bpt • desk • cites • philo • interiot • new AfD • SPATRA • WP:POLLS • WP:MEDCAB • WP:RFA • WP:RD/S, /L
I have particular pride/obsession/masochistic tendencies with several pages including:
Still not notable. The last AfD (when the article was named Abdali Medical Center) was 5 years ago and the decision was to keep the article although it is notable that there was a number of editors saying it met GNG but didn't/wouldn't consider whether the sourcing met NCORP criteria. Nothing has changed in the meantime for me. This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references have content that meets these criteria. HighKing ++ 17:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 18:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
References are a mile wide and an inch deep, primarily including the subject's own LinkedIn page, writings, patents, and grants. BD2412 T 20:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
The references are certainly not up to scratch, citations are limited ( Semantic scholar lists only one paper with 100+ citations and attributes an h-index of 2), and I don't believe any of these fellowships confer inherent notability either. A previous AFD in 2012 reached no consensus, with just one keep vote. Uhooep ( talk) 15:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Article is a WP:PROMO, fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:BIO. Renomination reason: sock puppet activity in the prior AfD discussion, also six months have passed since the last AfD. Charlie ( talk) 04:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Article is a WP:PROMO Fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for corporations, as explained in WP:NCORP, WP:ORGCRIT. Fails WP:RSP. Sponsored content published at supplements ( WP:NEWSORGINDIA). Renomination reason: sock puppet activity in the prior AfD discussion, also six months have passed since the last AfD. Charlie ( talk) 04:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Not notable for a page. The sources are not reliable MaximumRespect! MrFixer200 ( talk) 20:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I had an undisclosed conflict of interest when I created this article. My supervisor has asked me to request that the article be deleted on this basis. I am sorry I created it. I hope this process will be simple. Thank you. A loose necktie ( talk) 20:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that it meets WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
An automatically generated list of proposed deletions and other medicine-related article alerts can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Article alerts, Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Article alerts, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience/Article alerts
I was once prominent in the WP:SPATRA ( history). My offshoot translations were:
Independent projects:
Cleanup Taskforce |
---|
Desk Queue: 0 |
Areas of Expertise
|
I am no longer a participant in the Cleanup Taskforce. My former contributions are listed below; you may submit a cleanup request here.
Abbreviated Deletion Tools |
Articles ( howto| log) |
{{
subst:afd}} |
Speedy |
|
Redirects (
howto|
log) Miscellaneous ( log) Copyvios ( howto| log) |
Mergers |
|
Page moves |
|
Transwiki ( howto| log) |
|
Deletion review, policy, log |
I no longer believe in AfD, but I retain this template to help me navigate that wasteland if necessary.
bpt • desk • cites • philo • interiot • new AfD • SPATRA • WP:POLLS • WP:MEDCAB • WP:RFA • WP:RD/S, /L
I have particular pride/obsession/masochistic tendencies with several pages including:
Still not notable. The last AfD (when the article was named Abdali Medical Center) was 5 years ago and the decision was to keep the article although it is notable that there was a number of editors saying it met GNG but didn't/wouldn't consider whether the sourcing met NCORP criteria. Nothing has changed in the meantime for me. This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references have content that meets these criteria. HighKing ++ 17:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 18:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
References are a mile wide and an inch deep, primarily including the subject's own LinkedIn page, writings, patents, and grants. BD2412 T 20:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
The references are certainly not up to scratch, citations are limited ( Semantic scholar lists only one paper with 100+ citations and attributes an h-index of 2), and I don't believe any of these fellowships confer inherent notability either. A previous AFD in 2012 reached no consensus, with just one keep vote. Uhooep ( talk) 15:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Article is a WP:PROMO, fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:BIO. Renomination reason: sock puppet activity in the prior AfD discussion, also six months have passed since the last AfD. Charlie ( talk) 04:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Article is a WP:PROMO Fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for corporations, as explained in WP:NCORP, WP:ORGCRIT. Fails WP:RSP. Sponsored content published at supplements ( WP:NEWSORGINDIA). Renomination reason: sock puppet activity in the prior AfD discussion, also six months have passed since the last AfD. Charlie ( talk) 04:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Not notable for a page. The sources are not reliable MaximumRespect! MrFixer200 ( talk) 20:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I had an undisclosed conflict of interest when I created this article. My supervisor has asked me to request that the article be deleted on this basis. I am sorry I created it. I hope this process will be simple. Thank you. A loose necktie ( talk) 20:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that it meets WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
An automatically generated list of proposed deletions and other medicine-related article alerts can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Article alerts, Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Article alerts, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience/Article alerts
I was once prominent in the WP:SPATRA ( history). My offshoot translations were:
Independent projects:
Cleanup Taskforce |
---|
Desk Queue: 0 |
Areas of Expertise
|
I am no longer a participant in the Cleanup Taskforce. My former contributions are listed below; you may submit a cleanup request here.
Abbreviated Deletion Tools |
Articles ( howto| log) |
{{
subst:afd}} |
Speedy |
|
Redirects (
howto|
log) Miscellaneous ( log) Copyvios ( howto| log) |
Mergers |
|
Page moves |
|
Transwiki ( howto| log) |
|
Deletion review, policy, log |
I no longer believe in AfD, but I retain this template to help me navigate that wasteland if necessary.