To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

05:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Peaceray ( talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at South Korea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Miller— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 ( talk) 03:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Three Sisters (Australia). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eteethan( talk) 01:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aboriginal peoples in Canada, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Aboriginal peoples in Canada was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954553 on 2015-11-24T01:20:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 01:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aboriginal peoples in Canada. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}| lambast 01:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

NawlinWiki ( talk) 03:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to God in Christianity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: God in Christianity was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978654 on 2016-02-09T04:05:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 04:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paleolithic religion. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Paleolithic religion was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975558 on 2016-02-09T23:22:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Paleolithic religion with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Cannolis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Black has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cannolis ( talk) 01:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to State of Origin series— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888979 on 2016-09-06T03:37:35+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 03:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Australian gold rushes, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Australian gold rushes was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95446 on 2016-09-06T23:00:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Australian gold rushes. Little Will ( talk) 23:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Darylgolden. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Izanami-no-Mikoto— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Darylgolden^{( talk)} Ping when replying 02:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Izanami-no-Mikoto. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Izanami-no-Mikoto was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972444 on 2017-11-23T02:43:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Diversion program—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic ( talk) 05:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm TK421bsod. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to History of clothing and textiles—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TK421bsod ( talk) 00:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Nile—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Qzd ( talk) 00:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of The Next Step characters—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to A. Richard Newton has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: A. Richard Newton was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95687 on 2020-09-22T23:25:06+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Transaction processing system have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Transaction processing system was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872837 on 2021-02-22T01:04:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 01:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Novo Tape. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stock dilution have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) ^{My Talk Page} 00:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stock dilution. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stock dilution was changed by 125.253.45.106 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978605 on 2023-04-26T00:22:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 00:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Wikipedialuva. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Today Newspapers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipedialuva ( talk) 00:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hedy Lamarr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Peaceray ( talk) 05:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Today Newspapers, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray ( talk) 05:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC) reply