ( talk) 03:22, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Because you added a picture taken in 2006 of this actual aircraft on the wiki page. I thought you would like to know it is now destroyed and pilot killed. I was surprised to see Guy's airplane when I googled Aviat Husky. He was a long time friend and a very experienced pilot. Godabitibi ( talk) 15:04, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
The TSB may not come here. The autopsy found two blocked blood artery so a hart problem is a possibility. He crashed in conditions where he could have easily landed even with no engine. From the crash site it look like he hit the ice at a high speed above 100 mph and then bounced once on a very long distance. Prop was found half way in between. The cage cell frame was broken in 4 places. So it look like a very suddent drop at high speed. He had just took off about 5 minutes before. He was on it's first flight with it's brand new set of skis. We knew him as a very experienced and good pilot with aircrafts well maintained. He was also partner in a RV-7. His funerals are tomorrow. Godabitibi ( talk) 05:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello dear Ahunt. Im Iranian, These categories are okay and not attack page. I have autopatrolled on Iranian wiki. thanks Europe V ( talk) 16:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, you probably recall that I converted the "Windjammer" article to become Iron-hulled sailing ship. I also re-constituted a Windjammer article after some discussion with another editor; it's perhaps just this side of WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. The unfortunate thing is that all the other-wiki links stayed with that article. I have checked the following articles with Googletranslate to confirm that they refer to iron-hulled sailing ships:
So, I'm wondering if you have the skill to point them to Iron-hulled sailing ship. If you do, you might check my message at wikidata:Talk:Q573206, which may have resulted in this edit at wikidata:Q573206. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 00:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Why did you delete information relevant to the Quickies records? Jwkane ( talk) 02:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Adam, I've requested that the title of this article be changed but I can't get it to appear at WPAVIATION Announcements. If you have time could you take a look please? - Samf4u ( talk) 15:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I got mixed up somewhere, and thought I was on the X-35 page or something. Too many tabs open, and too tired!
Facepalm -
BilCat (
talk)
18:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
I mean ( User Ainali) and ( Gnoeee) Ptinphusmia ( talk) 08:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I am very sorry. I was trying to update the list of countries by millitary power, but my network was so disruptive, so I tried to save part by part with some random word in what did I changed section. but after getting warning I gave up editing. I did not mean to vandalize any page. Kingarthur581 ( talk) 16:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Please do not post on my page until {|markup formatting `${error}: error`|}<//p>>> ~~ tilde tilde 20:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC) name here interpolation boundary only clever people understand tildes Mrspaceowl ( talk) 20:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed you corrected errors on my userboxes. Thanks for doing that. I'm asking for your help once more in doing this correctly. I have been trying to put more user templates there but its not coming out right! It keeps appearing on the right side, scattered and in red. This appears the space under the already installed userboxes templates is full but I doubt that is the case. (talk) 14:08 18 February 2020 UTC Ptinphusmia ( talk) 13:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the offered assistance. I sure need it. Go ahead and do that please. And still let me know how you did it so I learn as well. The one red link is not a userbox and should be deleted. I also want to put this userbox template -
![]() | This user is a Participant of the Wikimedians for Sustainable Development User Group |
but couldn't. Could you help me out as well and tell me how you did it. Between: how do you put a link when writing a sentence ? I'm not talking about wikilinks now which are usually in blue. I am participating in Wikimedia education greenhouse online course where I saw a sentence, with some of the words in green. The words, when clicked on, takes you to that particular subject. For example...sample logic model on wikimedia, when clicked,takes you to a sample logic model picture on wikimedia. How is that done? Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
There are truly a lot I'm yet to learn here and sometimes, doing it all alone seems tiring Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
This is the link of the green linked text which is found at the first sentence of the last paragraph of the reply by Gina Bennett. The green linked text there says sample logic model from Wikimedia, which when clicked, takes to the sample logic model. https://wikimedia-education.moodle.school/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=386. Thanks for the edits on my talk page. Its more better now. But then, it seems I can't add further userboxe templates. And I wish to add more. How do I do this please? Ptinphusmia ( talk) 09:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Wow...thanks! I'm truly happy for your immense support. Let me check the demo one. Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
I have seen the demo. But I tried doing similar thing with this userbox template--{{ Wikimedians for Sustainable Development}}, but it keeps showing a scattered red coloured text. I don't know what I'm doing wrong Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Ohh! Okay. Though it displayed properly on other participants userpage....like User:Ainali Ptinphusmia ( talk) 08:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Nalinnishant9 had already gotten {{ uw-spam3}} and even after the brief ensuing discussion is clearly not willing to listen. I appreciate your good-faith {{ uw-spam2}} after the latest round, but I blocked as just a typical blog-spammer. If you think there's hope, let me know and I could unblock. DMacks ( talk) 18:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 12:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt, I wanted to know if I need to go to the Talk page to change a leader's picture or if I can simply be bold. I found more recent pictures for two of the leaders. I have a new picture for Trudeau that was taken during the G7. It's in the public domain. And I also found campaign pictures for Scheer that are in the public domain. They don't go against what we previously said in the Talk page (a leader looking at another one).
This is the Trudeau one : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:-G7Biarritz_(48622478973).jpg
Here are the Scheer ones : https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewscheer/48859362463/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewscheer/48859697821/
I'm not sure which one is better between the first and second to be honest. Which one do you think is better?
There's also this one, but it's not as good as the two others : https://www.flickr.com/photos/andrewscheer/48859595631/
I'm annoyed there isn't anything new for Blanchet, since his picture is 10 years old. Same thing for May, it's annoying that her picture is a bit old now. Bernier's is fine, since it isn't old.
Finally, I found this one for Singh: https://www.flickr.com/photos/usw-metallos/39604732844/in/photolist-WSzuF2-23Swwhs-2eWG4UT-SNSQs3-aHyvVk-QTeiFH-23kJBgs-NCx771-29EG8Mb-29EGacA-2heh3YA-2hb7F63/ It's not as recent as the others I have (it's around the same period as the picture from now, i.e. 2018), but it seems to be a better picture. What do you think? MikkelJSmith ( talk) 20:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
I've replied to you at Talk:Diamond DA20 but I'm not sure the ping worked. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey, since you raised the issue about the flags earlier and you have seniority over me. I was wondering if you could raise the issue about the new Scheer picture in the talk page. Someone put it back to the one with the flags. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 02:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt, as you've probably realized I have a bit more free time right now, which is why I've been catching up on some edits I hadn't done. I was wondering something. There's a story that came out this week and unlike the other stuff that I plan to add I'm not sure if this is noteworthy. So, I wanted to know what you think. We had this information that came out from CPC insiders : https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/2019/10/10/scheer-campaign-faces-leadership-speculation-as-election-day-nears.html https://apple.news/AcoCPYFY3Spah3gxl7IGfzA This one is paywalled but it's a development to the story : https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-despite-leadership-questions-scheer-says-conservatives-are-united/ This also references the development in the paywalled article https://www.nationalnewswatch.com/2019/10/11/despite-leadership-questions-scheer-says-conservatives-are-united-behind-him/ And finally there is this as the final development to the story : https://www.macleans.ca/politics/for-the-tories-peter-mackay-is-more-than-just-a-face-in-the-crowd/ Since we've had all these articles + some journalists asking questions and writing Scheer's response on Twitter I'm leaning towards news but I'm not sure.
What are your thoughts? Does this qualify as news?
MikkelJSmith ( talk) 22:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.
You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark
this link for convenience. For more information, please see
WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. –
Reidgreg (
talk)
20:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
So, I'm trying to update the endorsement section right now and I'm a bit confused by this article. Is Wells endorsing the Liberals here : https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/the-noise-and-the-stakes/? From what I saw online that's the conclusion other readers went to. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 13:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
For your contributions to discussion in the talk page for the People's Party of Canada article. Thank you for upholding Wikipedia's values. CremationLily ( talk) 01:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC) |
Hey Ahunt,
So, I've not edited in a while on the 2019 Canadian election page, but I still look at the edits. And I've realized that there's this guy called Tony removing stuff for "neutrality" even though it's already neutral and misrepresenting sources "due to bias". Is there anything we can do for that? JonathanScotty ( talk) 03:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt, just wanted to know what do you think of an election aftermath section for the 2019 Canadian Election. It was done for previous ones. (I'd prefer if you wrote the answer on the Talk page over there if it's possible)? MikkelJSmith ( talk) 19:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt, I was wondering how do you speedy delete? Someone has made a copy of a part (timeline) of the 2019 Canadian election article and based on consensus people want the page gone, since there's no reason for its existence and it has a load of dead references. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 00:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt - thanks for your WikiWings on my recent Marcel Jurca articles. As you know they are pretty much devoid of images. There are several on the Jurca website that I'd like to use, but I've never uploaded other people's images, and my brain turns to mush when I look at Wikipedia's stuff about copyright.
Here is the Jurca copyright page copied from http://www.marcel-jurca.com/index.php/en-us/copyright-en
I've already sent the announcement email to them, though had no reply yet, but it doesn't state that I need to have a reply.
Could you please tell me which copyright option I should choose when uploading these images to Commons? Lestocq ( talk) 15:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Correct my mistake award |
I am awarding this trophy to thank you for correcting my stupid mistake on the 2019 Canadian election page MikkelJSmith ( talk) 15:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FeatherPad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wayland ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, an editor, with whom I have some unproductive history, recently downgraded the quality rating of Talk:Wind-powered vehicle from B to C, without a substantive explanation. Perhaps you could you could look in on that and see which rating is warranted. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 21:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
So, I was looking at this and the problem is that there's no proof that the picture is in the Creative Commons. The link gives nothing and it's not a person's work from the file description. Contrast this with Singh's new picture which is someone's own work. So, should I remove it from the articles it's in, since we have no proof we can use it? - MikkelJSmith ( talk) 00:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Microsoft has recently launched a new logo for its Edge browser and an user has uploaded that recent logo i.e, File:Microsoft Edge logo.svg.
Can you please edit the svg image to make it bigger and update the summary section?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4062:186:356A:142E:6AE2:89DF:3DC0 ( talk) 14:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Ahunt
As you probably saw I moved the policy section that was hidden on the 2019 Canadian election page to my sandbox to flesh it out. I realize now that it's going to take a while if I just do it by myself. So, I was wondering, should I post the table back on the page even if it's incomplete? That way multiple editors can work on it and filling it out can go faster.
- MikkelJSmith ( talk) 04:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I lost my previous account after updating the password through a password generator(like LastPass) and forgetting to save it. Also, I had forgotten to add an email to the previous one too.
It's annoying tbh, since I lose my past edits and contributions.
I was really an idiot. I'll try and see if I can salvage it tomorrow (there's a chance I can).
Just wanted to give you a heads up. - MikkelJSmith2 ( talk) 21:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Template:Aircraft manufactured in Canada. I'd hate to see the size of Template:Aircraft manufactured in the United States! - BilCat ( talk) 21:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
In what way was this person being on this exact same aircraft and commenting to his colleague that it was making strange noises... Just a few Hours before it crashed killing several hundred people.... not notable?
Of course I would agree with you that it's not notable from the official viewpoint, or for the purposes of the FAA investigation regarding the actual crash which is why I didn't include it in the actual substance of the article but the "pop culture" references at the bottom.... Where it would become notable and worthy of mention if there are references to verify that it actually happened, which according to the page for Mr. Maertens, there are. I'm just saying if this person truly was on this exact plane, earlier in the day on the day it crashed.... Basically my point is if it's a true story then why not mention it. Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 19:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Forgot to sign Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 19:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Well I can see your point with regular people thinking the plane is crashing.... I mean I've only flown a few dozen times but every time there is even marginal turbulence the entire plane falls silent and people start making their peace with God....but the point I'm making here is that while this person was not an expert in the airline industry he was a professional athlete and professional athletes fly far more often than average people and considering he was on this exact plane the day it crashed this pro athlete likely wouldn't have mentioned to his friend that something sounded wrong/strange/odd unless he felt something legitimately seemed wrong and being a pro athlete who likely flew several hundred times he would probably have a realistic idea if something was out of the ordinary..... Not in the sense of going to make a report as though he was a pilot or a airplane mechanic but again.... If this is a true story, which it seems to be, then I'm just saying it's a legitimate connection to this flight and is an interesting enough side story to be worthy of mentioning near the bottom of article Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Your point is definitely valid as well as it doesn't directly have anything to do with it, except for the sense of the human perspective where there are so many people from so many flights who were about to get on a plane that crashed, or they missed their flight for some reason or they were scheduled on the next flight of a plane etc etc etc.... For sure hindsight bias is a real thing and if he mentioned it immediately upon reaching the terminal that's one thing but if he only mentioned it a week later after learning the plane had crashed then that's the hindsight bias as you say... Then of course it is also possible that other people heard something strange but being average citizens they don't have their own encyclopedia page to add their pov whereas Maertens being a pro athlete, does.... But fair enough, when I have the time at some point I'll look into his actual source material a bit closer & then perhaps bring it up in the talk page Raleigh80Z90Faema69 ( talk) 14:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
I wanted to send you this barnstar for helping me when I was a newcomer to this site. I don't think I would have enjoyed it as much without you. MikkelJSmith ( talk) 14:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:QuestAircraftLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
I have re-reverted the page and added an additional reference from the Federal Aviation Administration website under the section "How Do I Fly IFR in the SFRA?" it states "NEVER USE 1200" so to me that would be an SOLID indication that anyone who squawks 1200 in the SFRA is in direct violation of the SFRA under the regulations of the FAA and Department of Homeland Security regulations. Can I ask that in the future you please enter into a discussion first on the Talk Page before making any reversions. Thank you. YborCityJohn ( talk) 23:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm glad you find it useful. Note an editor wants it removed as it fails the fair use claim according to him (" the file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding"). I disagree.-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 10:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hobie 33, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acrylic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viking Aircraft Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viking Aircraft Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
I think about unretiring, some overzealous wonk reminds me why. Sigh. - BilCat ( talk) 21:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Ahunt I was checking the CPC leadership page (was going to add footnotes to Kenney and Wall saying they endorsed Ambrose), and I saw that you filled some bare references with ReFill2, what is that exactly? - MikkelJSmith ( talk) 16:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
On 16 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Chilean Air Force C-130 crash, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
In that case, any aircraft capable of single pilot flight has a crew of one, including dedicated trainers, which is silly. However if insist in enforcing this rule, I won't object, I will just step away from the article, as it is clear that my presence is not wanted. Nigel Ish ( talk) 14:15, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, Any ideas you have about making this policy would be most welcomed. - Samf4u ( talk) 14:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Adam, While searching I found Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents/Factors to which you were a major contributor. I'd like to take the draft to RfC and propose it becomes a project wide guideline or policy per Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines#Proposals. I'm asking for your permission to do this and for any ideas you may have to help the process along. Thank you, - Samf4u ( talk) 20:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
~ Happy Holidays ~ |
~ have a peaceful holiday and new year ~ ~mitch~ ( talk) 12:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hi and I am here to remind you that the template {{
Aircraft manufactured in Canada}} (
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Aircraft_manufactured_in_Canada) will need a documentation and a description. You can make the documentation by placing <noinclude>{{Documentation}}</noinclude>
and make the description using User:NicoV/TDE (TemplateDataEditor). --
Bank
Bank Robbery started a robbery (
🚨)
13:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for the award! Much appreciated. Kind regards to you! :) Hill9868 ( talk) 22:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |
FWiW Bzuk (
talk)
02:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, as a seasoned private/civil aviation editor, you might like to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airspeed Aviation. I for one am a bit at a loss to know what is the more encyclopedic way ahead.
Meanwhile, may I wish you the Season's Greetings and all the best from here on in. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 21:30, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはAhuntたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
03:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Donner60 ( talk) 07:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey Ahunt,
I wanted to know does deletion holds priority? I'm asking since there were some changes on Media coverage of Bernie Sanders and since there was some lack of consensus on those changes I wanted to revert them. However, I've lurked in the conversations and some editors have stated that even though there is lack of consensus deletion holds priority (the changes I'm looking to revert deleted some content on the page). - MikkelJSmith ( talk) 15:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 18:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Mmmm I see your point. I did flick over the references which have various domains but now on opening them I can see they are nearly all sort of official. I've done some googling and although there are lots of hits again they all seem to be official. Looking at news hits all I found are a bit tangential. This leaves me in a quandary, to my mind the subject is definitely notable but I can't demonstrate this by cites. I think really you should bite the bullet and put it to AFD if you feel it doesn't warrant an article rather than insisting on a maintenance template Lyndaship ( talk) 18:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
...clarifying your position on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rescue of Dustoff 65 into a Keep or Delete vote. thanks Mztourist ( talk) 10:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
please see regarding thanks
Leela52452 ( talk) 14:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
You are Welcome
Rocky 734 (
talk)
15:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
From Leonardo Wins U.S. Navy Helo Trainer Deal, seventh paragraph: "reinforced skids with removable shoes". Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 02:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Ahunt: This page User:GeneralIroh/Userboxes has at least four userboxes that aren't typed up correctly. They are most likely causing trouble for Category:Userboxes, can you spank this naughty page. Catfurball ( talk) 00:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Ahunt: I looked to see if this page was screwing up Category:Userboxes, it couldn't find it in the categories that I looked at. I'm thinking that those userboxes don't have categories yet. But I did find 5 naughty pages that I wasn't looking for. Catfurball ( talk) 18:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thanks for the thanks - I raced j24s for 5 years in the early 00s (Manhattan YC) and raced a j44 to Bermuda in 08. I was surprised there wasn't a page for them and started writing one mid-2019. Yours is vastly better then what I had but I am added some of the stuff I wrote in. Hope you like it and feel free to rewrite as you see fit. Thehornet ( talk) 20:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
the Sailboatdata quote at the end of the history section is GREAT - you should move to to the intro para with the rod j part - also I think its already ready for a new section for history and present Thehornet ( talk) 20:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
sorry about the J/28 35 70 edits, just promoting your work - FYI just fixed the J/88 redirect situation - not sure if you saw where it was going beforehand but I'm pretty sure (1,000,000% sure) it's not what you intended..... Thehornet ( talk) 16:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Almost every blank line (and extra horizontal space) was useful
at some point to some editor – and completely invisible to the reader. Please, either
ask or
ignore them. --
Brogo13 (
talk)
20:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
p.s.
This might interest you. (You are both fastidious and invited.) - User:Brogo13 ( User talk:Brogo13) 06:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Adam, I have some questions on the move of Quest Aircraft to Kodiak Aircraft. There doesn't appear to be a direct source for the new name, and I can't find that name on Daher's Kodiak site, at least currently. Also, Quest Kodiak hasn't been updated on the Daher acquisition at all. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 21:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Done -
BilCat (
talk)
01:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Greetings. I made a few minor additions to California roads articles, using a hard source, but editor Rschen7754 seems to have major issues with it and not only reverted but asked Diannaa to investigate the issue. I may need you to help defend my work, if you are willing. Mark Sublette Mark Sublette ( talk) 00:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Never mind. I have been spanked. Mark Sublette Mark Sublette ( talk) 01:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
This aircraft crashed yesterday killing owner/pilot Guy Beauchemin Godabitibi ( talk) 02:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Not sure I understand your question, I'm french. Godabitibi ( talk) 03:22, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Because you added a picture taken in 2006 of this actual aircraft on the wiki page. I thought you would like to know it is now destroyed and pilot killed. I was surprised to see Guy's airplane when I googled Aviat Husky. He was a long time friend and a very experienced pilot. Godabitibi ( talk) 15:04, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
The TSB may not come here. The autopsy found two blocked blood artery so a hart problem is a possibility. He crashed in conditions where he could have easily landed even with no engine. From the crash site it look like he hit the ice at a high speed above 100 mph and then bounced once on a very long distance. Prop was found half way in between. The cage cell frame was broken in 4 places. So it look like a very suddent drop at high speed. He had just took off about 5 minutes before. He was on it's first flight with it's brand new set of skis. We knew him as a very experienced and good pilot with aircrafts well maintained. He was also partner in a RV-7. His funerals are tomorrow. Godabitibi ( talk) 05:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello dear Ahunt. Im Iranian, These categories are okay and not attack page. I have autopatrolled on Iranian wiki. thanks Europe V ( talk) 16:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, you probably recall that I converted the "Windjammer" article to become Iron-hulled sailing ship. I also re-constituted a Windjammer article after some discussion with another editor; it's perhaps just this side of WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. The unfortunate thing is that all the other-wiki links stayed with that article. I have checked the following articles with Googletranslate to confirm that they refer to iron-hulled sailing ships:
So, I'm wondering if you have the skill to point them to Iron-hulled sailing ship. If you do, you might check my message at wikidata:Talk:Q573206, which may have resulted in this edit at wikidata:Q573206. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 00:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Why did you delete information relevant to the Quickies records? Jwkane ( talk) 02:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Adam, I've requested that the title of this article be changed but I can't get it to appear at WPAVIATION Announcements. If you have time could you take a look please? - Samf4u ( talk) 15:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I got mixed up somewhere, and thought I was on the X-35 page or something. Too many tabs open, and too tired!
Facepalm -
BilCat (
talk)
18:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
I mean ( User Ainali) and ( Gnoeee) Ptinphusmia ( talk) 08:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I am very sorry. I was trying to update the list of countries by millitary power, but my network was so disruptive, so I tried to save part by part with some random word in what did I changed section. but after getting warning I gave up editing. I did not mean to vandalize any page. Kingarthur581 ( talk) 16:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Please do not post on my page until {|markup formatting `${error}: error`|}<//p>>> ~~ tilde tilde 20:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC) name here interpolation boundary only clever people understand tildes Mrspaceowl ( talk) 20:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed you corrected errors on my userboxes. Thanks for doing that. I'm asking for your help once more in doing this correctly. I have been trying to put more user templates there but its not coming out right! It keeps appearing on the right side, scattered and in red. This appears the space under the already installed userboxes templates is full but I doubt that is the case. (talk) 14:08 18 February 2020 UTC Ptinphusmia ( talk) 13:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the offered assistance. I sure need it. Go ahead and do that please. And still let me know how you did it so I learn as well. The one red link is not a userbox and should be deleted. I also want to put this userbox template -
![]() | This user is a Participant of the Wikimedians for Sustainable Development User Group |
but couldn't. Could you help me out as well and tell me how you did it. Between: how do you put a link when writing a sentence ? I'm not talking about wikilinks now which are usually in blue. I am participating in Wikimedia education greenhouse online course where I saw a sentence, with some of the words in green. The words, when clicked on, takes you to that particular subject. For example...sample logic model on wikimedia, when clicked,takes you to a sample logic model picture on wikimedia. How is that done? Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
There are truly a lot I'm yet to learn here and sometimes, doing it all alone seems tiring Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
This is the link of the green linked text which is found at the first sentence of the last paragraph of the reply by Gina Bennett. The green linked text there says sample logic model from Wikimedia, which when clicked, takes to the sample logic model. https://wikimedia-education.moodle.school/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=386. Thanks for the edits on my talk page. Its more better now. But then, it seems I can't add further userboxe templates. And I wish to add more. How do I do this please? Ptinphusmia ( talk) 09:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Wow...thanks! I'm truly happy for your immense support. Let me check the demo one. Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
I have seen the demo. But I tried doing similar thing with this userbox template--{{ Wikimedians for Sustainable Development}}, but it keeps showing a scattered red coloured text. I don't know what I'm doing wrong Ptinphusmia ( talk) 20:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Ohh! Okay. Though it displayed properly on other participants userpage....like User:Ainali Ptinphusmia ( talk) 08:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Nalinnishant9 had already gotten {{ uw-spam3}} and even after the brief ensuing discussion is clearly not willing to listen. I appreciate your good-faith {{ uw-spam2}} after the latest round, but I blocked as just a typical blog-spammer. If you think there's hope, let me know and I could unblock. DMacks ( talk) 18:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)