This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 18 |
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The number of recovered persons for Luxembourg is extremely incorrect. This page shows 760 recovered, while in reality there are currently 3088.
Here's the official page of the Department of Health of Luxembourg. If you click on "38.514 persons tested since the beginning of the crisis" you'll see the current amount of cured persons: https://gouvernement.lu/en/dossiers.gouv_msan%2Ben%2Bdossiers%2B2020%2Bcorona-virus.html
A chart can be found beneath, here's the direct link: https://msan.gouvernement.lu/dam-assets/covid-19/stats/Infectes-et-gueris.png
Change 760 recovered to 3088 recovered. TheScarwolf ( talk) 13:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The number of recovered cases in the Commonwealth of Dominica is now at 13 recovered. http://dominica.gov.dm/corona A00rEdit ( talk) 17:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I understand wanting to correct Pennsylvania's numbers if needed, but simply listing -201 on 23 APRIL PA daily deaths is not the way to do it. People did die in PA that day. Correct the days in question or note it in some other way. 71.46.218.126 ( talk) 20:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! ^_^, there are almost 100 cases on board the Costa Atlantica cruise ship, could anybody include it? Thank you -- CoryGlee ( talk) 22:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
One case has recovered in Abkhazia: [3] (Russian language link). Kaiser matias ( talk) 14:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The number of recovered COVID-19 in the Commonwealth of Dominica is at 13 now, here are multiple links...... including the press briefing. https://www.dominicavibes.dm/news-264234/ https://dominicanewsonline.com/news/homepage/news/covid-19-four-more-patients-in-dominica-recover-some-services-to-resume/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaDNSzrUSAM&feature=youtu.be&t=542 A00rEdit ( talk) 04:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, this may just be my O/S or something, but I can make most of these columns go sort ascending but not sort descending. I don't know if others have the same issue, but I suspect I'm not the only one who sees sort descending to be a more useful option than sort ascending. Any chance of fixing this? (Countries can go either way, and cases default to sort descending, but deaths and recoveries don't seem to have a descending option. Ϣere SpielChequers 14:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Now that the French departments are not listed separately, should we include their cases in France's footnotes?-- 17jiangz1 ( talk) 16:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
There is bad data being added to the template from somewhere. New Zealand, US Virgin Islands, and Dominican Republic all have more recovered/dead cases than total cases. Many other countries may have bad data from the same source but without showing this obvious red flag. Also FYI, DR Congo and Republic of the Congo don't sort alphabetically with the shown name; they sort as if their name started with a "C". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3A60:E0C0:E0CE:DF30:1291:909 ( talk) 18:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
New Zealand recoveries are higher than the recorded number of infections due to the exclusion of a number of probable infections.
See above topic's discussion for context.
I have used WikiBlame (that's the name of the tool, I'm not looking for someone to blame, I promise) to see when RotC and DR Congo were given the sort values "Congo, Republic of the" and "Congo, DR" respectively. Once I finishing typing this paragraph I will continue searching for these insertions, but in the meantime I was wondering if these sort values were already appropriate, and if so how there was nothing on the viewer's end (like an efn template) to address for why these two rows mingled with other countries whose names began with "C" in alphabetical sorting.
Cheers, u|RayDeeUx ( contribs | talk page) 19:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
I've been noticing that even after lowering edit protections to auto-confirmed users as well as establishing points of current consensus in this talk page that there are still a few folks who ask for new columns and change the sorting scheme. I don't want the talk page (and its archives) to sound like a broken record of "please look at 'Current Consensus'", so I was wondering if we can duplicate the content under "Current consensus" into an edit notice for the talk page for the sake of visibility.
This is what most editors see when they visit the talk page (using the default Wikipedia skin, not Timeless, on a 16" MacBook Pro for those curious): https://imgur.com/a/M3eOFDj. (for how the talk page looks with Timeless skin with Dark Reader for Firefox, same device: https://imgur.com/a/bKUeMtH)
In both cases, the "new section" button is in a higher position than the content under "Current consensus". This makes the items under "Current consensus" less visible for people who have concerns about new columns, sorting, sources, etc. An edit notice would bring more visibility to the content under current consensus, and therefore less "ghost" topics, for lack of a better term.
Thoughts?
Cheers, u|RayDeeUx ( contribs | talk page) 16:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Did I miss something? The totals at the top of the table are hugely out of sync with the actual figures in the columns. In round figures, the total of cases at the top is about 32,000 more than the sum, the deaths are about 500 less than the sum, and the recoveries are about 25,000 more than the sum. Are the totals being sourced independently of the table? This makes no sense! Ptilinopus ( talk) 14:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
can someone please put back the administrative divisions i know that they are not the best but it would be better to see if all administrative divisions have it or only part of the country — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cokibdoki ( talk • contribs) 21:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
See - [4] Firdavs Kulolov ( talk) 08:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Comparing huge countries like the USA to Spain or Italy is not very useful. I think we should add European Union to the list as a sum of its 27 members. -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 18:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi from Germany, it is nonsense to add all EU numbers because of different testing strategies, some countries test a lot in order to find contacts and put them in quarantine, to slow down or stop the pandemia, others like Sweden tell their people simply to stay at home when they feel sick, and do not test them. Contacts? So what! The numbers of deaths might be better comparable. Of course the addition of total infected cases in the world is equally ridiculous and media do it nevertheless. -- 188.97.174.249 ( talk) 02:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
The text "As of {{#if:" now appears at the bottom of the data, and this appears to have had the unintended effect of creating a new (and mostly empty) column for the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.241.184 ( talk) 17:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
37.128.32.79 ( talk) 08:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Tylko w Polsce jest więcej ozdrowienców niż zarażonych!!!!?????
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Mexico cases to 17,799 because it has been updated Eduardo Tort ( talk) 06:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
<!-the information regarding deaths due to covid -19 in PAKISTAN is false. The correct figure is 343. --> Hammad solangi ( talk) 23:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Singapore has one more death, at 15, and 16,169 cases total.
Change number of deaths from 14 to 15, and total number of cases to 16,169.
Thanks!
Source: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/covid-19-new-cases-16000-apr-30-worker-dormitory-moh-12690334 Spoopybootyhole ( talk) 16:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not include Taiwan.— Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This phrase is used in the footnote regarding China.
I don't really think this is justified, insofar as Taiwan is no more or less disputed than any other part of China - the ROC and PRC both claim all of China, including the mainland and Taiwan.
I don't really understand why there is the insistence on saying "China excluding XYZ" instead of the equivalent "Mainland China" which needs fewer footnotes, but if we are going this route it should just be "excluding Taiwan". Magic9mushroom ( talk) 19:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia's naming policy, there are grounds for specifying "Mainland China" only to clarify that Hong Kong and Macao are excluded from the assertion being made. That is not the case in most occurrences of the phrase in this article, and that should be changed. Kevin McE ( talk) 23:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Its a weird phrase, to all non-Chinese audiences “China” already excludes Taiwan. MOS is clear, we use “China” only to refer to the People’s Republic of China, “mainland China” in the context of Wikipedia means the PRC minus the SARs. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 23:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
I removed "the disputed" in diff. (I suspect it was included at least in part as way to shoehorn in the link to the Political status of Taiwan article.) -sche ( talk) 23:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
most powerful nations on Earth with a population of over 20 millionis nothing but WP:SOAPBOX, considering no RS can back that polemical statement; it has less population than the adjoining Fujian of the PRC, and already has barely more GDP PPP than Shanghai and will be overtaken before long given the current 2020 GDP forecasts. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 18:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I suspect it was included at least in part as way to shoehorn in the link to the Political status of Taiwan article.Yes. As far as I know, that is the case. We tried to include a link hinting at the status of each split territory (e.g. British Overseas Territory, France's Overseas Collectivity, Crimea annexation by Russia). -- MarioGom ( talk) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I do not see a clear parallel between Crimea and Taiwan (Taiwan last changed hands from Japan to the ROC, and Japan no longer claims it), and I don't understand why (#nations that say Crimea was annexed illegally) vs. (#nations that recognise ROC) is meaningful. Crimea is worth noting as disputed in descriptions of Ukraine and Russia because most of Ukraine and most of Russia are not disputed; all of China is disputed between the ROC and PRC, and Taiwan is not three-way or four-way disputed (unlike e.g. Aksai Chin). I don't see a valid reason to note Taiwan being disputed. Magic9mushroom ( talk) 09:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Well folks, seems like this discussion's over and we have concluded with Does not include Taiwan.
Cheers,
u|RayDeeUx (
contribs |
talk page) 14:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not include Taiwan.— Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
There is a discussion about China's footnote regarding Taiwan: Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic § "Excluding the disputed Taiwan". -- MarioGom ( talk) 18:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Notifying experienced editors:
MarioGom (sorry for double ping!),
Capewearer. Cheers,
u|RayDeeUx (
contribs |
talk page) 16:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Raphaël Dunant, I would like to see the criteria you mentioned in [
[15]]. Thanks. Cheers,
u|RayDeeUx (
contribs |
talk page) 13:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Proposal Ain the RfC you mentioned reads, and I quote:
Also, territories that are not listed at WHO Situation Reports at all, may be listed if all the following requisites are met:
- There is at least one reliable source for the statistics.
- The counts are not included under any other territory in WHO Situation Reports.
There seems to be a typo in Tunisia's recovery number. Source lists 316, but we have 3016. KolyaSchaeffer ( talk) 02:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Williams ( talk • contribs) 07:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to add in updated data regarding coronavirus in India. I would be obliged if you grant access for the same. Ankushghosh73 ( talk) 17:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
English (translated): IMHO, if the cases of the British military base and colony in the Falkland/Malvinas Islands are excluded as Argentines, I believe that the neutrality of Wikipedia is being clearly violated. To count them, the world count did not fit significantly, much less the British, but the Argentine count must be respected, like/so the pillars of Wikipedia. Especiales ( talk) 11:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Spanish (source): EMHO, si se excluyen como argentinos los casos de la base militar y colonia británica en las Islas Malvinas/Falklands, creo que se está violando claramente la neutralidad de la wikipedia. Contarlos, no cambia significativamente el conteo mundial, mucho menos el británico, y el argentino debe respetarse, también los pilares de la Wikipedia. Especiales ( talk) 11:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
The number of cases for Spain is markedly different from that given in Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Spain medical cases chart; presumably serology-confirmed cases are not being counted here. Would be nice if someone could bring these templates in sync by editing this one. Thanks. 188.108.98.189 ( talk) 17:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
We currently have a separate column just for references. This is unusual for tables, and I'm not sure why it's needed. Wouldn't it be better to just move all the references to the column where we list the country name? This would free up a bit of space and make the table seem less cluttered. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 01:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to report a bug that sorting by the number of recoveries (doesn't matter if ascending or descending) provides a wrong result. While countries without data are at the bottom (or top) of the table, countries that have more than a thousand recovered cases appear in between 1 and 100 due to a decimal place. Just a minor issue though! - WhosJan ( talk) 17:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks to some new code in jquery.tablesorter, I've fixed the wonky headers for this table at the sandbox version: Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/sandbox. Now the sort buttons are at the top where they belong (and you can still access them after scrolling the table). Would anyone object to me moving these changes to the main template? Kaldari ( talk) 20:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Now that virtually every country has been affected by the pandemic, can we replace the "227" number under "Locations" with "Worldwide"? The 227 number is unintuitive (it took me a while to figure out what it even meant) and largely meaningless at this point. When there were only a handful of countries affected it was useful for tracking growth, but at this point it's more useful to talk about how many countries are not affected (or more realistically, not reporting). "Worldwide" seems like a better header for the totals row, i.e. worldwide cases, worldwide deaths, etc. Kaldari ( talk) 03:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Why some ship has it own entry, but MV Artania is not (4 deaths, 81 cases confirmed by Western Australia, 8 more by Indonesian authorities? Not sure confirmed cases have any overlap or not. ) Matthew hk ( talk) 12:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Cases in Palestine should either include Eastern Jerusalem or not, it is better to include Eastern Jerusalem because the Palestinian ministry of health most of the time does not breakdown the recovered cases. There another problem, the total cases as of now are not including Eastern Jerusalem, but the deaths include the two fatality cases in Eastern Jerusalem, so this should be fixed as soon as possible. Dr. Mohmad ( talk) 12:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
South Ossetia has announced they have 3 cases. These are the first confirmed cases there, and would not be counted in Georgia's totals. South Ossetia confirms first three cases of coronavirus. Kaiser matias ( talk) 20:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Per COVID-19_pandemic_on_Diamond_Princess#Deaths we have a bunch of sources that list all fourteen. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 08:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
How is going on the data of French Guinea? (In other words, where are the agreements summarized on this table regarding the treatment of foreign territory ?: Be careful of confusion with Guyana, and confusingly French Guinea says Guyane in French.). I can't find any explanation in the textual notes, but COVID-19 pandemic in French Guiana exists and no entry in this table. thank you. PS: I don't care so much about this , but just to 'prevent lost items'.-- Kyuri1449 ( talk) 11:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Currently, the table states that the total cases for New Zealand is 1492, however, it seems this is mistakenly using the sources probably+confirmed case number rather than just the confirmed cases.
The column's description states that the columns is for confirmed cases, so this seems incorrect. Dgrowley ( talk) 04:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
All three have updated numbers: Abkhazia (9 cases, 1 death, 2 recovered); Arstakh (14 cases, 0 deaths, 8 recovered); South Ossetia (22 cases, 0 deaths, 0 recovered). English-language source. Further, I'll note the linked site does source their material from the relevant health authorities, and is a neutral source for the region (which can be difficult). I'll also be happy to continue noting updates here, and if alternative sources are needed will get those. Kaiser matias ( talk) 16:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
India: total corona cases-74243 Deaths-2415 Recovered-24124 Achyuthkp27 ( talk) 18:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
New cases 1162 New death 19 103.80.2.77 ( talk) 11:47, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Bahrain recovery number is incorrect 2,2195 should read 2,219 - the 5 is typo AidanMoylesGray ( talk) 18:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Morocco cases number is incorrect 6,512 should read 6,512 - the 4 is typo > 18:13, 13 May 2020 Dellux 171,194 bytes +2 Morocco, Bahrain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herbrax212 ( talk • contribs)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 18 |
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The number of recovered persons for Luxembourg is extremely incorrect. This page shows 760 recovered, while in reality there are currently 3088.
Here's the official page of the Department of Health of Luxembourg. If you click on "38.514 persons tested since the beginning of the crisis" you'll see the current amount of cured persons: https://gouvernement.lu/en/dossiers.gouv_msan%2Ben%2Bdossiers%2B2020%2Bcorona-virus.html
A chart can be found beneath, here's the direct link: https://msan.gouvernement.lu/dam-assets/covid-19/stats/Infectes-et-gueris.png
Change 760 recovered to 3088 recovered. TheScarwolf ( talk) 13:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The number of recovered cases in the Commonwealth of Dominica is now at 13 recovered. http://dominica.gov.dm/corona A00rEdit ( talk) 17:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I understand wanting to correct Pennsylvania's numbers if needed, but simply listing -201 on 23 APRIL PA daily deaths is not the way to do it. People did die in PA that day. Correct the days in question or note it in some other way. 71.46.218.126 ( talk) 20:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! ^_^, there are almost 100 cases on board the Costa Atlantica cruise ship, could anybody include it? Thank you -- CoryGlee ( talk) 22:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
One case has recovered in Abkhazia: [3] (Russian language link). Kaiser matias ( talk) 14:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The number of recovered COVID-19 in the Commonwealth of Dominica is at 13 now, here are multiple links...... including the press briefing. https://www.dominicavibes.dm/news-264234/ https://dominicanewsonline.com/news/homepage/news/covid-19-four-more-patients-in-dominica-recover-some-services-to-resume/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaDNSzrUSAM&feature=youtu.be&t=542 A00rEdit ( talk) 04:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, this may just be my O/S or something, but I can make most of these columns go sort ascending but not sort descending. I don't know if others have the same issue, but I suspect I'm not the only one who sees sort descending to be a more useful option than sort ascending. Any chance of fixing this? (Countries can go either way, and cases default to sort descending, but deaths and recoveries don't seem to have a descending option. Ϣere SpielChequers 14:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Now that the French departments are not listed separately, should we include their cases in France's footnotes?-- 17jiangz1 ( talk) 16:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
There is bad data being added to the template from somewhere. New Zealand, US Virgin Islands, and Dominican Republic all have more recovered/dead cases than total cases. Many other countries may have bad data from the same source but without showing this obvious red flag. Also FYI, DR Congo and Republic of the Congo don't sort alphabetically with the shown name; they sort as if their name started with a "C". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3A60:E0C0:E0CE:DF30:1291:909 ( talk) 18:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
New Zealand recoveries are higher than the recorded number of infections due to the exclusion of a number of probable infections.
