Candy Crush Saga — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzalo Plana ( talk • contribs) 23:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 3primetime3. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that, and sorry to confuse you. I had an old version of the article open and I saved it by mistake. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Just so you know, Fred Flintstone was a character in a 1960s TV cartoon series. It was obvious vandalism and I'm glad you caught it. Thanks. John from Idegon ( talk) 06:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey there, I am writing to you because of
this edit you performed; don't worry, you did nothing wrong.
Commonly when we are nominating an article for
speedy deletion, we use a specific template that indicated a reason for deletion from
this page (
WP:CSD); this categorizes it and helps explain to admins better. For example, I corrected your edit that I referred to above with
this edit. It's okay if you don't get all of this (it took me a while when I was starting up, too), if you need further clarification, don't hesitate to reply below this message!
P.S. Try out the tool
WP:TWINKLE it saves time by automating maintenance tagging and editor notification. —
Skyllfully (
talk |
contribs)
06:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
You need to understand that with this edit you reinstated an edit made by a block evading sock (see WP:SOCK). Additionally, you made the edit through article protection (see WP:PP). As an autoconfirmed editor you are permitted to edit protected pages but one should exercise caution when doing so. Please be more careful. I'll watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Tide rolls 18:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Rainforest Cafe may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Curtis Jerrells: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
TJH2018
talk
01:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
sorry, I have no idea what happened here at all! I tried to add an IP if you scroll down but it seems one cannot change the "header part" in a filing. any way thanks for teh courteous revert. -- Wuerzele ( talk) 23:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm forced to vandalize the Abu Sayyaf article cause they beheaded my friend Bernard last year and they will not be forgiven for what they done to him 175.137.70.225 ( talk) 04:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Good Job Man!!!! :) :P Xx C00l G$Y x# t@lk 04:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC) |
Same here its 1:00 Am where I am still at it:)-- Xx C00l G$Y x# t@lk 04:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
AfD w/o Discussion page. Jim1138 ( talk) 06:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I've semi-protected your user page for a few days to help curb the vandalism there. If you'd like the protection removed or extended, feel free to contact any admin. Tide rolls 03:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the help with the List of Thermal Conductivities. Patriot1423 ( talk) 12:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
My Tens Gone is innocent. Got hacked by some immature adults. We caught them and changed the password. I made this new nick to try and delete it before the whole IP address went down completely. Sorry if I did it the wrong way. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 541 He Is Weird ( talk • contribs) 04:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I was adding the Fictional Serbian people category to the Mirko and Slavko article. I added it because they are Serbians. 174.113.214.250 ( talk) 23:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam ( talk) 23:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi I noticed you reverted some disruptive edits to the Wikipedia:sandbox by 3 different Ip users. They all made bade edits on the same day so do you think they are conected? Spidersmilk ( talk) 01:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
I put your user & talk pages where they belonged and adding move-protection to them. Sorry you're having to deal with whoever is behind this. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Unless you'd prefer to be blocked. 70.124.133.228 ( talk) 23:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at User_talk:70.124.133.228 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 70.124.133.228 ( talk) 00:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
70.124.133.228 (
talk)
00:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Mario Kart 64, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
166.137.98.59 (
talk)
00:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Ahem, have a read of this: Wikipedia:User_pages#Removal_of_comments.2C_notices.2C_and_warnings. Note especially the bits that say "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages" and "Note that restoring talk page notices is not a listed exception to the three-revert rule." -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 300-201 BC to the List of state leaders in the 3rd century BC. tahc chat 04:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The "Landmarks" section, it contents most of cultural and heritage content subjects. Thats the addition to "Culture" section. -- NY89 ( talk) 02:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Is ok, you are welcome. It's an editor's job. ;) -- NY89 ( talk) 02:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello 3primetime3. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Infant Jesus Shrine Tada, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to geographical locations. Thank you. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 05:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years...
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of English words of Spanish origin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinto. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi there 3PT3, from Portugal,
this player has scored nine goals in the league for Sevilla FC, not 10. This player has just won his third UEFA Europa League trophy. Instead of undoing me, maybe you could join efforts and help clean up the sick garbage vandalism to which the article has been subjected for the last 20 minutes or so? Thanks.
Happy editing -- Be Quiet AL ( talk) 20:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my mistake. I was in the process of rereverting it when you caught it for me. Thanks and apologies for my mistake. reddogsix ( talk) 02:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I have posted this on the discussion page of the article but I've been ignored.
Why is this called "Xincheng" when the official name is Sin Chen? http://www.sinchen.gov.tw/home.php
You mentioned because there's a need for consistency... well then we should just rename and leave as the government wants it to be. The station might as well be called Xincheng but the township name is Sin Chen unless they decide to rename it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asoksevil ( talk • contribs) 04:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry if I am doing this wrong; I am trying to talk to you about the concern of plagiarism you have with my references to the Humanity Party in the V for Vendetta article. There is no plagiarism; they are my own words, without regard to any other words that another may have used. I am not behind the Humanity Party; I just believe in its tenets and effort to eliminate world poverty and its right to use Anonymous and the mask in its efforts to describe its tenets. The Humanity Party has hundreds of thousands who have seen its video as posted by Anonymous Official, which I am not affiliated with. There are over 7,000 responses to the video. I am seeking to state why it has a right to use Anonymous and the mask. I hope you will reconsider your deletions and reinstate my paragraphs. Thank you for your reconsideration. ssevdor. (Again, sorry, if I put this in the wrong place; I couldn't figure out how to talk to you, and you requested a discussion before I tried to undo your deletion. I thought I had created a separate discussion here, but I didn't see it show up after I had written and attempted to post it. Thanks again.
The point of article talk pages is to discuss ambiguities and errors etc. I do not take kindly to you deleting my request for clarity without first addressing the issue. 93.155.220.96 ( talk) 14:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm working on updating the Top Rope Promotions page and you keep restarting it. Why do you keep doing this? 21kidbullet ( talk) 02:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
I was not doing a test. I added important information with source (reference) to confirm it. Rknopfel407 ( talk) 07:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Rknopfel407
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to address why I have reverted to my original paragraphs after you deleted it. Your stated reason is that it seems like plagiarism. There is no plagiarism. I wrote the paragraphs in my own words without regard to any other material. The points are well thought-out and well intended. I am not behind the Humanity Party; I merely support its efforts and its right to use the Anonymous identity and the mask. I would appreciate it if you would reconsider and restore the page to the way I had written it, subject to any changes you feel appropriate. They are my words alone. The only help I could use would be from someone such as yourself who could properly format the citations into Wikipedia footnotes. I lack the expertise. I believe that the points and references I made to those who oppose the humanity party are valid. I mentioned that hundreds of thousands of views of the principle video of the Humanity Party have occurred, and thousands (more than 7,000) of comments have been made under the video, posted by Anonymous Official, which I am not associated with in any way. Thank you for your reconsideration. ssevdor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssevdor ( talk • contribs) 03:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Don't you think it is relevant to mention the involvement with the nazis. It is one the two things the person is famous for. from the linked wiki article "to rid India of British rule with the help of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan left a troubled legacy"
this is his oath
'I swear by God this holy oath, that I will obey the leader of the German State and people, Adolph Hitler, as commander of the German Armed Forces, in the fight for freedom of India, in which fight the leader is Subhas Chandra Bose, and that as a brave soldier, I am willing to lay down my life for this oath.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.129.87 ( talk) 23:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
hey idiot ! What's wrong with my edit on the Campbell Shopping Complex fire Can you explain? I merely added the word "Interesting" to the Facts section as they are indeed intresting facts ! What's wrong with that ! 60.49.75.221 ( talk) 02:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Actually Black Widow is an expert hand to hand combatant. If it is mentioned in other characters' abilities, it should be mentioned in hers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanmohd2105 ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll find references for each of them and then add the content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanmohd2105 ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase ( talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
hi, Ya, I removed some content because it is duplication and not reliable data. some content was already posted below that which is correct data so brought it upwards and removed irrelevant data . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.111.8 ( talk) 06:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
The following article is for characters that did exist historically, abraham is a myth that has not been verified, please help.
/info/en/?search=List_of_founders_of_religious_traditions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.79.194.90 ( talk) 19:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Sorry to see that while I was otherwise occupied, you got to deal with the "'go 'za"/"'chos" vandal today when he discovered temporary protection on those pages had expired... Thanks for rising to the challenge! Take care! Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC) |
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 702–800 BC as I did in this edit? tahc chat 17:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC) @ Tahc: Done as requested. I actually forgot about this :). Nice to help you out again! :) -Primetime ( talk) 18:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Alumni is used for men, while alumnae is used for women. Can you revert your edit please? -- 78.180.248.173 ( talk) 11:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
You have reverted the introductory paragraphs at [1] to an earlier version which is grossly misleading for two reasons. It fails to point out that Renouf makes no claims to have researched the Holocaust herself: AFAIK she has not written a single word directly about this subject, though as clarified elsewhere in the entry she has become known for defending the legal/civil rights of those who do. Secondly it gives the impression that Renouf is a political activist who has done a bit of modelling work (rather like those countless "reality TV stars" and footballers' girlfriends who describe themselves as models) – whereas in fact she had a decades-long international career as an advertising model and television commercials actress, long before coming to any political notice. Hence I have re-reverted your changes. The user who made the original changes was clearly acting out of political malice, though I'm sure that's not the case with you. I also put in the word "late" before the disambiguation re Lady (Susan) Renouf. This was just because lazy journalists often use Wiki and it would be especially unfortunate for the late Lady Renouf's family if there were any confusion. Thanks. Oafc1990 ( talk) 17:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 801–900 BC to List of state leaders in the 9th century? Thanks. tahc chat 14:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Religion is an important subject because it determines if you go to heaven or hell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B117:74FA:4562:E880:D340:FCAF ( talk) 19:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Anschluss shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war in association with user account Tarl N. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.9.40.129 ( talk) 20:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Can you help me add an image to Are You Real? I don't know how to, thanks. 1097468wikieditor ( talk) 05:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Bro you mentioned on your user page that someone lonely can come and chat with you, and yep I am lonely and I want someone to do some PeP talk with me, and it can be you dude, and by the way I am Kain and I am from England, London and nice to meet you, I hope you would like to chat with me because I am very lonely in WP (Wikipedia).I think I will open your "TOP SECRET INFO" too.
Bye and Thank You Dude
Gandalf the Wizard 03:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Sure Dude thanks, but I gotta go to work bye.
Gandalf the Wizard 03:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gandalf the Wizard (
talk •
contribs)
Dear Friend, I would like to inform you that Bordoloi Trophy 2016 is NOT being telecast by PRAG news LIVE or recorded, please check your facts prior to removing comments made by people who know what they are talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.174.193 ( talk) 04:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
I am back dude your bro Kain, well today was looong day of work see ya soon !
Gandalfthe Wizard
Talk
16:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 902–1000 BC to List of state leaders in the 10th century? Thank you. tahc chat 02:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I believe the sentence referenced is poorly contructed. When I first read it, I came way with the impression that Deliverance had won three Academy Awards!! When I did some research, I found it had only gotten nominations. For arguments sake, take out the golden globe part of the statement, and it would read "It was a critical sucess, earning three academy awards nominations." The double plural doesn't make sense. Conversely, why then don't you make it "and five golden globes nominations" ?!! The noun is the nominations, the phrase academy award describes the noun-nominations, and shouldn't be pluralized. Thus my edit of award, instead of awards, which would link academy award to the word nominations. So maybe you should be spending some time in your sandbox... AA Pilot16 ( talk) 16:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Just a heads up, I reverted your edit on User talk:94.196.218.160 by accident. I thought the IP was the last to edit, but you reverted him before me. Sorry about that. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Primetime, how did you learn the piano so well? Did you have a musical talent that you were born with? What is the fastest rhythm you can play for at least 10 seconds? Do you like to pretend that you're playing the piano, even if you're not near it? Also, a generic question, are you male or female (I'm male). I can actually play the pipe organ (though not so well). Sorry for the load of questions — I'm just curious Awesomemeeos ( talk) 03:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I am sure about the star on the Ulster Banner. You need only look at the example provided, which is the same as the one used on its main page, to see that it is not two equilateral triangles, but two three-pointed stars. I made this point on the talk page under Definitions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:4216:A200:2922:70D8:AB89:8155 ( talk) 10:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
