Maybe WP:LTA/PT? 76.117.247.55 ( talk) 03:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC) BD2412: please could I have rollback here. As you know, I am an admin on WQ and WV, and have rollback on WB, so I know how to use rollback. Thanks.-- Collingwood ( talk) 19:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Could you move Talk:Bag_(disambiguation) back to Talk:Bag, merging it with your own comment? All of that talkpage is concerning the article-state-of-page. Ta :) — Quiddity ( talk) 21:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC) Could you please explain the following edits [1] [2] that have broken links? Is there an intention to rename Rowing project? -- Traveler100 ( talk) 21:25, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
New Martyr editI ran across your of the New Martyr article. You disambiguated Hasan to Hassan al-Banna. That seems very unlikely to me as the title New Martyr comes from the Eastern Orthodox Church and Hassan al-Banna is a Muslim. I thought maybe something got crossed up in your edit. Thanks, SchreiberBike ( talk) 05:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC) I notice that you made some edits to this article. It is currently up for GA review, and could benefit from an expert looking at it. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 11:58, 25 October 2012 (UTC) Hi, I notice you're making a number of edits in the form [[ First Amendment]] → [[ First Amendment to the United States Constitution]], on the premise that First Amendment is a disambiguation page. Actually, it used to be a dab page, but has been a redirect for some time (see Talk:First Amendment#Requested move, take 2). In cases like this, the links to the redirect are to be retained, rather than piped; see WP:NOTBROKEN. Are you maybe working with an automated tool that might still be reflecting First Amendment as a dab page? TJRC ( talk) 19:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Howdy chief. Requesting a !recount on the Rewilding_Animals RfD please. Of the four participants (including myself the nom), three proposed deletion of the ones with odd spacing around brackets. This isn't particularly clear from a quick reading of the RfD, largely due to my not grouping the redirects under discussion more clearly, apologies. - TB ( talk) 19:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
What do you think about Persian Empire redirect to Persian Empire (disambiguation)? -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 11:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC) FYI - Template:Did you know nominations/Protestant Bible — Maile ( talk) 21:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC) There is a proposal to move Impulsion (horse) back to just Impulsion. May want to hold off doing the dab links until that discussion has closed, another couple of days, I think. Montanabw (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Per long-standing consensus, as outlined in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles#Place names, the format for cities in Japan has been standardized to [[City, Prefecture]]. This is the style used for hundreds of Japanese municipality articles. I would appreciate if you could use your administrator powers to roll-back Yokosuka to [[Yokosuka, Kanagawa]] in accordance with this guideline. Regarding WP:TWODABS, in addition to the United States Fleet Activities Yokosuka, there are several “Yokosuka” articles which could be placed in a disambiguation page, including Yokosuka Domain, Yokosuka Castle, Yokosuka Line, and numerous “Yokosuka” aircraft. Such a disambiguation page cannot be created until Yokosuka is moved. Thanks. -- MChew ( talk) 14:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Coase theorem editHello, I noticed your of the Coase theorem article. It does seem likely that they are talking about the allocation of assets, but the Asset allocation article is about the distribution of assets in an investment portfolio, so I don't think that's the link that they are looking for there. Thanks, SchreiberBike ( talk) 02:04, 25 November 2012 (UTC) Nokia Theater (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion![]() An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nokia Theater (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Nokia Theater (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). I help dןǝɥ I 19:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
That's odd. The other editor who (earlier today) blanket reverted me on those articles, also missed a few. GoodDay ( talk) 02:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
An improved version of AWB is available at http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ Since you are a really active editor I would suggest that you always have the latest AWB revision. It has fixed some critical bugs (including the wikify-underlinked change) and it is much faster than the one you have. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 12:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
As I am sure you are aware, this edit you made with the edit summary minor fixes, mostly disambig links using AWB and was marked "minor" was not actually minor: Deleting 31,890 characters would not usually be minor, except when reverting vandalism. Is there a good reason for removing a long history of warnings? — EncMstr ( talk) 19:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
December 10 is Ada Lovelace's birthday! Not only was she the world's first computer programmer, but also the world's first female open source developer! Come celebrate with Wikimedia District of Columbia at Busboys & Poets for an informal get together! The Washington, DC event will be held on Monday, December 10, 2012 at Busboys & Poets on 5th St NW & K St NW near Mt Vernon Square. The area is easily accessible by the Red Line Chinatown stop and the Yellow Line and Green Line Mt Vernon Square stop, as well as by WMATA buses. Kirill [talk] 14:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello BD2412. I see you've improved the topic area by writing an entire new article on ThunderCats. What do you think of the {{ About}} template at the top of ThunderCats (1985 TV series)? It seems logical to change ThunderCats => ThunderCats (disambiguation), so we once again refer the reader to the DAB page for other meanings. However, this would take away the link to ThunderCats, which is your new article. Any other solution? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 02:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() The article Raffaele Esposito has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Hi. I don't think your deletions of Nampally and Ibrox disaster will work as you intended. Once the pages are undeleted, the links to them will still be in the database. Links are stored with the destination title as text, not as a page id, so deleting and undeleting does not affect the link record at all. Nice try, though. :-) R'n'B ( call me Russ) 20:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation efforts at SociopathyI have responded to your comments at Talk:Sociopathy; I'd like to request a response. (Your talk page cites a "Dispute resolution clause", and as I don't entirely understand what this means, I am hereby opting out of such an agreement at this time. I am only posting here to inform you and to request a response.) Thanks, C-PTSD ( talk) 17:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Also: I would like to apologize for having failed to tap you on the shoulder for input at Talk:Sociopathy, for the discussion about maintaining Sociopathy as a disambiguation page. My intention was to tap everyone in that discussion, but you only made the one comment on August 12, 2012, and it was so short that I didn't notice it. It was an oversight, not intentional; please excuse me. C-PTSD ( talk) 18:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC) I'm really not sure what to do about them, since I have essentially stopt dealing with vandals and vandalisms and do little editing now. Could some of them be made essays and the rest made an archive someone central rather than dependent on that or any IP addr? 76.117.247.55 ( talk) 21:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Was this a mistake? KTC ( talk) 01:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I can't put links for some reason. It was meant to say it was the one on category: Ride Albums. Just so you know what the heck I'm on about. CarrieVS ( talk) 14:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC) Hello BD2412, I don't think this is how this template works – or wouldn't all the links after Australia also need amending to include "List of soccer clubs in" (and the template renamed "Lists of soccer clubs in Oceania" or the like)..? Perhaps the template's documentation needs clarification. CsDix ( talk) 18:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
It looked and sounded like spam to me, so my auto-response kicked in. I meant no harm and apologise :) doktorb words deeds 13:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Per this comment at WP:RM: "Furthermore, I sometimes come upon situations where I lack the expertise in a given field needed to tell whether the initial page really is the primary topic". That happens to me all the time when I am doing WP:RCP (not whether it is a primary topic but whether it is a valid edit), and my solution is to just leave the questionable edit to someone else to deal with. We do have a noticeboard for BLP, and ones for some other subjects. I notice that MOS is treated as a noticeboard for MOS violations, even though I find that highly inappropriate. It is true that there might only be a dozen editors who are thoroughly familiar with either MOS and AT, and none with both, and almost the only way to attract any of their attention is at those respective talk pages, but I was wondering, are any of us too proud to just ask the question at the WP:Help desk? Would that be the best place to ask those questions? Should those of us who are familiar with these guidelines and policies be making more of a habit hanging out there to help answer these questions? Apteva ( talk) 23:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! When you move an existing article to create a disambiguation page, please take care to fix all incoming links immediately. Otherwise, readers following those existing links will not longer be taken to the article, and will be confused as to which link they should follow. Please do this now for the disambiguation pages you have already created. Cheers! bd2412 T 05:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Not sure what was going on here, but I've reverted! Pam D 09:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Hi BD2412, I'd appreciate any comments/ perspectives that you might have related to a discussion with another editor, re: the naming of disambiguation pages. I may not have fully appreciated the guidelines that you previously outlined for me. But my attempt to follow through with them seems to have run awry. Please see the brief discussion on my talk page. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 15:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
FYI, there is nothing wrong with links to redirects; see
the relevant section of the manual of style. For example, you recently changed By the way, in the cases where you really have to use pipes, make sure the whole word is included. For example, the link
Thanks for doing the disambiguation work. I intended to do it as soon as the bot left me a message, but you beat me to it. Thanks! Keizers ( talk) 15:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC) Hokkaido movesHey, I just noticed you did all these moves; thank you! They were queued up at WP:RM/TR for a while due to nobody having enough patience. Can I ask if you were able to use any automation for this? It is not uncommon for technical requests to ask for a large number of moves. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Well good. :) But. :) I haven't been in the top 4 in quite some time. So. We'll see. -- User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 05:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC) This is a great idea and am hoping to participate. Thank you… and HaPpY eDiTiNg! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 08:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Cheers. bd2412 T 02:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Im sorry i never sorted the redirect, but why did you delete it. Rather than recreating the page to add the Template:DisambigProject could you please undelete and add the tag removing the redirect, keeps the history which given the move i don't see as a bad thing even though redirects are cheap. Blethering Scot 18:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
