Reason: An unnecessary sidebar that could be integrated into the article's prose. It's only used and linked to once, which is from
United States diplomatic cables leak.
Reason: {{Historical populations}} already exists, and has more features. This sidebar is not necessary. The usages should be converted and this template deleted (or, if wanted, redirected).
Reason: Non-notable gymnast. I could not find a reliable source on her. The sources in Google News are all tabloid-y mentioning her only accompanying her husband(? fiancée?), or briefly mention her name in relation to gymnastics. Digi Sport, ProSport, etc. are really poor-quality.
Reason: Unable to establish notability. Coverage is extremely sparse on this person, and his name makes it tough to do a thorough search. The most noteworthy thing is that he lives on in an award in cricket, but nothing else I could find.
Reason: Nothing has improved since the last AfD. I'm unable to find sources, and the claim that this party is the "first women's political party" in Pakistan is dubious (even if claims like these indicate notability) because the source doesn't make this claim, but someone else related to the party. Everything else I could find was just a mention in a list. Finally, the article was created by
User:Rubina Shaheen, modified by
User:Pwml, and relatively recently
User:Rubinashaheenpk--all clearly COIs. This is just not a notable political party.
Reason: I'm unable to find anything about the band, and the four refs aren't great. It looks like they also went by 'Ophurall', and one of their band members passed a few years later. Their stuff is kindly available on the Internet Archive (and on their website), but those things don't indicate notability. In essence, a failure of
WP:BAND.
Reason: I don't believe there is enough out there to meet
WP:NORG. I've found only passing mentions of the political party, in both English and Serbian.Everything I've found. Books:
[1][2][3][4][5][6]. News:
[7][8][9][10][11][12]. PDFs:
[13][14]. Websites:
[15][16].
Reason: Can't find any sources referencing this author. Article is written in a very promotional tone. (Indeed, an editor with the same name has edited it extensively.)
Reason: The biographies fail
WP:SPORTBASIC. All information I've found about them come from sports databases, which do not confer notability as they are trivial sources with little to no standards for inclusion. Coverage of a game
by the BBC and another from
a Pakistani news site are both
WP:ROUTINE coverage, and a
very short bio mentioning the three from The Asian Age is just not enough. There is not widespread coverage of any of them to warrant an entry on Wikipedia.
Reason: Fails
WP:SIGCOV. The only sources I've found mostly consisted of his name as a part of a list of other names, while the few others remained passing mentions. From my search, the only reliable facts about him were that he won ASCAP awards for American Idol work in
2004,
2009,
2011, 2016 (
[17][18][19]), and
2022, and an honoree in
2008; produced for
Steps (pop group) (
[20][21]) and
Sybil (singer) (
[22]); and signed on at one point to a label called Diggermusic (
[23]). There's also an
interview, but that isn't an RS. While he may have won awards, there is no reliable in-depth coverage about him to meet SIGCOV.
Reason: I'm unable to find sources to meet non-trivial coverage from
WP:SPORTBASIC. The closest I could find was
two paragraphs in a book. The overwhelming majority of book sources merely include his name, so no notability conferred from them. Newspapers.com shows a ton of trivial routine sports coverage, which is fine for facts but not for notability, per NSPORTS.
Reason: This article is purportedly an
index article, but is instead a
WP:COATRACK with so much original research I can't even begin to describe. All of the references are solely used to make a point that ToSs are covered in media, so it fails to meet
WP:LISTN. Most of the article links aren't even to articles regarding ToS or privacy policies, either; they just link to a section in a website's/service's article. The links to full articles are only tangentially related.
Reason: This and
Template:Doc-code serve the same purpose. This one is not linked to by anywhere, and included outdated advice, like adding interwiki links to the documentation subpage.
Template:doc-code is linked to by
Template:Documentation and
Wikipedia:Documentation as the template to substitute. I'd suggest a deletion (or maybe a hist-merge could suffice?).
Reason: Unused template that redirects to
Template:Navbox. It's implausible that an editor would want to get a navbox or would desire getting there using this template.
Reason: Non-English title was repeatedly created, but instead of salting, it was created and protected. Since it's a highly-implausible title, and it has only one usage in mainspace, I'd rather it deleted and salted.
Reason: I don't believe this episode (or the other episodes) of
Helluva Boss pass
WP:GNG. The episodes are not covered in depth to warrant a standalone article.
Reason: Duplicate functions, but Pagelinks (
Module:PageLinks) has more features. Lx is meant to support a broad category of shortcut templates, but they can also be served by PageLinks. (See also the
no-consensus of merging a bunch of link templates.)
Reason: A misspelling of Reflist (refiist), but it's unreasonable to think that people would mistake the lowercase L for an uppercase i, so I don't think it should stick around.
Reason: All but two of the links are Dispenser links.
Dispenser's site is no longer functional, and the user has
effectively retired. For replacements of the functioning links, Citationbot can be invoked with the
Wikipedia:Citation expander gadget, and the XTools link can be found in either the
meta:MoreMenu or the XTools gadgets.
Reason:
WP:ROUTINE (motor)sports event. Nothing really of note happened. The article consists of a play-by-play, which isn't noteworthy itself. The remainder of the article is
unexplained statistics.
Reason:
WP:NFCC#8: I don't believe this scan benefits the reader enough to warrant a non-free media use. It is meant to show the layout of the paper pre-merge, but I don't see that as necessary. I've also nominated
File:Le-Jour-newspaper-Lebanon.jpg for deletion, which is the comparison scan.
Reason:
WP:NFCC#8: I don't believe this scan benefits the reader enough to warrant a non-free media use. It is meant to show the layout of the paper pre-merge, but I don't see that as necessary. I've also nominated
File:L'Orient-newspaper-Lebanon.jpg for deletion, which is the comparison scan.
Reason: I do not believe this image meets
WP:NFCC#1 because the tweets can be accurately depicted with prose. Indeed, the article already has this prose: Hinkle also falsely claimed on Twitter that Haaretz had reported that the Israeli government inflated the death toll for the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Haaretz quoted the post in a tweet and said that Hinkle's post "contain[ed] blatant lies" and was not substantiated by their reporting on the attack. Similarly, I don't think the image is important enough to meet
WP:NFCC#8, either.
Reason: Likely not own work. File information says the photo was taken in 2015, but
this University of Dayton article has a version of it in 2013. Curiously, the
Huffington Post has republished this photo, crediting Connor as providing the photo, but the exif metadata shows that it came from enwiki. The image on the UD article has "Larry lecture flyer 2013.indd" as the XMP:Title attribute.The uploader also uploaded
multiple other photos to Commons as their own work, which, if true, would mean they were with Connor for more than 20 years taking photos with him hiking up Mt. Kilimanjaro, with him in the sky, of him racing in 2001, and is named Brad Feinknopf.
Reason: Fails
WP:NFCC#1: no free equivalent. This can be replaced with a freely-licensed image
on Commons that has the share icon, or replace it with an SVG of the icon itself.
Reason: An unnecessary sidebar that could be integrated into the article's prose. It's only used and linked to once, which is from
United States diplomatic cables leak.
Reason: {{Historical populations}} already exists, and has more features. This sidebar is not necessary. The usages should be converted and this template deleted (or, if wanted, redirected).
Reason: Non-notable gymnast. I could not find a reliable source on her. The sources in Google News are all tabloid-y mentioning her only accompanying her husband(? fiancée?), or briefly mention her name in relation to gymnastics. Digi Sport, ProSport, etc. are really poor-quality.
Reason: Unable to establish notability. Coverage is extremely sparse on this person, and his name makes it tough to do a thorough search. The most noteworthy thing is that he lives on in an award in cricket, but nothing else I could find.
Reason: Nothing has improved since the last AfD. I'm unable to find sources, and the claim that this party is the "first women's political party" in Pakistan is dubious (even if claims like these indicate notability) because the source doesn't make this claim, but someone else related to the party. Everything else I could find was just a mention in a list. Finally, the article was created by
User:Rubina Shaheen, modified by
User:Pwml, and relatively recently
User:Rubinashaheenpk--all clearly COIs. This is just not a notable political party.
Reason: I'm unable to find anything about the band, and the four refs aren't great. It looks like they also went by 'Ophurall', and one of their band members passed a few years later. Their stuff is kindly available on the Internet Archive (and on their website), but those things don't indicate notability. In essence, a failure of
WP:BAND.
Reason: I don't believe there is enough out there to meet
WP:NORG. I've found only passing mentions of the political party, in both English and Serbian.Everything I've found. Books:
[1][2][3][4][5][6]. News:
[7][8][9][10][11][12]. PDFs:
[13][14]. Websites:
[15][16].
Reason: Can't find any sources referencing this author. Article is written in a very promotional tone. (Indeed, an editor with the same name has edited it extensively.)
Reason: The biographies fail
WP:SPORTBASIC. All information I've found about them come from sports databases, which do not confer notability as they are trivial sources with little to no standards for inclusion. Coverage of a game
by the BBC and another from
a Pakistani news site are both
WP:ROUTINE coverage, and a
very short bio mentioning the three from The Asian Age is just not enough. There is not widespread coverage of any of them to warrant an entry on Wikipedia.
Reason: Fails
WP:SIGCOV. The only sources I've found mostly consisted of his name as a part of a list of other names, while the few others remained passing mentions. From my search, the only reliable facts about him were that he won ASCAP awards for American Idol work in
2004,
2009,
2011, 2016 (
[17][18][19]), and
2022, and an honoree in
2008; produced for
Steps (pop group) (
[20][21]) and
Sybil (singer) (
[22]); and signed on at one point to a label called Diggermusic (
[23]). There's also an
interview, but that isn't an RS. While he may have won awards, there is no reliable in-depth coverage about him to meet SIGCOV.
Reason: I'm unable to find sources to meet non-trivial coverage from
WP:SPORTBASIC. The closest I could find was
two paragraphs in a book. The overwhelming majority of book sources merely include his name, so no notability conferred from them. Newspapers.com shows a ton of trivial routine sports coverage, which is fine for facts but not for notability, per NSPORTS.
Reason: This article is purportedly an
index article, but is instead a
WP:COATRACK with so much original research I can't even begin to describe. All of the references are solely used to make a point that ToSs are covered in media, so it fails to meet
WP:LISTN. Most of the article links aren't even to articles regarding ToS or privacy policies, either; they just link to a section in a website's/service's article. The links to full articles are only tangentially related.
Reason: This and
Template:Doc-code serve the same purpose. This one is not linked to by anywhere, and included outdated advice, like adding interwiki links to the documentation subpage.
Template:doc-code is linked to by
Template:Documentation and
Wikipedia:Documentation as the template to substitute. I'd suggest a deletion (or maybe a hist-merge could suffice?).
Reason: Unused template that redirects to
Template:Navbox. It's implausible that an editor would want to get a navbox or would desire getting there using this template.
Reason: Non-English title was repeatedly created, but instead of salting, it was created and protected. Since it's a highly-implausible title, and it has only one usage in mainspace, I'd rather it deleted and salted.
Reason: I don't believe this episode (or the other episodes) of
Helluva Boss pass
WP:GNG. The episodes are not covered in depth to warrant a standalone article.
Reason: Duplicate functions, but Pagelinks (
Module:PageLinks) has more features. Lx is meant to support a broad category of shortcut templates, but they can also be served by PageLinks. (See also the
no-consensus of merging a bunch of link templates.)
Reason: A misspelling of Reflist (refiist), but it's unreasonable to think that people would mistake the lowercase L for an uppercase i, so I don't think it should stick around.
Reason: All but two of the links are Dispenser links.
Dispenser's site is no longer functional, and the user has
effectively retired. For replacements of the functioning links, Citationbot can be invoked with the
Wikipedia:Citation expander gadget, and the XTools link can be found in either the
meta:MoreMenu or the XTools gadgets.
Reason:
WP:ROUTINE (motor)sports event. Nothing really of note happened. The article consists of a play-by-play, which isn't noteworthy itself. The remainder of the article is
unexplained statistics.
Reason:
WP:NFCC#8: I don't believe this scan benefits the reader enough to warrant a non-free media use. It is meant to show the layout of the paper pre-merge, but I don't see that as necessary. I've also nominated
File:Le-Jour-newspaper-Lebanon.jpg for deletion, which is the comparison scan.
Reason:
WP:NFCC#8: I don't believe this scan benefits the reader enough to warrant a non-free media use. It is meant to show the layout of the paper pre-merge, but I don't see that as necessary. I've also nominated
File:L'Orient-newspaper-Lebanon.jpg for deletion, which is the comparison scan.
Reason: I do not believe this image meets
WP:NFCC#1 because the tweets can be accurately depicted with prose. Indeed, the article already has this prose: Hinkle also falsely claimed on Twitter that Haaretz had reported that the Israeli government inflated the death toll for the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Haaretz quoted the post in a tweet and said that Hinkle's post "contain[ed] blatant lies" and was not substantiated by their reporting on the attack. Similarly, I don't think the image is important enough to meet
WP:NFCC#8, either.
Reason: Likely not own work. File information says the photo was taken in 2015, but
this University of Dayton article has a version of it in 2013. Curiously, the
Huffington Post has republished this photo, crediting Connor as providing the photo, but the exif metadata shows that it came from enwiki. The image on the UD article has "Larry lecture flyer 2013.indd" as the XMP:Title attribute.The uploader also uploaded
multiple other photos to Commons as their own work, which, if true, would mean they were with Connor for more than 20 years taking photos with him hiking up Mt. Kilimanjaro, with him in the sky, of him racing in 2001, and is named Brad Feinknopf.
Reason: Fails
WP:NFCC#1: no free equivalent. This can be replaced with a freely-licensed image
on Commons that has the share icon, or replace it with an SVG of the icon itself.