It is 100 percent true he died with a prostitute. See:
"A "witness" at the scene, Ernestine Drake, said she remembered the great coach talking football but not much else. She did say his last words were, "Football is a great game. You should come out this fall and see a few games." This being the fifties, nothing very salacious was published, at least in LA, but insiders were satisfied, and word certainly got around that Red, the old reprobate, wasn't diagramming plays that afternoon. Not surprisingly reports in the Bay Area cut closer to the bone. Two days later, the San Francisco Examiner went with an AP story which described Mrs. Drake as "a blonde in a downtown hotel room" who had just been "introduced to Sanders a few minutes before by Grimes, 81, the registered occupant of the room." The article continued: "Mrs. Drake, a divorcee, was convicted as a prostitute in nearby Beverly Hills in 1957 and served a jail term. Grimes has a long record of arrests for pandering and served a San Quentin Prison term after one conviction."" http://www.scout.com/college/ucla/story/986553-red-sanders-and-a-paradise-lost
"In August of 1958, Red Sanders died in a hotel room with a prostitute. The room was rented to her pimp." http://theuscherd.blogspot.com/2007/02/catching-up-with-ron-fletcher-usc-54-56_27.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:B44B:3400:69DE:EEF2:4B11:3979 ( talk) 06:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your prudent removal of a personal attack made by an anonymous user at Talk:Slender Man stabbing. The attack in question was a pretty blatant violation of our civility policy; the edit you made helped to keep the Wikipedia editing environment just a little more civil. Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC) |
Hello 3primetime3. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of KQHO-LD, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 16:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your work reverting the vandal on the Phil Collins page. He is obviously a complete sicko and probably needs psychiatric help. Rodericksilly ( talk) 05:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear 3primetime3,
Since you are the professional musician and the violinist, could you, please take a look at the Oleg Bezuglov article and consider expressing your opinion in discussion on whether it should be deleted or not. It was nominated on suspicion of not passing the WP:MUSICBIO criterion. The discussion is currently dead in the water, and I'm afraid it might be relisted again because of that. Thanks in advance! Fiddler11 05:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fidler11 ( talk • contribs)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐) 06:35, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi 3primetime3! I haven't talked to you or seen you around in quite some time... I hope that you're doing well and that life is happy. I just wanted to leave you a message to say hello and let you know that I was thinking about you... Wishing you my very best - ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Candy Crush Saga — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzalo Plana ( talk • contribs) 23:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 3primetime3. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that, and sorry to confuse you. I had an old version of the article open and I saved it by mistake. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Just so you know, Fred Flintstone was a character in a 1960s TV cartoon series. It was obvious vandalism and I'm glad you caught it. Thanks. John from Idegon ( talk) 06:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey there, I am writing to you because of
this edit you performed; don't worry, you did nothing wrong.
Commonly when we are nominating an article for
speedy deletion, we use a specific template that indicated a reason for deletion from
this page (
WP:CSD); this categorizes it and helps explain to admins better. For example, I corrected your edit that I referred to above with
this edit. It's okay if you don't get all of this (it took me a while when I was starting up, too), if you need further clarification, don't hesitate to reply below this message!
P.S. Try out the tool
WP:TWINKLE it saves time by automating maintenance tagging and editor notification. —
Skyllfully (
talk |
contribs)
06:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
You need to understand that with this edit you reinstated an edit made by a block evading sock (see WP:SOCK). Additionally, you made the edit through article protection (see WP:PP). As an autoconfirmed editor you are permitted to edit protected pages but one should exercise caution when doing so. Please be more careful. I'll watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Tide rolls 18:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Rainforest Cafe may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Curtis Jerrells: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
TJH2018
talk
01:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
sorry, I have no idea what happened here at all! I tried to add an IP if you scroll down but it seems one cannot change the "header part" in a filing. any way thanks for teh courteous revert. -- Wuerzele ( talk) 23:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm forced to vandalize the Abu Sayyaf article cause they beheaded my friend Bernard last year and they will not be forgiven for what they done to him 175.137.70.225 ( talk) 04:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Good Job Man!!!! :) :P Xx C00l G$Y x# t@lk 04:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC) |
