![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, 220 of Borg. I
welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or put {{helpme}}
(and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. You also might want to consider being "
adopted" by an experienced user who would show you how wikipedia works through a program called adopt-a-user. Again, welcome!
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
23:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, you know your way around, but I thought I'd leave you a template to get rid of the red link! ;) Now to give you everything I would have given you months ago but which the software won;t let me give to IPs! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Danny Rios has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Danny Rios was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://tokyoyakultswallows.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/rios-suspended-for-doping/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
15:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, the contributor is trying to erase the bad, yet factual history, and then to make it worse is trying to distort reality. Often time when trying to edit this particular page I encounter people like this. Even if you try to offer a rational solution or compromise they lash out. Unfortunately much like the wikipage the neighborhood itself has an identity crises. I am from the neighborhood and I would love to edit but my view would be biased too. But I will try to see if we can get somewhere with this contributor.-- El Mayimbe ( talk) 22:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello 220 of Borg. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Atlantis Vertigo Rave, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to raves. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 19:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabuderian Pluridisciplinary Methodology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabuderian Pluridisciplinary Methodology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy ( talk) 11:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Got an account, eh? HurricaneFan 25 — 18:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, page updated! Credits in the Edit Summary. How about sentence seven in the same para "On September 29, by the time Nesat managed to re-develop at 10 nautical miles (19 km; 12 mi) ragged eye," which also appears in the section Meteorological history, (secon para.) except it says "ab 10 nautical miles". - 220 of Borg 19:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Im not so expoert with Saab, but have to try keep on eye on that article, there seems to be lots of editors now when it went to bankruptcy --> Typ932 T· C 17:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Dear 220 of Borg, Thankyou for your message and sorry for such a late reply.
- I have done some editing (also wrote what I have edited in the page) letting people know what I have done. I have also removed some information and made it my graph a simple one. - I had originally posted the earthquaks from September due to February actually being considered a Aftershock of the 2010 Earthquake, I have removed the September ones off the graph though, as It does not apply to the 2011 Earthquake. - All the facts and information that is on the page is from GNS Science, Earthquake programme "Geonet New Zealand" which is funded by the Earthquake commission in New Zealand. I have gotten all information from and only them. I have not used information from other sources, as Geonet is the New Zealand earthquake seismology and the Information they get is much more accurate then other places in the world.
If there is anything else in which you are unhappy with I'll be happy to read and will reply a.s.a.p, Rifled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rifled ( talk • contribs) 02:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi thanks for your messages, I must say I'm not a expert at wikipedia but I am experienced in Earthquakes, my only problem is im not 100% familiar with wikipedia, and thus I must apologise and your messages are helping me do it right. Please message me if theres something I need doing. I am currently looking at how wikipedia is used, to help me in the future.
Rifled (
talk)
11:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
on your talk page, and an editor will visit you there to try to help you! -
220
of
Borg
12:54, 26 December 2011 (UTC):::: text
::::: text
<s>You are a bum</s>
to produce You are a bum
I wasn't aware that I was considered missing! :O That's perfectly fine. I hope you enjoy the rest of your holidays! Thanks, Nici Vampire Heart 06:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for that! I hope your festive season is merry and bright too :) Grutness... wha? 00:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Glad you found it useful. Your changes are perfectly fine. Thanks for letting me know. wiki-ny-2007 ( talk) 04:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Buckling restrained brace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connection ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Ok sir i am agree with you but problem with editing is that writing on wikipedia is too much controlled and regulated. I do not know why other users look for so much the extent of rightness in already right thing.There tens of wiki are there which simply shows that they are not neutral, they directly so the user relation with that religion,place,person why do n't you neutralize them.I am reading them from long time. First thing is that its too much difficult to decide which word will be better I do not know that "impressed" word was ok or not at place of "attracted" but what i can do, i think there is no else popular " young sufi singer" in india. And for that city that sentence was very very important. Secondly i do not understand if you know what is right and what is wrong why don't you made correction instead of deletion or reversion. I am on wikipedia since last one year but posting of such messages on user page and reversion is really bothering. Some one add text for information not for entertainment or publicity it should be understood by top users.
