This
user account is a
bot that uses
AutoWikiBrowser, operated by
とある白い猫 (
talk). It is used to make repetitive
automated or
semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the
bot policy. This bot does not yet have the approval of the community, or approval has been withdrawn or expired, and therefore shouldn't be making edits that appear to be unassisted except in the operator's or its own user and user talk space. To stop this bot until restarted by the bot's owner, edit its talk page. If that page is a redirect, edit that original redirecting page, not the target of the redirect. Administrators: if this bot is making edits that appear to be unassisted to pages not in the operator's or its own userspace, please block it or remove from the approved accounts. |
Emergency bot shutoff button
Administrators: Use this button if the bot is malfunctioning. (
direct link)
|
|
タチコマ robot(Formerly WOPR)Operator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): AWB Function Summary: I'd like to use the bot to fix redirects created by my username move (I want pages to link directly to my userpage rather than through a redirect. Aside from that I may make similar fixes. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): The bot will not run unattended. Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N Function Details: AWB automated functions DiscussionI hereby request a bot flag. -- Cat chi? 21:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
per redirect policy. Bots are expected to follow policy. Unless the link displays incorrectly...there is no need to edit the link. -- ST47 Talk 16:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC) ReopenedOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic and supervised Programming Language(s): pywikipediabot Function Summary: The bot will update signatures of mine. It will NOT alter the contents of the pages in any other way. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time run, once all the sigs are fixed there wont be anything left to fix. Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour (tho it will unlikely get close to this) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: The bot will update all of my sigs to the current one. Bot will use the code at http://botwiki.sno.cc/wiki/Python:SignChanger.py DiscussionAlthough my bot request for the task was declined earlier, later discussion on the matter and Wikipedian's such as User:Thatcher131, User:Mackensen, User:Fred Bauder commented on that thread. I would like to use a bot to preform the task so as not to "alert" peoples watchlists unnecessarily. -- Cat chi? 12:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC) I am opposed to this task. Policy states that bots must be useful, and this task is not useful. Further, it causes unnecessary load, and there is no community consensus for this task. Further, bots must obey all policies and guidelines, and WP:RDR says " Do not change links to redirects that are not broken". -- ST47 Talk· Desk 12:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Denied. There is no consensus for this bot to run, following the extended discussion on the issue. Furthermore, BRFA will not be used to try and create such consensus. Please do not request a bot be used for controversial tasks until it has consensus support (in which case it becomes generally-uncontroversial). Daniel 12:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robot(Formerly WOPR)Operator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Supervised & automatic. I will review the former category and new one (as well as the change in RC feed) but probably wont review every individual diff. Programming Language(s): AWB Function Summary: Rectaegorization (based on discussions on medians such as Wikipedia:CFD) Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Assisted but automated runs. I will manually input the task (recategorization) and monitor. Each task is to be run only once. Edit rate requested: 500 edits per hour (really depends on the task) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N Function Details: Find and replace task. Usage of "Category:X"'s will be replaced with "Category:Y"'s based on consensus DiscussionUm, I'm not entirely clear on what you intend to monitor the RC feed for and, also if you don't mind, could you please explain what you mean by 'based on discussions on medians such as WP:CFD'? -- Seed 2.0 18:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd just like to clarify, since category deletion wasn't mentioned previously. I assume, since you don't have the sysop bit, that if consensus is to "delete" that your bot will only be removing the category from all pages in the article namespace? What other namespaces may be modified? — Madman bum and angel ( talk – desk) 17:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Speedily Approved. This is already done by a bunch of bots and uses AWB which makes almost no mistakes. — METS501 ( talk) 05:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robot(Formerly WOPR)Operator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic and supervised Programming Language(s): AWB Function Summary: A find & replace task updating images based on consensus. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Multiple supervised runs with variable intervals Edit rate requested: Keep current rate of the bot. Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Update images such as removing duplicates, or changing jpgs -> svgs in coordination with my commons duties (as a commons admin). Much like how Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WOPR (02) handles categories. Discussion\n:Similar to your other task. ---- ST47 Talk 12:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
-- ST47 Talk 12:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): pywikipedia Function Summary: Fixing double redirects Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Irregular bursts Edit rate requested: X edits per Same as before Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: The bot will fix double redirects by bypassing the redirect chain as below
DiscussionSpeedily Approved. — METS501 ( talk) 11:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): AWB, pywikipediabot Function Summary: Removal of fair use images from non-article namespaces Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): manual bursts, no pattern Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour (tho it is unlikely the bot will hit this number) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Removal of images is built into AWB. I intend to remove fair use images used in non-article name spaces such as in signatures and etc. DiscussionI hereby request this additional task. -- Cat chi? 17:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Approved. Looks good. -- ST47 Talk· Desk 17:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): pywikipediabot Function Summary: Interwiki linkage Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): manual bursts, no pattern Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour (tho it is unlikely the bot will hit this number) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Using interwiki.py DiscussionI hereby request this additional task. -- Cat chi? 10:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): python or AWB (whichever is better depending on situation) Function Summary: Mass revert of edits of a specific user Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Manual run when necesary Edit rate requested: less than 10 edits per minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: This function of the bot would be used to mass revert disruptive mass edits such as left overs of vandalism only accounts or vandal bot strikes which are typically kept at bay. It can also be used for non-vandalism related edits and would be exclusively based on consensus. I hope to never need to use this function but want to be able to should the need arise. -- Cat chi? 14:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC) DiscussionJust to make this clear, this bot's function would be to revert all edits from a specified editor? If that is the case, then I would insist on seeing broad consensus that this is desirable before approval. A secondary (technical) concern is how the bot will react to edits that have since been modified. Will it revert edits that can be undone even after later edits? How will it deal with those it cannot undo? — Coren (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
If this bot is approved, you are expressly forbidden from using it to make or revert changes made to your signature. You are also strongly advised to seek confirmation that the bot needs to run from an admin before executing it, and it is suggested that you only run without some measure of discussion where blatant vandalism has occurred. If this bot is approved and used on non-blatant vandalism, it does contribute to the operator's revert limit, and if it is used improperly, it will be blocked. (Approval is up to the rest of you.) -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs 23:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC) This request is far from uncontroversial, and I would require broad community consensus before we proceed. I have asked the community at the village pump to comment so that such a consensus can be reached. — Coren (talk) 00:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC) I'd say this task is easiest accomplished with Javascript and a +sysop flag. Such edits can also automatically be marked as bot so they don't flood recent changes (see Help:Administration#Rollback). MER-C 03:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC) I'm particularly worried about a bot performing this activity, especially when dealing with proxy's or school based IP address where not all edits are vandalism based and multiple users are involved. This could result in it doing more damage than it fixes. Although I can see where the idea has come from, as frequently I will follow my bot around the wiki, and seeing the other contributions people have made. Usually 9 times out of 10 if they have vandalised something chances are high they have done the same somewhere else. Perhaps instead of creating a bot to do mass reverting in the chance that all the edits were destructive, create a bot that purposely follows or shadows the other Anti-Vandalism bots around, and looks at the top edits of people warned for vandalism to see if they have made unwanted edits to other articles? Just an idea Lloydpick 01:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted, supervised Programming Language(s): python or AWB (whichever is better depending on situation AWB seems more sane) Function Summary: Remove illegal links such as youtube links that are in violation of copyrights. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Manual run when necesary Edit rate requested: less than 10 edits per minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Bot will be used to help remove external links to youtube or any other illegal site (in violation of copyrights). This is something I can do regularly with AWB but I'd prefer using the bot account. In some cases some illegal links maybe inserted in bulk quantities which bot removal would be handy. -- Cat chi? 13:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC) DiscussionErm...ALL youtube links? -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs(st47) 13:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted, supervised Programming Language(s): python or AWB (whichever is better depending on situation AWB seems more sane) Function Summary: Replace/remove templates Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Manual run when necesary Edit rate requested: less than 10 edits per minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Bot will be used to help remove/replace templates on request -- Cat chi? 20:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Discussion
Very similar task to Image replacement and such. User is experienced. — Ree dy 20:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted Programming Language(s): python or awb Function Summary: Bot will move nomination pages of featured pictures to the filename. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time run Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Bot will move nomination pages of featured pictures to the filename.
DiscussionThis is per the absence of opposition to a now stale discussion at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Page name of the nominations. -- Cat chi? 14:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC) I don't really like the new names (ugly, too long) but I can see their utility if you want to link to them in a systematic way. Would just creating redirects at the new names suffice for your purposes? -- Eugène van der Pijll ( talk) 16:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. 20 moves, same as before. Let us know when the moves are done and ready for inspection. – Quadell ( talk) 13:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Approved. But please change the edit summary to link back to this BRfA if you would. Thanks, – Quadell ( talk) 13:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted Programming Language(s): python or awb Function Summary: Bot will add commonscats Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): infrequent one time runs Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: commonscat.py will be used to add the relevant template to the relevant pages. Routine task. DiscussionSpeedily Approved. — Ree dy 19:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: とある白い猫 ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search) Time filed: 20:34, Thursday March 15, 2012 ( UTC) Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised Programming language(s): AWB Source code available: AWB Function overview: Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Edit period(s): infrequent manual runs Estimated number of pages affected: depends on workload Exclusion compliant (Y/N): N, all older references to the renamed image should be removed as the old name is problematic Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function details: DiscussionHow will it use AWB to find out which image names need updating? Why is the bot not exclusion compliant? I agree this is a task that needs doing, but can't see the technical side of it. Rcsprinter (state) 21:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Approved for trial (10 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. I can't see a problem, let's see how this works out. Josh Parris 12:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC) TrialA user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) What was the result of the trial? Where are the links to diffs? Josh Parris 03:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Diffs show it working as advertised. Approved. Josh Parris 12:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: とある白い猫 ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search) Time filed: 08:21, Friday April 27, 2012 ( UTC) Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic Programming language(s): pywikipediabot Source code available: movepages.py Function overview: bot will rename all FPC subpages containing the namespace of the file ("Image:" or "File") by removing the namespace. Links going to FPC/{{PAGENAME}} are unable to find the relevant pages making template use complicated given the number of veriants. Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Move of older FPC pages (this does not necessarily count as consensus and bot will not be run until there is a complete agreement) Edit period(s): one time run Estimated number of pages affected: 531 pages ( Image:) + 968 pages ( File:) = 1,499 pages Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Y Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Y Function details: Obsolete "Image:" and current "File:" in FPC subpages make linking to these pages difficult through automated means. There are 4 flavors of FPCs at the moment with 3 flavors (FPC/File:Filename.ext FPC/Image:Filename.ext FPC/Filename.ext) following a common pattern. The 4th flavor is custom names which is beyond the scope of this request. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 08:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC) Discussion
Denied. Looking here and at the linked discussion, it seems only the proposed operator is in support of this task. All others are indifferent at best and several are opposed. Should consensus change (and I mean actually change, not just get dismissed), feel free to file a new BRFA. Anomie ⚔ 03:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/タチコマ robot (14) |
This
user account is a
bot that uses
AutoWikiBrowser, operated by
とある白い猫 (
talk). It is used to make repetitive
automated or
semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the
bot policy. This bot does not yet have the approval of the community, or approval has been withdrawn or expired, and therefore shouldn't be making edits that appear to be unassisted except in the operator's or its own user and user talk space. To stop this bot until restarted by the bot's owner, edit its talk page. If that page is a redirect, edit that original redirecting page, not the target of the redirect. Administrators: if this bot is making edits that appear to be unassisted to pages not in the operator's or its own userspace, please block it or remove from the approved accounts. |
Emergency bot shutoff button
Administrators: Use this button if the bot is malfunctioning. (
direct link)
|
|
タチコマ robot(Formerly WOPR)Operator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): AWB Function Summary: I'd like to use the bot to fix redirects created by my username move (I want pages to link directly to my userpage rather than through a redirect. Aside from that I may make similar fixes. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): The bot will not run unattended. Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N Function Details: AWB automated functions DiscussionI hereby request a bot flag. -- Cat chi? 21:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
per redirect policy. Bots are expected to follow policy. Unless the link displays incorrectly...there is no need to edit the link. -- ST47 Talk 16:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC) ReopenedOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic and supervised Programming Language(s): pywikipediabot Function Summary: The bot will update signatures of mine. It will NOT alter the contents of the pages in any other way. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time run, once all the sigs are fixed there wont be anything left to fix. Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour (tho it will unlikely get close to this) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: The bot will update all of my sigs to the current one. Bot will use the code at http://botwiki.sno.cc/wiki/Python:SignChanger.py DiscussionAlthough my bot request for the task was declined earlier, later discussion on the matter and Wikipedian's such as User:Thatcher131, User:Mackensen, User:Fred Bauder commented on that thread. I would like to use a bot to preform the task so as not to "alert" peoples watchlists unnecessarily. -- Cat chi? 12:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC) I am opposed to this task. Policy states that bots must be useful, and this task is not useful. Further, it causes unnecessary load, and there is no community consensus for this task. Further, bots must obey all policies and guidelines, and WP:RDR says " Do not change links to redirects that are not broken". -- ST47 Talk· Desk 12:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Denied. There is no consensus for this bot to run, following the extended discussion on the issue. Furthermore, BRFA will not be used to try and create such consensus. Please do not request a bot be used for controversial tasks until it has consensus support (in which case it becomes generally-uncontroversial). Daniel 12:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robot(Formerly WOPR)Operator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Supervised & automatic. I will review the former category and new one (as well as the change in RC feed) but probably wont review every individual diff. Programming Language(s): AWB Function Summary: Rectaegorization (based on discussions on medians such as Wikipedia:CFD) Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Assisted but automated runs. I will manually input the task (recategorization) and monitor. Each task is to be run only once. Edit rate requested: 500 edits per hour (really depends on the task) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N Function Details: Find and replace task. Usage of "Category:X"'s will be replaced with "Category:Y"'s based on consensus DiscussionUm, I'm not entirely clear on what you intend to monitor the RC feed for and, also if you don't mind, could you please explain what you mean by 'based on discussions on medians such as WP:CFD'? -- Seed 2.0 18:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd just like to clarify, since category deletion wasn't mentioned previously. I assume, since you don't have the sysop bit, that if consensus is to "delete" that your bot will only be removing the category from all pages in the article namespace? What other namespaces may be modified? — Madman bum and angel ( talk – desk) 17:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Speedily Approved. This is already done by a bunch of bots and uses AWB which makes almost no mistakes. — METS501 ( talk) 05:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robot(Formerly WOPR)Operator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic and supervised Programming Language(s): AWB Function Summary: A find & replace task updating images based on consensus. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Multiple supervised runs with variable intervals Edit rate requested: Keep current rate of the bot. Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Update images such as removing duplicates, or changing jpgs -> svgs in coordination with my commons duties (as a commons admin). Much like how Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WOPR (02) handles categories. Discussion\n:Similar to your other task. ---- ST47 Talk 12:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
-- ST47 Talk 12:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): pywikipedia Function Summary: Fixing double redirects Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Irregular bursts Edit rate requested: X edits per Same as before Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: The bot will fix double redirects by bypassing the redirect chain as below
DiscussionSpeedily Approved. — METS501 ( talk) 11:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): AWB, pywikipediabot Function Summary: Removal of fair use images from non-article namespaces Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): manual bursts, no pattern Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour (tho it is unlikely the bot will hit this number) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Removal of images is built into AWB. I intend to remove fair use images used in non-article name spaces such as in signatures and etc. DiscussionI hereby request this additional task. -- Cat chi? 17:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Approved. Looks good. -- ST47 Talk· Desk 17:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): pywikipediabot Function Summary: Interwiki linkage Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): manual bursts, no pattern Edit rate requested: 100 edits per hour (tho it is unlikely the bot will hit this number) Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Using interwiki.py DiscussionI hereby request this additional task. -- Cat chi? 10:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, supervised Programming Language(s): python or AWB (whichever is better depending on situation) Function Summary: Mass revert of edits of a specific user Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Manual run when necesary Edit rate requested: less than 10 edits per minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: This function of the bot would be used to mass revert disruptive mass edits such as left overs of vandalism only accounts or vandal bot strikes which are typically kept at bay. It can also be used for non-vandalism related edits and would be exclusively based on consensus. I hope to never need to use this function but want to be able to should the need arise. -- Cat chi? 14:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC) DiscussionJust to make this clear, this bot's function would be to revert all edits from a specified editor? If that is the case, then I would insist on seeing broad consensus that this is desirable before approval. A secondary (technical) concern is how the bot will react to edits that have since been modified. Will it revert edits that can be undone even after later edits? How will it deal with those it cannot undo? — Coren (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
If this bot is approved, you are expressly forbidden from using it to make or revert changes made to your signature. You are also strongly advised to seek confirmation that the bot needs to run from an admin before executing it, and it is suggested that you only run without some measure of discussion where blatant vandalism has occurred. If this bot is approved and used on non-blatant vandalism, it does contribute to the operator's revert limit, and if it is used improperly, it will be blocked. (Approval is up to the rest of you.) -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs 23:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC) This request is far from uncontroversial, and I would require broad community consensus before we proceed. I have asked the community at the village pump to comment so that such a consensus can be reached. — Coren (talk) 00:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC) I'd say this task is easiest accomplished with Javascript and a +sysop flag. Such edits can also automatically be marked as bot so they don't flood recent changes (see Help:Administration#Rollback). MER-C 03:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC) I'm particularly worried about a bot performing this activity, especially when dealing with proxy's or school based IP address where not all edits are vandalism based and multiple users are involved. This could result in it doing more damage than it fixes. Although I can see where the idea has come from, as frequently I will follow my bot around the wiki, and seeing the other contributions people have made. Usually 9 times out of 10 if they have vandalised something chances are high they have done the same somewhere else. Perhaps instead of creating a bot to do mass reverting in the chance that all the edits were destructive, create a bot that purposely follows or shadows the other Anti-Vandalism bots around, and looks at the top edits of people warned for vandalism to see if they have made unwanted edits to other articles? Just an idea Lloydpick 01:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted, supervised Programming Language(s): python or AWB (whichever is better depending on situation AWB seems more sane) Function Summary: Remove illegal links such as youtube links that are in violation of copyrights. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Manual run when necesary Edit rate requested: less than 10 edits per minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Bot will be used to help remove external links to youtube or any other illegal site (in violation of copyrights). This is something I can do regularly with AWB but I'd prefer using the bot account. In some cases some illegal links maybe inserted in bulk quantities which bot removal would be handy. -- Cat chi? 13:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC) DiscussionErm...ALL youtube links? -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs(st47) 13:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted, supervised Programming Language(s): python or AWB (whichever is better depending on situation AWB seems more sane) Function Summary: Replace/remove templates Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Manual run when necesary Edit rate requested: less than 10 edits per minute Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Bot will be used to help remove/replace templates on request -- Cat chi? 20:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Discussion
Very similar task to Image replacement and such. User is experienced. — Ree dy 20:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted Programming Language(s): python or awb Function Summary: Bot will move nomination pages of featured pictures to the filename. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time run Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: Bot will move nomination pages of featured pictures to the filename.
DiscussionThis is per the absence of opposition to a now stale discussion at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Page name of the nominations. -- Cat chi? 14:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC) I don't really like the new names (ugly, too long) but I can see their utility if you want to link to them in a systematic way. Would just creating redirects at the new names suffice for your purposes? -- Eugène van der Pijll ( talk) 16:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. 20 moves, same as before. Let us know when the moves are done and ready for inspection. – Quadell ( talk) 13:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Approved. But please change the edit summary to link back to this BRfA if you would. Thanks, – Quadell ( talk) 13:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: User:White Cat Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted Programming Language(s): python or awb Function Summary: Bot will add commonscats Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): infrequent one time runs Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: commonscat.py will be used to add the relevant template to the relevant pages. Routine task. DiscussionSpeedily Approved. — Ree dy 19:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: とある白い猫 ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search) Time filed: 20:34, Thursday March 15, 2012 ( UTC) Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised Programming language(s): AWB Source code available: AWB Function overview: Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Edit period(s): infrequent manual runs Estimated number of pages affected: depends on workload Exclusion compliant (Y/N): N, all older references to the renamed image should be removed as the old name is problematic Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function details: DiscussionHow will it use AWB to find out which image names need updating? Why is the bot not exclusion compliant? I agree this is a task that needs doing, but can't see the technical side of it. Rcsprinter (state) 21:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Approved for trial (10 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. I can't see a problem, let's see how this works out. Josh Parris 12:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC) TrialA user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) What was the result of the trial? Where are the links to diffs? Josh Parris 03:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Diffs show it working as advertised. Approved. Josh Parris 12:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
|
タチコマ robotOperator: とある白い猫 ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search) Time filed: 08:21, Friday April 27, 2012 ( UTC) Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic Programming language(s): pywikipediabot Source code available: movepages.py Function overview: bot will rename all FPC subpages containing the namespace of the file ("Image:" or "File") by removing the namespace. Links going to FPC/{{PAGENAME}} are unable to find the relevant pages making template use complicated given the number of veriants. Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Move of older FPC pages (this does not necessarily count as consensus and bot will not be run until there is a complete agreement) Edit period(s): one time run Estimated number of pages affected: 531 pages ( Image:) + 968 pages ( File:) = 1,499 pages Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Y Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Y Function details: Obsolete "Image:" and current "File:" in FPC subpages make linking to these pages difficult through automated means. There are 4 flavors of FPCs at the moment with 3 flavors (FPC/File:Filename.ext FPC/Image:Filename.ext FPC/Filename.ext) following a common pattern. The 4th flavor is custom names which is beyond the scope of this request. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 08:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC) Discussion
Denied. Looking here and at the linked discussion, it seems only the proposed operator is in support of this task. All others are indifferent at best and several are opposed. Should consensus change (and I mean actually change, not just get dismissed), feel free to file a new BRFA. Anomie ⚔ 03:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/タチコマ robot (14) |