![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Hello EyeSerene!
Thank you for the help you've given us with our class project.
I had previously written about adding a photo to the article. I have found one that is already on wikipedia on our project homepage ( Wikipedia:WikiProject Magical Realism Reconsidered )which applies to our book. Would you be able to help us put that picture into our project page (Kingdom of This World)?
I would like to thank you once again for your help. -- Svetlana 365 ( talk) 14:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your help!
I have found the picture, its in a great spot indeed! Thanks again!
-- Svetlana 365 ( talk) 15:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello again EyeSerene,
I would like to ask you whether a quote from the book we are creating the page about should be added within a specific format, (and if so, how?) or whether we can simply include the quote into the text as one would do in an essay, using quotation marks.
Thank you once again for all your kind help. -- Svetlana 365 ( talk) 17:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
I note that the RfC has now closed with a consensus to build on the existing "short" version. The article appears to be stable, though I note that there are several citation needed tags. After having the GAR on hold for over a month I feel that it is time for us to look at the article, give some comments and make a decision. I have left this same message on the GAR. SilkTork * YES! 16:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
A while back, you offered to help, and we are now at the point where we need it. If you go here, to section 7 you can see the list of articles they've edited. Some are up for GA already, but most of them could really use some help on the wikification, etc, comments, reviews, and general encouragement. There have been a few instances of them stepping on the toes of people with vested interests (ownership issues), but generally they are finding wikipedians cooperative and helpful. Auntieruth55 ( talk) 01:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Dear EyeSerene,
Thank you first of all for the help you have given our group with the Kingdom of This World project. We would like to ask you for your opinion on whether you think our page should fit the criteria of the Wikipedia style guide to be considered a good article. Are there any sections you think we need to improve? What is your overall impression of the article?
Thank you so much once again on behalf of all our group.
Sincerely, Svetlana —Preceding unsigned comment added by Svetlana 365 ( talk • contribs) 14:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Would you be able to comment on this editor's IP editing conduct before registering an account at: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Blablaaa? Thanks Nick-D ( talk) 05:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi , i wanted to say i understand your opinion. But things have changed since the normandy article. I also want to say that your argument of me downgrading german losses is not correct. I give always cited losses for both soviet and german. Our old problems on normandy are over i guess. ok ? Blablaaa ( talk) 08:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Yes i learned already. Blablaaa ( talk) 09:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
With reference to the last sentence! Ranger Steve ( talk) 17:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I've left a brief review on the GAR. Please feel free to refactor anything as you see fit, and I emphasise that my conclusion is tentative and awaiting your thoughts :) EyeSerene talk 14:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi EyeSerene. I think they mean me and Ecemaml, not you! The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 10:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#I made a boo-boo ;) Nick-D ( talk) 11:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC) sorry again for blocking you ;)
Hi EyeSerene,
For the Kingdom of This World page, i have found it very difficult to find a significant edition cover. I finally did... but it's on ebay.
The only picture i can find for the first English edition is on ebay and is a picture of the book taken by the seller: http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Kingdom-Of-This-World-%2F-1st-Edition!_W0QQitemZ220581726916QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20100402?IMSfp=TL100402153005r18878
Is there any chance whatsoever this could be accepted? -- Chris Weber ( talk) 07:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
-- Chris Weber ( talk) 17:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The World War Barnstar | |
I originally gave one of these to EnigmaMxmxc for a good article, but looking through the edit history today I realised just how much work you have put into the Battle of Villers-Bocage page. It's brilliantly put together in my opinion and your copyediting and prose is as much a part of that as Enigma's gathering of the sources. Like I said to him, if it was a chapter of a book, I'd buy it, (and I'm a demanding reader!) Ranger Steve ( talk) 17:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC) |
Hello. Its about this user → Scania N113 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) ←, this is not the first time he's been caught by us using his IP or sock accounts to conduct such disruptive edits. Isn't it strange that those socks are blocked but his master account remain safe? Thoughts? -- Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 09:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
For effecting the merger of the various task forces within the Military history Project over the last few months I hereby award you The da Vinci Barnstar. Thanks for all of your help. TomStar81 ( Talk) 22:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC) |
...I believe that last ACM award you were kind enough to hand out should also have an entry in the April Newsletter... ;-) Tks/cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 04:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi E
I will take a bunch of pics today and link to them here as already discussed for V-B; to be honest am not to sure what could be made of but ill feed back once ive taken some snaps.
