This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: I have determined that not just any "bullshit" makes the world go 'round – it is only that bullshit which we respect that makes the world go 'round. |
Would you hold a paper clip with your bare fingers and insert it into an electrical wall outlet? If you do, the odds are much better than fifty-fifty that you will receive a very nasty electrical shock. It is likely that you are aware of this fact – you know what would probably happen. So you don't insert a paper clip into a wall outlet not because you are afraid of electricity, but because you respect it.
“ | I don't get no respect – no respect at all. I told my doctor I wanna stop aging. He gave me a gun. — Rodney Dangerfield [1] | ” |
If Wikipedia could speak, it is just witty enough to upstage the illustrious but late comic Dangerfield and might in fact say...
There is little respect for me in the academic world. I am edited and improved by a vast community composed of anyone and everyone who desires to do so, regardless of background or of who or where in the world they may be. Big surprise!
Now, we all know that respect is not easy to come by. It can be earned only through long periods of trusted behavior and can be extinguished overnight by one untrustworthy act. However it is that we measure respect, the one thread that weaves itself in and out of the fabric of philosophical time is that there can be no respect from others unless and until there is self-respect.
So, the question arises... is the product of a reference-work project such as Wikipedia capable of such a thing as self-respect?
“ | I can win an argument on any topic, against any opponent. People know this, and steer clear of me at parties. Often, as a sign of their great respect, they don't even invite me. — Dave Barry [2] | ” |
One contributor to Wikipedia asks...
"By an unconscious self-parody I mean a poem or a passage in which the author is both characteristically and unintentionally absurd. I regret it has not been possible to include any Carlyle because, when I came to look through that fulgurating prose again after a happy lapse of thirty years since I had to read it in Freshman English at Yale, I discovered it was all self-parody."
— Dwight MacDonald, Parodies, p. 474
While MacDonald's trenchant style seems to rival Carlyle's, Wolfowitz makes a good point. Often I read on some talk page from another editor how Wikipedia just isn't respected out there in "polite society". A whine is a whine, and perhaps the problem is that we don't have any cheese to go with that whine? we don't just focus on improvement of Wikipedia and stop whining about how it (we) gets no respect?
Recently, while I helped a new contributor who wanted to do the best job he possibly could on an article, he all of a sudden reared up and blurted, "What if I'm just wasting my time? What if we're all just wasting our time?" The following ensued...
So it does appear that Wikipedia continues to gain respectability among the young learners who will shape the coming world. And if that thought keeps you awake at night, try some Carlyle or even some MacDonald. Sweet dreams!
This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: I have determined that not just any "bullshit" makes the world go 'round – it is only that bullshit which we respect that makes the world go 'round. |
Would you hold a paper clip with your bare fingers and insert it into an electrical wall outlet? If you do, the odds are much better than fifty-fifty that you will receive a very nasty electrical shock. It is likely that you are aware of this fact – you know what would probably happen. So you don't insert a paper clip into a wall outlet not because you are afraid of electricity, but because you respect it.
“ | I don't get no respect – no respect at all. I told my doctor I wanna stop aging. He gave me a gun. — Rodney Dangerfield [1] | ” |
If Wikipedia could speak, it is just witty enough to upstage the illustrious but late comic Dangerfield and might in fact say...
There is little respect for me in the academic world. I am edited and improved by a vast community composed of anyone and everyone who desires to do so, regardless of background or of who or where in the world they may be. Big surprise!
Now, we all know that respect is not easy to come by. It can be earned only through long periods of trusted behavior and can be extinguished overnight by one untrustworthy act. However it is that we measure respect, the one thread that weaves itself in and out of the fabric of philosophical time is that there can be no respect from others unless and until there is self-respect.
So, the question arises... is the product of a reference-work project such as Wikipedia capable of such a thing as self-respect?
“ | I can win an argument on any topic, against any opponent. People know this, and steer clear of me at parties. Often, as a sign of their great respect, they don't even invite me. — Dave Barry [2] | ” |
One contributor to Wikipedia asks...
"By an unconscious self-parody I mean a poem or a passage in which the author is both characteristically and unintentionally absurd. I regret it has not been possible to include any Carlyle because, when I came to look through that fulgurating prose again after a happy lapse of thirty years since I had to read it in Freshman English at Yale, I discovered it was all self-parody."
— Dwight MacDonald, Parodies, p. 474
While MacDonald's trenchant style seems to rival Carlyle's, Wolfowitz makes a good point. Often I read on some talk page from another editor how Wikipedia just isn't respected out there in "polite society". A whine is a whine, and perhaps the problem is that we don't have any cheese to go with that whine? we don't just focus on improvement of Wikipedia and stop whining about how it (we) gets no respect?
Recently, while I helped a new contributor who wanted to do the best job he possibly could on an article, he all of a sudden reared up and blurted, "What if I'm just wasting my time? What if we're all just wasting our time?" The following ensued...
So it does appear that Wikipedia continues to gain respectability among the young learners who will shape the coming world. And if that thought keeps you awake at night, try some Carlyle or even some MacDonald. Sweet dreams!