See above topic's discussion for context.
I have used WikiBlame (that's the name of the tool, I'm not looking for someone to blame, I promise) to see when RotC and DR Congo were given the sort values "Congo, Republic of the" and "Congo, DR" respectively. Once I finishing typing this paragraph I will continue searching for these insertions, but in the meantime I was wondering if these sort values were already appropriate, and if so how there was nothing on the viewer's end (like an efn template) to address for why these two rows mingled with other countries whose names began with "C" in alphabetical sorting.
Cheers, u|RayDeeUx ( contribs | talk page) 19:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
I've been noticing that even after lowering edit protections to auto-confirmed users as well as establishing points of current consensus in this talk page that there are still a few folks who ask for new columns and change the sorting scheme. I don't want the talk page (and its archives) to sound like a broken record of "please look at 'Current Consensus'", so I was wondering if we can duplicate the content under "Current consensus" into an edit notice for the talk page for the sake of visibility.
This is what most editors see when they visit the talk page (using the default Wikipedia skin, not Timeless, on a 16" MacBook Pro for those curious): https://imgur.com/a/M3eOFDj. (for how the talk page looks with Timeless skin with Dark Reader for Firefox, same device: https://imgur.com/a/bKUeMtH)
In both cases, the "new section" button is in a higher position than the content under "Current consensus". This makes the items under "Current consensus" less visible for people who have concerns about new columns, sorting, sources, etc. An edit notice would bring more visibility to the content under current consensus, and therefore less "ghost" topics, for lack of a better term.
Thoughts?
Cheers, u|RayDeeUx ( contribs | talk page) 16:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Did I miss something? The totals at the top of the table are hugely out of sync with the actual figures in the columns. In round figures, the total of cases at the top is about 32,000 more than the sum, the deaths are about 500 less than the sum, and the recoveries are about 25,000 more than the sum. Are the totals being sourced independently of the table? This makes no sense! Ptilinopus ( talk) 14:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
can someone please put back the administrative divisions i know that they are not the best but it would be better to see if all administrative divisions have it or only part of the country — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cokibdoki ( talk • contribs) 21:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
See - [4] Firdavs Kulolov ( talk) 08:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Comparing huge countries like the USA to Spain or Italy is not very useful. I think we should add European Union to the list as a sum of its 27 members. -- Gtoffoletto ( talk) 18:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi from Germany, it is nonsense to add all EU numbers because of different testing strategies, some countries test a lot in order to find contacts and put them in quarantine, to slow down or stop the pandemia, others like Sweden tell their people simply to stay at home when they feel sick, and do not test them. Contacts? So what! The numbers of deaths might be better comparable. Of course the addition of total infected cases in the world is equally ridiculous and media do it nevertheless. -- 188.97.174.249 ( talk) 02:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
The text "As of {{#if:" now appears at the bottom of the data, and this appears to have had the unintended effect of creating a new (and mostly empty) column for the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.241.184 ( talk) 17:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
37.128.32.79 ( talk) 08:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Tylko w Polsce jest więcej ozdrowienców niż zarażonych!!!!?????
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Mexico cases to 17,799 because it has been updated Eduardo Tort ( talk) 06:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
<!-the information regarding deaths due to covid -19 in PAKISTAN is false. The correct figure is 343. --> Hammad solangi ( talk) 23:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Singapore has one more death, at 15, and 16,169 cases total.
Change number of deaths from 14 to 15, and total number of cases to 16,169.
Thanks!
Source: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/covid-19-new-cases-16000-apr-30-worker-dormitory-moh-12690334 Spoopybootyhole ( talk) 16:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not include Taiwan.— Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This phrase is used in the footnote regarding China.
I don't really think this is justified, insofar as Taiwan is no more or less disputed than any other part of China - the ROC and PRC both claim all of China, including the mainland and Taiwan.
I don't really understand why there is the insistence on saying "China excluding XYZ" instead of the equivalent "Mainland China" which needs fewer footnotes, but if we are going this route it should just be "excluding Taiwan". Magic9mushroom ( talk) 19:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia's naming policy, there are grounds for specifying "Mainland China" only to clarify that Hong Kong and Macao are excluded from the assertion being made. That is not the case in most occurrences of the phrase in this article, and that should be changed. Kevin McE ( talk) 23:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Its a weird phrase, to all non-Chinese audiences “China” already excludes Taiwan. MOS is clear, we use “China” only to refer to the People’s Republic of China, “mainland China” in the context of Wikipedia means the PRC minus the SARs. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 23:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
I removed "the disputed" in diff. (I suspect it was included at least in part as way to shoehorn in the link to the Political status of Taiwan article.) -sche ( talk) 23:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
most powerful nations on Earth with a population of over 20 millionis nothing but WP:SOAPBOX, considering no RS can back that polemical statement; it has less population than the adjoining Fujian of the PRC, and already has barely more GDP PPP than Shanghai and will be overtaken before long given the current 2020 GDP forecasts. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 18:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I suspect it was included at least in part as way to shoehorn in the link to the Political status of Taiwan article.Yes. As far as I know, that is the case. We tried to include a link hinting at the status of each split territory (e.g. British Overseas Territory, France's Overseas Collectivity, Crimea annexation by Russia). -- MarioGom ( talk) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I do not see a clear parallel between Crimea and Taiwan (Taiwan last changed hands from Japan to the ROC, and Japan no longer claims it), and I don't understand why (#nations that say Crimea was annexed illegally) vs. (#nations that recognise ROC) is meaningful. Crimea is worth noting as disputed in descriptions of Ukraine and Russia because most of Ukraine and most of Russia are not disputed; all of China is disputed between the ROC and PRC, and Taiwan is not three-way or four-way disputed (unlike e.g. Aksai Chin). I don't see a valid reason to note Taiwan being disputed. Magic9mushroom ( talk) 09:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Well folks, seems like this discussion's over and we have concluded with Does not include Taiwan.
Cheers,
u|RayDeeUx (
contribs |
talk page) 14:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not include Taiwan.— Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
There is a discussion about China's footnote regarding Taiwan: Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic § "Excluding the disputed Taiwan". -- MarioGom ( talk) 18:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Notifying experienced editors:
MarioGom (sorry for double ping!),
Capewearer. Cheers,
u|RayDeeUx (
contribs |
talk page) 16:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Raphaël Dunant, I would like to see the criteria you mentioned in [
[15]]. Thanks. Cheers,
u|RayDeeUx (
contribs |
talk page) 13:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Proposal Ain the RfC you mentioned reads, and I quote:
Also, territories that are not listed at WHO Situation Reports at all, may be listed if all the following requisites are met:
- There is at least one reliable source for the statistics.
- The counts are not included under any other territory in WHO Situation Reports.
