Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
You seem to constantly edit various articles without adding any valuable sources and did not seem constructive to me. I recommend you use the talk page first before making such edits to the number of articles you edited. Thanks. ( N0n3up ( talk) 07:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC))
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lone Wolf McQuade— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jus da fax 07:16, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Victoria Harbour crossings, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Citobun ( talk) 11:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to President of Singapore. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 ( talk) 03:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cassini–Huygens, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 03:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ash (disambiguation). -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 04:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Names go on Ash (name) See wp:No personal attacks Jim1138 ( talk) 04:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Okay, sorry. And thanks.Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page). But please, tell the other guy to stop making threats. I mean, how was I to know this?
101.178.163.208 (
talk) 04:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Is a minor character in The Human Sexipede i.e. does not meet wp:notable (people). Create an article for Jordan Ash, then add his name to wp:disambiguation pages. Jim1138 ( talk) 05:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Caribbean Sea. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. BilCat ( talk) 09:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rachel Dolezal, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SwagGangster ★ 01:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rachel Dolezal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SwagGangster ★ 01:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Caribbean Sea. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 ( talk) 03:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Singapore Changi Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Jim1138 (
talk) 03:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Your edits at Interstate 110 show a possible comptence issue, as you twice inserted a circular redirect that led back to the dab about a road that was already mentioned on the pae. Doug Weller talk 08:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This edit [1] claiming many people said the pilot was Muslim was based on a source which said those people were conservative/rightwin sources and that the prosecutor had denied any relious motivation (sorry. some keys not workin on my laptop). There's no excuse for that. Either it was meant to be anti-Muslim or it was another competence issue, and I'm not sure I should continue to let you edit. Doug Weller talk 08:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Either way, I am not responsible for what other people think. And before you accuse me of being Anti Muslim, let me tell you that I regularly visit Muslim countries for holiday and some of my good friends are Muslims.
There's a difference. Doug Weller talk 13:29, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Syrian Democratic Forces, you may be blocked from editing. Editor abcdef ( talk) 10:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Thawb. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 07:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to U.S. Route 66. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. US 66 was in the Texas Panhandle, parallel to, and hundreds of miles from I-10 in the state. They never crossed in Texas. They only approached each other in the state of California, not Texas, so please stop reinserted factually false information. Imzadi 1979 → 05:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at American Airlines Flight 587, you may be blocked from editing. Spintendo 08:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Staten Island, you may be blocked from editing. An airplane crash that did not happen on Staten Island is not relevant to the article. You have already been warned about this, as well as several other cases of adding factual errors and editing disruptively. epicgenius ( talk) 13:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
I reverted some of your edits in a few articles since they don't really seem constructive. I asked you multiple times to explain yourself and your edits on the talk page which you refused, which I can assume that your edits must be in bad nature due to the fact that you refuse to use the talk page. I'm really reluctant on IP's so I think you should really consider using the talk pages whenever you have the chance. ( N0n3up ( talk) 17:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC))
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Louvre Abu Dhabi. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing. {{u|
zchrykng}} {
T|
C}
02:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:101.178.163.208 reported by User:Zchrykng (Result: ). Thank you. {{u|
zchrykng}} {
T|
C}
02:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me 12:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)More edit warring and more calling good-faith editors "vandals" will result in longer blocks. -- NeilN talk to me 12:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
My message to you here obviously did not get through to you. Your bout of edit war reverts today is a safe way of getting yourself blocked for a long time. I advice you to self revert those and take them to the respective talk pages. Also, none of the edits you reverted are vandalism. -- T*U ( talk) 06:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
If you look at the web-site of the governing body for air sports Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, you will see that there is a sport called Gliding, and another sport called Hang gliding. Gliding is a sport that uses sailplanes. Hang gliding uses foot-launched aircraft. These are quite distinct. They have their own championships at different places. The equivalent would be mixing Rugby League and Rugby Union in the same article even though they contain the same word. What links the sports, as well as other forms of flight, is that they involve Gliding flight. I think you are trying to show this link between the sports in the wrong article. You can see a comparison of the two types of aircraft in Glider (sailplane). I have been flying gliders for 36 years and I have written a book on the subject. Please acknowledge that there are people out there with more knowledge that you. The history on this page indicates that you find this difficult to accept. I have to preserve the quality of this featured article and so I must revert your reversion. JMcC ( talk) 08:35, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Double picture of the same subject, the Strait of Bonifacio.-- Xóil ( talk) 09:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 14:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Since you've been reverted once again withing the short breadth of a week, I'll leave this message so you'll be reminded of the actions that lead to your block.
You need to respect the fact that once you've been reverted you need to support your edits with sources, explanations and consensus. And since I have not seen you do any of those but instead edit-war, then I had no choice but to revert you. Remember that it's more than just having sources, you need support and consensus. In response to me "hounding" your edits, I had every right to revert your edits since your edits were arbitrary without being talked in the talk page and it's common checking on an IP's edits after problems, thus hope that you get in the habit of using the talk page rather than edit-warring like you have been. So it's not vandalism when an editor reverts an edit that violated WP:BRD.
You kept calling me a vandal, (when it's clearly you, and I explained why above), but I'm not the one who's constantly getting blocked, so have fun getting blocked. I'll say this one more time, if I see you making a new edit that has been reverted three times without taking it to the talk page I will report you to ANI leading to another block.( N0n3up ( talk) 14:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC))
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Abseiling, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 08:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Megan. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
You have been warned about edit warring multiple times, and you have been pointed to
WP:BRD, including very recent and detailed message by
user:N0n3up. And yet here you are again, just a few days after your last block ended. Discuss the edit on the talk page the first time you are undone. Don't keep restoring it.
Meters (
talk) 05:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hackney, South Australia. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Your revert wars with N0n3up are disruptive. Your unwillingness to use talk pages and your repeated reverts are harming Wikipedia in several ways. Repeated changes back and forth of article content make the encyclopaedia unstable and less useful for those who use Wikipedia as a source for information. Remember that Wikipedia is not there for the editors, but for the end users.
Edit war also scares other editors away from the articles. I have spent quite a lot of time trying to find solutions to some of the disputed articles, a task that is made very difficult by the obsessive reverts from the two of you. In some cases I have tried to find a middle way, in other cases I have agreed with one or the other, but have been forced to make long explanations and detailed descriptions about rather trivial and simple things. Now I am fed up. There are limits for how long I am willing to use time cleaning up after the two of you. I have better things to do both in real life and in Wikipedia. At least no-one can say that I have not tried.
I have still not seen any examples of vandalism from any of you two, so I hope the accusations about that is something in the past. I wish that the edit wars were history, too, but that seems to be beyond reach.
You have already been blocked several times for this behaviour. If you continue down this road, there is nothing to save you from a much longer block. -- T*U ( talk) 11:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent addition of references to Hackney, South Australia. Unfortunately, http://www.adelaidenow.com.au%2Fmessenger%2Fcity%2Fadelaide-faces-another-traffic-nightmare-as-work-begins-on-obahn-extension%2Fnews-story%2F3da93d924a42755190ff7504c159dd5a&usg=AOvVaw0cPj6uKTtEITUSX7bbZLbg returns an error 404. Can you provide a working link please (and correct the article)? Thanks in advance, Pdfpdf ( talk) 15:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Harry (name), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 06:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
No redlinks on a disambiguation page.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Harry (name). Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
You have been blocked several times for edit warring. And you have been thoroughly warned about WP:EDITWAR. If you continue to edit war, your next block will probably be very long. I see that you sometimes bring good additions to Wikipedia, but not always well explained, and then there may be need for discussion. Blind reverts back and forth are always disruptive. Please take a deep breath, drop the edit wars, and take your points to the talk pages instead. The alternative is so much worse. -- T*U ( talk) 07:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Glasses. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Find a better source than a Bible. It's a
wp:primary source and there is no other credible evidence for Moses parting the Red Sea.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Red Sea. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
None of the sources you give support your claim. The first source says that women with UAR drivers licence will get their Saudi licence easier since they do not have to prove their skills. It does not say that women used to drive in Saudi. The other source is underlining this. It clearly says that she was not allowed to drive in Saudi, even with a valid licence from UAR. Now please be a good editor and self revert your false claim in all the three articles. I have been trying to guide you, but I am kind of fed up with your edit warring and your reluctance to use talk pages. Do not say I have not warned you. -- T*U ( talk) 08:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bordello_of_Blood, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk to me) 03:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Wind could have parted the Red Sea... Therefore Moses? If you fail to get wp:consensus before restoring that or similar content again, this 'discussion' will continue on wp:ANI to get some admins' opinions. Exodus is mentioned on the article already. After the Six Day War, the Israelis dug up the Sinai Peninsula and didn't find any evidence of a large migration. BTW: Your mention of Yemen was unsourced. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 06:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to Blood (disambiguation). The disambiguation page is intended to allow readers to quickly sort through ambiguous titles (such as Blood (film)) to find the one they are interested in. Bordello of Blood is not ambiguous. Leschnei ( talk) 13:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jim1138 ( talk) 03:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deb. Jim1138 ( talk) 06:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your addition to Aks for the same reasons that I listed above for Blood (disambiguation). Aks (disambiguation) is a little different because it includes both items that use Aks as a word, like film titles, and acronyms, but it is not intended for every article that has aks in its title. Leschnei ( talk) 12:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kill.
