| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nomination for deletion of NATO Army warrant officer templatesNATO Army warrant officer templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Officer781 ( talk) 08:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC) As I now am convinced the warrant officer templates are worthy to keep, I think we need to put all the different countries' warrant officers all into the same category. Other than the countries which already have warrant officer templates, to aid in classifying warrant officers, these are the warrant officer ranks of the different countries:
I apologize for the misconduct and look forward to the template revamp. Cheers,-- Officer781 ( talk) 06:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I see you are rather involved with the template series. I am the original creator of these template and article series from about half a decade ago. I am pleased to see that there are people aside from me that give great care to these templates and articles. The original intention of the templates were to compare NATO ranks only but the use of the templates have increased. Italian Army ranks for example features the template outside of the templates original intention. Also the STANAG itself has been updated at least once since. Since the use of the template has increased I am thinking of renaming all "Ranks and Insignia of NATO" templates to "Ranks and Insignia" dropping the "of NATO" to expand its use to non-NATO countries and beyond. I also intend to generalize the template so that it is more robust and less complicated to use. I am thinking of a vertical style rather than horizontal.so that it is top towards bottom rather than sideways. Would you have objections to any of this? -- A Certain White Cat chi? 01:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations?This RfC discussing the above issue may be of interest to you. Dpmuk ( talk) 16:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Willeborg von Wertheim is a self redirectAre you sure you wanted to link to this? -- A Certain White Cat chi? 17:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I have AFDed WP:Dick at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. This is a courtesy as you are the earliest known contributer that I can ascertain. Tom Pippens ( talk) 19:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Marmara blackout of 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kocaeli ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC) I am trying very hard to get this incident on the main page as ITN element. It is very hard to do this when people keep removing the section I am linking to. :( Sorry I am quite frustrated by the constant removals at these articles as same content was quickly removed from Taliban article as well. It is very bad practice to have list of attacks. I honestly do not care how many people get killed in attacks. I care more about the details. Each attack should be a detailed section or an entirely separate article. Do we need 6 sources? Yes because each has different detail. I was hoping people who are more knowledgeable on the topic would expand using them. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 22:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
See ro:Wikipedia:Schimbarea_numelui_de_utilizator#White Cat → とある白い猫. Sorry for the long delay. Razvan Socol ( talk) 11:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Removal of bot status on testwikiYour bot タチコマ robot's last action is Aug, 2008. If you have any comment to remove bot status of タチコマ robot, please notify to here. Your bot status will be removed on 1 Feb, 2012 (UTC). -- Devunt ( talk) 09:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Hi, I too was harassed by a user (for years) so I can sympathies with your frustration with the site - probably better than most. I understand my opposition to your proposal upsets you. I am not commenting at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights in opposition to your proposal to upset you. My remarks are entirely based on issues commons and I dealt with back in 2006. I was among the people who was most displeased with the removal of so many decent images, particularly images from the Soviet space program. Unfortunately it is a matter of how copyright law works in practice which is very different from any other law. That said I hope to work with you because you clearly are a motivated wikipedian and I hope our disagreement doesn't reduce your motivation. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 14:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nomination for deletion of NATO Army warrant officer templatesNATO Army warrant officer templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Officer781 ( talk) 08:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC) As I now am convinced the warrant officer templates are worthy to keep, I think we need to put all the different countries' warrant officers all into the same category. Other than the countries which already have warrant officer templates, to aid in classifying warrant officers, these are the warrant officer ranks of the different countries:
I apologize for the misconduct and look forward to the template revamp. Cheers,-- Officer781 ( talk) 06:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I see you are rather involved with the template series. I am the original creator of these template and article series from about half a decade ago. I am pleased to see that there are people aside from me that give great care to these templates and articles. The original intention of the templates were to compare NATO ranks only but the use of the templates have increased. Italian Army ranks for example features the template outside of the templates original intention. Also the STANAG itself has been updated at least once since. Since the use of the template has increased I am thinking of renaming all "Ranks and Insignia of NATO" templates to "Ranks and Insignia" dropping the "of NATO" to expand its use to non-NATO countries and beyond. I also intend to generalize the template so that it is more robust and less complicated to use. I am thinking of a vertical style rather than horizontal.so that it is top towards bottom rather than sideways. Would you have objections to any of this? -- A Certain White Cat chi? 01:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations?This RfC discussing the above issue may be of interest to you. Dpmuk ( talk) 16:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Willeborg von Wertheim is a self redirectAre you sure you wanted to link to this? -- A Certain White Cat chi? 17:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I have AFDed WP:Dick at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. This is a courtesy as you are the earliest known contributer that I can ascertain. Tom Pippens ( talk) 19:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Marmara blackout of 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kocaeli ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC) I am trying very hard to get this incident on the main page as ITN element. It is very hard to do this when people keep removing the section I am linking to. :( Sorry I am quite frustrated by the constant removals at these articles as same content was quickly removed from Taliban article as well. It is very bad practice to have list of attacks. I honestly do not care how many people get killed in attacks. I care more about the details. Each attack should be a detailed section or an entirely separate article. Do we need 6 sources? Yes because each has different detail. I was hoping people who are more knowledgeable on the topic would expand using them. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 22:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
See ro:Wikipedia:Schimbarea_numelui_de_utilizator#White Cat → とある白い猫. Sorry for the long delay. Razvan Socol ( talk) 11:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Removal of bot status on testwikiYour bot タチコマ robot's last action is Aug, 2008. If you have any comment to remove bot status of タチコマ robot, please notify to here. Your bot status will be removed on 1 Feb, 2012 (UTC). -- Devunt ( talk) 09:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Hi, I too was harassed by a user (for years) so I can sympathies with your frustration with the site - probably better than most. I understand my opposition to your proposal upsets you. I am not commenting at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights in opposition to your proposal to upset you. My remarks are entirely based on issues commons and I dealt with back in 2006. I was among the people who was most displeased with the removal of so many decent images, particularly images from the Soviet space program. Unfortunately it is a matter of how copyright law works in practice which is very different from any other law. That said I hope to work with you because you clearly are a motivated wikipedian and I hope our disagreement doesn't reduce your motivation. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 14:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
|