There seems to be a typo in Tunisia's recovery number. Source lists 316, but we have 3016. KolyaSchaeffer ( talk) 02:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Williams ( talk • contribs) 07:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to add in updated data regarding coronavirus in India. I would be obliged if you grant access for the same. Ankushghosh73 ( talk) 17:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
English (translated): IMHO, if the cases of the British military base and colony in the Falkland/Malvinas Islands are excluded as Argentines, I believe that the neutrality of Wikipedia is being clearly violated. To count them, the world count did not fit significantly, much less the British, but the Argentine count must be respected, like/so the pillars of Wikipedia. Especiales ( talk) 11:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Spanish (source): EMHO, si se excluyen como argentinos los casos de la base militar y colonia británica en las Islas Malvinas/Falklands, creo que se está violando claramente la neutralidad de la wikipedia. Contarlos, no cambia significativamente el conteo mundial, mucho menos el británico, y el argentino debe respetarse, también los pilares de la Wikipedia. Especiales ( talk) 11:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
The number of cases for Spain is markedly different from that given in Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Spain medical cases chart; presumably serology-confirmed cases are not being counted here. Would be nice if someone could bring these templates in sync by editing this one. Thanks. 188.108.98.189 ( talk) 17:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
We currently have a separate column just for references. This is unusual for tables, and I'm not sure why it's needed. Wouldn't it be better to just move all the references to the column where we list the country name? This would free up a bit of space and make the table seem less cluttered. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 01:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to report a bug that sorting by the number of recoveries (doesn't matter if ascending or descending) provides a wrong result. While countries without data are at the bottom (or top) of the table, countries that have more than a thousand recovered cases appear in between 1 and 100 due to a decimal place. Just a minor issue though! - WhosJan ( talk) 17:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks to some new code in jquery.tablesorter, I've fixed the wonky headers for this table at the sandbox version: Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/sandbox. Now the sort buttons are at the top where they belong (and you can still access them after scrolling the table). Would anyone object to me moving these changes to the main template? Kaldari ( talk) 20:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Now that virtually every country has been affected by the pandemic, can we replace the "227" number under "Locations" with "Worldwide"? The 227 number is unintuitive (it took me a while to figure out what it even meant) and largely meaningless at this point. When there were only a handful of countries affected it was useful for tracking growth, but at this point it's more useful to talk about how many countries are not affected (or more realistically, not reporting). "Worldwide" seems like a better header for the totals row, i.e. worldwide cases, worldwide deaths, etc. Kaldari ( talk) 03:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Why some ship has it own entry, but MV Artania is not (4 deaths, 81 cases confirmed by Western Australia, 8 more by Indonesian authorities? Not sure confirmed cases have any overlap or not. ) Matthew hk ( talk) 12:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Cases in Palestine should either include Eastern Jerusalem or not, it is better to include Eastern Jerusalem because the Palestinian ministry of health most of the time does not breakdown the recovered cases. There another problem, the total cases as of now are not including Eastern Jerusalem, but the deaths include the two fatality cases in Eastern Jerusalem, so this should be fixed as soon as possible. Dr. Mohmad ( talk) 12:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
South Ossetia has announced they have 3 cases. These are the first confirmed cases there, and would not be counted in Georgia's totals. South Ossetia confirms first three cases of coronavirus. Kaiser matias ( talk) 20:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Per COVID-19_pandemic_on_Diamond_Princess#Deaths we have a bunch of sources that list all fourteen. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 08:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
How is going on the data of French Guinea? (In other words, where are the agreements summarized on this table regarding the treatment of foreign territory ?: Be careful of confusion with Guyana, and confusingly French Guinea says Guyane in French.). I can't find any explanation in the textual notes, but COVID-19 pandemic in French Guiana exists and no entry in this table. thank you. PS: I don't care so much about this , but just to 'prevent lost items'.-- Kyuri1449 ( talk) 11:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Currently, the table states that the total cases for New Zealand is 1492, however, it seems this is mistakenly using the sources probably+confirmed case number rather than just the confirmed cases.
The column's description states that the columns is for confirmed cases, so this seems incorrect. Dgrowley ( talk) 04:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
All three have updated numbers: Abkhazia (9 cases, 1 death, 2 recovered); Arstakh (14 cases, 0 deaths, 8 recovered); South Ossetia (22 cases, 0 deaths, 0 recovered). English-language source. Further, I'll note the linked site does source their material from the relevant health authorities, and is a neutral source for the region (which can be difficult). I'll also be happy to continue noting updates here, and if alternative sources are needed will get those. Kaiser matias ( talk) 16:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
India: total corona cases-74243 Deaths-2415 Recovered-24124 Achyuthkp27 ( talk) 18:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
New cases 1162 New death 19 103.80.2.77 ( talk) 11:47, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Bahrain recovery number is incorrect 2,2195 should read 2,219 - the 5 is typo AidanMoylesGray ( talk) 18:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Morocco cases number is incorrect 6,512 should read 6,512 - the 4 is typo > 18:13, 13 May 2020 Dellux 171,194 bytes +2 Morocco, Bahrain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herbrax212 ( talk • contribs)