A man from Matrix ( talk) 21:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
You wrote a long paragraph to make me understand, thanks for that.I was having many queries and I asked few question from two three users but they are like robots. They behave like very professional persons. I don't know what's wrong in sharing information with others ;because they are approved good users.I am thankful to you that you replied in really good descriptive manner. I have many constraints.Everything is achievable but it just need time and lot of practice I was trying them in short time that is my mistake.But whatever I am writing on WP is just for information, knowledge and convenience. Because the area I have covered in my edits is the most backward area of India so I was trying to highlight these areas because I don't think it will be done by someone in the future. People here don't believe in study and area is full of illiterate people, no bus services,inferior roads, no power supply. But this area is part of India's most developed state.The information I am sharing hardly have any reference because no one bothers about these people and area so without reference information is useless (a/c to WP). But that sufi singer definitely having many references. As far as my name is concerned ,there is no need to worry about that because I will be no longer here on WP for edits to disturb the status of elite panel of WP. And I am sorry for my poor command over English language. It's not my tongue language and I started learning it few years ago.
Thank You Very Much.
A man from Matrix ( talk) 17:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Based on its current state, it's pretty clear that 2011–12 Los Angeles arson attacks needs some serious work. I've started a discussion about how to go forward at Talk:2011–12 Los Angeles arson attacks#One cleanup possibility, and you're invited to participate. Thanks in advance, Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I received you e-mail where you notificated my inclusion in the Missing Wikipedians list. It's true that I haven't been active as an editor for a while. However, I continue to enjoy reading Wikipedia every few days. I reply to all messages I receive on my user page. I don't know if this qualifies me as missing or not. Maybe missing is different from inactive. Anyway, All the best, Anna Lincoln 12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for the delayed response...but yes, happy to be of help. Personally, I think it meets the notability requirement. And I think the title's fine as is. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 17:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
A belated Merry Christmas from me. About time you got an account too ;) — James ( Talk • Contribs) • 6:04pm • 08:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your post. I think that SVT is largely dormant, however I know that a few people actively watch the page, including me. I'll definitely take a look at the link you posted. This is exactly the sort of thing that SVT was created for. Thanks again. Shadowjams ( talk) 23:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi 220_of_Borg. May I rustle your pines? Thanks for this revert, but if you check the diff, you'll see you used Template:uw-unsourced2. The 2 means it's a warning at level 2 on the 1-4 warning scale. Is there a reason why you chose level 2? Normally, first warning would be level 1, next=2, next=3, next=4, next=blocked. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_user_warnings/Usage_and_layout#Levels if you've not read it lately.
Actually there's no harm done, as the user again misbehaved, so I gave him a lvl2 also!
Anyway, I see you've taken to WP very quickly, and it's great you use TW to revert vandalism.
Happy editing, Trafford09 ( talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
@ Trafford09.
Hi, Trafford09, thank you for your POV. I class the welcome template I used as roughly equivalent to a level 1 warning. I think this is better than a immediate level 1 (agf) warning-only template as I; welcome the noob, 'chastise' them (without 'biting'), and point them in the right direction with links in case they are just a little misguided. They can't complain they weren't warned! So I would suggest upgrading yours to a level 3 warning.
In fact, having another look at their edit history (Esp. since your post) they have added un-sourced information to Costa Concordia 7 times across 3 hours, 5 times after first warning (and 3 more since your post here). They should be are blocked now! The last 5 edits was also the same text so edit warring and 3RR violation too. And that
text was rather un-encyclopedic and, potentially, needlessly distressing for any readers who knew passengers aboard that ship. On the other hand if it was true, not particularly relevant unless a RS mentioned it or a passenger was attacked by a predator.
• As a matter of procedure I have therefore added a {{
uw-ew}}
Edit warring Template to the editors collection.
And I agree with HJ, the warning level depends on the nature of the edit in question. A particularly bad, blatant and badly sourced or un-sourced BLP vio could and should result in an immediate higher lvl warning or even an immediate preventative block. Pines un-rustled.
220
of
Borg
02:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
@ HJ
AWOL!
