User
Talk
Dashboard
Articles
Scripts
Tools
Templates
Userboxes
Awards
![]() |
---|
4 July 2024 |
Hi. Could the line !('/' in page_title) &
be removed from
803 (
hist ·
log)? I can't think of a scenario where a new user would need to edit someone else's subpage, and I've seen users vandalizing guestbooks and other subpages before. Thanks. '''[[
User:CanonNi]]''' (
talk •
contribs) 10:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
page_first_contributor != user_name
could work for already created subpages.
Nobody (
talk) 11:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Air on White ( talk) 00:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I propose that 1076 ( hist · log), with a filter's description of "Draftified article more than 180 days old", be modified from a threshold of 180 days to 90 days. The notes in the filter say the following:
Since these changes where the filter moved from 90 to 180 days, there has been a RfC on the matter of draftifications and how long after creation is appropriate. It was closed March 24, 2022, and the result was that pages over 90 days should not generally be draftified. As such, it makes sense for the filter to reflect this. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Nyttend ( talk) 12:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. -->
beside the templates)I've tested possible code for this filter on Test Wiki (see here), and it seems to work well. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
!contains_any(user_groups, 'extendedconfirmed', 'sysop', 'bot', 'patrol')
? –
PharyngealImplosive7
(talk) 01:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
before article has been createdclause of the hidden comment. Can the filter tell the difference between these two cases? If not, then I do not think it will be a helpful filter (unless it is log-only). Primefac ( talk) 13:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
!added_lines irlike '#redirect'
line is used to not catch drafts that were turned into redirects (likely from a page move). '''[[
User:CanonNi]]''' (
talk •
contribs) 13:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Rusty talk contribs 23:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Ed-Tech Press, also known as "Scientific E-Resources, is a Wikipedia mirror. They print copies of books that are just Wikipedia articles. Per WP:CIRCULAR, we should never cite them in articles. Unfortunately, these books are listed in Google Books, and there's no obvious warning on them. I've inadvertently cited them twice recently. While I really appreciate reversions like this one, it seems like this is an area where an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Could we please have an abuse filter set up for this string:
|publisher=Scientific e-Resources
which should catch most {{ cite book}} uses? If it would be great if it could produce a warning message like "Ed-Tech Press and Scientific E-Resources are Wikipedia mirrors. They are not reliable sources and should not be cited in articles per WP:CIRCULAR." I think that the 'warn' setting should be sufficient. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 01:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
page_namespace == 0 & !contains_any(user_groups "bot", "sysop", "extendedconfirmed") & ( mirrors := "(?:\|publisher\s*\=\s*(?:(?:[Ss]cientific [Ee]\s?-\s?[Rr]esources)|(?:Ed\s?-\s?[Tt]ech [Pp]ress)))|(?:\|url\s*\=\s*edtechpress\.co\.uk)" added_lines irlike mirrors & !(removed_lines irlike mirrors) )
Backlog CLEAN!
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 0 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 1 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
Possibly contested candidates | 2 |
Other candidates | 6 |
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Previously had AWB rights, back to editing now. SerChevalerie ( talk) 07:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc. talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I’ve reviewed pages on the new pages feed. In fact, I have sometimes CSD or redirected (because it’s a duplicate article) before NPRs, please consider me. 48 JCL 12:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker ( talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights
As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ ( talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been a long-time editor on this site for 7 years with lots of experience creating articles and participating in AfD discussions. I plan to use this permission to help clear the backlog and provide feedback to editors for their new articles, regardless of whether their article is notable or not. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah ( talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to assist with this project. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar 💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I'm S-Aura. I've been editing Wikipedia for a few years. I've added new articles and learned how Wikipedia works. I'm good at finding mistakes and fixing them.
Now, I want to help review edits to make sure the information on Wikipedia is correct and reliable. I think it's important for people to have access to accurate information, and I want to help make that happen.
Thankyou! 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 19:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help out reviewing edits before it is published as an live article. I do have good experience. I am aware that statements must be sourced, and I know what is considered nonsense. Cwater1 ( talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Cwater1 ( talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing on Wikipedia consistently for almost a year, focusing on fighting vandalism, fixing citations, and archival. I believe that having this permission could aid in the approval of constructive pending changes that I often come across while fighting vandalism. I have made roughly 1500 edits, and have earned the rollback permission. — Your local Sink Cat ( The Sink). 23:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I'd just like an extra tool in my vandal fighting utility belt. Plus signing off on good edits would make me feel helpful. -- D'n'B- t -- 17:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! Requesting rollback rights to be able to use different tools for reverting vandalism. I'm open to any questions or feedback on my editing and counter-vandalism actions. Cheers. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 11:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been fighting vandalism for a while now and would like to use some other tools, like WP:HUGGLE to do so more efficiently. I've grown to have a good understanding of how to fight vandalism, including WP:RPPI and WP:AIV. Thanks for considering and have a great rest of your day! MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 16:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Bot Name | Status | Created | Last editor | Date/Time | Last BAG editor | Date/Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IznoBot 4 ( T| C| B| F) | Open | 2024-07-13, 15:47:52 | Izno | 2024-07-13, 15:48:19 | Never edited by BAG | n/a |
Platybot ( T| C| B| F) | Open | 2024-07-08, 08:52:05 | BilledMammal | 2024-07-08, 11:47:35 | Never edited by BAG | n/a |
BattyBot 81 ( T| C| B| F) | On hold | 2024-02-07, 14:12:49 | ProcrastinatingReader | 2024-02-15, 12:09:35 | ProcrastinatingReader | 2024-02-15, 12:09:35 |
C1MM-bot 2 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-06-25, 00:56:44 | Primefac | 2024-07-05, 17:53:58 | Primefac | 2024-07-05, 17:53:58 |
BaranBOT 3 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-06-19, 05:08:35 | Primefac | 2024-07-10, 15:32:21 | Primefac | 2024-07-10, 15:32:21 |
DannyS712 bot III 74 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-05-09, 00:02:12 | TheSandDoctor | 2024-07-13, 22:20:18 | TheSandDoctor | 2024-07-13, 22:20:18 |
StradBot 2 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-02-17, 03:20:39 | SD0001 | 2024-02-17, 05:58:51 | SD0001 | 2024-02-17, 05:58:51 |
CapsuleBot 2 ( T| C| B| F) | Extended trial | 2023-06-14, 00:14:29 | Capsulecap | 2024-01-20, 02:36:30 | Primefac | 2024-01-15, 07:40:39 |
AussieBot 1 ( T| C| B| F) | Extended trial: User response needed! | 2023-03-22, 01:57:36 | Hawkeye7 | 2024-02-18, 23:33:13 | Primefac | 2024-02-18, 20:10:45 |
DoggoBot 10 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2023-03-02, 02:55:00 | Frostly | 2024-02-21, 22:41:18 | Primefac | 2024-01-15, 07:40:49 |
Mdann52 bot 14 ( T| C| B| F) | Trial complete | 2024-06-10, 17:46:58 | Mdann52 | 2024-07-06, 08:56:38 | Primefac | 2024-07-05, 17:57:38 |
BaranBOT 2 ( T| C| B| F) | Trial complete | 2024-05-27, 14:01:46 | DreamRimmer | 2024-07-06, 14:03:24 | Primefac | 2024-06-27, 15:25:33 |
PrimeBOT 39 ( T| C| B| F) | On hold | 2023-05-11, 12:48:50 | Primefac | 2023-09-22, 10:51:59 | Headbomb | 2023-07-02, 17:38:58 |
User
Talk
Dashboard
Articles
Scripts
Tools
Templates
Userboxes
Awards
![]() |
---|
4 July 2024 |
Hi. Could the line !('/' in page_title) &
be removed from
803 (
hist ·
log)? I can't think of a scenario where a new user would need to edit someone else's subpage, and I've seen users vandalizing guestbooks and other subpages before. Thanks. '''[[
User:CanonNi]]''' (
talk •
contribs) 10:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
page_first_contributor != user_name
could work for already created subpages.
Nobody (
talk) 11:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Air on White ( talk) 00:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I propose that 1076 ( hist · log), with a filter's description of "Draftified article more than 180 days old", be modified from a threshold of 180 days to 90 days. The notes in the filter say the following:
Since these changes where the filter moved from 90 to 180 days, there has been a RfC on the matter of draftifications and how long after creation is appropriate. It was closed March 24, 2022, and the result was that pages over 90 days should not generally be draftified. As such, it makes sense for the filter to reflect this. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Nyttend ( talk) 12:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Important, do not remove this line before article has been created. -->
beside the templates)I've tested possible code for this filter on Test Wiki (see here), and it seems to work well. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
!contains_any(user_groups, 'extendedconfirmed', 'sysop', 'bot', 'patrol')
? –
PharyngealImplosive7
(talk) 01:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
before article has been createdclause of the hidden comment. Can the filter tell the difference between these two cases? If not, then I do not think it will be a helpful filter (unless it is log-only). Primefac ( talk) 13:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
!added_lines irlike '#redirect'
line is used to not catch drafts that were turned into redirects (likely from a page move). '''[[
User:CanonNi]]''' (
talk •
contribs) 13:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Rusty talk contribs 23:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Ed-Tech Press, also known as "Scientific E-Resources, is a Wikipedia mirror. They print copies of books that are just Wikipedia articles. Per WP:CIRCULAR, we should never cite them in articles. Unfortunately, these books are listed in Google Books, and there's no obvious warning on them. I've inadvertently cited them twice recently. While I really appreciate reversions like this one, it seems like this is an area where an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Could we please have an abuse filter set up for this string:
|publisher=Scientific e-Resources
which should catch most {{ cite book}} uses? If it would be great if it could produce a warning message like "Ed-Tech Press and Scientific E-Resources are Wikipedia mirrors. They are not reliable sources and should not be cited in articles per WP:CIRCULAR." I think that the 'warn' setting should be sufficient. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 01:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
page_namespace == 0 & !contains_any(user_groups "bot", "sysop", "extendedconfirmed") & ( mirrors := "(?:\|publisher\s*\=\s*(?:(?:[Ss]cientific [Ee]\s?-\s?[Rr]esources)|(?:Ed\s?-\s?[Tt]ech [Pp]ress)))|(?:\|url\s*\=\s*edtechpress\.co\.uk)" added_lines irlike mirrors & !(removed_lines irlike mirrors) )
Backlog CLEAN!
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 0 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 1 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
Possibly contested candidates | 2 |
Other candidates | 6 |
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Previously had AWB rights, back to editing now. SerChevalerie ( talk) 07:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc. talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I’ve reviewed pages on the new pages feed. In fact, I have sometimes CSD or redirected (because it’s a duplicate article) before NPRs, please consider me. 48 JCL 12:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker ( talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights
As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ ( talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been a long-time editor on this site for 7 years with lots of experience creating articles and participating in AfD discussions. I plan to use this permission to help clear the backlog and provide feedback to editors for their new articles, regardless of whether their article is notable or not. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah ( talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to assist with this project. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar 💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I'm S-Aura. I've been editing Wikipedia for a few years. I've added new articles and learned how Wikipedia works. I'm good at finding mistakes and fixing them.
Now, I want to help review edits to make sure the information on Wikipedia is correct and reliable. I think it's important for people to have access to accurate information, and I want to help make that happen.
Thankyou! 𝒮- 𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 19:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help out reviewing edits before it is published as an live article. I do have good experience. I am aware that statements must be sourced, and I know what is considered nonsense. Cwater1 ( talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Cwater1 ( talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing on Wikipedia consistently for almost a year, focusing on fighting vandalism, fixing citations, and archival. I believe that having this permission could aid in the approval of constructive pending changes that I often come across while fighting vandalism. I have made roughly 1500 edits, and have earned the rollback permission. — Your local Sink Cat ( The Sink). 23:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I'd just like an extra tool in my vandal fighting utility belt. Plus signing off on good edits would make me feel helpful. -- D'n'B- t -- 17:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! Requesting rollback rights to be able to use different tools for reverting vandalism. I'm open to any questions or feedback on my editing and counter-vandalism actions. Cheers. Rkieferbaum ( talk) 11:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been fighting vandalism for a while now and would like to use some other tools, like WP:HUGGLE to do so more efficiently. I've grown to have a good understanding of how to fight vandalism, including WP:RPPI and WP:AIV. Thanks for considering and have a great rest of your day! MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 16:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Bot Name | Status | Created | Last editor | Date/Time | Last BAG editor | Date/Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IznoBot 4 ( T| C| B| F) | Open | 2024-07-13, 15:47:52 | Izno | 2024-07-13, 15:48:19 | Never edited by BAG | n/a |
Platybot ( T| C| B| F) | Open | 2024-07-08, 08:52:05 | BilledMammal | 2024-07-08, 11:47:35 | Never edited by BAG | n/a |
BattyBot 81 ( T| C| B| F) | On hold | 2024-02-07, 14:12:49 | ProcrastinatingReader | 2024-02-15, 12:09:35 | ProcrastinatingReader | 2024-02-15, 12:09:35 |
C1MM-bot 2 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-06-25, 00:56:44 | Primefac | 2024-07-05, 17:53:58 | Primefac | 2024-07-05, 17:53:58 |
BaranBOT 3 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-06-19, 05:08:35 | Primefac | 2024-07-10, 15:32:21 | Primefac | 2024-07-10, 15:32:21 |
DannyS712 bot III 74 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-05-09, 00:02:12 | TheSandDoctor | 2024-07-13, 22:20:18 | TheSandDoctor | 2024-07-13, 22:20:18 |
StradBot 2 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2024-02-17, 03:20:39 | SD0001 | 2024-02-17, 05:58:51 | SD0001 | 2024-02-17, 05:58:51 |
CapsuleBot 2 ( T| C| B| F) | Extended trial | 2023-06-14, 00:14:29 | Capsulecap | 2024-01-20, 02:36:30 | Primefac | 2024-01-15, 07:40:39 |
AussieBot 1 ( T| C| B| F) | Extended trial: User response needed! | 2023-03-22, 01:57:36 | Hawkeye7 | 2024-02-18, 23:33:13 | Primefac | 2024-02-18, 20:10:45 |
DoggoBot 10 ( T| C| B| F) | In trial | 2023-03-02, 02:55:00 | Frostly | 2024-02-21, 22:41:18 | Primefac | 2024-01-15, 07:40:49 |
Mdann52 bot 14 ( T| C| B| F) | Trial complete | 2024-06-10, 17:46:58 | Mdann52 | 2024-07-06, 08:56:38 | Primefac | 2024-07-05, 17:57:38 |
BaranBOT 2 ( T| C| B| F) | Trial complete | 2024-05-27, 14:01:46 | DreamRimmer | 2024-07-06, 14:03:24 | Primefac | 2024-06-27, 15:25:33 |
PrimeBOT 39 ( T| C| B| F) | On hold | 2023-05-11, 12:48:50 | Primefac | 2023-09-22, 10:51:59 | Headbomb | 2023-07-02, 17:38:58 |