BD - I filled out the rest of Fort Fisher and did all of the Battle of Corinth links at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Disambiguation help needed., but that's about the extent of my knowledge. If no one steps up to do the other ones, I may put my nose to the grindstone and try to figure out what is what, but I'm relatively inexpert at 20th century conflicts. Cdtew ( talk) 18:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC) The standard title for given names articles seems to be Name (given name). I am also trying to avoid having the given name page turned into a disambiguation page. The title of the article should be moved back immediately to Tabitha (given name) and the disambiguation page should be separate. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 20:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes, better wording. I had two drafts from stream of consciousness and tried to make a coherent whole but came in just shy of the mark. :-) Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 01:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC) Hi, thanks for the note on 2-entry DABs. Now I will have to find another sense and start another article, just to save that page. 8-)
Hello. You reverted a change to a redirect. I presumed that edit would have been non-controversial in substance. The redirect, as it stood, did not even direct to a "Thema". In contrast, the diambig that was created as a target included a number of actual Themas, as well as the original target. You cited WP:MDP. According to that wikiproject page, I gather that "Thema" should link directly to what is now the " Thema (disambiguation)" page, but should be named "Thema". (As the wp project page says, "This situation is avoidable, as the disambiguation page can exist at Foogle."). That would be best, I think, as Thema properly refers to a number of articles where Thema is significant in the name of the article: such as Thema (rapper), Thema International Fund, Thema macroscia, Thema psammoxantha, Thema Mundi, Thema protogramma, as well as Thema syneidiseos. That's in addition to the target that you re-created for the phrase, which fails to even have "Thema" in its name -- Theme (Byzantine district). Thoughts?-- Epeefleche ( talk) 20:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court Cases for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to SCOTUS cases and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 13:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC) I'm seeing 6 or 7 entries of you in Recent Changes at a time. I don't know what you think, but many bots don't edit this fast. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me... review me... 05:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
Maybe WP:LTA/PT? 76.117.247.55 ( talk) 03:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC) BD2412: please could I have rollback here. As you know, I am an admin on WQ and WV, and have rollback on WB, so I know how to use rollback. Thanks.-- Collingwood ( talk) 19:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Could you move Talk:Bag_(disambiguation) back to Talk:Bag, merging it with your own comment? All of that talkpage is concerning the article-state-of-page. Ta :) — Quiddity ( talk) 21:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC) Could you please explain the following edits [1] [2] that have broken links? Is there an intention to rename Rowing project? -- Traveler100 ( talk) 21:25, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
New Martyr editI ran across your of the New Martyr article. You disambiguated Hasan to Hassan al-Banna. That seems very unlikely to me as the title New Martyr comes from the Eastern Orthodox Church and Hassan al-Banna is a Muslim. I thought maybe something got crossed up in your edit. Thanks, SchreiberBike ( talk) 05:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC) I notice that you made some edits to this article. It is currently up for GA review, and could benefit from an expert looking at it. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 11:58, 25 October 2012 (UTC) Hi, I notice you're making a number of edits in the form [[ First Amendment]] → [[ First Amendment to the United States Constitution]], on the premise that First Amendment is a disambiguation page. Actually, it used to be a dab page, but has been a redirect for some time (see Talk:First Amendment#Requested move, take 2). In cases like this, the links to the redirect are to be retained, rather than piped; see WP:NOTBROKEN. Are you maybe working with an automated tool that might still be reflecting First Amendment as a dab page? TJRC ( talk) 19:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Howdy chief. Requesting a !recount on the Rewilding_Animals RfD please. Of the four participants (including myself the nom), three proposed deletion of the ones with odd spacing around brackets. This isn't particularly clear from a quick reading of the RfD, largely due to my not grouping the redirects under discussion more clearly, apologies. - TB ( talk) 19:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
What do you think about Persian Empire redirect to Persian Empire (disambiguation)? -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 11:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC) FYI - Template:Did you know nominations/Protestant Bible — Maile ( talk) 21:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC) There is a proposal to move Impulsion (horse) back to just Impulsion. May want to hold off doing the dab links until that discussion has closed, another couple of days, I think. Montanabw (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Per long-standing consensus, as outlined in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles#Place names, the format for cities in Japan has been standardized to [[City, Prefecture]]. This is the style used for hundreds of Japanese municipality articles. I would appreciate if you could use your administrator powers to roll-back Yokosuka to [[Yokosuka, Kanagawa]] in accordance with this guideline. Regarding WP:TWODABS, in addition to the United States Fleet Activities Yokosuka, there are several “Yokosuka” articles which could be placed in a disambiguation page, including Yokosuka Domain, Yokosuka Castle, Yokosuka Line, and numerous “Yokosuka” aircraft. Such a disambiguation page cannot be created until Yokosuka is moved. Thanks. -- MChew ( talk) 14:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Coase theorem editHello, I noticed your of the Coase theorem article. It does seem likely that they are talking about the allocation of assets, but the Asset allocation article is about the distribution of assets in an investment portfolio, so I don't think that's the link that they are looking for there. Thanks, SchreiberBike ( talk) 02:04, 25 November 2012 (UTC) Nokia Theater (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion![]() An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nokia Theater (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Nokia Theater (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). I help dןǝɥ I 19:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
That's odd. The other editor who (earlier today) blanket reverted me on those articles, also missed a few. GoodDay ( talk) 02:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
An improved version of AWB is available at http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ Since you are a really active editor I would suggest that you always have the latest AWB revision. It has fixed some critical bugs (including the wikify-underlinked change) and it is much faster than the one you have. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 12:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
As I am sure you are aware, this edit you made with the edit summary minor fixes, mostly disambig links using AWB and was marked "minor" was not actually minor: Deleting 31,890 characters would not usually be minor, except when reverting vandalism. Is there a good reason for removing a long history of warnings? — EncMstr ( talk) 19:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
December 10 is Ada Lovelace's birthday! Not only was she the world's first computer programmer, but also the world's first female open source developer! Come celebrate with Wikimedia District of Columbia at Busboys & Poets for an informal get together! The Washington, DC event will be held on Monday, December 10, 2012 at Busboys & Poets on 5th St NW & K St NW near Mt Vernon Square. The area is easily accessible by the Red Line Chinatown stop and the Yellow Line and Green Line Mt Vernon Square stop, as well as by WMATA buses. Kirill [talk] 14:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello BD2412. I see you've improved the topic area by writing an entire new article on ThunderCats. What do you think of the {{ About}} template at the top of ThunderCats (1985 TV series)? It seems logical to change ThunderCats => ThunderCats (disambiguation), so we once again refer the reader to the DAB page for other meanings. However, this would take away the link to ThunderCats, which is your new article. Any other solution? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 02:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() The article Raffaele Esposito has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Hi. I don't think your deletions of Nampally and Ibrox disaster will work as you intended. Once the pages are undeleted, the links to them will still be in the database. Links are stored with the destination title as text, not as a page id, so deleting and undeleting does not affect the link record at all. Nice try, though. :-) R'n'B ( call me Russ) 20:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation efforts at SociopathyI have responded to your comments at Talk:Sociopathy; I'd like to request a response. (Your talk page cites a "Dispute resolution clause", and as I don't entirely understand what this means, I am hereby opting out of such an agreement at this time. I am only posting here to inform you and to request a response.) Thanks, C-PTSD ( talk) 17:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Also: I would like to apologize for having failed to tap you on the shoulder for input at Talk:Sociopathy, for the discussion about maintaining Sociopathy as a disambiguation page. My intention was to tap everyone in that discussion, but you only made the one comment on August 12, 2012, and it was so short that I didn't notice it. It was an oversight, not intentional; please excuse me. C-PTSD ( talk) 18:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC) I'm really not sure what to do about them, since I have essentially stopt dealing with vandals and vandalisms and do little editing now. Could some of them be made essays and the rest made an archive someone central rather than dependent on that or any IP addr? 76.117.247.55 ( talk) 21:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Was this a mistake? KTC ( talk) 01:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I can't put links for some reason. It was meant to say it was the one on category: Ride Albums. Just so you know what the heck I'm on about. CarrieVS ( talk) 14:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC) Hello BD2412, I don't think this is how this template works – or wouldn't all the links after Australia also need amending to include "List of soccer clubs in" (and the template renamed "Lists of soccer clubs in Oceania" or the like)..? Perhaps the template's documentation needs clarification. CsDix ( talk) 18:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
It looked and sounded like spam to me, so my auto-response kicked in. I meant no harm and apologise :) doktorb words deeds 13:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Per this comment at WP:RM: "Furthermore, I sometimes come upon situations where I lack the expertise in a given field needed to tell whether the initial page really is the primary topic". That happens to me all the time when I am doing WP:RCP (not whether it is a primary topic but whether it is a valid edit), and my solution is to just leave the questionable edit to someone else to deal with. We do have a noticeboard for BLP, and ones for some other subjects. I notice that MOS is treated as a noticeboard for MOS violations, even though I find that highly inappropriate. It is true that there might only be a dozen editors who are thoroughly familiar with either MOS and AT, and none with both, and almost the only way to attract any of their attention is at those respective talk pages, but I was wondering, are any of us too proud to just ask the question at the WP:Help desk? Would that be the best place to ask those questions? Should those of us who are familiar with these guidelines and policies be making more of a habit hanging out there to help answer these questions? Apteva ( talk) 23:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! When you move an existing article to create a disambiguation page, please take care to fix all incoming links immediately. Otherwise, readers following those existing links will not longer be taken to the article, and will be confused as to which link they should follow. Please do this now for the disambiguation pages you have already created. Cheers! bd2412 T 05:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Not sure what was going on here, but I've reverted! Pam D 09:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Hi BD2412, I'd appreciate any comments/ perspectives that you might have related to a discussion with another editor, re: the naming of disambiguation pages. I may not have fully appreciated the guidelines that you previously outlined for me. But my attempt to follow through with them seems to have run awry. Please see the brief discussion on my talk page. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 15:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
FYI, there is nothing wrong with links to redirects; see
the relevant section of the manual of style. For example, you recently changed By the way, in the cases where you really have to use pipes, make sure the whole word is included. For example, the link
Thanks for doing the disambiguation work. I intended to do it as soon as the bot left me a message, but you beat me to it. Thanks! Keizers ( talk) 15:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC) Hokkaido movesHey, I just noticed you did all these moves; thank you! They were queued up at WP:RM/TR for a while due to nobody having enough patience. Can I ask if you were able to use any automation for this? It is not uncommon for technical requests to ask for a large number of moves. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Well good. :) But. :) I haven't been in the top 4 in quite some time. So. We'll see. -- User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 05:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC) This is a great idea and am hoping to participate. Thank you… and HaPpY eDiTiNg! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 08:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Cheers. bd2412 T 02:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Im sorry i never sorted the redirect, but why did you delete it. Rather than recreating the page to add the Template:DisambigProject could you please undelete and add the tag removing the redirect, keeps the history which given the move i don't see as a bad thing even though redirects are cheap. Blethering Scot 18:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
BD - I filled out the rest of Fort Fisher and did all of the Battle of Corinth links at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Disambiguation help needed., but that's about the extent of my knowledge. If no one steps up to do the other ones, I may put my nose to the grindstone and try to figure out what is what, but I'm relatively inexpert at 20th century conflicts. Cdtew ( talk) 18:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC) The standard title for given names articles seems to be Name (given name). I am also trying to avoid having the given name page turned into a disambiguation page. The title of the article should be moved back immediately to Tabitha (given name) and the disambiguation page should be separate. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 20:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes, better wording. I had two drafts from stream of consciousness and tried to make a coherent whole but came in just shy of the mark. :-) Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 01:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC) Hi, thanks for the note on 2-entry DABs. Now I will have to find another sense and start another article, just to save that page. 8-)
Hello. You reverted a change to a redirect. I presumed that edit would have been non-controversial in substance. The redirect, as it stood, did not even direct to a "Thema". In contrast, the diambig that was created as a target included a number of actual Themas, as well as the original target. You cited WP:MDP. According to that wikiproject page, I gather that "Thema" should link directly to what is now the " Thema (disambiguation)" page, but should be named "Thema". (As the wp project page says, "This situation is avoidable, as the disambiguation page can exist at Foogle."). That would be best, I think, as Thema properly refers to a number of articles where Thema is significant in the name of the article: such as Thema (rapper), Thema International Fund, Thema macroscia, Thema psammoxantha, Thema Mundi, Thema protogramma, as well as Thema syneidiseos. That's in addition to the target that you re-created for the phrase, which fails to even have "Thema" in its name -- Theme (Byzantine district). Thoughts?-- Epeefleche ( talk) 20:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court Cases for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to SCOTUS cases and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 13:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC) I'm seeing 6 or 7 entries of you in Recent Changes at a time. I don't know what you think, but many bots don't edit this fast. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me... review me... 05:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |