I'm Pdebee, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Although you're free to perform most tasks on Wikipedia without registering, it's highly recommended you create an account as there are many added benefits. It's private and secure and it's also free, simple, and quick to do.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. If you register an account, you can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you could put a link to it on your user page.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
IP address linked to
your contributions page (however, if you create an account, your IP address will be hidden and you will be able to build a custom signature that can link to your own user page), a link to this IP's talk page, and a
timestamp.Sincerely, Patrick. ツ
Pdebee.
(talk)(
guestbook)
11:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
[New section after the fact to fix my own having inattentive replied in the wrong place.]
{{static IP}}
is not part of {{Welcome to Wikipedia}}
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
01:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
02:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
04:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)(
edit conflict) I added the template. It's a standard template, found on
WP:Twinkle, and part of group of IP user page templates found on hundreds of thousands of IP user pages. It does say "Welcome" right on it, and encourages IP users to
create an account, which has many benefits, including anonymity, and
Fred Gandt has been on WP long enough to know this (curious as to why he's watching this page, responded so quickly, and made no effort to clarify the benign nature of the template. His comment actually does quite the opposite). It's not a warning, and there is nothing nefarious or otherwise negative about it. The only information there, specific to this account, is openly available with the IP address, that you sign every comment with, and is stamped on every edit you make. You
removed it contrary to WP
guidelines, with the edit summary: "removing Static IP header, as it's unclear why it was added, and seems to have unwanted connotations
". Just what "connotations" are you referring to? I look forward to your reply. Meanwhile, the template should be re-added. -
wolf
02:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
02:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I've added hundreds, perhaps thousands of these templates, and along with the thousands more on pages I've seen that we're already added by other users... I really don't think I've ever seen anyone react to it the way you have (one might even characterize it as an "over-reaction"). I don't see what you find so "confusing and counter-intuitive
" about it, perhaps you could clarify that. And it is a "welcome" template... it says "welcome" right on it. It is placed at the top off the page automatically, and really, it doesn't make sense to have placed at the bottom, mixed in with other threads and notices. It could be over-looked. And while other contents can be removed, this one shouldn't. There are no hidden or alterior motives here.
You stated there were "unwanted connotations
" to the template (twice! so far...) You have not clarified that (and yes, when you
post a complaint, part of it in ALL CAPS, that's considered
screaming). You wrote; "I might be overthinking this, but the connotations seem to be 'SIGN UP FOR AN ACCOUNT OR ELSE WE'LL LOUDLY DISCUSS WHERE YOU ARE'.
" Really? You think the template is some kind of threat? If you don't sign up for an account, someone (the
secret cabal I suppose) will loudly (in ALL CAPS I suppose) make a point of posting your location on talk pages... somewhere (even though that's not allowed and just not done)... you really believe that's the message here? You believe that's the actual intent of that template? If you believe that such sinister functions exist on this project, why take part? And if you you're so concerned about your location being revealed, then why are you plastering your IP address all over the place? Why not opt for an account that affords you the privacy you seek?
Lastly, per WP:UP (as stated above) but specifically WP:UP#CMT:
A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes:
For IP editors, templates and notes left to indicate other users share the same IP address. This includes schools, military installations, WiFi hotspots, and other shared IP addresses, but not dynamic IP addresses.
So as I said, it shouldn't have been removed and should probably go back. There's nothing evil going on here. I'm trying to address your concerns, but it would be helpful if your responses didn't provide vague/non-answers, while adding more accusations and comments that just need additional clarification. Thank you - wolf 04:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Coryphantha Talk 12:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
I notice you make positive contributions to wikipedia. You should make an account. I think you'd make for a good member of our community. VR talk 18:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
You’ve made very positive contributions and consistently contribute to talk page conversations. You should make an account, you’d make an EXCELLENT member of the WP community! (Not that you don’t already, but be recognized for your efforts! :)) Spf121188 ( talk) 03:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
747pilot ( talk) 15:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 19:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Have you used any prior account on Wikipedia? I'm thinking User:Ledenierhomme and his various socks. nableezy - 19:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnlightenmentNow1792 ( talk • contribs)
@ Nableezy: I was fairly puzzled by this comment having been left on my talk page -- with your signature and an old datestamp, and none added by the actual message-sender. But apparently it's an unsigned c'n'p of this message that you originally left for EnlightenmentNow1792. Rather odd behaviour by most standards, but as nothing for that user. (I'd have left this on your own page, but evidently I can't; I assume due to unflagged semi-protection.) Just thought you might like to know. 109.255.211.6 ( talk) 13:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi there. Just FYI, WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK only applies to "currently active block"s. Firefangledfeathers ( talk | contribs) 14:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Perhaps a 1-on-1 will be more productive ( WP:TALKSTALK aside). I think the origins of WP:NSPORTS now expose it to WP:WIKILAWYERING. NSPORTS sought to identify objective conditions what were quick, reliable indicators that WP:GNG could be met. Therefore, the spirit was not to evade GNG, but to complement it. Along the way, some sports added leagues that were not good indicators that GNG could be met. Ideally, those league get removed. Instead, all leagues have been removed. Now some want to cripple NSPORTS even more, and render it useless in any AfD. Meanwhile, WP:N reads that a page meeting SNG is presumed to be notable. Thus, I see the two problems being:
The participation criteria are now being revisited. A bit more drastic than I think was needed, but some specific sports' inaction brought this onto the whole of NSPORTS. OK. I just don't see where we now need to further neuter "Keep: meets NSPORTS" because NSPORTS "relies" on GNG. Interested in your ideas. Cheers.— Bagumba ( talk) 06:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Mhawk10 ( talk) 21:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
No you indented it as a reply to me, you add an 1 indent to reply to a user.
You indent is so that is is one "indent" from the user you're replying to. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
News sources that explicitly debunk your POV: AFP, [1] BBC, [2] DW, [3] CNN, [4] WashPo, [5], Financial Times, [6].
The acknowledged scholarly experts (A. Umland, K. Fedorenko, A. Shekhovtsov, and others) publishing in Peer-reviewed academic journals that explicitly debunk your POV:
Gomza, I., & Zajaczkowski, J. (2019). Black Sun Rising: Political Opportunity Structure Perceptions and Institutionalization of the Azov Movement in Post-Euromaidan Ukraine. Nationalities Papers, 47(5), 774-800.
Fedorenko, K., & Umland, A. (2022). Between Frontline and Parliament: Ukrainian Political Parties and Irregular Armed Groups in 2014–2019. Nationalities Papers, 50(2), 237-261.
Umland, A. (2019). "Irregular Militias and Radical Nationalism in Post-Euromaydan Ukraine: The Prehistory and Emergence of the “Azov” Battalion in 2014." Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(1).
Fedorenko, K. Umland, A. (2019). "Zwischen Front und Parlament: Freiwilligenverbände und Parteien in der Ukraine." OSTEUROPA, 69. Jg., 3 4/2019, 163-176.
- EnlightenmentNow1792 ( talk) 11:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
References
Hello! You seem to have an interest in the recent death of Elizabeth II, so I wanted to invite to the WikiProject of Current Events new task force The London Bridge Task Force, which will be working on improving all the articles around the death of Elizabeth II. A task force is similar to a WikiProject, which is where you can communicate with other editors who all have the same goal, which is improving all the articles around a specific topic. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip ( talk) 23:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. Will you please place state your position in the 'survey section' of the Ocean RFC. GoodDay ( talk) 23:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
So, quick note, the Queen Elizabeth disambiguation page doesn't mention russian liz at all. I understand she was empress, not queen, but considering the interchangeability of terms (the DAB mentions Empress Elisabeth of Austria), I'm surprised it doesn't mention her. FrederalBacon ( talk) 04:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Trickle-down economics, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. —
Moops ⋠
T⋡
05:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Unnecessarily ( talk) 15:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
I was invited by Adakiko to enter a discussion on his talk page. I didn't realize there would be other people offering advice. I shall indeed make myself acquainted with the two you suggested, and then hopefully get back to the conversation.
Unnecessarily ( talk) 15:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (109.255.211.6) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page.
Again, welcome! SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 15:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
FWIW, your position at the RFC (at Charles III) that DrKay has opened (concerning the infobox), comes across a tad incoherent. I'm not entirely certain as to what you're arguing for. GoodDay ( talk) 19:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Still can't get direct answer out of you. Can't say I didn't try. GoodDay ( talk) 20:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Letting you know, an edit-conflict between us created a mess on the talkpage. I had to revert your post, to correct the mess. GoodDay ( talk) 23:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Later today, I'll contact the rest of the WikiProjects about the Charles III task force. Like WP:Saint Lucia, WP:Papua New Guinea, etc. GoodDay ( talk) 11:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Oceanic dolphin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (
talk)
16:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
109, you've proven yourself time and time again to be an excellent contributor to talk page discussions and unprotected articles, even if we don't always agree on everything. I know that you know the benefits to account creation, so I'm not going to condescendingly remind you of them, but I do think you should consider; it would make changing content in Charles's article easier, for example.
Best wishes, Tim O'Doherty ( talk) 18:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
Great job pushing the DYK section on
Talk:Charles III on a path toward archiving (hopefully)! In all seriousness, the section probably would have languished on the talk page for another year or two if you hadn't noticed it.
By the way, I'm glad to see you active again. You're a great editor and Wikipedia is lucky to have you around. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 02:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC) |
Please see https://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/dfhd/page_fhbro_eng.aspx?id=2795 Rideau Hall is a vice-regal residence. It is the official residence of the governor general. Wellington Bay ( talk) 18:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
1) According to the Parks Canada website:
2) According to Canadian Heritage's schools page Rideau Hall is the:
3) The Governor General's website says Rideau Hall is:
4) The website of the National Capital Commission, which administers the property, says:
5) The Government of Canada (National Capital Commission) publication Official Residences of Canada says:
6)A Crown of Maples on page 5 has a portrait of the Queen with the following cutline:
Wellington Bay ( talk) 19:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
It was meant to be read with a southern drawl. lol
Thanks for the correction. ₪ MIESIANIACAL 21:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at
Talk:Monarchy of Canada, is considered
bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
--Picard's Facepalm •
Made It So
Engage! •
20:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
=;An Invite to join WikiProject Canada
![]() Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Canada. I'd like to invite you to become a part of the many Canadian related WikiProjects. The goal of WikiProject Canada is to improve the quality and quantity of information about the country on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject main page for more information. |
Moxy🍁 21:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Dependent territories of the United Kingdom, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Clyde H. Mapping (
talk)
13:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to climate change, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 12:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
... anyone may alert..., emph. added. I'm quite sure this was simply a slight misunderstanding on your part or perhaps just a hasty choice of words. But it's an unfortunate look in the context of throwing phrases like "you are not ready to edit in the CTOPICs area".
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Mezzanine (album), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 07:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
I'm Pdebee, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Although you're free to perform most tasks on Wikipedia without registering, it's highly recommended you create an account as there are many added benefits. It's private and secure and it's also free, simple, and quick to do.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. If you register an account, you can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you could put a link to it on your user page.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
IP address linked to
your contributions page (however, if you create an account, your IP address will be hidden and you will be able to build a custom signature that can link to your own user page), a link to this IP's talk page, and a
timestamp.Sincerely, Patrick. ツ
Pdebee.
(talk)(
guestbook)
11:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
[New section after the fact to fix my own having inattentive replied in the wrong place.]
{{static IP}}
is not part of {{Welcome to Wikipedia}}
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
01:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
02:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
04:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)(
edit conflict) I added the template. It's a standard template, found on
WP:Twinkle, and part of group of IP user page templates found on hundreds of thousands of IP user pages. It does say "Welcome" right on it, and encourages IP users to
create an account, which has many benefits, including anonymity, and
Fred Gandt has been on WP long enough to know this (curious as to why he's watching this page, responded so quickly, and made no effort to clarify the benign nature of the template. His comment actually does quite the opposite). It's not a warning, and there is nothing nefarious or otherwise negative about it. The only information there, specific to this account, is openly available with the IP address, that you sign every comment with, and is stamped on every edit you make. You
removed it contrary to WP
guidelines, with the edit summary: "removing Static IP header, as it's unclear why it was added, and seems to have unwanted connotations
". Just what "connotations" are you referring to? I look forward to your reply. Meanwhile, the template should be re-added. -
wolf
02:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Fred Gandt ·
talk ·
contribs
02:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I've added hundreds, perhaps thousands of these templates, and along with the thousands more on pages I've seen that we're already added by other users... I really don't think I've ever seen anyone react to it the way you have (one might even characterize it as an "over-reaction"). I don't see what you find so "confusing and counter-intuitive
" about it, perhaps you could clarify that. And it is a "welcome" template... it says "welcome" right on it. It is placed at the top off the page automatically, and really, it doesn't make sense to have placed at the bottom, mixed in with other threads and notices. It could be over-looked. And while other contents can be removed, this one shouldn't. There are no hidden or alterior motives here.
You stated there were "unwanted connotations
" to the template (twice! so far...) You have not clarified that (and yes, when you
post a complaint, part of it in ALL CAPS, that's considered
screaming). You wrote; "I might be overthinking this, but the connotations seem to be 'SIGN UP FOR AN ACCOUNT OR ELSE WE'LL LOUDLY DISCUSS WHERE YOU ARE'.
" Really? You think the template is some kind of threat? If you don't sign up for an account, someone (the
secret cabal I suppose) will loudly (in ALL CAPS I suppose) make a point of posting your location on talk pages... somewhere (even though that's not allowed and just not done)... you really believe that's the message here? You believe that's the actual intent of that template? If you believe that such sinister functions exist on this project, why take part? And if you you're so concerned about your location being revealed, then why are you plastering your IP address all over the place? Why not opt for an account that affords you the privacy you seek?
Lastly, per WP:UP (as stated above) but specifically WP:UP#CMT:
A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes:
For IP editors, templates and notes left to indicate other users share the same IP address. This includes schools, military installations, WiFi hotspots, and other shared IP addresses, but not dynamic IP addresses.
So as I said, it shouldn't have been removed and should probably go back. There's nothing evil going on here. I'm trying to address your concerns, but it would be helpful if your responses didn't provide vague/non-answers, while adding more accusations and comments that just need additional clarification. Thank you - wolf 04:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Coryphantha Talk 12:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
I notice you make positive contributions to wikipedia. You should make an account. I think you'd make for a good member of our community. VR talk 18:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
You’ve made very positive contributions and consistently contribute to talk page conversations. You should make an account, you’d make an EXCELLENT member of the WP community! (Not that you don’t already, but be recognized for your efforts! :)) Spf121188 ( talk) 03:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
747pilot ( talk) 15:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 19:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Have you used any prior account on Wikipedia? I'm thinking User:Ledenierhomme and his various socks. nableezy - 19:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnlightenmentNow1792 ( talk • contribs)
@ Nableezy: I was fairly puzzled by this comment having been left on my talk page -- with your signature and an old datestamp, and none added by the actual message-sender. But apparently it's an unsigned c'n'p of this message that you originally left for EnlightenmentNow1792. Rather odd behaviour by most standards, but as nothing for that user. (I'd have left this on your own page, but evidently I can't; I assume due to unflagged semi-protection.) Just thought you might like to know. 109.255.211.6 ( talk) 13:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi there. Just FYI, WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK only applies to "currently active block"s. Firefangledfeathers ( talk | contribs) 14:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Perhaps a 1-on-1 will be more productive ( WP:TALKSTALK aside). I think the origins of WP:NSPORTS now expose it to WP:WIKILAWYERING. NSPORTS sought to identify objective conditions what were quick, reliable indicators that WP:GNG could be met. Therefore, the spirit was not to evade GNG, but to complement it. Along the way, some sports added leagues that were not good indicators that GNG could be met. Ideally, those league get removed. Instead, all leagues have been removed. Now some want to cripple NSPORTS even more, and render it useless in any AfD. Meanwhile, WP:N reads that a page meeting SNG is presumed to be notable. Thus, I see the two problems being:
The participation criteria are now being revisited. A bit more drastic than I think was needed, but some specific sports' inaction brought this onto the whole of NSPORTS. OK. I just don't see where we now need to further neuter "Keep: meets NSPORTS" because NSPORTS "relies" on GNG. Interested in your ideas. Cheers.— Bagumba ( talk) 06:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Mhawk10 ( talk) 21:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
No you indented it as a reply to me, you add an 1 indent to reply to a user.
You indent is so that is is one "indent" from the user you're replying to. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
News sources that explicitly debunk your POV: AFP, [1] BBC, [2] DW, [3] CNN, [4] WashPo, [5], Financial Times, [6].
The acknowledged scholarly experts (A. Umland, K. Fedorenko, A. Shekhovtsov, and others) publishing in Peer-reviewed academic journals that explicitly debunk your POV:
Gomza, I., & Zajaczkowski, J. (2019). Black Sun Rising: Political Opportunity Structure Perceptions and Institutionalization of the Azov Movement in Post-Euromaidan Ukraine. Nationalities Papers, 47(5), 774-800.
Fedorenko, K., & Umland, A. (2022). Between Frontline and Parliament: Ukrainian Political Parties and Irregular Armed Groups in 2014–2019. Nationalities Papers, 50(2), 237-261.
Umland, A. (2019). "Irregular Militias and Radical Nationalism in Post-Euromaydan Ukraine: The Prehistory and Emergence of the “Azov” Battalion in 2014." Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(1).
Fedorenko, K. Umland, A. (2019). "Zwischen Front und Parlament: Freiwilligenverbände und Parteien in der Ukraine." OSTEUROPA, 69. Jg., 3 4/2019, 163-176.
- EnlightenmentNow1792 ( talk) 11:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
References
Hello! You seem to have an interest in the recent death of Elizabeth II, so I wanted to invite to the WikiProject of Current Events new task force The London Bridge Task Force, which will be working on improving all the articles around the death of Elizabeth II. A task force is similar to a WikiProject, which is where you can communicate with other editors who all have the same goal, which is improving all the articles around a specific topic. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip ( talk) 23:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. Will you please place state your position in the 'survey section' of the Ocean RFC. GoodDay ( talk) 23:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
So, quick note, the Queen Elizabeth disambiguation page doesn't mention russian liz at all. I understand she was empress, not queen, but considering the interchangeability of terms (the DAB mentions Empress Elisabeth of Austria), I'm surprised it doesn't mention her. FrederalBacon ( talk) 04:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Trickle-down economics, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. —
Moops ⋠
T⋡
05:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Unnecessarily ( talk) 15:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
I was invited by Adakiko to enter a discussion on his talk page. I didn't realize there would be other people offering advice. I shall indeed make myself acquainted with the two you suggested, and then hopefully get back to the conversation.
Unnecessarily ( talk) 15:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (109.255.211.6) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page.
Again, welcome! SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 15:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
FWIW, your position at the RFC (at Charles III) that DrKay has opened (concerning the infobox), comes across a tad incoherent. I'm not entirely certain as to what you're arguing for. GoodDay ( talk) 19:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Still can't get direct answer out of you. Can't say I didn't try. GoodDay ( talk) 20:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Letting you know, an edit-conflict between us created a mess on the talkpage. I had to revert your post, to correct the mess. GoodDay ( talk) 23:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Later today, I'll contact the rest of the WikiProjects about the Charles III task force. Like WP:Saint Lucia, WP:Papua New Guinea, etc. GoodDay ( talk) 11:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Oceanic dolphin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (
talk)
16:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
109, you've proven yourself time and time again to be an excellent contributor to talk page discussions and unprotected articles, even if we don't always agree on everything. I know that you know the benefits to account creation, so I'm not going to condescendingly remind you of them, but I do think you should consider; it would make changing content in Charles's article easier, for example.
Best wishes, Tim O'Doherty ( talk) 18:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
Great job pushing the DYK section on
Talk:Charles III on a path toward archiving (hopefully)! In all seriousness, the section probably would have languished on the talk page for another year or two if you hadn't noticed it.
By the way, I'm glad to see you active again. You're a great editor and Wikipedia is lucky to have you around. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 02:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC) |
Please see https://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/dfhd/page_fhbro_eng.aspx?id=2795 Rideau Hall is a vice-regal residence. It is the official residence of the governor general. Wellington Bay ( talk) 18:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
1) According to the Parks Canada website:
2) According to Canadian Heritage's schools page Rideau Hall is the:
3) The Governor General's website says Rideau Hall is:
4) The website of the National Capital Commission, which administers the property, says:
5) The Government of Canada (National Capital Commission) publication Official Residences of Canada says:
6)A Crown of Maples on page 5 has a portrait of the Queen with the following cutline:
Wellington Bay ( talk) 19:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
It was meant to be read with a southern drawl. lol
Thanks for the correction. ₪ MIESIANIACAL 21:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at
Talk:Monarchy of Canada, is considered
bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
--Picard's Facepalm •
Made It So
Engage! •
20:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
=;An Invite to join WikiProject Canada
![]() Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Canada. I'd like to invite you to become a part of the many Canadian related WikiProjects. The goal of WikiProject Canada is to improve the quality and quantity of information about the country on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject main page for more information. |
Moxy🍁 21:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Dependent territories of the United Kingdom, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Clyde H. Mapping (
talk)
13:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to climate change, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 12:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
... anyone may alert..., emph. added. I'm quite sure this was simply a slight misunderstanding on your part or perhaps just a hasty choice of words. But it's an unfortunate look in the context of throwing phrases like "you are not ready to edit in the CTOPICs area".
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Mezzanine (album), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 07:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |