![]() |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
Thanks for this ! Daniel Case ( talk) 22:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
I appreciate many of the great edits you've helped out with so far. I would just like to ask you to keep WP:NPOV and WP:STICKTOSOURCE in mind while dealing with articles about anti-abortion extremism/terrorism. Even though these people committed heinous acts, it is important that we only relay what is in reliable sourcing, and try to not include our own views of the subject matter. I know this may feel like whitewashing bureaucracy or some such, but it's a matter of verifiability and that we (ourselves) are not considered reliable sources. If you feel some of the changes I undid are of absolute necessity, please feel free to start a discussion at the talk page of the relevant articles and garner consensus for your ideas. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 04:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Chill the fuck out. Drmies ( talk) 00:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics. If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Happy editing! BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC) Hi, and best wishes! I notice some of your WP:Edit summaries state arguments or reasons rather than simply explaining what you've done. WP editors are supposed to use the WP:Talk pages to explain their reasoning; the Edit summaries should simply summarize the edits. Happy editing! BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
|
I looked through your contributions and you seem to have a fairly in-depth understanding of policy, so I'm not going to slap you with a prewritten template for this. Howeve, I reverted your edit because I didn't think it was very good. Apart from what I said in the edit summary (the quote from Clarke was accurate, the editorialization was inappropriate) I don't have a major disagreement with your changes -- if you created a section on the talk page I'd be glad to discuss it. jp× g 02:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Engr. Smitty. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Megan Ellison—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Engr.
Smitty
Werben
06:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
"Legal scholar" is his profession. "Law professor at Harvard University" is his current employment. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
![]() |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
Thanks for this ! Daniel Case ( talk) 22:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
I appreciate many of the great edits you've helped out with so far. I would just like to ask you to keep WP:NPOV and WP:STICKTOSOURCE in mind while dealing with articles about anti-abortion extremism/terrorism. Even though these people committed heinous acts, it is important that we only relay what is in reliable sourcing, and try to not include our own views of the subject matter. I know this may feel like whitewashing bureaucracy or some such, but it's a matter of verifiability and that we (ourselves) are not considered reliable sources. If you feel some of the changes I undid are of absolute necessity, please feel free to start a discussion at the talk page of the relevant articles and garner consensus for your ideas. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 04:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Chill the fuck out. Drmies ( talk) 00:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics. If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Happy editing! BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC) Hi, and best wishes! I notice some of your WP:Edit summaries state arguments or reasons rather than simply explaining what you've done. WP editors are supposed to use the WP:Talk pages to explain their reasoning; the Edit summaries should simply summarize the edits. Happy editing! BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
|
I looked through your contributions and you seem to have a fairly in-depth understanding of policy, so I'm not going to slap you with a prewritten template for this. Howeve, I reverted your edit because I didn't think it was very good. Apart from what I said in the edit summary (the quote from Clarke was accurate, the editorialization was inappropriate) I don't have a major disagreement with your changes -- if you created a section on the talk page I'd be glad to discuss it. jp× g 02:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Engr. Smitty. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Megan Ellison—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Engr.
Smitty
Werben
06:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
"Legal scholar" is his profession. "Law professor at Harvard University" is his current employment. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |