Well I watched it once read the tread it said he blanked him, thought no he definatly didn't, so I watched specifically that bit and it was clear that he doesn't just usual doctor missing the important bit, anyways writing it's called watching it etc is not berating you, so get off your high horse and use your brain, instead of saying no origneal research when it was clear no blanking took place. Anyhows who cares, I've had a go at rewriting that bit.KnowIG 07:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
It's clear if you watch the episode that The Doctor is too preoccupied with other things to realise initially that he is talking to Rory, but does so eventually. So it's not a case of "blanking" anyway, it's a case of delayed understanding. Rodhull andemu 19:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Sock puppeting again grow upKnowIG 19:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
[1] I think he really does want a break now... ╟─ Treasury Tag► prorogation─╢ 21:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
You seem all worked up over me changing the date format on the article. It's MM/DD/YYYY on the infobox, yet DD/MM/YYYY within the article? WP:DATE specifically states that American articles should have MM/DD/YYYY; now if the Zodiac killings took place in Manchester or Leeds, by all means, keep it that way, but my editing was in no way disruptive. If I were disruptive, I would edit Virginia Woolf and claim that she gave birth to a chimpanzee. 72.193.122.5 ( talk) 20:38, June the 21st, 2010 (UTC)
Damned little cowards hiding behind proxies who sling their garbage...anyway, thank you very much for covering my back. I greatly appreciate it. Regards, PMDrive1061 ( talk) 21:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Argh! You beat me to this. Keep up the good work. :) Set Sail For The Seven Seas 342° 37' 45" NET 22:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Seriously, stop removing my edits on the Inbetweeners page. If you want people to assist in adding news to Wikipedia, leave it alone.
Thanks for reverting that obviously abrasive vandalism from my talk page. I don't know what that IP said but thank you. They don't understand that I won't stop, regardless of their childish antics :) – Tommy message 23:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I ran across your reversion of User:X--BAH's out of place edits to Meryl Streep. I'm sure you probably monitor a large number of articles and are short on time. I did, however, look at her (assuming it's a her) edits and I'm not sure I would label them vandalism. A quick check indicates there is a Meryl Streep Day [2] consistent with her edit. [3] Streep was also in "Secret Service" with John Lithgow on Broadway, a performance of which was taped for PBS [4]consistent with her edit here [5]. Obviously very green and no Wikipedia staff ever approved her edits, but she does seem to want to contribute something useful. I'm not exceptionally patient myself in dealing with other editors, but then I'm not an administrator either. Eudemis ( talk) 02:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I totally mangled your protection of this article by mistake. I wouldn't have taken any action had I known you were involved. Please tak a look and make any repair you deem necessary. Sorry for causing you the extra work. See ya 'round Tide rolls 02:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Do you watch The Shadows article at all? It has been growing like Topsy in recent months and is becoming a beheamoth of an entry - frankly it is now an unutterable mess and I wouldn't even know where to start with cleaning it up. Any ideas? 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 12:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
...but the Tracey Beaker debacle is a thorn in my side. After you blocked Anna2123456789 and her IP sock 62.31.196.31 on June 7th, the account User:RandomGirl1 was created on June 16th and immediately began editing Tracey Beaker articles. My first concern is that RandomGirl requested an ' unblock' of the protected redirect on Amy-Leigh Hickman. Anna's sock IP also requested an 'unblock' of the article on the talk page prior to being blocked herself. In addition, the new account RandonGirl1 is hosting copies of the redirected articles on her user page - the same articles Anna continually recreated post AfD close. Is this quacking enough? -- Jezebel'sPonyo shhh 18:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I put a notice on the talk pages of both List of blues-rock musicians and List of blues-rock performers, suggesting these should be merged, about three weeks ago. No one has responded so far, and I am tempted to go ahead and effect this (assuming I can figure out how to do it). However, is there another protocol hoop to leap through, before I cause unilateral armageddon ? Cheers,
Derek R Bullamore ( talk) 20:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
For the account creation block on JoeShmoe5151. Updating the list of new sockpuppets in his SPI has been delaying me from getting dinner. Ian.thomson ( talk) 23:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I had originally registered to use AWB under Moon-sunrise. As you can see, I have since changed my user name. So can you please replacing Moon-sunrise with YumeChaser on the check page? 夢 追人 08:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Could you please look into the recent edits here? There's an editor removing a CN template, and the one time they provided a summary it didn't seem sufficient. They've thus far ignored a request to use the Talk page as well. Thanks! Doniago ( talk) 20:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Some guy it's putting in the genre of the wiki, Nu Metal, protect the article or do something please, Thanks.-- Rolando69 ( talk) 01:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, would you be able to help me with this page I am creating, I am having trouble with the mark up language and layout. Thanks a lot.
-- Thehelpinghandforwiki ( talk) 10:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Damn you're fast! No sooner had I whacked rollback than you;d already got the banhammer out! Nice work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
You edited out my link to a University of London student page from the University of Liverpool wiki page. There is a clear link. Students at University College Liverpool were awarded London degrees. There are therefore 18 years worth of Liverpool students in the London lists and in my opinion this means the link is of legitimate interest to anyone interested in the history of Liverpool University. I can understand your confusion, mind. The London page doesn't mention Liverpool at the moment. It will. I have amended it (I work for Senate House Library) but I have no control as to when the amended version will go live. It should do in the next few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard temple ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
We'll have to agree to differ on this one then. I'll do further research on the link between the two universities and then I intend to add this information to the main text in the Liverpool article. The link isn't indiscriminate information: it includes names of students at Liverpool in the first two decades of its existence. So it is very relevant. The students at a university are its history as much as more famous alumni. It isn't a bare list either: it includes a great deal more information than that. All the best, RT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard temple ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Rodhullandemu,
You look like the person to help with my query. When I studied law, we were told that statutes and case law should be underlined. Having read some articles i have noticed that this isn't done. Is this because there isn't a way of underlining on Wikipedia or is it because it is something peculiar to English law?
I'm just asking out of interest, I don't have any ulterior motive.--
Ykraps (
talk)
06:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
It seems to be that the style is to put cases in italics rather than underline them. Oh well thanks for showing me how to underline. Regards-- Ykraps ( talk) 17:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Is not going to get anything but unconfirmed vandalism, better imo to 24 hr it to semi. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
You banned MUCHERS22 from editing for a week after he violated the three reversion rule in editing Nuclear program of Iran. The ban just ended and he/she went back and made the same edit. I don't know how you deal with someone who refuses to follow the rules even after being punished. NPguy ( talk) 02:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry about using the image(s) on my userpage that I didn't have the rights to. I apologize about the inconvenience and I'll educate myself more on Wikipedia's content policy so I know what I'm allowed to do or not do. Thank you.
-- Blackout0189 ( talk) 17:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Michael_Jackson#Victory_Tour_glove_sells_for_.24190K —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.79.109 ( talk) 19:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
See http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%3aVillage+pump+%28proposals%29&diff=370667822&oldid=370667715 - naturally I reverted it. Give them the bird (sorry, couldn't resist...) Ronhjones (Talk) 20:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
What could possibly be more entertaining, pleasurable, important or stimulating than a good hard spank on a Monday afternoon while sitting in front of the computer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.47.225 ( talk) 23:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Rodhullandemu, you last warned JDPhD ( talk · contribs) regarding ArbCom sanctions, here [6]. Please see edits from 29 June by JDPhD at the page Aleister Crowley. Note that this is indeed within the topic of Scientology and thus within the purview of WP:COFS sanctions (all related articles on probation) or WP:ARBSCI remedies (regarding WP:SPA accounts, topic bans, etc.) Aleister Crowley was a known associate of L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology. The edits by JDPhD are 20:48, 29 June 2010, and then when this was undone by an administrator, User:John, JDPhD added it back, again, less than an hour later 21:13, 29 June 2010. It seems blatant enough, for a topic ban per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Scientology#Discretionary_topic_ban, which could then be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Scientology#Log_of_blocks.2C_bans.2C_and_restrictions. Thoughts? -- Cirt ( talk) 23:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (This refers to WP:ANI#KnowIG, for the avoidance of doubt.) ╟─ Treasury Tag► assemblyman─╢ 13:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm interested in rewriting the content on Robert Leon Davis. After a complaint that there wasn't any other links to the content, I updated 6 new links. Deathdivedog ( talk) 16:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sammy the Seeker and User_talk:GSK#Please_listen. Yworo ( talk) 01:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello again. I have noticed recently that admins are able to remove particularly offensive edits and/or edit summaries. This one [7] is pretty vile. If I am wrong and you can't - or don't want to remove it - no problem. Also, I looked for a warning that might cover an edit summary like this and I couldn't decide if there was one that fir the bill. "Attack" didn't seem quite right. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 17:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
The original file was created by User:Aido2002; the somewhat odd details are explained in the information template (but not the rationale). I have no idea where the second version came from. I agree with your statement on User talk:Lordalpha1 that it should be uploaded to Commons if it is PD, which I doubt, and in any case should certainly be a separate file. After posting this I will revert to the downsized version (which i do not oppose), copy the author information to the FUR, and remove the no source template, because I feel that the source is unambiguously stated. HereToHelp ( talk to me) 23:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
He claims he is is still blocked. IP/auotblock? Verbal chat 16:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
71.233.16.176 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Making unconstructive edits, esp. at Death of John Lennon. Reverts despite being told how his edits aren't helpful. Could you keep an eye out? Radiopathy •talk• 17:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello again. I don't know if you still have this page Talk:Jeremy Brett on your watchlist. Requests to mention his possible bisexuality have popped up again. Based on this edit history Special:Contributions/Dozybeaky and the fact that it is HC's favorite subject IMO something fishy is up - even with the explanation added today. Colonel Warden on the other hand seems legit although there is little editing on actor pages before this (actually I can't find any yet but I may not have gone back far enough.) The bothersome thing is they only want to talk about it - they don't want to present any sourced evidence of it. I would like your opinion and will defer to it. As ever thanks for your time in checking this out. MarnetteD | Talk 17:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, no worries. Good evening to you :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.88.105 ( talk) 19:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Greetings Rod, just a word of thanks for downsizing File:Mongoliad splash screen.jpg, I appreciate it. Not to seem like an absolute cretin, but would you mind telling me an easy way of doing this so that I don't need volunteers clearing up after me in future? Cheers, Skomorokh 19:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
24.147.184.81 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
They've had sufficient warning, but continue to changegenres without discussion.
Radiopathy
•talk•
21:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
For what it's worth, the versions prior to the July 2009 edits by Sausages99 ( talk · contribs) appear not to be copyright violations. (The copyright violation does explain why what I was seeing in the 2000–2003 sources wasn't matching the article. I hadn't got as far as 2009. ☺) Uncle G ( talk) 16:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:You Can't Do That On Vinyl Front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Thought you might be interested in this. Several-month-long discussion on merging this with Serbian grammar and Serbian and Croatian grammar/ Serbo-Croatian grammar (the latter probably best because Bosnian and Montenegrin redirect there too), with notices given at the languages wikiproject. However, Croatian grammar keeps getting reverted into a content fork, with the argument that it isn't a fork if you give it a different name. I made a stub of what I thought it would be that wouldn't be a fork; I don't really care, though, if it's s.t. along those lines (itself probably mergeable into Croatian language) or just a rd. as people had agreed to. — kwami ( talk) 20:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. If you can spare a few minutes your opinion would be appreciated at: Wikiproject/Discographies#Do music videos and other charted songs belong. -- Lil-unique1 ( talk) 01:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Rod. Well he is back.
1. Illyrian Lizzard ( talk · contribs) = 2. Sinbad Barron ( talk · contribs)
1.
Lizzard
2.
HRB, sock of Sinbad
And sure, everything else. For more, i am here. - Tadija speaks 11:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,I am Saud ,why are you deleting my pictures?-- Saudahmed66 ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my pictures?-- Saudahmed66 ( talk) 19:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Excellent work, especially as it looked like unverifiable trivia to me. Great show, one of my favorites too. -- John ( talk) 20:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy emu! Best regards, Hamster Sandwich ( talk) 23:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads up there has been tons if changes at Ozzy Osbourne I see you have a couple so you might already be all over this, here's the diffs Diff's. I'm not good enough with Ozzy to see if this editor is making "Good" changes. I can't imagine this many changes are needed to an established article. Just letting someone know who knows the article these edits need to be checked. Mlpearc powwow 00:51, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
P.S. And not a word about any of this from this editor on the talk page. Mlpearc powwow 00:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Well I watched it once read the tread it said he blanked him, thought no he definatly didn't, so I watched specifically that bit and it was clear that he doesn't just usual doctor missing the important bit, anyways writing it's called watching it etc is not berating you, so get off your high horse and use your brain, instead of saying no origneal research when it was clear no blanking took place. Anyhows who cares, I've had a go at rewriting that bit.KnowIG 07:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
It's clear if you watch the episode that The Doctor is too preoccupied with other things to realise initially that he is talking to Rory, but does so eventually. So it's not a case of "blanking" anyway, it's a case of delayed understanding. Rodhull andemu 19:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Sock puppeting again grow upKnowIG 19:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
[1] I think he really does want a break now... ╟─ Treasury Tag► prorogation─╢ 21:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
You seem all worked up over me changing the date format on the article. It's MM/DD/YYYY on the infobox, yet DD/MM/YYYY within the article? WP:DATE specifically states that American articles should have MM/DD/YYYY; now if the Zodiac killings took place in Manchester or Leeds, by all means, keep it that way, but my editing was in no way disruptive. If I were disruptive, I would edit Virginia Woolf and claim that she gave birth to a chimpanzee. 72.193.122.5 ( talk) 20:38, June the 21st, 2010 (UTC)
Damned little cowards hiding behind proxies who sling their garbage...anyway, thank you very much for covering my back. I greatly appreciate it. Regards, PMDrive1061 ( talk) 21:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Argh! You beat me to this. Keep up the good work. :) Set Sail For The Seven Seas 342° 37' 45" NET 22:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Seriously, stop removing my edits on the Inbetweeners page. If you want people to assist in adding news to Wikipedia, leave it alone.
Thanks for reverting that obviously abrasive vandalism from my talk page. I don't know what that IP said but thank you. They don't understand that I won't stop, regardless of their childish antics :) – Tommy message 23:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I ran across your reversion of User:X--BAH's out of place edits to Meryl Streep. I'm sure you probably monitor a large number of articles and are short on time. I did, however, look at her (assuming it's a her) edits and I'm not sure I would label them vandalism. A quick check indicates there is a Meryl Streep Day [2] consistent with her edit. [3] Streep was also in "Secret Service" with John Lithgow on Broadway, a performance of which was taped for PBS [4]consistent with her edit here [5]. Obviously very green and no Wikipedia staff ever approved her edits, but she does seem to want to contribute something useful. I'm not exceptionally patient myself in dealing with other editors, but then I'm not an administrator either. Eudemis ( talk) 02:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I totally mangled your protection of this article by mistake. I wouldn't have taken any action had I known you were involved. Please tak a look and make any repair you deem necessary. Sorry for causing you the extra work. See ya 'round Tide rolls 02:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Do you watch The Shadows article at all? It has been growing like Topsy in recent months and is becoming a beheamoth of an entry - frankly it is now an unutterable mess and I wouldn't even know where to start with cleaning it up. Any ideas? 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 12:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
...but the Tracey Beaker debacle is a thorn in my side. After you blocked Anna2123456789 and her IP sock 62.31.196.31 on June 7th, the account User:RandomGirl1 was created on June 16th and immediately began editing Tracey Beaker articles. My first concern is that RandomGirl requested an ' unblock' of the protected redirect on Amy-Leigh Hickman. Anna's sock IP also requested an 'unblock' of the article on the talk page prior to being blocked herself. In addition, the new account RandonGirl1 is hosting copies of the redirected articles on her user page - the same articles Anna continually recreated post AfD close. Is this quacking enough? -- Jezebel'sPonyo shhh 18:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I put a notice on the talk pages of both List of blues-rock musicians and List of blues-rock performers, suggesting these should be merged, about three weeks ago. No one has responded so far, and I am tempted to go ahead and effect this (assuming I can figure out how to do it). However, is there another protocol hoop to leap through, before I cause unilateral armageddon ? Cheers,
Derek R Bullamore ( talk) 20:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
For the account creation block on JoeShmoe5151. Updating the list of new sockpuppets in his SPI has been delaying me from getting dinner. Ian.thomson ( talk) 23:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I had originally registered to use AWB under Moon-sunrise. As you can see, I have since changed my user name. So can you please replacing Moon-sunrise with YumeChaser on the check page? 夢 追人 08:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Could you please look into the recent edits here? There's an editor removing a CN template, and the one time they provided a summary it didn't seem sufficient. They've thus far ignored a request to use the Talk page as well. Thanks! Doniago ( talk) 20:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Some guy it's putting in the genre of the wiki, Nu Metal, protect the article or do something please, Thanks.-- Rolando69 ( talk) 01:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, would you be able to help me with this page I am creating, I am having trouble with the mark up language and layout. Thanks a lot.
-- Thehelpinghandforwiki ( talk) 10:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Damn you're fast! No sooner had I whacked rollback than you;d already got the banhammer out! Nice work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
You edited out my link to a University of London student page from the University of Liverpool wiki page. There is a clear link. Students at University College Liverpool were awarded London degrees. There are therefore 18 years worth of Liverpool students in the London lists and in my opinion this means the link is of legitimate interest to anyone interested in the history of Liverpool University. I can understand your confusion, mind. The London page doesn't mention Liverpool at the moment. It will. I have amended it (I work for Senate House Library) but I have no control as to when the amended version will go live. It should do in the next few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard temple ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
We'll have to agree to differ on this one then. I'll do further research on the link between the two universities and then I intend to add this information to the main text in the Liverpool article. The link isn't indiscriminate information: it includes names of students at Liverpool in the first two decades of its existence. So it is very relevant. The students at a university are its history as much as more famous alumni. It isn't a bare list either: it includes a great deal more information than that. All the best, RT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard temple ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Rodhullandemu,
You look like the person to help with my query. When I studied law, we were told that statutes and case law should be underlined. Having read some articles i have noticed that this isn't done. Is this because there isn't a way of underlining on Wikipedia or is it because it is something peculiar to English law?
I'm just asking out of interest, I don't have any ulterior motive.--
Ykraps (
talk)
06:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
It seems to be that the style is to put cases in italics rather than underline them. Oh well thanks for showing me how to underline. Regards-- Ykraps ( talk) 17:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Is not going to get anything but unconfirmed vandalism, better imo to 24 hr it to semi. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
You banned MUCHERS22 from editing for a week after he violated the three reversion rule in editing Nuclear program of Iran. The ban just ended and he/she went back and made the same edit. I don't know how you deal with someone who refuses to follow the rules even after being punished. NPguy ( talk) 02:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry about using the image(s) on my userpage that I didn't have the rights to. I apologize about the inconvenience and I'll educate myself more on Wikipedia's content policy so I know what I'm allowed to do or not do. Thank you.
-- Blackout0189 ( talk) 17:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Michael_Jackson#Victory_Tour_glove_sells_for_.24190K —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.79.109 ( talk) 19:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
See http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%3aVillage+pump+%28proposals%29&diff=370667822&oldid=370667715 - naturally I reverted it. Give them the bird (sorry, couldn't resist...) Ronhjones (Talk) 20:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
What could possibly be more entertaining, pleasurable, important or stimulating than a good hard spank on a Monday afternoon while sitting in front of the computer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.47.225 ( talk) 23:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Rodhullandemu, you last warned JDPhD ( talk · contribs) regarding ArbCom sanctions, here [6]. Please see edits from 29 June by JDPhD at the page Aleister Crowley. Note that this is indeed within the topic of Scientology and thus within the purview of WP:COFS sanctions (all related articles on probation) or WP:ARBSCI remedies (regarding WP:SPA accounts, topic bans, etc.) Aleister Crowley was a known associate of L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology. The edits by JDPhD are 20:48, 29 June 2010, and then when this was undone by an administrator, User:John, JDPhD added it back, again, less than an hour later 21:13, 29 June 2010. It seems blatant enough, for a topic ban per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Scientology#Discretionary_topic_ban, which could then be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Scientology#Log_of_blocks.2C_bans.2C_and_restrictions. Thoughts? -- Cirt ( talk) 23:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (This refers to WP:ANI#KnowIG, for the avoidance of doubt.) ╟─ Treasury Tag► assemblyman─╢ 13:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm interested in rewriting the content on Robert Leon Davis. After a complaint that there wasn't any other links to the content, I updated 6 new links. Deathdivedog ( talk) 16:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sammy the Seeker and User_talk:GSK#Please_listen. Yworo ( talk) 01:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello again. I have noticed recently that admins are able to remove particularly offensive edits and/or edit summaries. This one [7] is pretty vile. If I am wrong and you can't - or don't want to remove it - no problem. Also, I looked for a warning that might cover an edit summary like this and I couldn't decide if there was one that fir the bill. "Attack" didn't seem quite right. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 17:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
The original file was created by User:Aido2002; the somewhat odd details are explained in the information template (but not the rationale). I have no idea where the second version came from. I agree with your statement on User talk:Lordalpha1 that it should be uploaded to Commons if it is PD, which I doubt, and in any case should certainly be a separate file. After posting this I will revert to the downsized version (which i do not oppose), copy the author information to the FUR, and remove the no source template, because I feel that the source is unambiguously stated. HereToHelp ( talk to me) 23:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
He claims he is is still blocked. IP/auotblock? Verbal chat 16:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
71.233.16.176 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Making unconstructive edits, esp. at Death of John Lennon. Reverts despite being told how his edits aren't helpful. Could you keep an eye out? Radiopathy •talk• 17:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello again. I don't know if you still have this page Talk:Jeremy Brett on your watchlist. Requests to mention his possible bisexuality have popped up again. Based on this edit history Special:Contributions/Dozybeaky and the fact that it is HC's favorite subject IMO something fishy is up - even with the explanation added today. Colonel Warden on the other hand seems legit although there is little editing on actor pages before this (actually I can't find any yet but I may not have gone back far enough.) The bothersome thing is they only want to talk about it - they don't want to present any sourced evidence of it. I would like your opinion and will defer to it. As ever thanks for your time in checking this out. MarnetteD | Talk 17:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, no worries. Good evening to you :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.88.105 ( talk) 19:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Greetings Rod, just a word of thanks for downsizing File:Mongoliad splash screen.jpg, I appreciate it. Not to seem like an absolute cretin, but would you mind telling me an easy way of doing this so that I don't need volunteers clearing up after me in future? Cheers, Skomorokh 19:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
24.147.184.81 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log)
They've had sufficient warning, but continue to changegenres without discussion.
Radiopathy
•talk•
21:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
For what it's worth, the versions prior to the July 2009 edits by Sausages99 ( talk · contribs) appear not to be copyright violations. (The copyright violation does explain why what I was seeing in the 2000–2003 sources wasn't matching the article. I hadn't got as far as 2009. ☺) Uncle G ( talk) 16:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:You Can't Do That On Vinyl Front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Thought you might be interested in this. Several-month-long discussion on merging this with Serbian grammar and Serbian and Croatian grammar/ Serbo-Croatian grammar (the latter probably best because Bosnian and Montenegrin redirect there too), with notices given at the languages wikiproject. However, Croatian grammar keeps getting reverted into a content fork, with the argument that it isn't a fork if you give it a different name. I made a stub of what I thought it would be that wouldn't be a fork; I don't really care, though, if it's s.t. along those lines (itself probably mergeable into Croatian language) or just a rd. as people had agreed to. — kwami ( talk) 20:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. If you can spare a few minutes your opinion would be appreciated at: Wikiproject/Discographies#Do music videos and other charted songs belong. -- Lil-unique1 ( talk) 01:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Rod. Well he is back.
1. Illyrian Lizzard ( talk · contribs) = 2. Sinbad Barron ( talk · contribs)
1.
Lizzard
2.
HRB, sock of Sinbad
And sure, everything else. For more, i am here. - Tadija speaks 11:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,I am Saud ,why are you deleting my pictures?-- Saudahmed66 ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my pictures?-- Saudahmed66 ( talk) 19:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Excellent work, especially as it looked like unverifiable trivia to me. Great show, one of my favorites too. -- John ( talk) 20:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy emu! Best regards, Hamster Sandwich ( talk) 23:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads up there has been tons if changes at Ozzy Osbourne I see you have a couple so you might already be all over this, here's the diffs Diff's. I'm not good enough with Ozzy to see if this editor is making "Good" changes. I can't imagine this many changes are needed to an established article. Just letting someone know who knows the article these edits need to be checked. Mlpearc powwow 00:51, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
P.S. And not a word about any of this from this editor on the talk page. Mlpearc powwow 00:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)