Also would you be able to knock me up a map of Sword beach if i provided you with the required information and pics?-- EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 13:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing that issue with REFTR. I think he addressed me as I happened to be the one to give him the final warning. Hopefully he uses the talk pages and finds reliable sources. Is there anything else I should have done in this situation? I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and vandalpatrol. -- N419BH ( talk) 17:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you - I completely understand and will comply. This has nothing to do with marketing but everything to do with egregious trademark infringement in Ireland, Israel and Colombia. There is no other stores that exist. Unfortunately, until we file legal papers (which is very unfortunate) I will not have proper identification for the purposes of this article. However, considering one of the infringing parties is selling illegal product our reputation is being sullied without merit. REFTR ( talk) 17:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
The
April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 19:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
You seemed to have annoyed somebody. Check the deleted edits. Ivo Josipović ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 20:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Don't know if you recall a few weeks ago, this editor would frequently make accusations of sockpuppetry against editors with whom he disagreed, but refused to file RFCU so he could continue to make the attacks. Anyway, he continues to make snarky attacks to this day... I've filed an ANI report, and I'm notifying you since you helped in the past. Thanks for any help you can provide. // Blaxthos ( t / c ) 19:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, -- -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 23:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, -- -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 23:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
He's still at it.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 07:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your blocking User_talk:41.56.203.237 for their edits to The Shack. Appreciate your involvement. peterl ( talk) 22:26, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Eyeserene, I'm having real problems with the attitude of Jim Sweeney who has absolutely ravaged the article on the Long Range Desert Group without any discussion or consultation whatsoever; this editor had nothing to do with the article prior to May 14 2010 yet, right from the get-go seems to think that he is entitled to remove entire sections - which have been cited, regardless of his claims, and generally tear the entire thing to peices. I protested, and told him on his talk page that I would help with improving the article yet he removed it without replying directly to me on my talk page [ here]. Compare [ this] with [ this]; On May 18 I added citations for each paragraph but Jim Sweeny reverted and removed them then placed an edit notice saying that each paragraph needed a seperate citation! This is totally unfair and is disruptive editing. In my veiw he is being totally disruptive and uncooperative and his reasoning "The sections were nothing to do with the LRDG. I think the article is improved without them" is a matter of opinion - other editors have worked on the article and haven't so far made any of the sweeping changes that Jim Sweeney has made in just four days. Minorhistorian ( talk) 04:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your time and assistance. I love this site, and frankly seeing little or no action against obvious career vandals is worse to me than their vandalism. Vadon ( talk) 17:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Related threads merged under one heading. EyeSerene talk
Hello. Thanks for "locking" the Tea party movement. Well, perhaps that is not the correct wikipedia term, as I am rather new to the whole editing business. However, I was beginning to feel that it needed to be "controlled", and I think someone that is not in the USA is better able to do that in interest of neutrality.
Regards, Chicopadilla ( talk) 23:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you locked down this page. I would ask that you view the talk page regarding the U of W study. I have presented the sourcing information and the current wording is clearly
WP:OR
Arzel (
talk) 03:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I finally got some information I was waiting for and I added it to Louis H. Carpenter. This confirmed and updated dates for ranks, assignments, and positions. I also finally confirmed his service with the 5th United States Colored Cavalry Regiment. I would appreciate if you took a look at it. With another review, do you think this will finally get to A/FA status?
Please let me know. Jrcrin001 ( talk) 08:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP evading block Cptnono ( talk) 23:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi You previously blocked the user User_talk:41.56.203.237 for disruptive edits to the page The Shack as listed here. Now they are unblocked, they are repeating their disruptive edits. Can you please advise the process to get them blocked again, this time for a longer period (they have repeated their disruptive insert of an external link twice just today). Thanks peterl ( talk) 10:32, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I saw your edit summary for the coordinator page and thought for a minute there that you were also resigning. Glad to see that was not the case. TomStar81 ( Talk) 09:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thank you for your message, I would like to inform you that I have responded to your threads on my home page and on the arbitration page. I look forward to working with you on a peaceful and productive solution. thanks, mike James Michael DuPont 18:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi mate, would you mind throwing a glance through my editorial and see if you could give it some tweaks. Cheers, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 20:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi EyeSerene, I was wondering if you wanted to take a look at the Adi Da article. Tao2911 has begun to recklessly edit the article, and is showing signs of incivility again. At one point, you had banned some of his sock puppets and said you would monitor the article to make sure things were okay. I think an Administrator presence is needed, if you have time. Thank you.-- Devanagari108 ( talk) 00:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear EyeSerene, Thank you! Hard to keep up with 80 post in two days! If you would not mind putting protection up a few more days than originally stated that would be appreciated. I have a heavy work load right now. I plan to post, in discussion, suggested compromises and see if we can resolve things. Thanks again. Jason Riverdale ( talk) 01:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Eye Serene,
I think there needs to be some sort of moratorium on entries into the Adi Da article.The "rapid fire" "change in article first "discuss later" approach is continuing without any dialog. The discussion taking place is after changes are made in the article. Some so-called "minor language changes" seems like it is overdone in it's re-phrasing. I have really tried to bring a cooperative consensus to this last week. There is dispute still on one main issue and which sources are accurate and permissible. Your suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you Jason Jason Riverdale ( talk) 19:20, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Eye.- can you make the consensus change we've agreed upon? I'd like to get these witnessed and acted upon as we deal with them - not wait for further points to be brought up and discussed first, as Jason Riverdale is suggesting. His participation has been somewhat irregular lately, and since he's agreed to a point, I'd like to see good faith with the change (however small it is...) Happy to see the lock remain in place for now. Tao2911 ( talk) 21:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Just saw you on the Global Warming page and wanted to say hi from Canada :) *waves* Torontokid2006 ( talk) 08:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
The
May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 21:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | |
In recognition of your work in this now completed CCI. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC) |
TFOWR 21:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Hello EyeSerene!
Thank you for the help you've given us with our class project.
I had previously written about adding a photo to the article. I have found one that is already on wikipedia on our project homepage ( Wikipedia:WikiProject Magical Realism Reconsidered )which applies to our book. Would you be able to help us put that picture into our project page (Kingdom of This World)?
I would like to thank you once again for your help. -- Svetlana 365 ( talk) 14:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your help!
I have found the picture, its in a great spot indeed! Thanks again!
-- Svetlana 365 ( talk) 15:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello again EyeSerene,
I would like to ask you whether a quote from the book we are creating the page about should be added within a specific format, (and if so, how?) or whether we can simply include the quote into the text as one would do in an essay, using quotation marks.
Thank you once again for all your kind help. -- Svetlana 365 ( talk) 17:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
I note that the RfC has now closed with a consensus to build on the existing "short" version. The article appears to be stable, though I note that there are several citation needed tags. After having the GAR on hold for over a month I feel that it is time for us to look at the article, give some comments and make a decision. I have left this same message on the GAR. SilkTork * YES! 16:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
A while back, you offered to help, and we are now at the point where we need it. If you go here, to section 7 you can see the list of articles they've edited. Some are up for GA already, but most of them could really use some help on the wikification, etc, comments, reviews, and general encouragement. There have been a few instances of them stepping on the toes of people with vested interests (ownership issues), but generally they are finding wikipedians cooperative and helpful. Auntieruth55 ( talk) 01:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Dear EyeSerene,
Thank you first of all for the help you have given our group with the Kingdom of This World project. We would like to ask you for your opinion on whether you think our page should fit the criteria of the Wikipedia style guide to be considered a good article. Are there any sections you think we need to improve? What is your overall impression of the article?
Thank you so much once again on behalf of all our group.
