![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Adamgerber80, re Magar class landing ships & the origin of the design: The design being based on the Round Table class is one of those obvious, always known things - because it's true. I remember it being widely mentioned, & not questioned when INS Gharial was new. It's already mentioned in one of the sources referenced on the Magar-class page, i.e. Bharat Rakshak, which is not known for downplaying Indian capabilities. I can refer you to paper sources, e.g. Janes Fighting Ships, but reliable online sources are harder without paying. It looks as if the original open sources have dropped from the web. I'll try, though.
What about GlobalSecurity? - http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/l-magar.htm Or - http://www.deagel.com/Fighting-Ships/Magar_a002029001.aspx Or the US Naval Institute - https://news.usni.org/2014/02/03/indian-amphibious-warship-runs-aground http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA246185&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf (pp 17 & 41) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjirving ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC) All secondary at best, unfortunately.
BTW, IIRC it was on the page originally & was well referenced. Someone removed it with no good reason. Could it be dug out of the history?
Oh, & comparing photographs & quoted dimensions shows that the Magar class is very similar indeed to the Round Tables. Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjirving ( talk • contribs) 22:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, greetings. nice to see that you are also from Mumbai (me too). I had insisted on showing the occupation of Capt. Muthukrishnan for two reasons:-
1. The occupation of other officers mentioned in the article are given too - inspite of its relevancy or otherwise. 2. Territorial Army, by its nature, is a force where people from various diverse background serve - without leaving their current work. Thus it is very much relevant to show their background - that would give an idea of diversity of Territorial Army.
Hence may I request that you allow the occupation of the officer to be shown in the article. Would be glad to hear your opinion on the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTerrier ( talk • contribs) 00:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Im just Imform that The Su-30 operator has been Added Content. Im was Thinking that can you Checked These Sources Su-30 Bangladesh as We Don't Have any Referrences same as J-10, Thanks. Hawkeye Ridgesaw Summer ( talk) 21:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Adamgerber. You have rolled back a substantial edit twice now regardless to the fact that it is backed by reputable sources such as CNN, the Diplomat and Dawn. You have provided no reasoning as to why you would think that your action is appropriate. It is clearly stated in the message which granted you the rollback privilege on this very page that:
I can't help but feel that you have broken both of these rules here. When I rolled back your rollback, It appeared to me that yours wasn't done in good-faith because you had just removed an edit backed up by reliable sources which can be considered as vandalism by some. And since you have done it again for some reason, I am now holding off from reverting to that edit, as that would make this an edit-war which I am sure is not something either of us wants. At least until you provide your reason, which I hope is a good one.
It is my understanding that a Wiki page should reflect the latest information backed up by sources. The edit regarding Pakistan's seaborne strike capability is backed up as such. Which has left me confused that why would you consider rolling it back over and over again? I certainly do not wish to engage in an edit war which is obviously a juvenile and counter-productive thing to do. Which is why I am using this form to get your opinion on the matter regarding your actions, given that you so graciously offered that I should point it out if I believe you are mistaken. You have claimed that multiple editors have rolled back that sort of edit. I have gone through the history (Admittedly not completely) and I haven't come across that kind of an event or anyone of the supposed multiple editors providing a reason. In the unlikely scenario that what you stated is correct, would you mind sharing the links with me so that I could learn about those particular edits and the reasons provided for rolling them back? Cheers!
Yea discuss... of course I did wrote it in the "Talk" section, for other users to respond/discuss or what for is the talk section? But nevermind, lets keep it as it is and its fine. If I missed another page to "ask/talk" than "Talk" than please tell me... I do not read often or never the non-article related pages, sometimes I answer some questions from Wikimedia (for example why young users, new registed with low edits quit so often was one, but there are much topics as you know for sure), but okay otherwise "we" keep it and its everything fine, I just saw another questionable data for a submarine nuclear of which India use one and want have 2, first is a 10-year leasing... reactor 190 MW, propulsion 32MW + 2 Reactors and only written 2 MW (not each 2 MW even, only 2 MW).
This is extreme low energy for a larger nuclear ship, and there are the other missing over 150 MW or I do not know over 75% ?! I think alone ship system, lightning for the ship and the crews areas even with save bulbs needs a lot, and most of course the ship systems, navigations, any radio connections inside the boat, radar, screens and so on... and this even sharing at least sometimes to load the small electro low-sound engine for being not loud at 4 knots, you need I guess 10-times as much electric generation, and propulsion might be right but 190 MW than?! Alone the size and costs for such a great, its almost like one from the Nimitz Aircraft Carriers... never heard that it is possible to cover all this with this energy, but I better do no ask :D Maybe someone else detects the questionable figures or not, have a nice <wherever you live> Kilon22 ( talk) 01:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
I said, check this article, you find 25 penalties on this article + even pictures with clearly visible producer/name etc... nothing happened, and it is here more and more the same thing. There is still the page and a guy seriously asked me if I do not have a "Accumulator (Mignon/Micro)-Magazine or so without visible AD or so, I mean magazines have AD too and well the site still exists, so it depends WHO makes the edits and not the rules, so please delete/archive this if you can. I was only frustrated because it starts to get very extreme here too and as said on the other side other pages are tolerated only because a user of the first days maybe did this... so sorry. I will not delete this, because they told me on German Wikipedia this can have a ban/warning too if I would delete my own comment on which you answered.
as I said, that is the reason why Wikipedia no longer is the number 1 on Google, 10 years ago in German Google almost every search result number 1 was wikipedia, now you have to add "wiki" to the search or you have to search it under the normal results and I really understand since a few months why this is so... I will strongly try to prevent that with only reading and no edit or the so called "talk"-page even if, like a german phrase is, even if it is itching me in my fingers to do something against a terrible error (in my opinion) ;) Nevermind and have a nice rest of your weekend Kilon22 ( talk) 15:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
This is the notification for: [ [3]]. -- Fenal Kalundo ( talk) 09:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Please check tweeter of indian defence minister arun jetly who tweets about ser trials of the second scorpion class domestic made submarine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tusharkumar bhatt ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Liu Xiaobo. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Giant
Snowman
16:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
All tests completed. Kalvari waiting for the PM for commissioning. Read on. https://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-services/air-defense/030433040321-linde-va-feter-son-premier-sous-marin-scorpene-2100971.php Livefist ( talk) 12:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
I went back and checked if I offered an explanation or not. But I'll reiterate it.
Checking UK's and USA's agricultural ministry wikis , one can see that the photo of the Minister or the head of those institutions is not plastered on the top, or anywhere for that matter. A ministry's WIKI page unlike the government websites shouldn't be used to glorify any particular individual. If you are inclined to the minister/his party/political ideologies or If you feel ownership of the page and wish to set it to your standards not the wiki's standard, I'd leave it at that.
thanks.
Dog-named-Romeo ( talk) 17:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, My edits was mere more facts and reliable sources like British Library and established authors who supports Tibetan causes. The original article was too biased and contains many partisan information. However, I didn't remove them, merely added more facts. Please do not use false and partisan sources. If you do, make sure also allow sources that you don't like. Please be balanced and calm, without emotional attachment.
Zip yz ( talk) 21:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Can you explain what is wrong with my edits? What content is unsourced?-- 119.160.98.177 ( talk) 06:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
I have listed good source on it but you simply turned a blind eye on it and blame others for fun. -- 146.96.252.3 ( talk) 06:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber, I was surprised with this warning to a newbie, especially because the editor provided an excellent source and your warning was at level 3 or 4. This is really an unfortunate way to treat new editors, and I hope you will refrain from doing such things in future. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 13:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Kautilya3:
@ Adamgerber80: So, if I didn't misunderstand you, you do not want to and are not going to change your approach, right? -- 146.96.252.3 ( talk) 03:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have opened a thread on ANI on behalf of 146.96.252.3 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) per their request. I will now have a look into the situation and respond at the thread -- There'sNoTime ( to explain) 19:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Adamgerber80 I had given correct reference to Professor Christopher S. Raj article except in his education which I wrote from profile from site jnu.ac.in. However, he was retired on April 8, 2017 and the university has deleted profile of Christopher S. Raj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathewmg1 ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
you have been edited page without any trusted source AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 20:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Why you disturb me every time i know about Type 56 more then you AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 20:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Mrs kindly do your work on your indian pages Type 56 is not designed in 1947 it's design date is 1950-55 AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 20:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice very soon i will provide you all the reliable sources about type 56 Thanks.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 17:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello dear, I saw that you are deleting and adding in the Page Italian nuclear weapons program I thank you for your attention on Italian Page, but please can you explain me why you are deleting " without a good motivation", and why i should talk on talk Page, you are the only one that have problems with this article.. LuigiPortaro29 ( talk) 08:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
You are vandalizing article.Italy can deliber b61 in case of war as US claim.In Ghedi only italian jets in fact.
You are widely anti italian.b61 in. Ghedi can be delibered only by AMI as all referenced rerport.You are an enbious third world guy for propaganda.
You have revised the suzuki merhan information Wikipedia is not your property you are not allowing anyone to add any info you can check on internet about suzuki mehran AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 15:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Removed the previously added category. Please consider reconciliation Jsncol ( talk) 04:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Your warnings on my talk page will not get you anywhere go read WP Terrorist than try and challenge my edit 2 years editing and still ignorant about Wikipedia policies. ShaniAli1lo ( talk) 20:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear you arw not allowing anyone to add anything even with reliable sources as you edited suzuki khyber page it's production date is 1990-2000 also you have edited suzuki merhan and Type 56 page i think you have a personal Hostility with me? Please do not edit any information without reliable sources you want to rule Wikipedia i think. AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 15:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Albert Dawkins ( talk) 13:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
In my opinion, you are adding speedy deletion tags without much substantial reason. Please let us know why you put speedy deletion tags on 2 of the articles? I do not know if you have created any new articles but it is an extremely difficult process for your information. Maybe you would enjoy creating new articles when you are new on WP (you seem quite new and inexperienced and hence your immature behavior is partially justified in my opinion). I do follow the guidelines like - please do not bite the newbies. As you will become experienced, I would suggest you to then take the job of fighting vandalism etc. Because then your understanding of vandalism or promotion / advertisement would have been increased. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 12:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
It is my request to administrators to look at the edits happening from this account and take appropriate actions. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 10:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
I have just noticed man that you are a computer scientist and also can code in Python. Why are you behaving like this if you have such a nice profile? Just spend more time reading things and you will understand things better. Just remember a very important saying in digital age "Think before you type". I hope you will not misunderstand my friendly advice. I am sorry if you feel that you do not need this advice. I will not communicate with you henceforth if you do not like me, or my editing. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 11:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --
Abhijeet Safai (
talk)
11:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear Adamgerber80, I am really sorry for my misunderstanding. There is really a vada pav vendor named Ashok Vaidya for which references can be found here. I am so much grateful to Dr. Ashok D B Vaidya for his contributions in the filed of research that I got furious when I thought by mistake that you are making fun of him by comparing him with a vada pav vendor. Dr. Ashok D B Vaidya is father of Dr. Vidita Vaidya, who is also a scientist. I am so much grateful to this man known as Vaidya sir in my life that I easily got carried away by emotions and did not pay attention to what you are saying. I am really sorry from the bottom of my heart for the inconvenience caused to you. Kindly forgive me for my rude behavior. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 15:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
I see you have been changing my edits, I have added to the talk page but apparently this has been getting ignored. I was hoping we could resolve any disagreements here that's why I'm opening this new section on your talk page.
/info/en/?search=Template:Infobox_weapon Origin if for where the weapons was designed or first manufactured. In both cases this is russia for su-30.
But Adam do you see why I have a problem with you. You where providing sources saying the tank is a JV and should have both countries listed. One guy comes along says the tank is licence produced and removes information, Your stance changes all of a sudden and you begin protecting his edits. So when the same is applied to on of your pages, you have this double standard which has just been blatantly exposed, do you see why that's not fair?
Could you take a look at and preceding edits? As far as I can tell, the user is adding content on a missile that we already have an article for, Sayyad-2, and is copying it almost word for word. I'm at 3RR now, but they're not getting the message. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 23:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, I have proposed the removal of a section from the article Equipment of the Pakistan Army (see it's talk page). Thanks! -- Maxx786 ( talk) 06:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Adamgerber80. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Alex Shih Talk 17:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Egypt and Nigeria can be deleted from map of Regional power. Kingofwoods ( talk) 17:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Konsam Himalay Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YSM ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
On behalf Military history project coordinators, for your contributions to the Indian military related topics. It's great to see someone on my tracks. For any help related to Indian military related issues, please ping me, I'll be glad to help you. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 15:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, I see that you reverted my edits on Lt. Gen. AK Singh's page. You asked for an explanation of the edits I made. I'm happy to provide the same.
1. The link to the page of Prof. Jagdish Mukhi in the 'Government Offices' section was broken. I fixed that. I linked to the correct page.
2. The ribbons used in the awards and decorations page are not of the highest quality, visually. I used the ribbons found on this page and in my opinion, the visual quality of ribbons improved considerably. This is most obvious when you look at the depiction of the 'Sena Medal.'
These are all the changes I made. There was no malicious intent in making these changes. FlyingBlueDream ( talk) 11:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Adamgerber80, re Magar class landing ships & the origin of the design: The design being based on the Round Table class is one of those obvious, always known things - because it's true. I remember it being widely mentioned, & not questioned when INS Gharial was new. It's already mentioned in one of the sources referenced on the Magar-class page, i.e. Bharat Rakshak, which is not known for downplaying Indian capabilities. I can refer you to paper sources, e.g. Janes Fighting Ships, but reliable online sources are harder without paying. It looks as if the original open sources have dropped from the web. I'll try, though.
What about GlobalSecurity? - http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/l-magar.htm Or - http://www.deagel.com/Fighting-Ships/Magar_a002029001.aspx Or the US Naval Institute - https://news.usni.org/2014/02/03/indian-amphibious-warship-runs-aground http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA246185&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf (pp 17 & 41) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjirving ( talk • contribs) 22:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC) All secondary at best, unfortunately.
BTW, IIRC it was on the page originally & was well referenced. Someone removed it with no good reason. Could it be dug out of the history?
Oh, & comparing photographs & quoted dimensions shows that the Magar class is very similar indeed to the Round Tables. Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjirving ( talk • contribs) 22:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, greetings. nice to see that you are also from Mumbai (me too). I had insisted on showing the occupation of Capt. Muthukrishnan for two reasons:-
1. The occupation of other officers mentioned in the article are given too - inspite of its relevancy or otherwise. 2. Territorial Army, by its nature, is a force where people from various diverse background serve - without leaving their current work. Thus it is very much relevant to show their background - that would give an idea of diversity of Territorial Army.
Hence may I request that you allow the occupation of the officer to be shown in the article. Would be glad to hear your opinion on the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTerrier ( talk • contribs) 00:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Im just Imform that The Su-30 operator has been Added Content. Im was Thinking that can you Checked These Sources Su-30 Bangladesh as We Don't Have any Referrences same as J-10, Thanks. Hawkeye Ridgesaw Summer ( talk) 21:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Adamgerber. You have rolled back a substantial edit twice now regardless to the fact that it is backed by reputable sources such as CNN, the Diplomat and Dawn. You have provided no reasoning as to why you would think that your action is appropriate. It is clearly stated in the message which granted you the rollback privilege on this very page that:
I can't help but feel that you have broken both of these rules here. When I rolled back your rollback, It appeared to me that yours wasn't done in good-faith because you had just removed an edit backed up by reliable sources which can be considered as vandalism by some. And since you have done it again for some reason, I am now holding off from reverting to that edit, as that would make this an edit-war which I am sure is not something either of us wants. At least until you provide your reason, which I hope is a good one.
It is my understanding that a Wiki page should reflect the latest information backed up by sources. The edit regarding Pakistan's seaborne strike capability is backed up as such. Which has left me confused that why would you consider rolling it back over and over again? I certainly do not wish to engage in an edit war which is obviously a juvenile and counter-productive thing to do. Which is why I am using this form to get your opinion on the matter regarding your actions, given that you so graciously offered that I should point it out if I believe you are mistaken. You have claimed that multiple editors have rolled back that sort of edit. I have gone through the history (Admittedly not completely) and I haven't come across that kind of an event or anyone of the supposed multiple editors providing a reason. In the unlikely scenario that what you stated is correct, would you mind sharing the links with me so that I could learn about those particular edits and the reasons provided for rolling them back? Cheers!
Yea discuss... of course I did wrote it in the "Talk" section, for other users to respond/discuss or what for is the talk section? But nevermind, lets keep it as it is and its fine. If I missed another page to "ask/talk" than "Talk" than please tell me... I do not read often or never the non-article related pages, sometimes I answer some questions from Wikimedia (for example why young users, new registed with low edits quit so often was one, but there are much topics as you know for sure), but okay otherwise "we" keep it and its everything fine, I just saw another questionable data for a submarine nuclear of which India use one and want have 2, first is a 10-year leasing... reactor 190 MW, propulsion 32MW + 2 Reactors and only written 2 MW (not each 2 MW even, only 2 MW).
This is extreme low energy for a larger nuclear ship, and there are the other missing over 150 MW or I do not know over 75% ?! I think alone ship system, lightning for the ship and the crews areas even with save bulbs needs a lot, and most of course the ship systems, navigations, any radio connections inside the boat, radar, screens and so on... and this even sharing at least sometimes to load the small electro low-sound engine for being not loud at 4 knots, you need I guess 10-times as much electric generation, and propulsion might be right but 190 MW than?! Alone the size and costs for such a great, its almost like one from the Nimitz Aircraft Carriers... never heard that it is possible to cover all this with this energy, but I better do no ask :D Maybe someone else detects the questionable figures or not, have a nice <wherever you live> Kilon22 ( talk) 01:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
I said, check this article, you find 25 penalties on this article + even pictures with clearly visible producer/name etc... nothing happened, and it is here more and more the same thing. There is still the page and a guy seriously asked me if I do not have a "Accumulator (Mignon/Micro)-Magazine or so without visible AD or so, I mean magazines have AD too and well the site still exists, so it depends WHO makes the edits and not the rules, so please delete/archive this if you can. I was only frustrated because it starts to get very extreme here too and as said on the other side other pages are tolerated only because a user of the first days maybe did this... so sorry. I will not delete this, because they told me on German Wikipedia this can have a ban/warning too if I would delete my own comment on which you answered.
as I said, that is the reason why Wikipedia no longer is the number 1 on Google, 10 years ago in German Google almost every search result number 1 was wikipedia, now you have to add "wiki" to the search or you have to search it under the normal results and I really understand since a few months why this is so... I will strongly try to prevent that with only reading and no edit or the so called "talk"-page even if, like a german phrase is, even if it is itching me in my fingers to do something against a terrible error (in my opinion) ;) Nevermind and have a nice rest of your weekend Kilon22 ( talk) 15:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
This is the notification for: [ [3]]. -- Fenal Kalundo ( talk) 09:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Please check tweeter of indian defence minister arun jetly who tweets about ser trials of the second scorpion class domestic made submarine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tusharkumar bhatt ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Liu Xiaobo. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Giant
Snowman
16:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
All tests completed. Kalvari waiting for the PM for commissioning. Read on. https://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-services/air-defense/030433040321-linde-va-feter-son-premier-sous-marin-scorpene-2100971.php Livefist ( talk) 12:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
I went back and checked if I offered an explanation or not. But I'll reiterate it.
Checking UK's and USA's agricultural ministry wikis , one can see that the photo of the Minister or the head of those institutions is not plastered on the top, or anywhere for that matter. A ministry's WIKI page unlike the government websites shouldn't be used to glorify any particular individual. If you are inclined to the minister/his party/political ideologies or If you feel ownership of the page and wish to set it to your standards not the wiki's standard, I'd leave it at that.
thanks.
Dog-named-Romeo ( talk) 17:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, My edits was mere more facts and reliable sources like British Library and established authors who supports Tibetan causes. The original article was too biased and contains many partisan information. However, I didn't remove them, merely added more facts. Please do not use false and partisan sources. If you do, make sure also allow sources that you don't like. Please be balanced and calm, without emotional attachment.
Zip yz ( talk) 21:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Can you explain what is wrong with my edits? What content is unsourced?-- 119.160.98.177 ( talk) 06:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
I have listed good source on it but you simply turned a blind eye on it and blame others for fun. -- 146.96.252.3 ( talk) 06:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber, I was surprised with this warning to a newbie, especially because the editor provided an excellent source and your warning was at level 3 or 4. This is really an unfortunate way to treat new editors, and I hope you will refrain from doing such things in future. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 13:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Kautilya3:
@ Adamgerber80: So, if I didn't misunderstand you, you do not want to and are not going to change your approach, right? -- 146.96.252.3 ( talk) 03:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have opened a thread on ANI on behalf of 146.96.252.3 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) per their request. I will now have a look into the situation and respond at the thread -- There'sNoTime ( to explain) 19:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Adamgerber80 I had given correct reference to Professor Christopher S. Raj article except in his education which I wrote from profile from site jnu.ac.in. However, he was retired on April 8, 2017 and the university has deleted profile of Christopher S. Raj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathewmg1 ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
you have been edited page without any trusted source AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 20:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Why you disturb me every time i know about Type 56 more then you AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 20:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Mrs kindly do your work on your indian pages Type 56 is not designed in 1947 it's design date is 1950-55 AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 20:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice very soon i will provide you all the reliable sources about type 56 Thanks.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 17:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello dear, I saw that you are deleting and adding in the Page Italian nuclear weapons program I thank you for your attention on Italian Page, but please can you explain me why you are deleting " without a good motivation", and why i should talk on talk Page, you are the only one that have problems with this article.. LuigiPortaro29 ( talk) 08:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
You are vandalizing article.Italy can deliber b61 in case of war as US claim.In Ghedi only italian jets in fact.
You are widely anti italian.b61 in. Ghedi can be delibered only by AMI as all referenced rerport.You are an enbious third world guy for propaganda.
You have revised the suzuki merhan information Wikipedia is not your property you are not allowing anyone to add any info you can check on internet about suzuki mehran AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 15:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Removed the previously added category. Please consider reconciliation Jsncol ( talk) 04:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Your warnings on my talk page will not get you anywhere go read WP Terrorist than try and challenge my edit 2 years editing and still ignorant about Wikipedia policies. ShaniAli1lo ( talk) 20:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear you arw not allowing anyone to add anything even with reliable sources as you edited suzuki khyber page it's production date is 1990-2000 also you have edited suzuki merhan and Type 56 page i think you have a personal Hostility with me? Please do not edit any information without reliable sources you want to rule Wikipedia i think. AtaurRehman2002 ( talk) 15:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Albert Dawkins ( talk) 13:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
In my opinion, you are adding speedy deletion tags without much substantial reason. Please let us know why you put speedy deletion tags on 2 of the articles? I do not know if you have created any new articles but it is an extremely difficult process for your information. Maybe you would enjoy creating new articles when you are new on WP (you seem quite new and inexperienced and hence your immature behavior is partially justified in my opinion). I do follow the guidelines like - please do not bite the newbies. As you will become experienced, I would suggest you to then take the job of fighting vandalism etc. Because then your understanding of vandalism or promotion / advertisement would have been increased. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 12:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
It is my request to administrators to look at the edits happening from this account and take appropriate actions. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 10:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
I have just noticed man that you are a computer scientist and also can code in Python. Why are you behaving like this if you have such a nice profile? Just spend more time reading things and you will understand things better. Just remember a very important saying in digital age "Think before you type". I hope you will not misunderstand my friendly advice. I am sorry if you feel that you do not need this advice. I will not communicate with you henceforth if you do not like me, or my editing. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 11:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --
Abhijeet Safai (
talk)
11:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear Adamgerber80, I am really sorry for my misunderstanding. There is really a vada pav vendor named Ashok Vaidya for which references can be found here. I am so much grateful to Dr. Ashok D B Vaidya for his contributions in the filed of research that I got furious when I thought by mistake that you are making fun of him by comparing him with a vada pav vendor. Dr. Ashok D B Vaidya is father of Dr. Vidita Vaidya, who is also a scientist. I am so much grateful to this man known as Vaidya sir in my life that I easily got carried away by emotions and did not pay attention to what you are saying. I am really sorry from the bottom of my heart for the inconvenience caused to you. Kindly forgive me for my rude behavior. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 15:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
I see you have been changing my edits, I have added to the talk page but apparently this has been getting ignored. I was hoping we could resolve any disagreements here that's why I'm opening this new section on your talk page.
/info/en/?search=Template:Infobox_weapon Origin if for where the weapons was designed or first manufactured. In both cases this is russia for su-30.
But Adam do you see why I have a problem with you. You where providing sources saying the tank is a JV and should have both countries listed. One guy comes along says the tank is licence produced and removes information, Your stance changes all of a sudden and you begin protecting his edits. So when the same is applied to on of your pages, you have this double standard which has just been blatantly exposed, do you see why that's not fair?
Could you take a look at and preceding edits? As far as I can tell, the user is adding content on a missile that we already have an article for, Sayyad-2, and is copying it almost word for word. I'm at 3RR now, but they're not getting the message. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 23:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, I have proposed the removal of a section from the article Equipment of the Pakistan Army (see it's talk page). Thanks! -- Maxx786 ( talk) 06:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Adamgerber80. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Alex Shih Talk 17:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Egypt and Nigeria can be deleted from map of Regional power. Kingofwoods ( talk) 17:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Konsam Himalay Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YSM ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
On behalf Military history project coordinators, for your contributions to the Indian military related topics. It's great to see someone on my tracks. For any help related to Indian military related issues, please ping me, I'll be glad to help you. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 15:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Adamgerber80, I see that you reverted my edits on Lt. Gen. AK Singh's page. You asked for an explanation of the edits I made. I'm happy to provide the same.
1. The link to the page of Prof. Jagdish Mukhi in the 'Government Offices' section was broken. I fixed that. I linked to the correct page.
2. The ribbons used in the awards and decorations page are not of the highest quality, visually. I used the ribbons found on this page and in my opinion, the visual quality of ribbons improved considerably. This is most obvious when you look at the depiction of the 'Sena Medal.'
These are all the changes I made. There was no malicious intent in making these changes. FlyingBlueDream ( talk) 11:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)