|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Joëlle Jones has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Joëlle Jones was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion/article/37498/1/female-comic-book-artist-prada-ss18-mfw-brigid-elva-joelle-jones-trina-robbins) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Your recent editing history at Me Too (hashtag) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
Talk:Me Too (hashtag), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Falling Gravity 20:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 02:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Weinstein effect without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please do not removed sourced material without consensus on the talk page.
Ifnord (
talk)
21:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
This is jammerbirdi. Thank you for the explanation on editing content about yourself. I didn't know that. I'm sorry for undoing your edits in light of hearing it.
There are some holes and unconnected dots in the 'origin' story of #metoo. I'm particularly interested as I am one of those dots. I will do some more research on finding out how to provide and verify information to those who are permitted to edit entries that apply directly to me.
One thing, for your trouble, that doesn't apply directly to me is this. On October 16, the day after Alyssa Milano's tweet calling for the hashtag to be used and with #metoo already having gone global, Alyssa tweeted that she'd she'd JUST learned of a previous metoo movement. So Tarana Burke was not the source of the idea as Alyssa Milano hadn't heard of that movement unto the day after she called for the hashtag movement. Alyssa has said only that she got this idea from a friend.
Look, in the long run, what's important is that there is now a movement that allows women to add their voice and experiences to the record. But Wikipedia, like any good encyclopedia is about spot-on accurate information and unvarnished detail. As a person who has been watching this all happen for the last month with the weirdest mix of great satisfaction and abject terror (because I live in LA and want to live here happily ever after and I don't know what no-good-deed-goes-unpunished story might result as my name becomes a part of this) I feel a great responsibility for the information on this Wikipedia page to be accurate and true.
Anyway.
Again, I meant no disrespect and I'm sorry for the misunderstanding (on my part.)
db
Jammerbirdi ( talk) 16:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
you would have to want the most complete and accurate information, wouldn't you? if you're editing Wikipedia pages in good faith?
Jammerbirdi ( talk) 16:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:70.112.229.80 reported by User:Kb.au (Result: ). Thank you.
Kb.au (
talk)
18:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Acroterion
(talk)
01:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. Take to the talk-page for discussion before you begin throwing shade towards other users.-
DisneyMetalhead (
talk)
15:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, which you made under the fraudulent rationale of undoing "vandalism". If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did with your edits to Adam Hughes
here and
here, you will be
blocked from editing.
Regarding your first edit, the information in the article comes directly from the sources cited for it. Regarding your second edit, you provided no rationale for how adding material not found in the cited source at the end of that passage, and removing the fact that the Wonder Woman statue was based on Hughes' cover for Wonder Woman #150, constituted "undoing vandalism". If you have a legitimate issue with the article's content, then open a discussion on the article's talk page, in which you can discuss the matter with other editors in a civil manner. Nightscream ( talk) 00:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Nightscream (
talk)
21:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
You've been blocked from Wikipedia for one week due to edit warring, and for incivility and personal attacks. Please do better. El_C 21:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you trigger the edit filter becuase of your persistent
edit warring. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
EGL1234 (
talk •
contribs)
04:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Please don't revert someone after they remove your comments from their own talk page, especially if those comments are snarky and unconstructive, in the first place. Please don't fall into old habits. Not to sounds like a broken record, but please do better. El_C 08:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Joëlle Jones has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Joëlle Jones was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion/article/37498/1/female-comic-book-artist-prada-ss18-mfw-brigid-elva-joelle-jones-trina-robbins) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Your recent editing history at Me Too (hashtag) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
Talk:Me Too (hashtag), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Falling Gravity 20:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 02:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Weinstein effect without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please do not removed sourced material without consensus on the talk page.
Ifnord (
talk)
21:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
This is jammerbirdi. Thank you for the explanation on editing content about yourself. I didn't know that. I'm sorry for undoing your edits in light of hearing it.
There are some holes and unconnected dots in the 'origin' story of #metoo. I'm particularly interested as I am one of those dots. I will do some more research on finding out how to provide and verify information to those who are permitted to edit entries that apply directly to me.
One thing, for your trouble, that doesn't apply directly to me is this. On October 16, the day after Alyssa Milano's tweet calling for the hashtag to be used and with #metoo already having gone global, Alyssa tweeted that she'd she'd JUST learned of a previous metoo movement. So Tarana Burke was not the source of the idea as Alyssa Milano hadn't heard of that movement unto the day after she called for the hashtag movement. Alyssa has said only that she got this idea from a friend.
Look, in the long run, what's important is that there is now a movement that allows women to add their voice and experiences to the record. But Wikipedia, like any good encyclopedia is about spot-on accurate information and unvarnished detail. As a person who has been watching this all happen for the last month with the weirdest mix of great satisfaction and abject terror (because I live in LA and want to live here happily ever after and I don't know what no-good-deed-goes-unpunished story might result as my name becomes a part of this) I feel a great responsibility for the information on this Wikipedia page to be accurate and true.
Anyway.
Again, I meant no disrespect and I'm sorry for the misunderstanding (on my part.)
db
Jammerbirdi ( talk) 16:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
you would have to want the most complete and accurate information, wouldn't you? if you're editing Wikipedia pages in good faith?
Jammerbirdi ( talk) 16:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:70.112.229.80 reported by User:Kb.au (Result: ). Thank you.
Kb.au (
talk)
18:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Acroterion
(talk)
01:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. Take to the talk-page for discussion before you begin throwing shade towards other users.-
DisneyMetalhead (
talk)
15:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, which you made under the fraudulent rationale of undoing "vandalism". If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did with your edits to Adam Hughes
here and
here, you will be
blocked from editing.
Regarding your first edit, the information in the article comes directly from the sources cited for it. Regarding your second edit, you provided no rationale for how adding material not found in the cited source at the end of that passage, and removing the fact that the Wonder Woman statue was based on Hughes' cover for Wonder Woman #150, constituted "undoing vandalism". If you have a legitimate issue with the article's content, then open a discussion on the article's talk page, in which you can discuss the matter with other editors in a civil manner. Nightscream ( talk) 00:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Nightscream (
talk)
21:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
You've been blocked from Wikipedia for one week due to edit warring, and for incivility and personal attacks. Please do better. El_C 21:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you trigger the edit filter becuase of your persistent
edit warring. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
EGL1234 (
talk •
contribs)
04:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Please don't revert someone after they remove your comments from their own talk page, especially if those comments are snarky and unconstructive, in the first place. Please don't fall into old habits. Not to sounds like a broken record, but please do better. El_C 08:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |