WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
KonstableBot deflagged
Your bot, KonstableBot which was approved and flagged some time ago has now been deflagged due to inactivity. If you wish to run your bot again, feel free to return to the requests for bot approval page where you can reapply for your bot's task and flag. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the BAG or myself. WjB scribe 01:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 01:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 05:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 06:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash ( talk) 03:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash ( talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Thanks for picking up on my grammar :) -- Killercatt1 ( talk) 14:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Microsoft SQL Server Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 11:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Delivered by the automated Giggabot ( stop!) 01:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 20:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
| The The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Thanks for uploading
Image:1991 coup yeltsin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Footrot flats strip.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 08:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zallinger-allosaurus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 20:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reverting your changes in the strcat article for the following reasons:
- strcat() is able to handle certain fundamental as well as common errors, such as NULL parameters. - The first loop in the illustrated implementation is supposed to advance the index i to point to the end of the dest buffer. Your change made the code erroneous - surely not a good example for newbies. - char str1[] = "Hello,"; is the single most basic array declaration/definition/initialization statement, where one needs not declare the size of the array. Explicitly specifying the array dimensions is often a cause for errors, due to ill-formed or unterminated strings. - Caller-callee conventions (preconditions-postconditions) are fundamental in the definition of an interface. It's important one knows not only what a function does, but under what conditions and with what guarantees.
I hope you will give room for discussion before making hasty changes to an article. The talk page for the article, or my talk page are acceptable areas to do so.
Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikefoo ( talk • contribs) 09:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jesus Second Coming Book.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fæ ( talk) 08:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Template:Expert-subject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 23:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Pat Korte for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pat Korte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Korte (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 02:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Your latest change on UTF-8 page reads:
UTF-8B is lossless if the UTF-8 encoding of these error code points is considered invalid so they convert to 3 errors. However the resulting UTF-16 cannot be modified before converting back, as a sequence of "errors" may convert to a valid UTF-8 sequence! This makes this scheme much less useful than it may first appear, for instance you cannot use it to make a loss-less UTF-8 editor from a loss-less UTF-16 editor).
Please elaborate a bit. In particular it's hard to get what are "these error code points" you are referring to and the notion of a lossless UTF-8/UTF-16 editor and their relations comes seemingly from nowhere causing a confusion.
Besides I believe a "lossless encoding" in this context means a reversible encoding: i.e. a transformation exists to undo the encoding and recover the initial data no matter what. However since we still produce an invalid UTF-8 though slightly less invalid (surrogates are prohibited in UTF-8) we may encounter some problems if another encoding conversion is applied, i.e. UTF-8 --> UTF-16.
Mejedi ( talk) 01:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Titan Cement for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Titan Cement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titan Cement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 16:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Template:Expert needed has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. THE DIAZ
talk •
contribs 19:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Evilkiwi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilmah-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Spitzak, I added comments to the UTF-8 Talk page regarding your reverts to the changes I made. Would you mind responding? Thanks. 68.6.78.143 ( talk) 15:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Ivanxqz ( talk) 15:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The Wikipedia pages for code pages state "The following table shows (code page). Each character is shown with its Unicode equivalent.". This sentence is placed right in front of each table.
Removing the Unicode equivalents from the code tables does not serve any purpose. It invalidates the Wikipedia pages' content.
Many of us heavily relied on the Unicode equivalents U+xxxx listed in the code page tables, which are now no longer visible. I strongly argue that the Unicode U+xxxx equivalents should be rendered visually in the tables, in addition to the (linked) character graphic. Removing the U+xxxx is bad for developers who need to map code page character definitions to Unicode, e.g. to update legacy software. There are plenty of non-Wikipedia resources that show code page tables with Unicode equivalents. Because of this change, I'm sure very few will continue using these Wikipedia tables as a reference and rather prefer external resources.
Sorry for the rant, but this mass change is disappointing and removes critical information for no reason.
I have nominated Pericles for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ( t · c) buidhe 04:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
You’ve reverted an edit that I’d made to the antikytheria mechanism article, and I don't understand your explanation. You say that "hours are not used" yet
- the device has markings for 8 hours and 16 hours, which coincides with the length of the salient cycle, and this is supported in the source material;
- my edit did not establish the context of the usage of hours, my edit merely clarified the language of an edit that had established this—thus your intent (to counter the idea that a measurement of hours is relevant) is not addressed, as you have left the heart of that idea untouched
Please explain these two things, namely why you don’t believe the cited facts about the hours measurement, and why you have justified your reversion of my edit by stating that your intent was to do something which the reversion does not accomplish. I appreciate the attention you apply to my concerns. —catsmoke talk 19:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi.
Not sure why you wrote "nonsense, useless and duplicate link".
- Added means for utilization in Windows and other forms of representation such as Hex and Base 64
- Added another verified attack
- What is nonsense here?
I would have appreciated if we talked before you undo everything and discard.
Kaerez (
talk) 18:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
It would be nice if you'd give a reason for a revert. Utonsal ( talk) 18:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- You're complaining to the wrong user - the person who did that revert was @ Spitzak: - and the reason is that the hexadecimal values from \x40 to \x5f have the 8-bit values 01000000 to 01011111, so those values are described as 010xxxxx. Those are the 7-bit values 10xxxxx, which is what was there before your edit.
- I.e., the 8-bit values have the upper 3 bits 010, but the 7-bit values have the upper 2 bits 10, and what was showing in the article was a 7-bit value, so it should have the upper bits 10. That bullet point was presumably using 7-bit rather than 8-bit notation because ASCII is a 7-bit character encoding (which, when stored in an 8-bit byte, has the 8th bit 0). Guy Harris ( talk) 00:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
KonstableBot deflagged
Your bot, KonstableBot which was approved and flagged some time ago has now been deflagged due to inactivity. If you wish to run your bot again, feel free to return to the requests for bot approval page where you can reapply for your bot's task and flag. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the BAG or myself. WjB scribe 01:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 01:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 05:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash ( talk) 06:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash ( talk) 03:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash ( talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Thanks for picking up on my grammar :) -- Killercatt1 ( talk) 14:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Microsoft SQL Server Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 11:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Delivered by the automated Giggabot ( stop!) 01:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 20:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
| The The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Thanks for uploading
Image:1991 coup yeltsin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Footrot flats strip.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 08:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zallinger-allosaurus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 20:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reverting your changes in the strcat article for the following reasons:
- strcat() is able to handle certain fundamental as well as common errors, such as NULL parameters. - The first loop in the illustrated implementation is supposed to advance the index i to point to the end of the dest buffer. Your change made the code erroneous - surely not a good example for newbies. - char str1[] = "Hello,"; is the single most basic array declaration/definition/initialization statement, where one needs not declare the size of the array. Explicitly specifying the array dimensions is often a cause for errors, due to ill-formed or unterminated strings. - Caller-callee conventions (preconditions-postconditions) are fundamental in the definition of an interface. It's important one knows not only what a function does, but under what conditions and with what guarantees.
I hope you will give room for discussion before making hasty changes to an article. The talk page for the article, or my talk page are acceptable areas to do so.
Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikefoo ( talk • contribs) 09:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jesus Second Coming Book.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fæ ( talk) 08:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Template:Expert-subject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 23:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Pat Korte for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pat Korte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Korte (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 02:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Your latest change on UTF-8 page reads:
UTF-8B is lossless if the UTF-8 encoding of these error code points is considered invalid so they convert to 3 errors. However the resulting UTF-16 cannot be modified before converting back, as a sequence of "errors" may convert to a valid UTF-8 sequence! This makes this scheme much less useful than it may first appear, for instance you cannot use it to make a loss-less UTF-8 editor from a loss-less UTF-16 editor).
Please elaborate a bit. In particular it's hard to get what are "these error code points" you are referring to and the notion of a lossless UTF-8/UTF-16 editor and their relations comes seemingly from nowhere causing a confusion.
Besides I believe a "lossless encoding" in this context means a reversible encoding: i.e. a transformation exists to undo the encoding and recover the initial data no matter what. However since we still produce an invalid UTF-8 though slightly less invalid (surrogates are prohibited in UTF-8) we may encounter some problems if another encoding conversion is applied, i.e. UTF-8 --> UTF-16.
Mejedi ( talk) 01:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Titan Cement for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Titan Cement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titan Cement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 16:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Template:Expert needed has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. THE DIAZ
talk •
contribs 19:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Evilkiwi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dilmah-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Spitzak, I added comments to the UTF-8 Talk page regarding your reverts to the changes I made. Would you mind responding? Thanks. 68.6.78.143 ( talk) 15:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Ivanxqz ( talk) 15:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The Wikipedia pages for code pages state "The following table shows (code page). Each character is shown with its Unicode equivalent.". This sentence is placed right in front of each table.
Removing the Unicode equivalents from the code tables does not serve any purpose. It invalidates the Wikipedia pages' content.
Many of us heavily relied on the Unicode equivalents U+xxxx listed in the code page tables, which are now no longer visible. I strongly argue that the Unicode U+xxxx equivalents should be rendered visually in the tables, in addition to the (linked) character graphic. Removing the U+xxxx is bad for developers who need to map code page character definitions to Unicode, e.g. to update legacy software. There are plenty of non-Wikipedia resources that show code page tables with Unicode equivalents. Because of this change, I'm sure very few will continue using these Wikipedia tables as a reference and rather prefer external resources.
Sorry for the rant, but this mass change is disappointing and removes critical information for no reason.
I have nominated Pericles for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ( t · c) buidhe 04:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
You’ve reverted an edit that I’d made to the antikytheria mechanism article, and I don't understand your explanation. You say that "hours are not used" yet
- the device has markings for 8 hours and 16 hours, which coincides with the length of the salient cycle, and this is supported in the source material;
- my edit did not establish the context of the usage of hours, my edit merely clarified the language of an edit that had established this—thus your intent (to counter the idea that a measurement of hours is relevant) is not addressed, as you have left the heart of that idea untouched
Please explain these two things, namely why you don’t believe the cited facts about the hours measurement, and why you have justified your reversion of my edit by stating that your intent was to do something which the reversion does not accomplish. I appreciate the attention you apply to my concerns. —catsmoke talk 19:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi.
Not sure why you wrote "nonsense, useless and duplicate link".
- Added means for utilization in Windows and other forms of representation such as Hex and Base 64
- Added another verified attack
- What is nonsense here?
I would have appreciated if we talked before you undo everything and discard.
Kaerez (
talk) 18:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
It would be nice if you'd give a reason for a revert. Utonsal ( talk) 18:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- You're complaining to the wrong user - the person who did that revert was @ Spitzak: - and the reason is that the hexadecimal values from \x40 to \x5f have the 8-bit values 01000000 to 01011111, so those values are described as 010xxxxx. Those are the 7-bit values 10xxxxx, which is what was there before your edit.
- I.e., the 8-bit values have the upper 3 bits 010, but the 7-bit values have the upper 2 bits 10, and what was showing in the article was a 7-bit value, so it should have the upper bits 10. That bullet point was presumably using 7-bit rather than 8-bit notation because ASCII is a 7-bit character encoding (which, when stored in an 8-bit byte, has the 8th bit 0). Guy Harris ( talk) 00:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)