| Quicklinks |
|---|
| Other Excellent articles on CSD |
Original Article
Glendale High School is located in Springfield Missouri. The mascot is a falcon.
Nomination Criteria
A1 No context. Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." Context is different from content, treated in A3, below.
Deletion Options
| rationale | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Agree with rationale to speedy delete. | 3 | 4.7 |
| Disagree with rationale. Subject of article is clear, but deletable by other criteria. | 2 | 3.1 |
| Disagree with rationale. Subject of article is clear, but this is a case where IAR applies. | 3 | 4.7 |
| Disagree with speedy deletion, speedy deleting of school articles is controversial should be sent to AFD/PROD. | 56 | 87.5 |
Survey Comments
| Common rationale | Count |
|---|---|
- It should be noted that the "don't delete schools 'cuz they're controversial" argument only comes into play for A7, not all CSD.
- Clear context - school is clearly subject of article
- Borderline though, if someone did complain over a speedy deletion, I would just recommend recreation over undeletion.
- Disagree with deletion. Would take no more than 5 minutes for any admin (indeed any user) to make a perfectly acceptable stub - plenty of info on google.
- Does not meet A1 at all; I would redirect to city article.
- Wouldn't send it to prod or AFD; wikify and add a school stub tag
- there is enough context to identify the subject, and there is likely enough information to write a bigger article.
- Disagree with deletion, let alone speedying. Assuming the school exists, this is easily expandable
- probably not notable, but the inclusionists will murder you if you speedy a school
- Short article but established sufficient context.
- While I wouldn't argue much if it was deleted under this criterion, it's not quite under the criteria.
- Remove speedy, schools should go to AfD really (though primary schools can be redirected to school district)
- prod, in this case, unless more is added
- Most likely would redirect to district page
- Take the time to create a proper stub. Just need to wikilink city and provide URL of school or school system web page and you've got a passable stub. If nonexistent then G3/obvious hoax applies, but check for obscure private schools before G3ing.
- Has plenty of context. High Schools are generally deemed notable.
- High schools are generally held to be notable at AfD. Presuming this is a verifiable school, it should probably be kept.
- enough context to locate
Balloonman's analysis
A1 is clearly incorrect. You can immediately tell what school and what city you are talking about. Schools are generally not subject to speedy deletion because their deletion (particularly at the HS/College level) is controversial. At most a prod, but in all reality, this could possibly be left alone!
| Quicklinks |
|---|
| Other Excellent articles on CSD |
Original Article
Glendale High School is located in Springfield Missouri. The mascot is a falcon.
Nomination Criteria
A1 No context. Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." Context is different from content, treated in A3, below.
Deletion Options
| rationale | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Agree with rationale to speedy delete. | 3 | 4.7 |
| Disagree with rationale. Subject of article is clear, but deletable by other criteria. | 2 | 3.1 |
| Disagree with rationale. Subject of article is clear, but this is a case where IAR applies. | 3 | 4.7 |
| Disagree with speedy deletion, speedy deleting of school articles is controversial should be sent to AFD/PROD. | 56 | 87.5 |
Survey Comments
| Common rationale | Count |
|---|---|
- It should be noted that the "don't delete schools 'cuz they're controversial" argument only comes into play for A7, not all CSD.
- Clear context - school is clearly subject of article
- Borderline though, if someone did complain over a speedy deletion, I would just recommend recreation over undeletion.
- Disagree with deletion. Would take no more than 5 minutes for any admin (indeed any user) to make a perfectly acceptable stub - plenty of info on google.
- Does not meet A1 at all; I would redirect to city article.
- Wouldn't send it to prod or AFD; wikify and add a school stub tag
- there is enough context to identify the subject, and there is likely enough information to write a bigger article.
- Disagree with deletion, let alone speedying. Assuming the school exists, this is easily expandable
- probably not notable, but the inclusionists will murder you if you speedy a school
- Short article but established sufficient context.
- While I wouldn't argue much if it was deleted under this criterion, it's not quite under the criteria.
- Remove speedy, schools should go to AfD really (though primary schools can be redirected to school district)
- prod, in this case, unless more is added
- Most likely would redirect to district page
- Take the time to create a proper stub. Just need to wikilink city and provide URL of school or school system web page and you've got a passable stub. If nonexistent then G3/obvious hoax applies, but check for obscure private schools before G3ing.
- Has plenty of context. High Schools are generally deemed notable.
- High schools are generally held to be notable at AfD. Presuming this is a verifiable school, it should probably be kept.
- enough context to locate
Balloonman's analysis
A1 is clearly incorrect. You can immediately tell what school and what city you are talking about. Schools are generally not subject to speedy deletion because their deletion (particularly at the HS/College level) is controversial. At most a prod, but in all reality, this could possibly be left alone!