Hi Tomruen. Just to let you know, I used your recently created diagram File:Extreme transneptunian object eccentricity vs perihelion.png, in these four minor-planet articles: 2004 XR190, 2014 FC72, 2014 FZ71 and 2015 FJ345. Good job. Rfassbind – talk 00:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Be aware that there are two different ones! Burzuchius ( talk) 12:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tom. What are the Coordinates of the photographers position of this video? -- Hp.Baumeler ( talk) 12:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Hanspeter -- Hp.Baumeler ( talk) 18:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Following its appearance at AFD, I spent time time working out the story behind the August 2016 lunar eclipse (specifically, that there was no August 2016 lunar eclipse). However, I haven't removed that event from the Lunar eclipse set templates because I'm not exactly sure how they've been arranged. The August 2016 "event" is in Template:Lunar eclipse set 2016-2020 but the other 2016 eclipses (March, September) are in Template:Lunar eclipse set 2013-2016.
I suspect what needs to happen is that the August 2016 entry should be removed from the 2016-2020 template (and the navigation link from 2013-2016 changed accordingly). However, that means that there would no longer be any 2016 entries in the "2016-2020", so ideally that would also then be retitled "2017-2020" and the transcluded uses adjusted accordingly (or not, via the magic of redirects).
I know we owe a lot of the eclipse work to you, and I didn't want to offer my best bull-in-a-China-shop impression by making these changes without your input on the topic. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 17:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear TomRuen; Forgive me if im addressing this through improper channels. Long time reader, first time post
Apart from PolyView, what software do you use to generate the image sequence in your eclipse animations?
Kwixotic Kwixotic ( talk) 05:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm also curious about pictures such as File:Plutino_distributions_and_sizes.png. Is this also from Full Sky Astronomy? If so, can I download this program and run it off line? If not, do you know of any similar programs I can find that will run offline? Thank you, — Soap — 16:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Why did you use Twitter as a source on FarFarOut? If you respond here, please use {{ ping}}. Thanks. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey Tom, maybe I'm being dense, but what is the source for this edit? I couldn't find those figures in the existing material. Thanks! — Huntster ( t @ c) 02:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Uniform hyperbolic tiling list table has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Cantitruncated hypercube polytopes has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 18:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I noticed that several of your uploads were recently used in this SciShow Space video about the (real) ninth planet. Good work!
P.S. You may remember me as The Doctahedron. Hello! Qzekrom 💬 theythem 05:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I hope you're well. Have you seen the Main Page today?
All the best, Joe
I realized that the parallelepiped article does not have in-depth details about its special cases, just a line on two monoclinic types, so I've extended it to include as many subsets with different symmetry as I can following the rhombohedron article. As I've noticed that a number of geometry-related information was added by you on Wikipedia, I decided to approach you. Do you know if the list of 7 subsets of parallelepiped (cube, square cuboid, trigonal trapezohedron, rectangular cuboid, right rhombic prism, general rectangular prism, general rhombic prism) is complete? Thanks.-- Officer781 ( talk) 03:56, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Special cases of parallelepiped, stripped down |
![]() |
Special cases of
rhombohedron, stripped down |
![]() Octahedral symmetry subgroup relations with inversion center |
![]() Special cases of the parallelepiped |
I read the tetrahedron article and was impressed with the close correspondence of the subsets with the subgroups. As such I made an image just for the parallelepiped article that lists the subgroups. These are shown above. Comparing the two images, I've realized that Th, C4h and S6 don't have a distorted cube entry. Are these some kind of special forms?-- Officer781 ( talk) 02:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
If you're interested in rotational symmetry, arrow markups work. Tom Ruen ( talk) 15:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
2013 RA109's orbit in the eTNO orbit image looks like its longitude of perihelion is too small, could you double check it? Agmartin ( talk) 16:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting my bogus addition to 24-cell back in February! Since then I have made a great many more edits, and made many more mistakes in my attempt to explain more of Coxeter's findings in a way that is accessible to readers (like myself) unacquainted with mathematics, and (hopefully) corrected them as I went along. Would you look over the article again in its present form and tell me what you see that is still troubled? Dc.samizdat ( talk) 21:14, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Dear Tomruen/archive13,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Urhixidur ( talk) 16:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tom!
I'm a researcher and I've been searching recently for further explanation behind the group theory blurb on the page Compound of five tetrahedra ( I managed to track down that edit to you). It seems to me there is a more general statement about when one can take an orbit (in this case, the orbit Ix in S^2/I consisting of vertices of the dodecahedron) and split it up into orbits corresponding to cosets (in this case, cosets of the tetrahedral group T in I). Do cosets orbits always partition a given orbit? I've asked a question on StackExchange about this (no answers yet), but I was also wondering whether you could point me to a source that dives deeper into this. Thanks!
-- ComradeVVA ( talk) 16:51, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Tomruen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Effects of different voting systems under similar circumstances".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 08:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
There is an error at Template talk:Infobox solar eclipse#Infobox generates dead link that would benefit from your expertise. I don't think you got my ping. --- Coffeeand crumbs 12:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, what is needed to add in the external link to the Youtube interview with Andrew Vanderburg and science writer John Michael Godier that you removed? It is one of the best videos up right now. Andrew Vanderburg is one of the lead coauthors for the HD139139 science paper. If there is some technical Wikipedia issue, can you help with that? Here is the YouTube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=Ml8BsjSdPWo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom98006 ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Tomruen,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Lithopsian and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nyx stream should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyx stream .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lithopsian ( talk) 19:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
The article Abandoned (2015 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable film, no significant independent coverage, per WP:NF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
BOVINEBOY
2008 18:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Nice additions! Any plans for adding the icosahedral-symmetry ones? ^_^ Double sharp ( talk) 16:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, You included a couple of operators (yank and exalt) that I can't find any reference to elsewhere)
They were just shortcut names for composite operators: x=kt, y=tk, to better express geodesic and Goldberg polyhedra, so I picked yank and exalt to match the letters. Tom Ruen ( talk) 12:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tomruen, I'd just like to say a massive thank you for the astronomical images you've made available through Wikipedia and Wikimedia. I teach astronomy and have been looking for images for my slideshows and videos, and your name comes up again and again with the best image for my purpose. Amazing work, cheers! Cosmogoblin ( talk) 20:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Beat me to it - I first learned about the new names from Wikipedia! ― Дрейгорич / Dreigorich Talk 07:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Tom, As a follow-up to your suggestion made off-wiki, I have started a draft on the Grünbaum-Dress polyhedra at User:Steelpillow/test1. I will do what more I can to it but will not have much time to spare, so feel free to take it over as you see fit. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 10:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Would you mind elaborating the projections (ie. A4, B4, or H4) of the nonuniform omnisnubs?
I'll give the parameters:
Done some replacement of the vertex figures, because some of them are purely illustrative and not an actual rendering of such.
Cheers! Kwékwlos ( talk) 07:44, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Space Barnstar | |
For being an early contributor to the 2I/Borisov article. ↠Pine (✉) 06:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC) |
I sent an email to you about the next Mercury transit. Thank you very much. -- Catalaalatac ( talk) 00:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that you added some additional information to edits by an IP user, which stated that the naming poll for 2007 OR10 was manipulated by someone who used a spam bot to repeatedly vote for Gonggong. I'm uncertain about this and I want to discuss about whether this should be included in 2007 OR10's article despite that no official sources have addressed this potential issue. Since you one of the only people who probably know about this, mind if you check the talk page regarding this? Sorry if I seem hesitant. Nrco0e ( talk) 20:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
The article Rectified antiprism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Cannot find any article and essay is about this topic in Google, and it is not meet WP:GNG and WP:OR.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
SCP-2000 (
talk) 10:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Kushal Kishore ( talk) 06:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
When I was researching the tesseract(not because of marvel) i seen the images of you octeract. Theres somethin so "spiritual" for a lack of a better word about it. It calls out to my soul in a weird way. I've seen this in my mind since I was a small child. Its someway seems primitive to our consciousness. Thank you for the work you have done. It's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen. -Anon, Nov 11, 2019
Template:Prism dual polyhedra db has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Pkbwcgs (
talk) 16:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The plot is incorrect - I am not sure where the error arose, possibly one of the orbital elements.
I have a photo of Hyakutake taken 03/23/1996 @ 23::00 CST and it is clearly in Bootes, Arcturus is in the frame.
I checked in Stellarium which confirms this.
This site shows the correct path: [6] Orbital elements and epheremis: [7]
2601:246:5500:FA80:21E:C2FF:FEC2:E8ED ( talk) 02:53, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tomruen. Just to let you know, I used your recently created diagram File:Extreme transneptunian object eccentricity vs perihelion.png, in these four minor-planet articles: 2004 XR190, 2014 FC72, 2014 FZ71 and 2015 FJ345. Good job. Rfassbind – talk 00:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Be aware that there are two different ones! Burzuchius ( talk) 12:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tom. What are the Coordinates of the photographers position of this video? -- Hp.Baumeler ( talk) 12:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Hanspeter -- Hp.Baumeler ( talk) 18:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Following its appearance at AFD, I spent time time working out the story behind the August 2016 lunar eclipse (specifically, that there was no August 2016 lunar eclipse). However, I haven't removed that event from the Lunar eclipse set templates because I'm not exactly sure how they've been arranged. The August 2016 "event" is in Template:Lunar eclipse set 2016-2020 but the other 2016 eclipses (March, September) are in Template:Lunar eclipse set 2013-2016.
I suspect what needs to happen is that the August 2016 entry should be removed from the 2016-2020 template (and the navigation link from 2013-2016 changed accordingly). However, that means that there would no longer be any 2016 entries in the "2016-2020", so ideally that would also then be retitled "2017-2020" and the transcluded uses adjusted accordingly (or not, via the magic of redirects).
I know we owe a lot of the eclipse work to you, and I didn't want to offer my best bull-in-a-China-shop impression by making these changes without your input on the topic. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 17:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear TomRuen; Forgive me if im addressing this through improper channels. Long time reader, first time post
Apart from PolyView, what software do you use to generate the image sequence in your eclipse animations?
Kwixotic Kwixotic ( talk) 05:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm also curious about pictures such as File:Plutino_distributions_and_sizes.png. Is this also from Full Sky Astronomy? If so, can I download this program and run it off line? If not, do you know of any similar programs I can find that will run offline? Thank you, — Soap — 16:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Why did you use Twitter as a source on FarFarOut? If you respond here, please use {{ ping}}. Thanks. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey Tom, maybe I'm being dense, but what is the source for this edit? I couldn't find those figures in the existing material. Thanks! — Huntster ( t @ c) 02:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Uniform hyperbolic tiling list table has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Cantitruncated hypercube polytopes has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 18:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I noticed that several of your uploads were recently used in this SciShow Space video about the (real) ninth planet. Good work!
P.S. You may remember me as The Doctahedron. Hello! Qzekrom 💬 theythem 05:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I hope you're well. Have you seen the Main Page today?
All the best, Joe
I realized that the parallelepiped article does not have in-depth details about its special cases, just a line on two monoclinic types, so I've extended it to include as many subsets with different symmetry as I can following the rhombohedron article. As I've noticed that a number of geometry-related information was added by you on Wikipedia, I decided to approach you. Do you know if the list of 7 subsets of parallelepiped (cube, square cuboid, trigonal trapezohedron, rectangular cuboid, right rhombic prism, general rectangular prism, general rhombic prism) is complete? Thanks.-- Officer781 ( talk) 03:56, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Special cases of parallelepiped, stripped down |
![]() |
Special cases of
rhombohedron, stripped down |
![]() Octahedral symmetry subgroup relations with inversion center |
![]() Special cases of the parallelepiped |
I read the tetrahedron article and was impressed with the close correspondence of the subsets with the subgroups. As such I made an image just for the parallelepiped article that lists the subgroups. These are shown above. Comparing the two images, I've realized that Th, C4h and S6 don't have a distorted cube entry. Are these some kind of special forms?-- Officer781 ( talk) 02:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
If you're interested in rotational symmetry, arrow markups work. Tom Ruen ( talk) 15:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
2013 RA109's orbit in the eTNO orbit image looks like its longitude of perihelion is too small, could you double check it? Agmartin ( talk) 16:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting my bogus addition to 24-cell back in February! Since then I have made a great many more edits, and made many more mistakes in my attempt to explain more of Coxeter's findings in a way that is accessible to readers (like myself) unacquainted with mathematics, and (hopefully) corrected them as I went along. Would you look over the article again in its present form and tell me what you see that is still troubled? Dc.samizdat ( talk) 21:14, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Dear Tomruen/archive13,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Urhixidur ( talk) 16:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tom!
I'm a researcher and I've been searching recently for further explanation behind the group theory blurb on the page Compound of five tetrahedra ( I managed to track down that edit to you). It seems to me there is a more general statement about when one can take an orbit (in this case, the orbit Ix in S^2/I consisting of vertices of the dodecahedron) and split it up into orbits corresponding to cosets (in this case, cosets of the tetrahedral group T in I). Do cosets orbits always partition a given orbit? I've asked a question on StackExchange about this (no answers yet), but I was also wondering whether you could point me to a source that dives deeper into this. Thanks!
-- ComradeVVA ( talk) 16:51, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Tomruen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Effects of different voting systems under similar circumstances".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 08:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
There is an error at Template talk:Infobox solar eclipse#Infobox generates dead link that would benefit from your expertise. I don't think you got my ping. --- Coffeeand crumbs 12:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, what is needed to add in the external link to the Youtube interview with Andrew Vanderburg and science writer John Michael Godier that you removed? It is one of the best videos up right now. Andrew Vanderburg is one of the lead coauthors for the HD139139 science paper. If there is some technical Wikipedia issue, can you help with that? Here is the YouTube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=Ml8BsjSdPWo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom98006 ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Tomruen,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Lithopsian and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nyx stream should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyx stream .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lithopsian ( talk) 19:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
The article Abandoned (2015 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable film, no significant independent coverage, per WP:NF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
BOVINEBOY
2008 18:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Nice additions! Any plans for adding the icosahedral-symmetry ones? ^_^ Double sharp ( talk) 16:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, You included a couple of operators (yank and exalt) that I can't find any reference to elsewhere)
They were just shortcut names for composite operators: x=kt, y=tk, to better express geodesic and Goldberg polyhedra, so I picked yank and exalt to match the letters. Tom Ruen ( talk) 12:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tomruen, I'd just like to say a massive thank you for the astronomical images you've made available through Wikipedia and Wikimedia. I teach astronomy and have been looking for images for my slideshows and videos, and your name comes up again and again with the best image for my purpose. Amazing work, cheers! Cosmogoblin ( talk) 20:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Beat me to it - I first learned about the new names from Wikipedia! ― Дрейгорич / Dreigorich Talk 07:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Tom, As a follow-up to your suggestion made off-wiki, I have started a draft on the Grünbaum-Dress polyhedra at User:Steelpillow/test1. I will do what more I can to it but will not have much time to spare, so feel free to take it over as you see fit. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 10:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Would you mind elaborating the projections (ie. A4, B4, or H4) of the nonuniform omnisnubs?
I'll give the parameters:
Done some replacement of the vertex figures, because some of them are purely illustrative and not an actual rendering of such.
Cheers! Kwékwlos ( talk) 07:44, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Space Barnstar | |
For being an early contributor to the 2I/Borisov article. ↠Pine (✉) 06:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC) |
I sent an email to you about the next Mercury transit. Thank you very much. -- Catalaalatac ( talk) 00:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that you added some additional information to edits by an IP user, which stated that the naming poll for 2007 OR10 was manipulated by someone who used a spam bot to repeatedly vote for Gonggong. I'm uncertain about this and I want to discuss about whether this should be included in 2007 OR10's article despite that no official sources have addressed this potential issue. Since you one of the only people who probably know about this, mind if you check the talk page regarding this? Sorry if I seem hesitant. Nrco0e ( talk) 20:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
The article Rectified antiprism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Cannot find any article and essay is about this topic in Google, and it is not meet WP:GNG and WP:OR.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
SCP-2000 (
talk) 10:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Kushal Kishore ( talk) 06:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
When I was researching the tesseract(not because of marvel) i seen the images of you octeract. Theres somethin so "spiritual" for a lack of a better word about it. It calls out to my soul in a weird way. I've seen this in my mind since I was a small child. Its someway seems primitive to our consciousness. Thank you for the work you have done. It's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen. -Anon, Nov 11, 2019
Template:Prism dual polyhedra db has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Pkbwcgs (
talk) 16:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The plot is incorrect - I am not sure where the error arose, possibly one of the orbital elements.
I have a photo of Hyakutake taken 03/23/1996 @ 23::00 CST and it is clearly in Bootes, Arcturus is in the frame.
I checked in Stellarium which confirms this.
This site shows the correct path: [6] Orbital elements and epheremis: [7]
2601:246:5500:FA80:21E:C2FF:FEC2:E8ED ( talk) 02:53, 25 December 2019 (UTC)