Sincerely, Svetlana —Preceding unsigned comment added by Svetlana 365 ( talk • contribs) 14:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Would you be able to comment on this editor's IP editing conduct before registering an account at: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Blablaaa? Thanks Nick-D ( talk) 05:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi , i wanted to say i understand your opinion. But things have changed since the normandy article. I also want to say that your argument of me downgrading german losses is not correct. I give always cited losses for both soviet and german. Our old problems on normandy are over i guess. ok ? Blablaaa ( talk) 08:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Yes i learned already. Blablaaa ( talk) 09:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
With reference to the last sentence! Ranger Steve ( talk) 17:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I've left a brief review on the GAR. Please feel free to refactor anything as you see fit, and I emphasise that my conclusion is tentative and awaiting your thoughts :) EyeSerene talk 14:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi EyeSerene. I think they mean me and Ecemaml, not you! The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 10:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#I made a boo-boo ;) Nick-D ( talk) 11:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC) sorry again for blocking you ;)
Hi EyeSerene,
For the Kingdom of This World page, i have found it very difficult to find a significant edition cover. I finally did... but it's on ebay.
The only picture i can find for the first English edition is on ebay and is a picture of the book taken by the seller: http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Kingdom-Of-This-World-%2F-1st-Edition!_W0QQitemZ220581726916QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20100402?IMSfp=TL100402153005r18878
Is there any chance whatsoever this could be accepted? -- Chris Weber ( talk) 07:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
-- Chris Weber ( talk) 17:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The World War Barnstar | |
I originally gave one of these to EnigmaMxmxc for a good article, but looking through the edit history today I realised just how much work you have put into the Battle of Villers-Bocage page. It's brilliantly put together in my opinion and your copyediting and prose is as much a part of that as Enigma's gathering of the sources. Like I said to him, if it was a chapter of a book, I'd buy it, (and I'm a demanding reader!) Ranger Steve ( talk) 17:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC) |
Hello. Its about this user → Scania N113 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) ←, this is not the first time he's been caught by us using his IP or sock accounts to conduct such disruptive edits. Isn't it strange that those socks are blocked but his master account remain safe? Thoughts? -- Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 09:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
For effecting the merger of the various task forces within the Military history Project over the last few months I hereby award you The da Vinci Barnstar. Thanks for all of your help. TomStar81 ( Talk) 22:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC) |
...I believe that last ACM award you were kind enough to hand out should also have an entry in the April Newsletter... ;-) Tks/cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 04:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi E
I will take a bunch of pics today and link to them here as already discussed for V-B; to be honest am not to sure what could be made of but ill feed back once ive taken some snaps.
Also would you be able to knock me up a map of Sword beach if i provided you with the required information and pics?-- EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 13:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing that issue with REFTR. I think he addressed me as I happened to be the one to give him the final warning. Hopefully he uses the talk pages and finds reliable sources. Is there anything else I should have done in this situation? I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and vandalpatrol. -- N419BH ( talk) 17:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you - I completely understand and will comply. This has nothing to do with marketing but everything to do with egregious trademark infringement in Ireland, Israel and Colombia. There is no other stores that exist. Unfortunately, until we file legal papers (which is very unfortunate) I will not have proper identification for the purposes of this article. However, considering one of the infringing parties is selling illegal product our reputation is being sullied without merit. REFTR ( talk) 17:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
The
April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 19:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
You seemed to have annoyed somebody. Check the deleted edits. Ivo Josipović ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 20:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Don't know if you recall a few weeks ago, this editor would frequently make accusations of sockpuppetry against editors with whom he disagreed, but refused to file RFCU so he could continue to make the attacks. Anyway, he continues to make snarky attacks to this day... I've filed an ANI report, and I'm notifying you since you helped in the past. Thanks for any help you can provide. // Blaxthos ( t / c ) 19:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, -- -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 23:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, -- -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 23:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
He's still at it.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 07:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your blocking User_talk:41.56.203.237 for their edits to The Shack. Appreciate your involvement. peterl ( talk) 22:26, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Eyeserene, I'm having real problems with the attitude of Jim Sweeney who has absolutely ravaged the article on the Long Range Desert Group without any discussion or consultation whatsoever; this editor had nothing to do with the article prior to May 14 2010 yet, right from the get-go seems to think that he is entitled to remove entire sections - which have been cited, regardless of his claims, and generally tear the entire thing to peices. I protested, and told him on his talk page that I would help with improving the article yet he removed it without replying directly to me on my talk page [ here]. Compare [ this] with [ this]; On May 18 I added citations for each paragraph but Jim Sweeny reverted and removed them then placed an edit notice saying that each paragraph needed a seperate citation! This is totally unfair and is disruptive editing. In my veiw he is being totally disruptive and uncooperative and his reasoning "The sections were nothing to do with the LRDG. I think the article is improved without them" is a matter of opinion - other editors have worked on the article and haven't so far made any of the sweeping changes that Jim Sweeney has made in just four days. Minorhistorian ( talk) 04:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your time and assistance. I love this site, and frankly seeing little or no action against obvious career vandals is worse to me than their vandalism. Vadon ( talk) 17:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Related threads merged under one heading. EyeSerene talk
Hello. Thanks for "locking" the Tea party movement. Well, perhaps that is not the correct wikipedia term, as I am rather new to the whole editing business. However, I was beginning to feel that it needed to be "controlled", and I think someone that is not in the USA is better able to do that in interest of neutrality.
Regards, Chicopadilla ( talk) 23:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you locked down this page. I would ask that you view the talk page regarding the U of W study. I have presented the sourcing information and the current wording is clearly
WP:OR
Arzel (
talk) 03:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
I finally got some information I was waiting for and I added it to Louis H. Carpenter. This confirmed and updated dates for ranks, assignments, and positions. I also finally confirmed his service with the 5th United States Colored Cavalry Regiment. I would appreciate if you took a look at it. With another review, do you think this will finally get to A/FA status?
Please let me know. Jrcrin001 ( talk) 08:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP evading block Cptnono ( talk) 23:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi You previously blocked the user User_talk:41.56.203.237 for disruptive edits to the page The Shack as listed here. Now they are unblocked, they are repeating their disruptive edits. Can you please advise the process to get them blocked again, this time for a longer period (they have repeated their disruptive insert of an external link twice just today). Thanks peterl ( talk) 10:32, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I saw your edit summary for the coordinator page and thought for a minute there that you were also resigning. Glad to see that was not the case. TomStar81 ( Talk) 09:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thank you for your message, I would like to inform you that I have responded to your threads on my home page and on the arbitration page. I look forward to working with you on a peaceful and productive solution. thanks, mike James Michael DuPont 18:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi mate, would you mind throwing a glance through my editorial and see if you could give it some tweaks. Cheers, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 20:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi EyeSerene, I was wondering if you wanted to take a look at the Adi Da article. Tao2911 has begun to recklessly edit the article, and is showing signs of incivility again. At one point, you had banned some of his sock puppets and said you would monitor the article to make sure things were okay. I think an Administrator presence is needed, if you have time. Thank you.-- Devanagari108 ( talk) 00:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear EyeSerene, Thank you! Hard to keep up with 80 post in two days! If you would not mind putting protection up a few more days than originally stated that would be appreciated. I have a heavy work load right now. I plan to post, in discussion, suggested compromises and see if we can resolve things. Thanks again. Jason Riverdale ( talk) 01:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Eye Serene,
I think there needs to be some sort of moratorium on entries into the Adi Da article.The "rapid fire" "change in article first "discuss later" approach is continuing without any dialog. The discussion taking place is after changes are made in the article. Some so-called "minor language changes" seems like it is overdone in it's re-phrasing. I have really tried to bring a cooperative consensus to this last week. There is dispute still on one main issue and which sources are accurate and permissible. Your suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you Jason Jason Riverdale ( talk) 19:20, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Eye.- can you make the consensus change we've agreed upon? I'd like to get these witnessed and acted upon as we deal with them - not wait for further points to be brought up and discussed first, as Jason Riverdale is suggesting. His participation has been somewhat irregular lately, and since he's agreed to a point, I'd like to see good faith with the change (however small it is...) Happy to see the lock remain in place for now. Tao2911 ( talk) 21:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Just saw you on the Global Warming page and wanted to say hi from Canada :) *waves* Torontokid2006 ( talk) 08:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
The
May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 21:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | |
In recognition of your work in this now completed CCI. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC) |
TFOWR 21:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)