Good to have you back! This
discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Cikgu Jasmin Airways may be of interest. -
220
of
Borg
02:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
aggh, that person is such a pest. I did around 20 corrective edits last night and I checked over many more that both you, User:Hawaiian717 and others did as well. That info box slipped past me. I did not keep a record of all the IPs being used but this person has been engaging in mischief editing with a clear and discernible pattern and style. On some of the articles it goes well back into december. I assume it is an established editor who has gone feral. I noted some standard corrective edits mixed in with earlier mischief edits. Some of the erroneous content is quite well disguised. Good work with all your clean ups, and thanks for saying hello. I hope this person soon sorts out whatever aircraft and airline information demons that have found their way into their cranial cavity. -- Felix ( talk) 04:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I will correct this mad things. Noel.guillet ( talk) 07:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Unnai Ninaithu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
When tagging a page witgh {{ copyvio}} please remember to also list it at WP:CP as described in the instructions in the template. The copyvio at Isa Khan has only jsut be dealt with as those that deal with copyvios at WP:CP were unaware of it. A bot would normally automatically list anything that was not listed but this was down for several months and it's best it is not relied upon. Dpmuk ( talk) 21:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Esophageal and Pectoralis ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your help at Anjulie! Mr. Absurd ( talk) 03:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Parrot AR.Drone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gyro ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Norman Allan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manly ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 04:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thanks, deleted now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for popping by :) Fayedizard ( talk) 12:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Hurricanefan24 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Hurricanefan24 to accept or decline the nomination. A page will then be created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/220 of Borg. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. |
If "multi-player" is preferred over "multiplayer" (e. g. in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier), why didn't you start at Multiplayer video game? Nczempin ( talk) 13:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barnstarbob regarding recent edits of Chevrolet Vega. -- Biker Biker ( talk) 12:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your request to me via the Reference Desk ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science#Why_do_consumer_electronics_use_DC.3F) to register.
I have been much discouraged from registering by peanut admin folk discussing whether to block me on their (publicly accesible!) Admin noticeboard, admin discussions on whether I'm a troll, or someone else quite unlikely, and by their occaisional bizare discussion on blocking others. (notwithstanding that certain nuisances I could name popping up with impunity when they are bored - they will know who they are). As my IP address changes each time I boot up the PC, I can come and go as I wish. Registering would only make it easier from them to block me.
I always, unless it is obviously otherwise, assume OP's have posted their questions with genuine need to know.understand, or a genuine desire to know/understand, and I only post if the subject falls within my competence and I believe I am being helpful. I do challenge folk who have posted things incorrect. So it's a bit mystifying why Admin folk think I'm a threat - perhaps they have either too much or too litle to do. Keit 120.145.23.26 ( talk) 15:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
there must be some sort of error.the only change i have made to this account is changing the infobox title to "2012 aurora massacre" other than that i don't recall any other edits. talk) 21:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
i take wikipedia very seriously and yes i am aware that wikipedia is not myspace or facebook,i apologize if you think i am abusing my account.but i have not added any other edits other than changing the title to 2012 aurora massacre.this "i pray to god" message could not have been me.this could be he hacking problem that happened in my account but otherwise,it was not me personally.i will change my log-in in order for these problems to end talk) 14:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh you're not nagging it actually helps to know what i am doing wrong.I have to be taught these things because i am still a child and thanks for understanding the whole incident.I'll take your advice. VGB 6:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I am currently editing the page Monster In My Pocket since i have every figure and the last person who edited did not complete the figure list.I suppose you can see the edits i made to it.So check that page out and tell me what you think.By the way the page content that i edited is "More details about individual monsters". VGB 23:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Valē,
Neil Alden Armstrong (August 5, 1930 – August 25, 2012)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gadag-Betageri, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hindustani and Freedom fighters ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Boing.
thought that this link may be of interest in regards to the 6 September wp:AN/I 'follies',
•
"GOLD BAR WEBSITE CARRIES UNTRUTHFUL ARTICLE ABOUT NEWSPAPER AND CITIZENS" skyvalleychronicle.com. September 06, 2012. WP gets lots of mentions, c/w screencaps of relevant pages. I think that Ms. Block may have guaranteed that the information on her former WP page is now available elsewhere on the Internet (
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Anne_K._Block) for posterity. Regards -
220
of
Borg
03:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
First of all, a "Flare stack", a "Gas flare" and a "Blowdown stack" are all one and the same thing. In my 50 years of designing refineries and natural gas plants and operating them, the most common usage is "Flare stack". Flare stack exists now, but it redirects to Gas flare.
Merging Blowdown stack into Flare stack would require little if any actual merging. Perhaps your added reference to the BP explosion is all that is needed.
I would urge you to make those changes because I simply don't want to get involved in what may turn into a hassle. mbeychok ( talk) 15:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Timeshift9,
I have updated this page, basically added legal/charge details and refs. 'borrowed' from the pages for
Craig Thompson and
Michael Williamson, then expanded the scanty lead to cover them too. See
here. Enough? -
220
of
Borg
23:29, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Oh you missed the 'Liberal' Expense Liberation?
It happened in Peter Rieths Days.
Not sure
Derek R Bullamore (
t·
c) but for some reason, your edits seem to closely follow my tagging.
See
here,
again, and
also, perhaps
here too. Are you my first 'edit stalker' ?
-
220
of
Borg
10:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
You have got you reply on User talk:Greatuser Greatuser ( talk) 07:05, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Dear Borg,
I would like to show my appreciation for your multiple edits. I would like also to ask you to act on my behalf and to accept my edit request published at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eric_Dill#Edit_request_on_2_November_2012 I would appreciate you understanding. Best wishes, Daniel Dwdimov ( talk) 15:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC) |
I Goofed
I am sorry I lost the citation and could not find the documentation again. I am not very good on the computer. I tried and gave up. "Petraeus stated "Clearly, she (Broadwell) connived her way into my pants to destroy the good name of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.” Was from a news article that I did not cite because I lost it. I did not think it was tripe. I was surprised at Petraeus' statement and suspicion of Broadwell's motives. I thought the quote had value. The statement was copied and pasted. I did not make it up. I am not that creative. It is on a news bulletin on line somewhere. Sorry, I goofed. It was not an attempt to vandalize. I keep forgetting every word I add on the Wikipedia without a citation has no value and is looked on with suspicion by others. I have also found citing from a published book that is somewhat obscure has no value. Even if the just of the material can immediately be found elsewhere. The curiosity of others is not at the same level as mine. I imagine you will never do a search for the quote and document it yourself, since you think it is tripe. We have different values and perceptions. To me a quote is only a quote. It has historical value. Kazuba ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:13, 10 November 2012
I found it again. [1] Kazuba ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:30, 10 November 2012
I am sorry 220 of Borg. I now see the source I used for the quote is flaky and cannot be trusted. I apologize. I was totally fooled by my haste and the impressive format. Please forgive me I meant no harm. Kazuba ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:08, 11 November 2012
Have you considered archiving this page? You can get a bot to do it if you want (there's some code at the top of my talk page you can copy and change my username to yours), but manual editing is easy enough when you don't have a very busy talk page. It just makes current discussions easier to find and reduces the page load time. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, The Magnificent Clean-keeper
The silliness at
Lech Kaczyński continues,
212.14.57.130 (
talk ·
contribs) (at
West Pomeranian University of Technology by the way) has re-added their unsourced fringe theories at least twice since you reverted them last. I have given them a lvl 3 warning for unsourced edits and also told them they are edit warring,
here. Just FYI, regards,
220
of
Borg
09:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMAS Coonawarra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Mareklug,
Thank you for correcting my edits at
IL-76 and
Aéro-Service that, as it tuned out, erroneously attributed the crashed aircraft to the wrong company.
I note that
http://aviation-safety.net has not updated their information yet! See relevant page
here. Regards,
220
of
Borg
01:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
220 of Borg, have you been in contact with the Collective lately? ≈ Learve ( talk) 13:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
And the compliments of the season to you, too! I hope it's been a good one for you! Grutness... wha? 03:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I was going through CAT:UAA when I noticed that you had made a username-policy notification at User talk:Angliss. Although it's not that important, and there's no real harm done, we usually ignore any improper usernames that haven't edited in a while, since they're likely to not edit again. In this case, the user last edited in October 2011, so that issue could have been ignored. But, like I said, no real harm done. Happy holidays.-- Slon02 ( talk) 21:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
← Over there ~Eric F 74.60.29.141 ( talk) 03:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing that to my attention! Happy editing, Spencer T♦ C 06:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hemilability, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dimerisation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
I have declined your request to speedy delete 2012 New Zealand primetime television schedule. I did this because WP:NOT is not a reason for speedy deleting a page - see the first example at WP:NOTCSD. If you think it should be deleted, feel free to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, 220 of Borg. I've responded to your comments on this article on my talk page. Cheers, Koro Neil ( talk) 13:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
And thanks for your response. Much appreciated. Koro Neil ( talk) 14:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Oranges Juicy ( talk) 06:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
...and again, in case you're not watching the thread! :) -- Oranges Juicy ( talk) 06:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Largoplazo. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Indian Air Force Day, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 10:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, 220 of Borg. I
welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or put {{helpme}}
(and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. You also might want to consider being "
adopted" by an experienced user who would show you how wikipedia works through a program called adopt-a-user. Again, welcome!