Same here its 1:00 Am where I am still at it:)-- Xx C00l G$Y x# t@lk 04:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
AfD w/o Discussion page. Jim1138 ( talk) 06:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I've semi-protected your user page for a few days to help curb the vandalism there. If you'd like the protection removed or extended, feel free to contact any admin. Tide rolls 03:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the help with the List of Thermal Conductivities. Patriot1423 ( talk) 12:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
My Tens Gone is innocent. Got hacked by some immature adults. We caught them and changed the password. I made this new nick to try and delete it before the whole IP address went down completely. Sorry if I did it the wrong way. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 541 He Is Weird ( talk • contribs) 04:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I was adding the Fictional Serbian people category to the Mirko and Slavko article. I added it because they are Serbians. 174.113.214.250 ( talk) 23:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam ( talk) 23:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi I noticed you reverted some disruptive edits to the Wikipedia:sandbox by 3 different Ip users. They all made bade edits on the same day so do you think they are conected? Spidersmilk ( talk) 01:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
I put your user & talk pages where they belonged and adding move-protection to them. Sorry you're having to deal with whoever is behind this. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Unless you'd prefer to be blocked. 70.124.133.228 ( talk) 23:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at User_talk:70.124.133.228 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 70.124.133.228 ( talk) 00:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
70.124.133.228 (
talk)
00:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Mario Kart 64, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
166.137.98.59 (
talk)
00:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Ahem, have a read of this: Wikipedia:User_pages#Removal_of_comments.2C_notices.2C_and_warnings. Note especially the bits that say "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages" and "Note that restoring talk page notices is not a listed exception to the three-revert rule." -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 300-201 BC to the List of state leaders in the 3rd century BC. tahc chat 04:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The "Landmarks" section, it contents most of cultural and heritage content subjects. Thats the addition to "Culture" section. -- NY89 ( talk) 02:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Is ok, you are welcome. It's an editor's job. ;) -- NY89 ( talk) 02:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello 3primetime3. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Infant Jesus Shrine Tada, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to geographical locations. Thank you. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 05:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years...
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of English words of Spanish origin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinto. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi there 3PT3, from Portugal,
this player has scored nine goals in the league for Sevilla FC, not 10. This player has just won his third UEFA Europa League trophy. Instead of undoing me, maybe you could join efforts and help clean up the sick garbage vandalism to which the article has been subjected for the last 20 minutes or so? Thanks.
Happy editing -- Be Quiet AL ( talk) 20:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my mistake. I was in the process of rereverting it when you caught it for me. Thanks and apologies for my mistake. reddogsix ( talk) 02:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I have posted this on the discussion page of the article but I've been ignored.
Why is this called "Xincheng" when the official name is Sin Chen? http://www.sinchen.gov.tw/home.php
You mentioned because there's a need for consistency... well then we should just rename and leave as the government wants it to be. The station might as well be called Xincheng but the township name is Sin Chen unless they decide to rename it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asoksevil ( talk • contribs) 04:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry if I am doing this wrong; I am trying to talk to you about the concern of plagiarism you have with my references to the Humanity Party in the V for Vendetta article. There is no plagiarism; they are my own words, without regard to any other words that another may have used. I am not behind the Humanity Party; I just believe in its tenets and effort to eliminate world poverty and its right to use Anonymous and the mask in its efforts to describe its tenets. The Humanity Party has hundreds of thousands who have seen its video as posted by Anonymous Official, which I am not affiliated with. There are over 7,000 responses to the video. I am seeking to state why it has a right to use Anonymous and the mask. I hope you will reconsider your deletions and reinstate my paragraphs. Thank you for your reconsideration. ssevdor. (Again, sorry, if I put this in the wrong place; I couldn't figure out how to talk to you, and you requested a discussion before I tried to undo your deletion. I thought I had created a separate discussion here, but I didn't see it show up after I had written and attempted to post it. Thanks again.
The point of article talk pages is to discuss ambiguities and errors etc. I do not take kindly to you deleting my request for clarity without first addressing the issue. 93.155.220.96 ( talk) 14:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm working on updating the Top Rope Promotions page and you keep restarting it. Why do you keep doing this? 21kidbullet ( talk) 02:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
I was not doing a test. I added important information with source (reference) to confirm it. Rknopfel407 ( talk) 07:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Rknopfel407
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to address why I have reverted to my original paragraphs after you deleted it. Your stated reason is that it seems like plagiarism. There is no plagiarism. I wrote the paragraphs in my own words without regard to any other material. The points are well thought-out and well intended. I am not behind the Humanity Party; I merely support its efforts and its right to use the Anonymous identity and the mask. I would appreciate it if you would reconsider and restore the page to the way I had written it, subject to any changes you feel appropriate. They are my words alone. The only help I could use would be from someone such as yourself who could properly format the citations into Wikipedia footnotes. I lack the expertise. I believe that the points and references I made to those who oppose the humanity party are valid. I mentioned that hundreds of thousands of views of the principle video of the Humanity Party have occurred, and thousands (more than 7,000) of comments have been made under the video, posted by Anonymous Official, which I am not associated with in any way. Thank you for your reconsideration. ssevdor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssevdor ( talk • contribs) 03:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Don't you think it is relevant to mention the involvement with the nazis. It is one the two things the person is famous for. from the linked wiki article "to rid India of British rule with the help of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan left a troubled legacy"
this is his oath
'I swear by God this holy oath, that I will obey the leader of the German State and people, Adolph Hitler, as commander of the German Armed Forces, in the fight for freedom of India, in which fight the leader is Subhas Chandra Bose, and that as a brave soldier, I am willing to lay down my life for this oath.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.129.87 ( talk) 23:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
hey idiot ! What's wrong with my edit on the Campbell Shopping Complex fire Can you explain? I merely added the word "Interesting" to the Facts section as they are indeed intresting facts ! What's wrong with that ! 60.49.75.221 ( talk) 02:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Actually Black Widow is an expert hand to hand combatant. If it is mentioned in other characters' abilities, it should be mentioned in hers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanmohd2105 ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll find references for each of them and then add the content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanmohd2105 ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase ( talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
hi, Ya, I removed some content because it is duplication and not reliable data. some content was already posted below that which is correct data so brought it upwards and removed irrelevant data . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.111.8 ( talk) 06:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
The following article is for characters that did exist historically, abraham is a myth that has not been verified, please help.
/info/en/?search=List_of_founders_of_religious_traditions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.79.194.90 ( talk) 19:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Sorry to see that while I was otherwise occupied, you got to deal with the "'go 'za"/"'chos" vandal today when he discovered temporary protection on those pages had expired... Thanks for rising to the challenge! Take care! Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC) |
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 702–800 BC as I did in this edit? tahc chat 17:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC) @ Tahc: Done as requested. I actually forgot about this :). Nice to help you out again! :) -Primetime ( talk) 18:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Alumni is used for men, while alumnae is used for women. Can you revert your edit please? -- 78.180.248.173 ( talk) 11:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
You have reverted the introductory paragraphs at [1] to an earlier version which is grossly misleading for two reasons. It fails to point out that Renouf makes no claims to have researched the Holocaust herself: AFAIK she has not written a single word directly about this subject, though as clarified elsewhere in the entry she has become known for defending the legal/civil rights of those who do. Secondly it gives the impression that Renouf is a political activist who has done a bit of modelling work (rather like those countless "reality TV stars" and footballers' girlfriends who describe themselves as models) – whereas in fact she had a decades-long international career as an advertising model and television commercials actress, long before coming to any political notice. Hence I have re-reverted your changes. The user who made the original changes was clearly acting out of political malice, though I'm sure that's not the case with you. I also put in the word "late" before the disambiguation re Lady (Susan) Renouf. This was just because lazy journalists often use Wiki and it would be especially unfortunate for the late Lady Renouf's family if there were any confusion. Thanks. Oafc1990 ( talk) 17:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 801–900 BC to List of state leaders in the 9th century? Thanks. tahc chat 14:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Religion is an important subject because it determines if you go to heaven or hell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B117:74FA:4562:E880:D340:FCAF ( talk) 19:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Anschluss shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war in association with user account Tarl N. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.9.40.129 ( talk) 20:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Can you help me add an image to Are You Real? I don't know how to, thanks. 1097468wikieditor ( talk) 05:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Bro you mentioned on your user page that someone lonely can come and chat with you, and yep I am lonely and I want someone to do some PeP talk with me, and it can be you dude, and by the way I am Kain and I am from England, London and nice to meet you, I hope you would like to chat with me because I am very lonely in WP (Wikipedia).I think I will open your "TOP SECRET INFO" too.
Bye and Thank You Dude
Gandalf the Wizard 03:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Sure Dude thanks, but I gotta go to work bye.
Gandalf the Wizard 03:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gandalf the Wizard (
talk •
contribs)
Dear Friend, I would like to inform you that Bordoloi Trophy 2016 is NOT being telecast by PRAG news LIVE or recorded, please check your facts prior to removing comments made by people who know what they are talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.174.193 ( talk) 04:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
I am back dude your bro Kain, well today was looong day of work see ya soon !
Gandalfthe Wizard
Talk
16:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Would you please now REDIRECT all the years 902–1000 BC to List of state leaders in the 10th century? Thank you. tahc chat 02:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I believe the sentence referenced is poorly contructed. When I first read it, I came way with the impression that Deliverance had won three Academy Awards!! When I did some research, I found it had only gotten nominations. For arguments sake, take out the golden globe part of the statement, and it would read "It was a critical sucess, earning three academy awards nominations." The double plural doesn't make sense. Conversely, why then don't you make it "and five golden globes nominations" ?!! The noun is the nominations, the phrase academy award describes the noun-nominations, and shouldn't be pluralized. Thus my edit of award, instead of awards, which would link academy award to the word nominations. So maybe you should be spending some time in your sandbox... AA Pilot16 ( talk) 16:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Just a heads up, I reverted your edit on User talk:94.196.218.160 by accident. I thought the IP was the last to edit, but you reverted him before me. Sorry about that. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Primetime, how did you learn the piano so well? Did you have a musical talent that you were born with? What is the fastest rhythm you can play for at least 10 seconds? Do you like to pretend that you're playing the piano, even if you're not near it? Also, a generic question, are you male or female (I'm male). I can actually play the pipe organ (though not so well). Sorry for the load of questions — I'm just curious Awesomemeeos ( talk) 03:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I am sure about the star on the Ulster Banner. You need only look at the example provided, which is the same as the one used on its main page, to see that it is not two equilateral triangles, but two three-pointed stars. I made this point on the talk page under Definitions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:4216:A200:2922:70D8:AB89:8155 ( talk) 10:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
It is 100 percent true he died with a prostitute. See:
"A "witness" at the scene, Ernestine Drake, said she remembered the great coach talking football but not much else. She did say his last words were, "Football is a great game. You should come out this fall and see a few games." This being the fifties, nothing very salacious was published, at least in LA, but insiders were satisfied, and word certainly got around that Red, the old reprobate, wasn't diagramming plays that afternoon. Not surprisingly reports in the Bay Area cut closer to the bone. Two days later, the San Francisco Examiner went with an AP story which described Mrs. Drake as "a blonde in a downtown hotel room" who had just been "introduced to Sanders a few minutes before by Grimes, 81, the registered occupant of the room." The article continued: "Mrs. Drake, a divorcee, was convicted as a prostitute in nearby Beverly Hills in 1957 and served a jail term. Grimes has a long record of arrests for pandering and served a San Quentin Prison term after one conviction."" http://www.scout.com/college/ucla/story/986553-red-sanders-and-a-paradise-lost
"In August of 1958, Red Sanders died in a hotel room with a prostitute. The room was rented to her pimp." http://theuscherd.blogspot.com/2007/02/catching-up-with-ron-fletcher-usc-54-56_27.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:B44B:3400:69DE:EEF2:4B11:3979 ( talk) 06:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your prudent removal of a personal attack made by an anonymous user at Talk:Slender Man stabbing. The attack in question was a pretty blatant violation of our civility policy; the edit you made helped to keep the Wikipedia editing environment just a little more civil. Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 06:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC) |
Hello 3primetime3. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of KQHO-LD, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 16:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your work reverting the vandal on the Phil Collins page. He is obviously a complete sicko and probably needs psychiatric help. Rodericksilly ( talk) 05:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear 3primetime3,
Since you are the professional musician and the violinist, could you, please take a look at the Oleg Bezuglov article and consider expressing your opinion in discussion on whether it should be deleted or not. It was nominated on suspicion of not passing the WP:MUSICBIO criterion. The discussion is currently dead in the water, and I'm afraid it might be relisted again because of that. Thanks in advance! Fiddler11 05:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fidler11 ( talk • contribs)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐) 06:35, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 3primetime3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi 3primetime3! I haven't talked to you or seen you around in quite some time... I hope that you're doing well and that life is happy. I just wanted to leave you a message to say hello and let you know that I was thinking about you... Wishing you my very best - ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)