|
Welcome to my talk page!
I like to keep things compact, and don't have any great ideas for my user page yet, so my signature directs here. I was a long-time reader and lurker (since 2003). I appreciate the Five pillars and the idea of open knowledge, and want to give something back; this is why I began editing in 2021. I'd like to receive your feedback on anything I've done. Expect a reply! :) By the way:
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Because you have good ideas! Amoxicillin on a Boat ( talk) 14:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
Interesting but annoying. The portal isn't finished. In my opinion, it isn't worth finishing, but I am recommending that the closer wait until the originator comes off block to see if they have any comments. If it were finished, it would still be inferior to the deleted portal. Since it isn't substantially identical, you are correct that it isn't a G4, but it won't be as good as the deleted portal, which still wasn't worth keeping.
Do new portals appear in the New Page feed? Is that how you saw that this portal had been recreated? Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
... for this edit. This was obviously one of the rare occasions when changing another editor's post was the right thing to do.👍 JBW ( talk) 13:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, i am Alex Brad Casanas, mostly known on YouTube and Reddit by my alias MISTER MANTICORE. I appreciate your work in The Monument Mythos article but as you can see i left a message to my fans and the article editors, as my therapist recommended me to ask you all to stop the work on the article and to delete it for my mental sanity keep. If you don't know about me, i did horrible things in the past and i had to seek for mental help after it, and that article only makes me feel grief and damage slowly my mental sanity as it reminds me of the bad things i did. Thanks for taking your time and reading my message.
Yours faithfully,
Alex Brad Casanas (MISTER MANTICORE) Alex Brad Casanas ( talk) 15:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
References
|
---|
|
Hi!
Speaking from extensive past experience at Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine, in my opinion talk page discussion would be a much better way to effect infobox changes.
I had to use a Twinkle restore as it wasn’t practical to do a manual reversion, so I cordially invite you to redo the source rescues.
Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 09:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Do you often do recent major news events? If not, you should consider doing more of them, your emphasis on procedure and no-nonsense is ideal for it Alexanderkowal ( talk) 22:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia, as a sort of the idea of it, is to be very open to accepting contributions, to the point that a lot of material can be put together very quickly, and it can be updated immediately when events change. For instance, when something important happens in current events, we have an article on it right away. If you would like to collaborate with me on a specific current event article, start a new current event article and seek my input etc., I'd be very glad to participate. — Alalch E. 23:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your attention to detail, bold edits and re-structuring of April 2024 Israel–Hamas war protests on university campuses in the United States. Others might not agree, but I do! CommunityNotesContributor ( talk) 23:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hi Alalch E. In my opinion, this was a bad close.
Firstly, I don't believe that it's fair towards the nominator or the participants in that discussion for the (reasonably well-attended) MfD to have been procedurally closed based on a move that occurred some time after the discussion had started (indeed, I would question whether it's appropriate to move a draft currently at MfD to mainspace at all). This is especially true due to the fact that, regardless of whether the draft is under discussion at MfD or AfD, the same rationale for deletion - WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE - would apply in this case.
Secondly, given the split of the opinions expressed by editors in the discussion, I believe that this was a
WP:BADNAC - i.e., that [t]he outcome [was] a close call...or likely to be controversial
, and so the MfD should therefore have been closed by an administrator.
Thirdly, as you are involved with regards to the page in question, having edited the draft & accepted it/moved it to mainspace, I believe that your closure of this discussion was also inappropriate in that regard.
I would ask that you consider undoing your close, and moving the page back to draftspace pending the outcome of the MfD. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 08:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I have asked for a deletion review of Draft:Kashana Cauley. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 11:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
@
Jclemens,
SportingFlyer, and
Star Mississippi: With respect to how
DRV is not a user conduct review forum
, would you kindly comment on the conduct side of things here? (I think that pinging three people is probably more than enough, but I welcome anyone's comments). I promise that I will listen and answer questions and not be defensive.—
Alalch E. 13:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I'm just wondering why you tagged Draft:Hungary-Croatia as G3. I am not saying that it is not a hoax, but I am not sure whether it is blatant enough for G3. QwertyForest ( talk) 20:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Welcome to my talk page!
I like to keep things compact, and don't have any great ideas for my user page yet, so my signature directs here. I was a long-time reader and lurker (since 2003). I appreciate the Five pillars and the idea of open knowledge, and want to give something back; this is why I began editing in 2021. I'd like to receive your feedback on anything I've done. Expect a reply! :) By the way:
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Because you have good ideas! Amoxicillin on a Boat ( talk) 14:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
Interesting but annoying. The portal isn't finished. In my opinion, it isn't worth finishing, but I am recommending that the closer wait until the originator comes off block to see if they have any comments. If it were finished, it would still be inferior to the deleted portal. Since it isn't substantially identical, you are correct that it isn't a G4, but it won't be as good as the deleted portal, which still wasn't worth keeping.
Do new portals appear in the New Page feed? Is that how you saw that this portal had been recreated? Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
... for this edit. This was obviously one of the rare occasions when changing another editor's post was the right thing to do.👍 JBW ( talk) 13:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, i am Alex Brad Casanas, mostly known on YouTube and Reddit by my alias MISTER MANTICORE. I appreciate your work in The Monument Mythos article but as you can see i left a message to my fans and the article editors, as my therapist recommended me to ask you all to stop the work on the article and to delete it for my mental sanity keep. If you don't know about me, i did horrible things in the past and i had to seek for mental help after it, and that article only makes me feel grief and damage slowly my mental sanity as it reminds me of the bad things i did. Thanks for taking your time and reading my message.
Yours faithfully,
Alex Brad Casanas (MISTER MANTICORE) Alex Brad Casanas ( talk) 15:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
References
|
---|
|
Hi!
Speaking from extensive past experience at Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine, in my opinion talk page discussion would be a much better way to effect infobox changes.
I had to use a Twinkle restore as it wasn’t practical to do a manual reversion, so I cordially invite you to redo the source rescues.
Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 09:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Do you often do recent major news events? If not, you should consider doing more of them, your emphasis on procedure and no-nonsense is ideal for it Alexanderkowal ( talk) 22:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia, as a sort of the idea of it, is to be very open to accepting contributions, to the point that a lot of material can be put together very quickly, and it can be updated immediately when events change. For instance, when something important happens in current events, we have an article on it right away. If you would like to collaborate with me on a specific current event article, start a new current event article and seek my input etc., I'd be very glad to participate. — Alalch E. 23:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your attention to detail, bold edits and re-structuring of April 2024 Israel–Hamas war protests on university campuses in the United States. Others might not agree, but I do! CommunityNotesContributor ( talk) 23:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hi Alalch E. In my opinion, this was a bad close.
Firstly, I don't believe that it's fair towards the nominator or the participants in that discussion for the (reasonably well-attended) MfD to have been procedurally closed based on a move that occurred some time after the discussion had started (indeed, I would question whether it's appropriate to move a draft currently at MfD to mainspace at all). This is especially true due to the fact that, regardless of whether the draft is under discussion at MfD or AfD, the same rationale for deletion - WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE - would apply in this case.
Secondly, given the split of the opinions expressed by editors in the discussion, I believe that this was a
WP:BADNAC - i.e., that [t]he outcome [was] a close call...or likely to be controversial
, and so the MfD should therefore have been closed by an administrator.
Thirdly, as you are involved with regards to the page in question, having edited the draft & accepted it/moved it to mainspace, I believe that your closure of this discussion was also inappropriate in that regard.
I would ask that you consider undoing your close, and moving the page back to draftspace pending the outcome of the MfD. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 08:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I have asked for a deletion review of Draft:Kashana Cauley. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 11:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
@
Jclemens,
SportingFlyer, and
Star Mississippi: With respect to how
DRV is not a user conduct review forum
, would you kindly comment on the conduct side of things here? (I think that pinging three people is probably more than enough, but I welcome anyone's comments). I promise that I will listen and answer questions and not be defensive.—
Alalch E. 13:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I'm just wondering why you tagged Draft:Hungary-Croatia as G3. I am not saying that it is not a hoax, but I am not sure whether it is blatant enough for G3. QwertyForest ( talk) 20:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)