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
23:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, you know your way around, but I thought I'd leave you a template to get rid of the red link! ;) Now to give you everything I would have given you months ago but which the software won;t let me give to IPs! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Danny Rios has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Danny Rios was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://tokyoyakultswallows.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/rios-suspended-for-doping/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
15:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, the contributor is trying to erase the bad, yet factual history, and then to make it worse is trying to distort reality. Often time when trying to edit this particular page I encounter people like this. Even if you try to offer a rational solution or compromise they lash out. Unfortunately much like the wikipage the neighborhood itself has an identity crises. I am from the neighborhood and I would love to edit but my view would be biased too. But I will try to see if we can get somewhere with this contributor.-- El Mayimbe ( talk) 22:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello 220 of Borg. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Atlantis Vertigo Rave, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to raves. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 19:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabuderian Pluridisciplinary Methodology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabuderian Pluridisciplinary Methodology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy ( talk) 11:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Got an account, eh? HurricaneFan 25 — 18:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, page updated! Credits in the Edit Summary. How about sentence seven in the same para "On September 29, by the time Nesat managed to re-develop at 10 nautical miles (19 km; 12 mi) ragged eye," which also appears in the section Meteorological history, (secon para.) except it says "ab 10 nautical miles". - 220 of Borg 19:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Im not so expoert with Saab, but have to try keep on eye on that article, there seems to be lots of editors now when it went to bankruptcy --> Typ932 T· C 17:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Dear 220 of Borg, Thankyou for your message and sorry for such a late reply.
- I have done some editing (also wrote what I have edited in the page) letting people know what I have done. I have also removed some information and made it my graph a simple one. - I had originally posted the earthquaks from September due to February actually being considered a Aftershock of the 2010 Earthquake, I have removed the September ones off the graph though, as It does not apply to the 2011 Earthquake. - All the facts and information that is on the page is from GNS Science, Earthquake programme "Geonet New Zealand" which is funded by the Earthquake commission in New Zealand. I have gotten all information from and only them. I have not used information from other sources, as Geonet is the New Zealand earthquake seismology and the Information they get is much more accurate then other places in the world.
If there is anything else in which you are unhappy with I'll be happy to read and will reply a.s.a.p, Rifled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rifled ( talk • contribs) 02:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi thanks for your messages, I must say I'm not a expert at wikipedia but I am experienced in Earthquakes, my only problem is im not 100% familiar with wikipedia, and thus I must apologise and your messages are helping me do it right. Please message me if theres something I need doing. I am currently looking at how wikipedia is used, to help me in the future.
Rifled (
talk)
11:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
on your talk page, and an editor will visit you there to try to help you! -
220
of
Borg
12:54, 26 December 2011 (UTC):::: text
::::: text
<s>You are a bum</s>
to produce You are a bum
I wasn't aware that I was considered missing! :O That's perfectly fine. I hope you enjoy the rest of your holidays! Thanks, Nici Vampire Heart 06:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for that! I hope your festive season is merry and bright too :) Grutness... wha? 00:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Glad you found it useful. Your changes are perfectly fine. Thanks for letting me know. wiki-ny-2007 ( talk) 04:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Buckling restrained brace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connection ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Ok sir i am agree with you but problem with editing is that writing on wikipedia is too much controlled and regulated. I do not know why other users look for so much the extent of rightness in already right thing.There tens of wiki are there which simply shows that they are not neutral, they directly so the user relation with that religion,place,person why do n't you neutralize them.I am reading them from long time. First thing is that its too much difficult to decide which word will be better I do not know that "impressed" word was ok or not at place of "attracted" but what i can do, i think there is no else popular " young sufi singer" in india. And for that city that sentence was very very important. Secondly i do not understand if you know what is right and what is wrong why don't you made correction instead of deletion or reversion. I am on wikipedia since last one year but posting of such messages on user page and reversion is really bothering. Some one add text for information not for entertainment or publicity it should be understood by top users.
A man from Matrix ( talk) 21:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
You wrote a long paragraph to make me understand, thanks for that.I was having many queries and I asked few question from two three users but they are like robots. They behave like very professional persons. I don't know what's wrong in sharing information with others ;because they are approved good users.I am thankful to you that you replied in really good descriptive manner. I have many constraints.Everything is achievable but it just need time and lot of practice I was trying them in short time that is my mistake.But whatever I am writing on WP is just for information, knowledge and convenience. Because the area I have covered in my edits is the most backward area of India so I was trying to highlight these areas because I don't think it will be done by someone in the future. People here don't believe in study and area is full of illiterate people, no bus services,inferior roads, no power supply. But this area is part of India's most developed state.The information I am sharing hardly have any reference because no one bothers about these people and area so without reference information is useless (a/c to WP). But that sufi singer definitely having many references. As far as my name is concerned ,there is no need to worry about that because I will be no longer here on WP for edits to disturb the status of elite panel of WP. And I am sorry for my poor command over English language. It's not my tongue language and I started learning it few years ago.
Thank You Very Much.
A man from Matrix ( talk) 17:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Based on its current state, it's pretty clear that 2011–12 Los Angeles arson attacks needs some serious work. I've started a discussion about how to go forward at Talk:2011–12 Los Angeles arson attacks#One cleanup possibility, and you're invited to participate. Thanks in advance, Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I received you e-mail where you notificated my inclusion in the Missing Wikipedians list. It's true that I haven't been active as an editor for a while. However, I continue to enjoy reading Wikipedia every few days. I reply to all messages I receive on my user page. I don't know if this qualifies me as missing or not. Maybe missing is different from inactive. Anyway, All the best, Anna Lincoln 12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for the delayed response...but yes, happy to be of help. Personally, I think it meets the notability requirement. And I think the title's fine as is. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 17:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
A belated Merry Christmas from me. About time you got an account too ;) — James ( Talk • Contribs) • 6:04pm • 08:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your post. I think that SVT is largely dormant, however I know that a few people actively watch the page, including me. I'll definitely take a look at the link you posted. This is exactly the sort of thing that SVT was created for. Thanks again. Shadowjams ( talk) 23:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi 220_of_Borg. May I rustle your pines? Thanks for this revert, but if you check the diff, you'll see you used Template:uw-unsourced2. The 2 means it's a warning at level 2 on the 1-4 warning scale. Is there a reason why you chose level 2? Normally, first warning would be level 1, next=2, next=3, next=4, next=blocked. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_user_warnings/Usage_and_layout#Levels if you've not read it lately.
Actually there's no harm done, as the user again misbehaved, so I gave him a lvl2 also!
Anyway, I see you've taken to WP very quickly, and it's great you use TW to revert vandalism.
Happy editing, Trafford09 ( talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
@ Trafford09.
Hi, Trafford09, thank you for your POV. I class the welcome template I used as roughly equivalent to a level 1 warning. I think this is better than a immediate level 1 (agf) warning-only template as I; welcome the noob, 'chastise' them (without 'biting'), and point them in the right direction with links in case they are just a little misguided. They can't complain they weren't warned! So I would suggest upgrading yours to a level 3 warning.
In fact, having another look at their edit history (Esp. since your post) they have added un-sourced information to Costa Concordia 7 times across 3 hours, 5 times after first warning (and 3 more since your post here). They should be are blocked now! The last 5 edits was also the same text so edit warring and 3RR violation too. And that
text was rather un-encyclopedic and, potentially, needlessly distressing for any readers who knew passengers aboard that ship. On the other hand if it was true, not particularly relevant unless a RS mentioned it or a passenger was attacked by a predator.
• As a matter of procedure I have therefore added a {{
uw-ew}}
Edit warring Template to the editors collection.
And I agree with HJ, the warning level depends on the nature of the edit in question. A particularly bad, blatant and badly sourced or un-sourced BLP vio could and should result in an immediate higher lvl warning or even an immediate preventative block. Pines un-rustled.
220
of
Borg
02:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
@ HJ
AWOL!
Good to have you back! This
discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Cikgu Jasmin Airways may be of interest. -
220
of
Borg
02:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
aggh, that person is such a pest. I did around 20 corrective edits last night and I checked over many more that both you, User:Hawaiian717 and others did as well. That info box slipped past me. I did not keep a record of all the IPs being used but this person has been engaging in mischief editing with a clear and discernible pattern and style. On some of the articles it goes well back into december. I assume it is an established editor who has gone feral. I noted some standard corrective edits mixed in with earlier mischief edits. Some of the erroneous content is quite well disguised. Good work with all your clean ups, and thanks for saying hello. I hope this person soon sorts out whatever aircraft and airline information demons that have found their way into their cranial cavity. -- Felix ( talk) 04:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I will correct this mad things. Noel.guillet ( talk) 07:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Unnai Ninaithu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
When tagging a page witgh {{ copyvio}} please remember to also list it at WP:CP as described in the instructions in the template. The copyvio at Isa Khan has only jsut be dealt with as those that deal with copyvios at WP:CP were unaware of it. A bot would normally automatically list anything that was not listed but this was down for several months and it's best it is not relied upon. Dpmuk ( talk) 21:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Esophageal and Pectoralis ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your help at Anjulie! Mr. Absurd ( talk) 03:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Parrot AR.Drone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gyro ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Norman Allan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manly ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 04:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Dori ☾ Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thanks, deleted now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for popping by :) Fayedizard ( talk) 12:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Hurricanefan24 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Hurricanefan24 to accept or decline the nomination. A page will then be created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/220 of Borg. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. |
If "multi-player" is preferred over "multiplayer" (e. g. in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier), why didn't you start at Multiplayer video game? Nczempin ( talk) 13:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barnstarbob regarding recent edits of Chevrolet Vega. -- Biker Biker ( talk) 12:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your request to me via the Reference Desk ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science#Why_do_consumer_electronics_use_DC.3F) to register.
I have been much discouraged from registering by peanut admin folk discussing whether to block me on their (publicly accesible!) Admin noticeboard, admin discussions on whether I'm a troll, or someone else quite unlikely, and by their occaisional bizare discussion on blocking others. (notwithstanding that certain nuisances I could name popping up with impunity when they are bored - they will know who they are). As my IP address changes each time I boot up the PC, I can come and go as I wish. Registering would only make it easier from them to block me.
I always, unless it is obviously otherwise, assume OP's have posted their questions with genuine need to know.understand, or a genuine desire to know/understand, and I only post if the subject falls within my competence and I believe I am being helpful. I do challenge folk who have posted things incorrect. So it's a bit mystifying why Admin folk think I'm a threat - perhaps they have either too much or too litle to do. Keit 120.145.23.26 ( talk) 15:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
there must be some sort of error.the only change i have made to this account is changing the infobox title to "2012 aurora massacre" other than that i don't recall any other edits. talk) 21:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
i take wikipedia very seriously and yes i am aware that wikipedia is not myspace or facebook,i apologize if you think i am abusing my account.but i have not added any other edits other than changing the title to 2012 aurora massacre.this "i pray to god" message could not have been me.this could be he hacking problem that happened in my account but otherwise,it was not me personally.i will change my log-in in order for these problems to end talk) 14:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh you're not nagging it actually helps to know what i am doing wrong.I have to be taught these things because i am still a child and thanks for understanding the whole incident.I'll take your advice. VGB 6:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I am currently editing the page Monster In My Pocket since i have every figure and the last person who edited did not complete the figure list.I suppose you can see the edits i made to it.So check that page out and tell me what you think.By the way the page content that i edited is "More details about individual monsters". VGB 23:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Valē,
Neil Alden Armstrong (August 5, 1930 – August 25, 2012)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gadag-Betageri, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hindustani and Freedom fighters ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Boing.
thought that this link may be of interest in regards to the 6 September wp:AN/I 'follies',
•
"GOLD BAR WEBSITE CARRIES UNTRUTHFUL ARTICLE ABOUT NEWSPAPER AND CITIZENS" skyvalleychronicle.com. September 06, 2012. WP gets lots of mentions, c/w screencaps of relevant pages. I think that Ms. Block may have guaranteed that the information on her former WP page is now available elsewhere on the Internet (
http://www.ask.com/wiki/Anne_K._Block) for posterity. Regards -
220
of
Borg
03:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
First of all, a "Flare stack", a "Gas flare" and a "Blowdown stack" are all one and the same thing. In my 50 years of designing refineries and natural gas plants and operating them, the most common usage is "Flare stack". Flare stack exists now, but it redirects to Gas flare.
Merging Blowdown stack into Flare stack would require little if any actual merging. Perhaps your added reference to the BP explosion is all that is needed.
I would urge you to make those changes because I simply don't want to get involved in what may turn into a hassle. mbeychok ( talk) 15:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Timeshift9,
I have updated this page, basically added legal/charge details and refs. 'borrowed' from the pages for
Craig Thompson and
Michael Williamson, then expanded the scanty lead to cover them too. See
here. Enough? -
220
of
Borg
23:29, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Oh you missed the 'Liberal' Expense Liberation?
It happened in Peter Rieths Days.
Not sure
Derek R Bullamore (
t·
c) but for some reason, your edits seem to closely follow my tagging.
See
here,
again, and
also, perhaps
here too. Are you my first 'edit stalker' ?
-
220
of
Borg
10:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
You have got you reply on User talk:Greatuser Greatuser ( talk) 07:05, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Dear Borg,
I would like to show my appreciation for your multiple edits. I would like also to ask you to act on my behalf and to accept my edit request published at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eric_Dill#Edit_request_on_2_November_2012 I would appreciate you understanding. Best wishes, Daniel Dwdimov ( talk) 15:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC) |
I Goofed
I am sorry I lost the citation and could not find the documentation again. I am not very good on the computer. I tried and gave up. "Petraeus stated "Clearly, she (Broadwell) connived her way into my pants to destroy the good name of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.” Was from a news article that I did not cite because I lost it. I did not think it was tripe. I was surprised at Petraeus' statement and suspicion of Broadwell's motives. I thought the quote had value. The statement was copied and pasted. I did not make it up. I am not that creative. It is on a news bulletin on line somewhere. Sorry, I goofed. It was not an attempt to vandalize. I keep forgetting every word I add on the Wikipedia without a citation has no value and is looked on with suspicion by others. I have also found citing from a published book that is somewhat obscure has no value. Even if the just of the material can immediately be found elsewhere. The curiosity of others is not at the same level as mine. I imagine you will never do a search for the quote and document it yourself, since you think it is tripe. We have different values and perceptions. To me a quote is only a quote. It has historical value. Kazuba ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:13, 10 November 2012
I found it again. [1] Kazuba ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:30, 10 November 2012
I am sorry 220 of Borg. I now see the source I used for the quote is flaky and cannot be trusted. I apologize. I was totally fooled by my haste and the impressive format. Please forgive me I meant no harm. Kazuba ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:08, 11 November 2012
Have you considered archiving this page? You can get a bot to do it if you want (there's some code at the top of my talk page you can copy and change my username to yours), but manual editing is easy enough when you don't have a very busy talk page. It just makes current discussions easier to find and reduces the page load time. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, The Magnificent Clean-keeper
The silliness at
Lech Kaczyński continues,
212.14.57.130 (
talk ·
contribs) (at
West Pomeranian University of Technology by the way) has re-added their unsourced fringe theories at least twice since you reverted them last. I have given them a lvl 3 warning for unsourced edits and also told them they are edit warring,
here. Just FYI, regards,
220
of
Borg
09:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMAS Coonawarra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Mareklug,
Thank you for correcting my edits at
IL-76 and
Aéro-Service that, as it tuned out, erroneously attributed the crashed aircraft to the wrong company.
I note that
http://aviation-safety.net has not updated their information yet! See relevant page
here. Regards,
220
of
Borg
01:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
220 of Borg, have you been in contact with the Collective lately? ≈ Learve ( talk) 13:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
And the compliments of the season to you, too! I hope it's been a good one for you! Grutness... wha? 03:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I was going through CAT:UAA when I noticed that you had made a username-policy notification at User talk:Angliss. Although it's not that important, and there's no real harm done, we usually ignore any improper usernames that haven't edited in a while, since they're likely to not edit again. In this case, the user last edited in October 2011, so that issue could have been ignored. But, like I said, no real harm done. Happy holidays.-- Slon02 ( talk) 21:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
← Over there ~Eric F 74.60.29.141 ( talk) 03:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing that to my attention! Happy editing, Spencer T♦ C 06:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hemilability, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dimerisation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
I have declined your request to speedy delete 2012 New Zealand primetime television schedule. I did this because WP:NOT is not a reason for speedy deleting a page - see the first example at WP:NOTCSD. If you think it should be deleted, feel free to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, 220 of Borg. I've responded to your comments on this article on my talk page. Cheers, Koro Neil ( talk) 13:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
And thanks for your response. Much appreciated. Koro Neil ( talk) 14:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Oranges Juicy ( talk) 06:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
...and again, in case you're not watching the thread! :) -- Oranges Juicy ( talk) 06:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Largoplazo. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Indian Air Force Day, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 10:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery