Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jericho High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neptune (mythology). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Evan Goldberg have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Why did you cite a nonexistent tweet with the title "Lisa's ATM code is 6969"? — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs) 01:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Naya Rivera, you may be blocked from editing. Stating a fact about production that is cited elsewhere in the article, as standard, is not speculation nor inappropriate. If you are reading something else into it and don't like it, that's you unable to understand the purpose of the note column. Kingsif ( talk) 21:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Children's and Family Emmy Award for Outstanding Children's or Family Viewing Series, you may be blocked from editing. We have a specific process ( WP:AFD) for proposing the deletion of articles. Boldly blanking and redirecting for the purposes of pushing your opinion without consensus is unconstructive and disruptive. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I'm sorry about what I did was blocked by sockpuppet and trying to removed edit such as "Toonturama", I promise I'll become a very better person when I was expiring next year. Thanks. 2600:100C:B24B:3290:B8CA:B5DA:FA42:87A9 ( talk) 20:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 108.41.81.126!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
echidnaLives -
talk -
edits 01:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
|
I noticed that you had reverted a large number of edits of mine, where I added shows that aired on Disney+, Paramount+, and HBO Max to various "List of [X Year] American television debuts". Allow me to explain my thought process behind adding them
I was referring to the following pages ( List of Disney+ original programming, List of HBO Max original programming, and List of Paramount+ original programming), and if a show mentioned there was absent in the "List of [X Year] American television debuts" page, I added it (though I ignored tables for non-English language programming, continuations, and co-productions). Similarly, if a show mentioned on the "TV Debuts by year" table, I investigated the show and removed it if it was a non-American production. In short, I was trying to put the various pages in synch with each other. I actually have a full list of un-synched shows on an excel sheet 194.80.233.40 ( talk) 08:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pokémon (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss ( talk) 01:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dr. Phil (talk show), you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
DatGuy
Talk
Contribs 20:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)>
108.41.81.126 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no legitimate evidence to these sockpuppetry allegations. BaldiBasicsFan has made extreme attacks on my character and wanted to get the person they were arguing with out of the way so they didn’t have to endure any pushback for their argument. Please take a look at Talk:Justin Roiland for the pertinent discussions. BaldiBasicsFan has a clear history of stoking arguments with other users, and his attempt to tie the people he clearly has personal biases against other users he’s had problems with shouldve never been taken seriously.
Decline reason:
WP:NOTTHEM Ponyo bons mots 22:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
108.41.81.126 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no legitimate evidence to these sockpuppetry allegations. BaldiBasicsFan has made extreme attacks on my character and wanted to get the person they were arguing with out of the way so they didn’t have to endure any pushback for their argument. Please take a look at Talk:Justin Roiland for the pertinent discussions. BaldiBasicsFan has a clear history of stoking arguments with other users, and his attempt to tie the people he clearly has personal biases against other users he’s had problems with shouldve never been taken seriously. I was never notified I was under investigation. I was therefore never given the chance to properly defend myself under the same rules, instead only after I was blocked. WP:NOTTHEM should absolutely not apply here. How am I supposed to properly defend myself against accusations of sockpuppeting without discussing how the accusations came to be, exploring motive for false accusations and bad-faith arguing from the accuser? I am a separate individual who was targeted in bad faith and therefore accusations of sockpuppeting cannot stand. If you're trying to get me to change my ways, what ways are those? What is there for me to improve upon if the accusations are false and don't actually reflect the situation?
Decline reason:
This is even worse than the first request. See WP:NOTTHEM. You were blocked for your actions, not those of others, and that's all you should discuss. 331dot ( talk) 23:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, 108.41.81.126. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Back on the Record with Bob Costas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, 108.41.81.126. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Back on the Record with Bob Costas".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 15:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jericho High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neptune (mythology). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Evan Goldberg have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Why did you cite a nonexistent tweet with the title "Lisa's ATM code is 6969"? — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs) 01:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Naya Rivera, you may be blocked from editing. Stating a fact about production that is cited elsewhere in the article, as standard, is not speculation nor inappropriate. If you are reading something else into it and don't like it, that's you unable to understand the purpose of the note column. Kingsif ( talk) 21:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Children's and Family Emmy Award for Outstanding Children's or Family Viewing Series, you may be blocked from editing. We have a specific process ( WP:AFD) for proposing the deletion of articles. Boldly blanking and redirecting for the purposes of pushing your opinion without consensus is unconstructive and disruptive. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I'm sorry about what I did was blocked by sockpuppet and trying to removed edit such as "Toonturama", I promise I'll become a very better person when I was expiring next year. Thanks. 2600:100C:B24B:3290:B8CA:B5DA:FA42:87A9 ( talk) 20:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 108.41.81.126!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
echidnaLives -
talk -
edits 01:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
|
I noticed that you had reverted a large number of edits of mine, where I added shows that aired on Disney+, Paramount+, and HBO Max to various "List of [X Year] American television debuts". Allow me to explain my thought process behind adding them
I was referring to the following pages ( List of Disney+ original programming, List of HBO Max original programming, and List of Paramount+ original programming), and if a show mentioned there was absent in the "List of [X Year] American television debuts" page, I added it (though I ignored tables for non-English language programming, continuations, and co-productions). Similarly, if a show mentioned on the "TV Debuts by year" table, I investigated the show and removed it if it was a non-American production. In short, I was trying to put the various pages in synch with each other. I actually have a full list of un-synched shows on an excel sheet 194.80.233.40 ( talk) 08:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pokémon (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss ( talk) 01:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dr. Phil (talk show), you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
DatGuy
Talk
Contribs 20:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)>
108.41.81.126 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no legitimate evidence to these sockpuppetry allegations. BaldiBasicsFan has made extreme attacks on my character and wanted to get the person they were arguing with out of the way so they didn’t have to endure any pushback for their argument. Please take a look at Talk:Justin Roiland for the pertinent discussions. BaldiBasicsFan has a clear history of stoking arguments with other users, and his attempt to tie the people he clearly has personal biases against other users he’s had problems with shouldve never been taken seriously.
Decline reason:
WP:NOTTHEM Ponyo bons mots 22:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
108.41.81.126 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no legitimate evidence to these sockpuppetry allegations. BaldiBasicsFan has made extreme attacks on my character and wanted to get the person they were arguing with out of the way so they didn’t have to endure any pushback for their argument. Please take a look at Talk:Justin Roiland for the pertinent discussions. BaldiBasicsFan has a clear history of stoking arguments with other users, and his attempt to tie the people he clearly has personal biases against other users he’s had problems with shouldve never been taken seriously. I was never notified I was under investigation. I was therefore never given the chance to properly defend myself under the same rules, instead only after I was blocked. WP:NOTTHEM should absolutely not apply here. How am I supposed to properly defend myself against accusations of sockpuppeting without discussing how the accusations came to be, exploring motive for false accusations and bad-faith arguing from the accuser? I am a separate individual who was targeted in bad faith and therefore accusations of sockpuppeting cannot stand. If you're trying to get me to change my ways, what ways are those? What is there for me to improve upon if the accusations are false and don't actually reflect the situation?
Decline reason:
This is even worse than the first request. See WP:NOTTHEM. You were blocked for your actions, not those of others, and that's all you should discuss. 331dot ( talk) 23:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, 108.41.81.126. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Back on the Record with Bob Costas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, 108.41.81.126. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Back on the Record with Bob Costas".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 15:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |