Please see my comment at this draft DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
I stumbled upon vandalism of a public official and would like to see the page protected. I edited it back to remove the vandalism.
Here is the page:
/info/en/?search=Anne_Milgram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckoian ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Q28 ( talk) 06:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, i request for my deleted article to be restored. Dr BA Thango ( talk) 10:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
-- Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 02:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm struggling to understand your closing statement here. You appear to cite the policy on proposed deletions of BLPs, but as this is not a proposed deletion, but an AfD, where does policy state that this should be deleted? -- c ( talk) 12:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Sir, I have checked Arabic sources as you mentioned and I founded this source so plz check click to veiw. Humble84 ( talk) 11:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for looking into the Wikipedia editathon for March! Keep in touch Hamaxides ( talk) 17:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I want my article copied to my user-page, for further editing and proofreading my wikipedia.
Rosen Method ( talk) 11:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Rosen Method / new username to be changed to: Alsephina Rohini
2601:484:C201:32E0:D4A8:3F7B:FD97:AD72 (
talk)
01:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
He has proposed a new username. Are you OK with it? Edits seem OK. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day! Hi 78.26! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ( talk) 00:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC) |
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ( talk) 00:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi 78.26,
Could I request a revision deletion for the last 4 edits of
Evolutionary origin of religions. I think there's probably a honey pot of copyrighted contributions from
User:PzychoPat if you're in the market. This isn't a particularly time sensitive request so if there's a more appropriate place to request a revdev I'll happily park the message there. Thanks,
Pabsoluterince (
talk)
11:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I made created a page about John Tuner (recorder) and received a message from Jimfbleak saying I had created an autobiography, which I haven't. Would I be able to get the contents of the article back please. Thanks Gordon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gordonhall70 ( talk • contribs) 08:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 78.26. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boyd Senter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 05:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Sir. Please help to restore my deleted articles, Salif Gueye, Ahlamalik Williams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rma17 ( talk • contribs) 11:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Why didn't they give me full information or fix my mistakes than to delete my page??? Is it fair enough? KhethiweM ( talk) 21:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
GOOD DAY! I AM CHUKLEPEDIA, YOU HELPED ME BEFORE ON ACCEPTING THE 'MY BOY (ALBUM)' DRAFT TO ARTICLE, SO I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT! ALSO, I WANTED TO ASK YOU IF YOU CAN HELP ME REVIEWING MY NEW DRAFT Draft:Moog: The Electric Eclectics of Dick Hyman, IF YOU PLEASE BE SO KIND REVIEWING IT. HAVE A NICE DAY AND GREETINGS! :) -- Chuklepedia ( talk) 22:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
THIS article is relate to news site which support new investors and stake holder in NFT World. /info/en/?search=NFTStudio24 these are all sources links but I need your help , is these are not enough ,
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/430802
https://topemergingtech.com/5-ways-cloud-computing-is-used-in-machine-learning/
https://techbullion.com/how-do-you-verify-the-authenticity-of-an-nft-with-nftstudio24/
https://topemergingtech.com/5-best-applications-of-ai-in-the-fashion-retail-industry/
https://www.latestly.com/technology/how-to-verify-a-solana-nft-3675132.html
https://eng.jeeveypakistan.com/?p=14271
https://techmag.com.pk/blockchain-facilitation-is-ready-for-supply-chain-business/
https://pakobserver.net/countering-disinformation-key-to-nft-blockchain-business-asif-hameed/
https://nation.com.pk/2022/05/14/how-does-blockchain-work/
https://nation.com.pk/2022/07/07/nft-news-the-rising-need-for-nft-regulatory-framework/
https://nation.com.pk/2022/07/07/nft-news-the-rising-need-for-nft-regulatory-framework/
Kyle154 ( talk) 17:59, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Akron Baptist Temple at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 ( talk) 11:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
@ 78.26: I got a suggestion for you, how about you and me work on a article for Florida Hospital. This used to be an article the creator of the article was confused when they created it, instead of talking about the subnetwork it was talking about Florida Hospital Orlando. Last year I tried to find information, but Google wasn't much help for me since it was showing me websites that had no connection. Today I found some for Florida Hospital. If you are interested you can move the page to draft and give me a ping. And since you have better digging powers then me you can collect the websites. What do you think? Catfurball ( talk) 19:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 78.26. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abu Dhabi Petroleum Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Sincere thanks for your vote and research efforts. Any chance you could sign off your admirable work with something somehow? Unsigned contribs - no matter how well-founded - get ignored by the kids in charge. Alas. Plutonium27 ( talk) 11:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
On 10 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Akron Baptist Temple, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Akron Baptist Temple (pictured) once featured 6-foot-tall (1.8 m) red lettering that flashed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Akron Baptist Temple. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Akron Baptist Temple), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 20,421 views (850.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 23:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have been trying to set up a draft page to be reviewed for the 'Child Brain Injury Trust', however, I think it's been deleted as i cant see it anywhere? Would you be able to let me know if this page has been deleted? If it has, can you send it back so i can submit it as a draft? Thanks ( Laura Crofts ( talk) 15:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Rob3512 ( Talk) 05:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
@ 78.26: Can you please protect AMITA Health. There is a vandal that keeps attacking it, this year and last year it has been attacked 17 times. And I just undid some of the vandalism. By this vandal User talk:165.75.7.250, is registered to Sirius Computer Solutions, Inc. Catfurball ( talk) 19:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Several edits of Rory Phillips (DJ) made by User_talk:95.147.222.131 commit the double crime of being both defamatory and poorly spelled. These have been undone or edited away but but would be best removed if you could. Letsnotstart ( talk) 01:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
hello. it seems that in 2020 you deleted the entry on the European Triode Festival (ETF). as the initial author and organizer, i only today noticed the deletion when i wanted to forward somebody the link. not being familiar with the workings of wikipedia, i was surprised about the reasons given for the deletion (and also why i was never informed about the deletion process). the ETF still exists. except for 2020, it was held every year since 2003. a simple google search will yield plenty of links. there are reports in well known publications like "Stereophile" and others. the reason that led to the deletion of the entry also describes the nature of the ETF. i started it as a non-profit, grass roots event modeled after my swiss understanding of direct democracy. nobody "owns" the ETF. there is no ETF leadership or steering committee. there are no written rules, just the understanding and mutual agreement that somebody (mostly a group of two or three persons) volunteers to organize the next three festivals in his country. he then carries the ETF torch for the next three years until – usually in the 2nd year – a new volunteer offers to carry on. since this is all unpaid work and there is considerable financial risk (often the organizer has to pay upfront for the venue), no volunteer has ever been rejected. organizers are free on how they interpret the idea of the ETF. often they set up their own ETF website instead of taking over existing ones. nobody can force them not to. many organizers weren't even aware that there is a wikipedia entry. and none so far (up to the deletion) had the idea of adding something to the entry… calling it a niche event is correct and incorrect at the same time. it is a niche event in the sense that the number of participants is –again by mutual understanding- limited to 100. this number has proven to be a good compromise. participants usually bring a lot of DIY and commercial stuff to the festival, doors are never locked, everybody trusts each other. that is a central, not negotiable part of the ETF's unique character. any organizer so far usually had 500 applications and had to reject 400. who is being rejected is completely up to him. there is an unwritten law that previous organizers will always be admitted. in that sense, it *is* a niche. but the participants are anything but niche – among them are engineers and designers that develop new tube circuits that are granted international patents, there are entrepreneurs in the fields of tube manufacturing, transformer design / manufacturing, tonearm / cartridge / turntable manufacturing, circuit design, publishing, authors of reference books and many more – all in the field of audio / sound recording and reproduction. they all return to the festival (and pay the full entry fee!) because they value the unique character of the event. (the downside of limiting the number of participants is that being admitted has become sort of badge of honor. the ETF has the reputation of being an elite gathering since many of the participants are well known in DIY / tube audio / vinyl reproduction circles. i never intended this elite, exclusive reputation but it seems to be the inevitable trade-off of trying to preserve the (often quoted, never really defined) "spirit of the ETF". i would higly appreciate it if you could in some way make your deletion undone. please feel free to get in touch with me if you need any information which i will readily supply (if i can). i don't want to publish my e-mail address here, but you can reach me via the contact form on my website Chrint ( talk) 12:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, My page and article was wrongfully deleted, in my opinion and I do not have a copy of it can you assist me? AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 03:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I would like a copy of it to recover my content please. Just because it deleted does not mean I do not deserve a copy of my content. AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 13:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I am only asking for a copy for my own personal use not to have it restored please help me this is my work and my work is my life AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 05:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I am begging you. I need to copy and paste it for my own personal record. It is meant to be published elsewhere. I put a lot of time and effort into it and I am in desperate need of it back. AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 05:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I am the manager of JayTheKidd, and he is quite notable in Atlantic Canada. It was my only draft created, I’d like to receive the contents as I was not finished putting links and my references or the page itself. Realjaythekidd ( talk) 15:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:352 BC births indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Possibly being over-cautious, but nevertheless, giving you a heads up that I made a small formatting change to this AfD following your closure. The {{
reftalk}}
templates were placed in a way that caused the archive frame not to render correctly,
I fixed it. Regards,
Goldsztajn (
talk)
03:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
During the closing note of this AFD you wrote that Most of the keep arguments do not help at all in establishing notability. However, there are three unchallenged sources from the most recent argument demonstrating GNG is met. The three unchallenged sources from the most recent arguments are nothing but routine coverage of the subject, like the announcement of the CM candidate of a political Party. I know I'm kinda late but may I ask what is your opinion on me taking this to the deletion review? TheWikiholic ( talk) 04:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Please restore the Dillon Danis article, the article was deleted due to notability but the notability of the individual has increased greatly since the article was deleted. Thanks Blahwikiblah ( talk) 08:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
I have added additional information to the article. I feel it meets all notability standards and more information will be added as it’s made public. Please reinstate the article. Thanks Blahwikiblah ( talk) 01:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
I have added additional information to the article. I feel it meets all notability standards and more information will be added as it’s made public. Now I’m curious as to the next step? Im inexperienced and trying to learn. Do you have to resubmit it now that it’s a draft or can I? Ect.. please help lol thanks Blahwikiblah ( talk) 00:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
With a 4-4-1 split (K/D/draft), a delete outcome inappropriately rewards those who expend lots of virtual ink reiterating their position. No consensus or relist would be appropriate outcomes, but deletion is simply not reflected by that discussion. Please reconsider. Jclemens ( talk) 08:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
First, you are aware of WP:NOTVOTE as well as anyone, so the fact that it was a 4-4-1 split does not necessarily indicate a "no consensus" outcome. I'll give you my thoughts on the arguments and the outcomes thereof.
The nomination posited that this topic is not encyclopedic because WP:NOT is violated, in that there is not sufficient material in reliable sources to support an encyclopedic article.
The first !vote argued for moving to draft. The argument was the poor quality of the article, and did not present arguments for notability, pro or con. This position did not gain any traction and was not factored into my judgement decision.
the second !vote was for keep. It is completely void of policy and did not influence my close.
The third !vote (yours) was for keep. It made the argument that the topic is notable because the term is widely used in academic literature. Sources were claimed, but not presented. The argument that the term is used multiple times doesn't counter the argument, there are lots and lots of words used multiple times for which we do not have an article, but for which we have Wiktionary. As clearly argued under this !vote, that makes it a neologism and therefore in violation of WP:NOT.
The fourth !vote was for keep. It posited that it easily met GNG, but no sources were provided. WP:THREE was used in counterargument, which I completely discounted as an irrelevant use of the essay (not policy). I'm venting a little here, but THREE is an excellent essay about Anti-refspam, not about notability. The argument is not supported, and poor counterarguments are likewise discarded. I also don't see what super-niche has to do with notability. I tend to write about super-niche musical topics, for instance.
The fifth !vote was also to keep, and sources were presented. More than one source was presented, and if left unchallenged I would have closed the discussion as "keep" no matter how many delete !votes were made. However, in the ensuing discussion consensus developed that the sources presented were discussing a concept distinct from that presented in the article, or did not meet SIGCOV. That said, this was clearly the strongest argument and considerable weight was given to it.
The sixth !vote was officially stating the counter position posited under the fifth !vote. It reinforces the idea of the nominator, and factored strongly into my closing decision.
The seventh !vote was the strongest, clearly explaining why the topic is not covered by GNG, and again reinforcing that the topic violates NOT. It factored the strongest into my closing decision.
The eighth !vote reinforced the position supporting NOT, although it did not present any new arguments.
Therefore I judged that consensus, by strength of argument, was that the topic was not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Even by pure vote counting I see one backed policy-based argument for support (which was also refuted) and four policy-backed arguments for delete, making the vote tally 4-1 in favor of deletion. I believe relisting would have been inappropriate because there was a sufficient number of participants, there were arguments presented based on policy per WP:RELIST.
I don't see BLUDGEONING at this discussion (certainly the bane of way-too-many AfD discussions), as you allude to in your message. I do see arguments, counter-arguments, and counter-counter arguments, etc. This is to be expected and encouraged in a healthy debate. Some of the arguments were weak, some were strong, some were irrelevant. That will all take place in a discussion where editors in good faith have varying viewpoints and therefore disagree.
I'm sorry the outcome does not match your expectation, and that I have not come to the same conclusion as you. I want to reiterate my strong support for your editing, and I am very glad there are editors such as yourself who work so very hard to retain content they consider worthy of encyclopedic attention. If after reading this you continue to feel I have erred, please feel free to take this to deletion review. I will not be offended. I truly wish you all the best and happy editing. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
non-notable neologism that fails WP:NEO. Looking at your summary of my input, you misunderstand it entirely--I am not arguing that the term is notable, because I don't need to argue that the term is notable in order to defeat the assertion that WP:NEO is violated. You know that funny pyramid where 'refuting the central point' is at the top? That's what I'm doing here--or at least trying to. If I was arguing notability, then those critiquing my initial posting as not citing specific sources would have a point: they don't, because pointing to Google Scholar is plenty to refute the assertion that this is a neologism, and if it isn't a neologism, it cannot, by definition, be a non-notable neologism, even if it might have been otherwise non-notable.
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi 78.26! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) |
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 ( talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} |
Donner60 ( talk) 00:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Please see my comment at this draft DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
I stumbled upon vandalism of a public official and would like to see the page protected. I edited it back to remove the vandalism.
Here is the page:
/info/en/?search=Anne_Milgram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckoian ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Q28 ( talk) 06:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, i request for my deleted article to be restored. Dr BA Thango ( talk) 10:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
-- Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 02:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm struggling to understand your closing statement here. You appear to cite the policy on proposed deletions of BLPs, but as this is not a proposed deletion, but an AfD, where does policy state that this should be deleted? -- c ( talk) 12:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Sir, I have checked Arabic sources as you mentioned and I founded this source so plz check click to veiw. Humble84 ( talk) 11:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for looking into the Wikipedia editathon for March! Keep in touch Hamaxides ( talk) 17:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I want my article copied to my user-page, for further editing and proofreading my wikipedia.
Rosen Method ( talk) 11:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Rosen Method / new username to be changed to: Alsephina Rohini
2601:484:C201:32E0:D4A8:3F7B:FD97:AD72 (
talk)
01:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
He has proposed a new username. Are you OK with it? Edits seem OK. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day! Hi 78.26! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ( talk) 00:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC) |
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ( talk) 00:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi 78.26,
Could I request a revision deletion for the last 4 edits of
Evolutionary origin of religions. I think there's probably a honey pot of copyrighted contributions from
User:PzychoPat if you're in the market. This isn't a particularly time sensitive request so if there's a more appropriate place to request a revdev I'll happily park the message there. Thanks,
Pabsoluterince (
talk)
11:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I made created a page about John Tuner (recorder) and received a message from Jimfbleak saying I had created an autobiography, which I haven't. Would I be able to get the contents of the article back please. Thanks Gordon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gordonhall70 ( talk • contribs) 08:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 78.26. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boyd Senter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 05:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Sir. Please help to restore my deleted articles, Salif Gueye, Ahlamalik Williams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rma17 ( talk • contribs) 11:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Why didn't they give me full information or fix my mistakes than to delete my page??? Is it fair enough? KhethiweM ( talk) 21:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
GOOD DAY! I AM CHUKLEPEDIA, YOU HELPED ME BEFORE ON ACCEPTING THE 'MY BOY (ALBUM)' DRAFT TO ARTICLE, SO I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT! ALSO, I WANTED TO ASK YOU IF YOU CAN HELP ME REVIEWING MY NEW DRAFT Draft:Moog: The Electric Eclectics of Dick Hyman, IF YOU PLEASE BE SO KIND REVIEWING IT. HAVE A NICE DAY AND GREETINGS! :) -- Chuklepedia ( talk) 22:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
THIS article is relate to news site which support new investors and stake holder in NFT World. /info/en/?search=NFTStudio24 these are all sources links but I need your help , is these are not enough ,
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/430802
https://topemergingtech.com/5-ways-cloud-computing-is-used-in-machine-learning/
https://techbullion.com/how-do-you-verify-the-authenticity-of-an-nft-with-nftstudio24/
https://topemergingtech.com/5-best-applications-of-ai-in-the-fashion-retail-industry/
https://www.latestly.com/technology/how-to-verify-a-solana-nft-3675132.html
https://eng.jeeveypakistan.com/?p=14271
https://techmag.com.pk/blockchain-facilitation-is-ready-for-supply-chain-business/
https://pakobserver.net/countering-disinformation-key-to-nft-blockchain-business-asif-hameed/
https://nation.com.pk/2022/05/14/how-does-blockchain-work/
https://nation.com.pk/2022/07/07/nft-news-the-rising-need-for-nft-regulatory-framework/
https://nation.com.pk/2022/07/07/nft-news-the-rising-need-for-nft-regulatory-framework/
Kyle154 ( talk) 17:59, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Akron Baptist Temple at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 ( talk) 11:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
@ 78.26: I got a suggestion for you, how about you and me work on a article for Florida Hospital. This used to be an article the creator of the article was confused when they created it, instead of talking about the subnetwork it was talking about Florida Hospital Orlando. Last year I tried to find information, but Google wasn't much help for me since it was showing me websites that had no connection. Today I found some for Florida Hospital. If you are interested you can move the page to draft and give me a ping. And since you have better digging powers then me you can collect the websites. What do you think? Catfurball ( talk) 19:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 78.26. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abu Dhabi Petroleum Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Sincere thanks for your vote and research efforts. Any chance you could sign off your admirable work with something somehow? Unsigned contribs - no matter how well-founded - get ignored by the kids in charge. Alas. Plutonium27 ( talk) 11:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
On 10 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Akron Baptist Temple, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Akron Baptist Temple (pictured) once featured 6-foot-tall (1.8 m) red lettering that flashed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Akron Baptist Temple. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Akron Baptist Temple), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 20,421 views (850.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 23:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have been trying to set up a draft page to be reviewed for the 'Child Brain Injury Trust', however, I think it's been deleted as i cant see it anywhere? Would you be able to let me know if this page has been deleted? If it has, can you send it back so i can submit it as a draft? Thanks ( Laura Crofts ( talk) 15:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Rob3512 ( Talk) 05:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
@ 78.26: Can you please protect AMITA Health. There is a vandal that keeps attacking it, this year and last year it has been attacked 17 times. And I just undid some of the vandalism. By this vandal User talk:165.75.7.250, is registered to Sirius Computer Solutions, Inc. Catfurball ( talk) 19:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Several edits of Rory Phillips (DJ) made by User_talk:95.147.222.131 commit the double crime of being both defamatory and poorly spelled. These have been undone or edited away but but would be best removed if you could. Letsnotstart ( talk) 01:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
hello. it seems that in 2020 you deleted the entry on the European Triode Festival (ETF). as the initial author and organizer, i only today noticed the deletion when i wanted to forward somebody the link. not being familiar with the workings of wikipedia, i was surprised about the reasons given for the deletion (and also why i was never informed about the deletion process). the ETF still exists. except for 2020, it was held every year since 2003. a simple google search will yield plenty of links. there are reports in well known publications like "Stereophile" and others. the reason that led to the deletion of the entry also describes the nature of the ETF. i started it as a non-profit, grass roots event modeled after my swiss understanding of direct democracy. nobody "owns" the ETF. there is no ETF leadership or steering committee. there are no written rules, just the understanding and mutual agreement that somebody (mostly a group of two or three persons) volunteers to organize the next three festivals in his country. he then carries the ETF torch for the next three years until – usually in the 2nd year – a new volunteer offers to carry on. since this is all unpaid work and there is considerable financial risk (often the organizer has to pay upfront for the venue), no volunteer has ever been rejected. organizers are free on how they interpret the idea of the ETF. often they set up their own ETF website instead of taking over existing ones. nobody can force them not to. many organizers weren't even aware that there is a wikipedia entry. and none so far (up to the deletion) had the idea of adding something to the entry… calling it a niche event is correct and incorrect at the same time. it is a niche event in the sense that the number of participants is –again by mutual understanding- limited to 100. this number has proven to be a good compromise. participants usually bring a lot of DIY and commercial stuff to the festival, doors are never locked, everybody trusts each other. that is a central, not negotiable part of the ETF's unique character. any organizer so far usually had 500 applications and had to reject 400. who is being rejected is completely up to him. there is an unwritten law that previous organizers will always be admitted. in that sense, it *is* a niche. but the participants are anything but niche – among them are engineers and designers that develop new tube circuits that are granted international patents, there are entrepreneurs in the fields of tube manufacturing, transformer design / manufacturing, tonearm / cartridge / turntable manufacturing, circuit design, publishing, authors of reference books and many more – all in the field of audio / sound recording and reproduction. they all return to the festival (and pay the full entry fee!) because they value the unique character of the event. (the downside of limiting the number of participants is that being admitted has become sort of badge of honor. the ETF has the reputation of being an elite gathering since many of the participants are well known in DIY / tube audio / vinyl reproduction circles. i never intended this elite, exclusive reputation but it seems to be the inevitable trade-off of trying to preserve the (often quoted, never really defined) "spirit of the ETF". i would higly appreciate it if you could in some way make your deletion undone. please feel free to get in touch with me if you need any information which i will readily supply (if i can). i don't want to publish my e-mail address here, but you can reach me via the contact form on my website Chrint ( talk) 12:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, My page and article was wrongfully deleted, in my opinion and I do not have a copy of it can you assist me? AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 03:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I would like a copy of it to recover my content please. Just because it deleted does not mean I do not deserve a copy of my content. AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 13:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I am only asking for a copy for my own personal use not to have it restored please help me this is my work and my work is my life AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 05:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I am begging you. I need to copy and paste it for my own personal record. It is meant to be published elsewhere. I put a lot of time and effort into it and I am in desperate need of it back. AWiseWoman22 ( talk) 05:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I am the manager of JayTheKidd, and he is quite notable in Atlantic Canada. It was my only draft created, I’d like to receive the contents as I was not finished putting links and my references or the page itself. Realjaythekidd ( talk) 15:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:352 BC births indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Possibly being over-cautious, but nevertheless, giving you a heads up that I made a small formatting change to this AfD following your closure. The {{
reftalk}}
templates were placed in a way that caused the archive frame not to render correctly,
I fixed it. Regards,
Goldsztajn (
talk)
03:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
During the closing note of this AFD you wrote that Most of the keep arguments do not help at all in establishing notability. However, there are three unchallenged sources from the most recent argument demonstrating GNG is met. The three unchallenged sources from the most recent arguments are nothing but routine coverage of the subject, like the announcement of the CM candidate of a political Party. I know I'm kinda late but may I ask what is your opinion on me taking this to the deletion review? TheWikiholic ( talk) 04:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Please restore the Dillon Danis article, the article was deleted due to notability but the notability of the individual has increased greatly since the article was deleted. Thanks Blahwikiblah ( talk) 08:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
I have added additional information to the article. I feel it meets all notability standards and more information will be added as it’s made public. Please reinstate the article. Thanks Blahwikiblah ( talk) 01:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
I have added additional information to the article. I feel it meets all notability standards and more information will be added as it’s made public. Now I’m curious as to the next step? Im inexperienced and trying to learn. Do you have to resubmit it now that it’s a draft or can I? Ect.. please help lol thanks Blahwikiblah ( talk) 00:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
With a 4-4-1 split (K/D/draft), a delete outcome inappropriately rewards those who expend lots of virtual ink reiterating their position. No consensus or relist would be appropriate outcomes, but deletion is simply not reflected by that discussion. Please reconsider. Jclemens ( talk) 08:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
First, you are aware of WP:NOTVOTE as well as anyone, so the fact that it was a 4-4-1 split does not necessarily indicate a "no consensus" outcome. I'll give you my thoughts on the arguments and the outcomes thereof.
The nomination posited that this topic is not encyclopedic because WP:NOT is violated, in that there is not sufficient material in reliable sources to support an encyclopedic article.
The first !vote argued for moving to draft. The argument was the poor quality of the article, and did not present arguments for notability, pro or con. This position did not gain any traction and was not factored into my judgement decision.
the second !vote was for keep. It is completely void of policy and did not influence my close.
The third !vote (yours) was for keep. It made the argument that the topic is notable because the term is widely used in academic literature. Sources were claimed, but not presented. The argument that the term is used multiple times doesn't counter the argument, there are lots and lots of words used multiple times for which we do not have an article, but for which we have Wiktionary. As clearly argued under this !vote, that makes it a neologism and therefore in violation of WP:NOT.
The fourth !vote was for keep. It posited that it easily met GNG, but no sources were provided. WP:THREE was used in counterargument, which I completely discounted as an irrelevant use of the essay (not policy). I'm venting a little here, but THREE is an excellent essay about Anti-refspam, not about notability. The argument is not supported, and poor counterarguments are likewise discarded. I also don't see what super-niche has to do with notability. I tend to write about super-niche musical topics, for instance.
The fifth !vote was also to keep, and sources were presented. More than one source was presented, and if left unchallenged I would have closed the discussion as "keep" no matter how many delete !votes were made. However, in the ensuing discussion consensus developed that the sources presented were discussing a concept distinct from that presented in the article, or did not meet SIGCOV. That said, this was clearly the strongest argument and considerable weight was given to it.
The sixth !vote was officially stating the counter position posited under the fifth !vote. It reinforces the idea of the nominator, and factored strongly into my closing decision.
The seventh !vote was the strongest, clearly explaining why the topic is not covered by GNG, and again reinforcing that the topic violates NOT. It factored the strongest into my closing decision.
The eighth !vote reinforced the position supporting NOT, although it did not present any new arguments.
Therefore I judged that consensus, by strength of argument, was that the topic was not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Even by pure vote counting I see one backed policy-based argument for support (which was also refuted) and four policy-backed arguments for delete, making the vote tally 4-1 in favor of deletion. I believe relisting would have been inappropriate because there was a sufficient number of participants, there were arguments presented based on policy per WP:RELIST.
I don't see BLUDGEONING at this discussion (certainly the bane of way-too-many AfD discussions), as you allude to in your message. I do see arguments, counter-arguments, and counter-counter arguments, etc. This is to be expected and encouraged in a healthy debate. Some of the arguments were weak, some were strong, some were irrelevant. That will all take place in a discussion where editors in good faith have varying viewpoints and therefore disagree.
I'm sorry the outcome does not match your expectation, and that I have not come to the same conclusion as you. I want to reiterate my strong support for your editing, and I am very glad there are editors such as yourself who work so very hard to retain content they consider worthy of encyclopedic attention. If after reading this you continue to feel I have erred, please feel free to take this to deletion review. I will not be offended. I truly wish you all the best and happy editing. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
non-notable neologism that fails WP:NEO. Looking at your summary of my input, you misunderstand it entirely--I am not arguing that the term is notable, because I don't need to argue that the term is notable in order to defeat the assertion that WP:NEO is violated. You know that funny pyramid where 'refuting the central point' is at the top? That's what I'm doing here--or at least trying to. If I was arguing notability, then those critiquing my initial posting as not citing specific sources would have a point: they don't, because pointing to Google Scholar is plenty to refute the assertion that this is a neologism, and if it isn't a neologism, it cannot, by definition, be a non-notable neologism, even if it might have been otherwise non-notable.
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi 78.26! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) |
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 ( talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} |
Donner60 ( talk) 00:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)