Mālama Hawai`i: PROD; notified
Dani808 (
talk·contribs) 02:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article cites not references indicating significance, and the article says very little about what the organization does, therefore not meeting the criteria of
WP:GNG
Nick Price (actor): PROD; notified
VrouuVrou (
talk·contribs) 02:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: Fails the notability guidelines of
WP:ACTOR as he has only had minor roles in a few movies.
Ji Chang-wook: PROD; notified
Sunuraju (
talk·contribs) 06:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The actor has had nothing other than extremely mintor roles. Most of which have been in non-notable shows/movies themselves, and therefore fails
WP:ACTOR
Daybehavior: PROD; notified
Adored (
talk·contribs) 22:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article fails to cite any sources that indicate notability that meets the standards of
WP:BAND. The movie that they recorded a song for does not seem to be notable. The only non self-published-source I was able to find for the band was a brief one paragraph article about the band's new song being available to download to the websites first 100 visitors.
UFC unduspited 3: PROD; notified
Melvinj0 (
talk·contribs) 02:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The title name is a typo, and the game is a future game with release over a year away. The article fails the narrow guidelines of
WP:FUTURE, and should be created when the game is actually released and notable.
Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad: PROD; notified
Jpmainesq (
talk·contribs) 06:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article makes no claims of notability or significance. A Google search gave me no results that discussed the company other than the company's website, and another website that gave a brief overview of the company. Therefore, the article fails the requirements of
WP:GNG
The BandWagon Magazine: PROD; notified
Zmartinez1989 (
talk·contribs) 00:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article cites no references and gives no indication of significance. The magazine is in its beginning stages and has only produced five articles. The subject clearly fails
WP:NMEDIA
Fiji Consumers Association: PROD; notified
Josuamudreilagi (
talk·contribs) 05:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article fails to indicate how the organization is notable, and a Google search provided mostly self-published sources about the organization
Peter Maltitz Anderson: PROD; notified
Uxejn (
talk·contribs) 05:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: Being managing director of a company is not enough to pass the notability standards of
WP:BIO
Italian Martial Arts: PROD; notified
Altes2009 (
talk·contribs) 05:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: Wikipedia is not a place for just listing things (see
WP:NOTDIRECTORY). None of the terms here have articles on their own, and I was unable to find many of them on Google as well.
Luoshengjiao: PROD; notified
Hitomtomtom (
talk·contribs) 05:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The subject is not notable per
WP:BIO. And a Google search of his name only gives self-published sources, and only a few at that.
Basic programms in C: PROD; notified
Maky24 (
talk·contribs) 06:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The page is just a list of some randoom C programming functions without any explanation of notability or purpose.
Brazilian Jazz Quartet: PROD; notified
Brootr (
talk·contribs) 03:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The band fails the notability guidelines of
WP:BAND, and I have been unable to find sources that discuss the band in depth, other than just mentioning their works.
Briokids: PROD; notified
Deadcop (
talk·contribs) 06:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The band fails the notability requirements of
WP:BAND, and I have been unable to find any sources via Google other than self-published sources and information on forums.
Reason: The subject fails the notability guidelines of
WP:ORG, and I found no sources on Google other than self-published sources. The article also fails to cite any references.
Reason: The subject fails
WP:ORG. The article cites no sources, and other than being claimed to be the second oldest club (a claim that is unsourced), there is nothing significant about the group.
Reason: Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines of
WP:GNG. Any of the sources found online were self-published or just gave a brief description of the game and how to purchase it.
Reason: Removed copyrighted information. Most of the rest of the article is about the songs by artists that the subject has worked with. The subject fails
WP:BIO, and the references I could find on the internet were either purely promotional or self-published.
Reason: The company does not meet the notability guidelines of
WP:CORP, and most of the sources are either self-published or press releases from the company, or brief reviews of their software.
Reason: Subject does not meet the criteria of
WP:ACADEMIC, although there is a small claim of significance to necesitate PROD instead of speedy deletion. The article also violates
WP:BLPPROD
Reason: The article fails to indicate why the subject is notable, and I suspect the game fails
WP:GNG. The article also fails to cite any outside sources.
Reason: I was unable to find any non-self-published sources that discuss the magazine, and other than being the oldest magazine for the industry, it does not seem to pass
WP:GNG.
Reason: Other than a couple recent articles about a proposed wind farm, I was able to find no reliable sources on the company, and I therefore think it fails the notability of
WP:CORP
Reason: Not notable per
WP:FUTURE. It apparently premiered in November of 2010, but won't air until potentially 2012. I was also unable to find any reliable sources that discuss the show.
Reason: The article gives no indication of notability, and the groups seems to fail the notability requirements of
WP:BAND. The article also cites no references.
Reason: Fails notability of
WP:BIO. The award he won does not appear to be notable, and I was unable to find any reliable sources on Google with a search of "Phillip Nelson" + model.
Reason: I could not find any reliable sources about the subject, therefore, I believe this article fails both
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. I would
BLPPROD the article, as it's unreferenced; however, it was created before March 18, 2010.
Reason: The article fails
WP:GNG. The only sources I could find talk about potentially turning the mall into something else. If that happens (and it hasn't yet), then whatever is built in its place will be notable and should contain some if this info in a History section, but this is not notable enough to have its own article.
Reason: There are already links to species of vertebrates at
Vertebrate. A list of all vertebrates would be far too long for one page, and this page is unreferenced.
Reason: The article appears to violate
WP:GNG, and it is unreferenced. I was only able to find one reference that only indicates the album's release date.
Reason: The subject seems to only be notable for one event (
WP:BLP1E), her death, and doesn't otherwise seem to meet the qualifications of
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: If notable (which I greatly question), this should be redirected to an article on the disappearance (
WP:VICTIM; however, the victim does not appear to have "had a large role within a well-documented historic event," and therefore, I believe the article should simply be deleted.
Reason: Per
WP:VICTIM and
WP:BLP1E, this should be a page on her disappearance, not the individual, if the crime is a well-documented historic event (which that I would question too).
Reason: Doesnt appear to meet the notability of
WP:BIO and most of the previously referenced sources didn't mention his name or were unreliable. I have been unable to find any more reliable sources.
Reason: I could not find any secondary reliable sources for the company, and a Google search of "Bluesky Aviation Services" turns up only 9 links other than the Wikipedia page. It quite easily fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP.
Reason: This article has basically all the information at
List of "Occupy" protest locations. I would redirect there, but since Chicago is left uncapitalized, I find to be an unnecessary redirect.
Reason: Seems to be talking about
Generation Y, but I can't find any reliable sources who use this as another term for Generation Y, so I'm skeptical of redirecting.
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:GNG, and the only potentially reliable source I could find was the video of the Homepage TV show. A Google search failed to provide any other reliable sources.
Mālama Hawai`i: PROD; notified
Dani808 (
talk·contribs) 02:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article cites not references indicating significance, and the article says very little about what the organization does, therefore not meeting the criteria of
WP:GNG
Nick Price (actor): PROD; notified
VrouuVrou (
talk·contribs) 02:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: Fails the notability guidelines of
WP:ACTOR as he has only had minor roles in a few movies.
Ji Chang-wook: PROD; notified
Sunuraju (
talk·contribs) 06:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The actor has had nothing other than extremely mintor roles. Most of which have been in non-notable shows/movies themselves, and therefore fails
WP:ACTOR
Daybehavior: PROD; notified
Adored (
talk·contribs) 22:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article fails to cite any sources that indicate notability that meets the standards of
WP:BAND. The movie that they recorded a song for does not seem to be notable. The only non self-published-source I was able to find for the band was a brief one paragraph article about the band's new song being available to download to the websites first 100 visitors.
UFC unduspited 3: PROD; notified
Melvinj0 (
talk·contribs) 02:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The title name is a typo, and the game is a future game with release over a year away. The article fails the narrow guidelines of
WP:FUTURE, and should be created when the game is actually released and notable.
Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad: PROD; notified
Jpmainesq (
talk·contribs) 06:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article makes no claims of notability or significance. A Google search gave me no results that discussed the company other than the company's website, and another website that gave a brief overview of the company. Therefore, the article fails the requirements of
WP:GNG
The BandWagon Magazine: PROD; notified
Zmartinez1989 (
talk·contribs) 00:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article cites no references and gives no indication of significance. The magazine is in its beginning stages and has only produced five articles. The subject clearly fails
WP:NMEDIA
Fiji Consumers Association: PROD; notified
Josuamudreilagi (
talk·contribs) 05:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The article fails to indicate how the organization is notable, and a Google search provided mostly self-published sources about the organization
Peter Maltitz Anderson: PROD; notified
Uxejn (
talk·contribs) 05:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: Being managing director of a company is not enough to pass the notability standards of
WP:BIO
Italian Martial Arts: PROD; notified
Altes2009 (
talk·contribs) 05:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: Wikipedia is not a place for just listing things (see
WP:NOTDIRECTORY). None of the terms here have articles on their own, and I was unable to find many of them on Google as well.
Luoshengjiao: PROD; notified
Hitomtomtom (
talk·contribs) 05:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The subject is not notable per
WP:BIO. And a Google search of his name only gives self-published sources, and only a few at that.
Basic programms in C: PROD; notified
Maky24 (
talk·contribs) 06:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The page is just a list of some randoom C programming functions without any explanation of notability or purpose.
Brazilian Jazz Quartet: PROD; notified
Brootr (
talk·contribs) 03:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The band fails the notability guidelines of
WP:BAND, and I have been unable to find sources that discuss the band in depth, other than just mentioning their works.
Briokids: PROD; notified
Deadcop (
talk·contribs) 06:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)n#* Reason: The band fails the notability requirements of
WP:BAND, and I have been unable to find any sources via Google other than self-published sources and information on forums.
Reason: The subject fails the notability guidelines of
WP:ORG, and I found no sources on Google other than self-published sources. The article also fails to cite any references.
Reason: The subject fails
WP:ORG. The article cites no sources, and other than being claimed to be the second oldest club (a claim that is unsourced), there is nothing significant about the group.
Reason: Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines of
WP:GNG. Any of the sources found online were self-published or just gave a brief description of the game and how to purchase it.
Reason: Removed copyrighted information. Most of the rest of the article is about the songs by artists that the subject has worked with. The subject fails
WP:BIO, and the references I could find on the internet were either purely promotional or self-published.
Reason: The company does not meet the notability guidelines of
WP:CORP, and most of the sources are either self-published or press releases from the company, or brief reviews of their software.
Reason: Subject does not meet the criteria of
WP:ACADEMIC, although there is a small claim of significance to necesitate PROD instead of speedy deletion. The article also violates
WP:BLPPROD
Reason: The article fails to indicate why the subject is notable, and I suspect the game fails
WP:GNG. The article also fails to cite any outside sources.
Reason: I was unable to find any non-self-published sources that discuss the magazine, and other than being the oldest magazine for the industry, it does not seem to pass
WP:GNG.
Reason: Other than a couple recent articles about a proposed wind farm, I was able to find no reliable sources on the company, and I therefore think it fails the notability of
WP:CORP
Reason: Not notable per
WP:FUTURE. It apparently premiered in November of 2010, but won't air until potentially 2012. I was also unable to find any reliable sources that discuss the show.
Reason: The article gives no indication of notability, and the groups seems to fail the notability requirements of
WP:BAND. The article also cites no references.
Reason: Fails notability of
WP:BIO. The award he won does not appear to be notable, and I was unable to find any reliable sources on Google with a search of "Phillip Nelson" + model.
Reason: I could not find any reliable sources about the subject, therefore, I believe this article fails both
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. I would
BLPPROD the article, as it's unreferenced; however, it was created before March 18, 2010.
Reason: The article fails
WP:GNG. The only sources I could find talk about potentially turning the mall into something else. If that happens (and it hasn't yet), then whatever is built in its place will be notable and should contain some if this info in a History section, but this is not notable enough to have its own article.
Reason: There are already links to species of vertebrates at
Vertebrate. A list of all vertebrates would be far too long for one page, and this page is unreferenced.
Reason: The article appears to violate
WP:GNG, and it is unreferenced. I was only able to find one reference that only indicates the album's release date.
Reason: The subject seems to only be notable for one event (
WP:BLP1E), her death, and doesn't otherwise seem to meet the qualifications of
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: If notable (which I greatly question), this should be redirected to an article on the disappearance (
WP:VICTIM; however, the victim does not appear to have "had a large role within a well-documented historic event," and therefore, I believe the article should simply be deleted.
Reason: Per
WP:VICTIM and
WP:BLP1E, this should be a page on her disappearance, not the individual, if the crime is a well-documented historic event (which that I would question too).
Reason: Doesnt appear to meet the notability of
WP:BIO and most of the previously referenced sources didn't mention his name or were unreliable. I have been unable to find any more reliable sources.
Reason: I could not find any secondary reliable sources for the company, and a Google search of "Bluesky Aviation Services" turns up only 9 links other than the Wikipedia page. It quite easily fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP.
Reason: This article has basically all the information at
List of "Occupy" protest locations. I would redirect there, but since Chicago is left uncapitalized, I find to be an unnecessary redirect.
Reason: Seems to be talking about
Generation Y, but I can't find any reliable sources who use this as another term for Generation Y, so I'm skeptical of redirecting.
Reason: Seems to fail
WP:GNG, and the only potentially reliable source I could find was the video of the Homepage TV show. A Google search failed to provide any other reliable sources.