After you posted above that you understand that disambiguation pages are not intended to list all articles with a particular word in the title, and after you have been warned multiple times about revert warring, you went ahead and re-added inappropriate entries to a number of dab pages (reverting other editors' removals of those entries). Please stop this behaviour. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Multiple gunshot suicide have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce ( talk) 20:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Exsanguination have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce ( talk) 20:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jess. Can you explain why you reverted them?
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Otay Mesa, San Diego. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Important: Wikipedia articles can never be used as sources for Wikipedia articles. See
this information. Thank you. --
bonadea
contributions
talk 07:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gold card, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 09:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Cristabel0. I have reverted your edits on Angry Anderson and Blade as it did not appear constructive. If you want to test your edits please use Sandbox. Thank you. Cristabel0 ( talk) 10:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rodney Alcala. Donner60 ( talk) 04:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Human rights in the United Arab Emirates ; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
Discuss it on the talk page or leave it alone.
Meters (
talk) 04:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Drmies ( talk) 04:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. An edit that you recently made to Religion in Greece seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Iryna Harpy ( talk) 04:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United Patriots Front, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Costas Kilias has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harpy (disambiguation). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harpy (disambiguation). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.
Inappropriate in several ways. bonadea contributions talk 07:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vidal, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Vidal.
bonadea
contributions
talk 07:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
You seem to constantly edit various articles without adding any valuable sources and did not seem constructive to me. I recommend you use the talk page first before making such edits to the number of articles you edited. Thanks. ( N0n3up ( talk) 07:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC))
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lone Wolf McQuade— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jus da fax 07:16, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Victoria Harbour crossings, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Citobun ( talk) 11:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to President of Singapore. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 ( talk) 03:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cassini–Huygens, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 03:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ash (disambiguation). -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 04:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Names go on Ash (name) See wp:No personal attacks Jim1138 ( talk) 04:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Okay, sorry. And thanks.Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page). But please, tell the other guy to stop making threats. I mean, how was I to know this?
101.178.163.208 (
talk) 04:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Is a minor character in The Human Sexipede i.e. does not meet wp:notable (people). Create an article for Jordan Ash, then add his name to wp:disambiguation pages. Jim1138 ( talk) 05:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Caribbean Sea. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as " edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. BilCat ( talk) 09:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rachel Dolezal, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SwagGangster ★ 01:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rachel Dolezal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SwagGangster ★ 01:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Caribbean Sea. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 ( talk) 03:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Singapore Changi Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Jim1138 (
talk) 03:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Your edits at Interstate 110 show a possible comptence issue, as you twice inserted a circular redirect that led back to the dab about a road that was already mentioned on the pae. Doug Weller talk 08:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This edit [1] claiming many people said the pilot was Muslim was based on a source which said those people were conservative/rightwin sources and that the prosecutor had denied any relious motivation (sorry. some keys not workin on my laptop). There's no excuse for that. Either it was meant to be anti-Muslim or it was another competence issue, and I'm not sure I should continue to let you edit. Doug Weller talk 08:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Either way, I am not responsible for what other people think. And before you accuse me of being Anti Muslim, let me tell you that I regularly visit Muslim countries for holiday and some of my good friends are Muslims.
There's a difference. Doug Weller talk 13:29, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Syrian Democratic Forces, you may be blocked from editing. Editor abcdef ( talk) 10:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Thawb. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 07:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to U.S. Route 66. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. US 66 was in the Texas Panhandle, parallel to, and hundreds of miles from I-10 in the state. They never crossed in Texas. They only approached each other in the state of California, not Texas, so please stop reinserted factually false information. Imzadi 1979 → 05:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at American Airlines Flight 587, you may be blocked from editing. Spintendo 08:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Staten Island, you may be blocked from editing. An airplane crash that did not happen on Staten Island is not relevant to the article. You have already been warned about this, as well as several other cases of adding factual errors and editing disruptively. epicgenius ( talk) 13:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
I reverted some of your edits in a few articles since they don't really seem constructive. I asked you multiple times to explain yourself and your edits on the talk page which you refused, which I can assume that your edits must be in bad nature due to the fact that you refuse to use the talk page. I'm really reluctant on IP's so I think you should really consider using the talk pages whenever you have the chance. ( N0n3up ( talk) 17:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC))
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Louvre Abu Dhabi. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing. {{u|
zchrykng}} {
T|
C}
02:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:101.178.163.208 reported by User:Zchrykng (Result: ). Thank you. {{u|
zchrykng}} {
T|
C}
02:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me 12:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)More edit warring and more calling good-faith editors "vandals" will result in longer blocks. -- NeilN talk to me 12:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
My message to you here obviously did not get through to you. Your bout of edit war reverts today is a safe way of getting yourself blocked for a long time. I advice you to self revert those and take them to the respective talk pages. Also, none of the edits you reverted are vandalism. -- T*U ( talk) 06:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
If you look at the web-site of the governing body for air sports Fédération Aéronautique Internationale, you will see that there is a sport called Gliding, and another sport called Hang gliding. Gliding is a sport that uses sailplanes. Hang gliding uses foot-launched aircraft. These are quite distinct. They have their own championships at different places. The equivalent would be mixing Rugby League and Rugby Union in the same article even though they contain the same word. What links the sports, as well as other forms of flight, is that they involve Gliding flight. I think you are trying to show this link between the sports in the wrong article. You can see a comparison of the two types of aircraft in Glider (sailplane). I have been flying gliders for 36 years and I have written a book on the subject. Please acknowledge that there are people out there with more knowledge that you. The history on this page indicates that you find this difficult to accept. I have to preserve the quality of this featured article and so I must revert your reversion. JMcC ( talk) 08:35, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Double picture of the same subject, the Strait of Bonifacio.-- Xóil ( talk) 09:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 14:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Since you've been reverted once again withing the short breadth of a week, I'll leave this message so you'll be reminded of the actions that lead to your block.
You need to respect the fact that once you've been reverted you need to support your edits with sources, explanations and consensus. And since I have not seen you do any of those but instead edit-war, then I had no choice but to revert you. Remember that it's more than just having sources, you need support and consensus. In response to me "hounding" your edits, I had every right to revert your edits since your edits were arbitrary without being talked in the talk page and it's common checking on an IP's edits after problems, thus hope that you get in the habit of using the talk page rather than edit-warring like you have been. So it's not vandalism when an editor reverts an edit that violated WP:BRD.
You kept calling me a vandal, (when it's clearly you, and I explained why above), but I'm not the one who's constantly getting blocked, so have fun getting blocked. I'll say this one more time, if I see you making a new edit that has been reverted three times without taking it to the talk page I will report you to ANI leading to another block.( N0n3up ( talk) 14:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC))
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Abseiling, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 08:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Megan. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
You have been warned about edit warring multiple times, and you have been pointed to
WP:BRD, including very recent and detailed message by
user:N0n3up. And yet here you are again, just a few days after your last block ended. Discuss the edit on the talk page the first time you are undone. Don't keep restoring it.
Meters (
talk) 05:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hackney, South Australia. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Your revert wars with N0n3up are disruptive. Your unwillingness to use talk pages and your repeated reverts are harming Wikipedia in several ways. Repeated changes back and forth of article content make the encyclopaedia unstable and less useful for those who use Wikipedia as a source for information. Remember that Wikipedia is not there for the editors, but for the end users.
Edit war also scares other editors away from the articles. I have spent quite a lot of time trying to find solutions to some of the disputed articles, a task that is made very difficult by the obsessive reverts from the two of you. In some cases I have tried to find a middle way, in other cases I have agreed with one or the other, but have been forced to make long explanations and detailed descriptions about rather trivial and simple things. Now I am fed up. There are limits for how long I am willing to use time cleaning up after the two of you. I have better things to do both in real life and in Wikipedia. At least no-one can say that I have not tried.
I have still not seen any examples of vandalism from any of you two, so I hope the accusations about that is something in the past. I wish that the edit wars were history, too, but that seems to be beyond reach.
You have already been blocked several times for this behaviour. If you continue down this road, there is nothing to save you from a much longer block. -- T*U ( talk) 11:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent addition of references to Hackney, South Australia. Unfortunately, http://www.adelaidenow.com.au%2Fmessenger%2Fcity%2Fadelaide-faces-another-traffic-nightmare-as-work-begins-on-obahn-extension%2Fnews-story%2F3da93d924a42755190ff7504c159dd5a&usg=AOvVaw0cPj6uKTtEITUSX7bbZLbg returns an error 404. Can you provide a working link please (and correct the article)? Thanks in advance, Pdfpdf ( talk) 15:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Harry (name), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 06:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
No redlinks on a disambiguation page.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Harry (name). Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
You have been blocked several times for edit warring. And you have been thoroughly warned about WP:EDITWAR. If you continue to edit war, your next block will probably be very long. I see that you sometimes bring good additions to Wikipedia, but not always well explained, and then there may be need for discussion. Blind reverts back and forth are always disruptive. Please take a deep breath, drop the edit wars, and take your points to the talk pages instead. The alternative is so much worse. -- T*U ( talk) 07:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Glasses. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Find a better source than a Bible. It's a
wp:primary source and there is no other credible evidence for Moses parting the Red Sea.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Red Sea. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
None of the sources you give support your claim. The first source says that women with UAR drivers licence will get their Saudi licence easier since they do not have to prove their skills. It does not say that women used to drive in Saudi. The other source is underlining this. It clearly says that she was not allowed to drive in Saudi, even with a valid licence from UAR. Now please be a good editor and self revert your false claim in all the three articles. I have been trying to guide you, but I am kind of fed up with your edit warring and your reluctance to use talk pages. Do not say I have not warned you. -- T*U ( talk) 08:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bordello_of_Blood, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk to me) 03:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Wind could have parted the Red Sea... Therefore Moses? If you fail to get wp:consensus before restoring that or similar content again, this 'discussion' will continue on wp:ANI to get some admins' opinions. Exodus is mentioned on the article already. After the Six Day War, the Israelis dug up the Sinai Peninsula and didn't find any evidence of a large migration. BTW: Your mention of Yemen was unsourced. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 06:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to Blood (disambiguation). The disambiguation page is intended to allow readers to quickly sort through ambiguous titles (such as Blood (film)) to find the one they are interested in. Bordello of Blood is not ambiguous. Leschnei ( talk) 13:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jim1138 ( talk) 03:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deb. Jim1138 ( talk) 06:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted your addition to Aks for the same reasons that I listed above for Blood (disambiguation). Aks (disambiguation) is a little different because it includes both items that use Aks as a word, like film titles, and acronyms, but it is not intended for every article that has aks in its title. Leschnei ( talk) 12:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kill.
After you posted above that you understand that disambiguation pages are not intended to list all articles with a particular word in the title, and after you have been warned multiple times about revert warring, you went ahead and re-added inappropriate entries to a number of dab pages (reverting other editors' removals of those entries). Please stop this behaviour. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Multiple gunshot suicide have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce ( talk) 20:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Exsanguination have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce ( talk) 20:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jess. Can you explain why you reverted them?
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Otay Mesa, San Diego. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Important: Wikipedia articles can never be used as sources for Wikipedia articles. See
this information. Thank you. --
bonadea
contributions
talk 07:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gold card, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 09:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Cristabel0. I have reverted your edits on Angry Anderson and Blade as it did not appear constructive. If you want to test your edits please use Sandbox. Thank you. Cristabel0 ( talk) 10:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rodney Alcala. Donner60 ( talk) 04:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Human rights in the United Arab Emirates ; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
Discuss it on the talk page or leave it alone.
Meters (
talk) 04:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Drmies ( talk) 04:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. An edit that you recently made to Religion in Greece seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Iryna Harpy ( talk) 04:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United Patriots Front, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Costas Kilias has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harpy (disambiguation). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harpy (disambiguation). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.
Inappropriate in several ways. bonadea contributions talk 07:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vidal, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Vidal.
bonadea
contributions
talk 07:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |