The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge Seems clear enough I would have just merged myself. The Philadelphia libraries are not so distinct they can't be included in the main sortable table.
Reywas92Talk 19:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Hey, AB. I don't think it passes NLIST because I haven't found any sources discussing Carnegie libraries in Philly.
SWinxy (
talk) 20:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. A search for "Andrew Carnegie"+philadelpia+library turned up multiple useful references. Here's a sample:
The City of Philadelphia has proposed creating a "Carnegie Library Thematic Historic District"
[1].
The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia has an article about the libraries.
[2]
PhillyHistory.org publishes a a so-called "blog" of history articles by professional historians; this includes an article about Carnegie and the Philadelphia libraries.
[4]
This is not a "blog" in the sense of self-published opinions; reliability-wise, it's like the news blogs some news outlets have.
The library system has a long history article.
[5]
There's more out there; this is a start.
I'll note that the sources all indicate the Philadelphia libraries are a special group. We lose that if we merge this list into the state-wide list.
Keep per A.B. Basically, I have no problem with a merger, which can be discussed on the talk page and enacted if consensus forms there, but no stomach for forcing a merger through the AfD process--there's simply not a compelling enough reason to brute force this.
Jclemens (
talk) 20:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Should I withdraw the nom and do a RM? I completely forgot about that.
SWinxy (
talk) 21:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
AFD is for deleting articles, not for merge discussions, so it would be best to do that.
DreamFocus 20:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge Seems clear enough I would have just merged myself. The Philadelphia libraries are not so distinct they can't be included in the main sortable table.
Reywas92Talk 19:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Hey, AB. I don't think it passes NLIST because I haven't found any sources discussing Carnegie libraries in Philly.
SWinxy (
talk) 20:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. A search for "Andrew Carnegie"+philadelpia+library turned up multiple useful references. Here's a sample:
The City of Philadelphia has proposed creating a "Carnegie Library Thematic Historic District"
[1].
The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia has an article about the libraries.
[2]
PhillyHistory.org publishes a a so-called "blog" of history articles by professional historians; this includes an article about Carnegie and the Philadelphia libraries.
[4]
This is not a "blog" in the sense of self-published opinions; reliability-wise, it's like the news blogs some news outlets have.
The library system has a long history article.
[5]
There's more out there; this is a start.
I'll note that the sources all indicate the Philadelphia libraries are a special group. We lose that if we merge this list into the state-wide list.
Keep per A.B. Basically, I have no problem with a merger, which can be discussed on the talk page and enacted if consensus forms there, but no stomach for forcing a merger through the AfD process--there's simply not a compelling enough reason to brute force this.
Jclemens (
talk) 20:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Should I withdraw the nom and do a RM? I completely forgot about that.
SWinxy (
talk) 21:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
AFD is for deleting articles, not for merge discussions, so it would be best to do that.
DreamFocus 20:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.