Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 01:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC) El C ( talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, 202.161.58.88, is registered to Singapore Management University and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{ School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Kim Tae-yeon, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sni56996 ( talk) 07:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from discarding changes made to the list of champions and runner-ups, where those are merely deletions of references which are perfectly well-placed. The list has been consistently updated to include WTO and FDI champions and there is not reason for discarding such changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.208.6.251 ( talk) 09:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Moot court, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boomer Vial ^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 01:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 01:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

El C I feel like that was a bit unwarranted. They were trying to help clean up the mess that is Moot Court. Boomer Vial ^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 01:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

I'm seeing back and fourth adding then self-reverting for no apparent reason; done, perhaps, to provoke the content dispute to heat up. ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]} El_C 01:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

El C I know. I just assumed they couldn't figure out which version was the correct one, or something. One of the editors that was in the content dispute was blocked indefinitely by Bbb23 [5], so the only thing that I can think of is that the IP editor is a sock of HarrietNine. Boomer Vial ^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 01:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Either way, it's bizarre and disruptive—they can't claim testing either, because they've already edited the article extensively. But I'm open to hear their explanation. El_C 01:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

El C Sorry about questioning you, El. It just looked a bit odd that they were blocked right after I left a level-1 warning. Boomer Vial ^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 01:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Not at all. Being questioned makes me a better editor and admin. And I get that. I just didn't think warnings were needed for someone trying to stir up and instigate. But it's possible that I misread the situation and was just being paranoid. Certainly, as mentioned, I'm open to a reasonable explanation. El_C 01:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply