Template:R from related word is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Redirect Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was listed on templates for deletion, but there was no consensus to delete. See the log. ( archive entry) Courtland 02:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC) |
In a recent efit, User:Instantnood added this template to the redirect Rail gauges and power supply of Hong Kong rails [1]. Which leads me to wonder if this template is applied to the most ridiculous cases. What exactly will the intent of this category or template be, if anything practically long enough to be a sentence still appears here? A look at Category:Redirects from related words shows up a lot more dubious entries. Is this what the template/category is really for?-- Huaiwei 11:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
{{
Edit protected}}
Please change 'alternate' to 'alternative'. It is currently incorrect grammar and should be 'alternative' like is used in every other redirect template. McLerristarr / Mclay1 15:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
To editor Sangdeboeuf: had to revert your good faith retargeting to {{ R to related topic}} because that rcat can only be used in mainspace. This rcat, the {{ R from related word}} template, can be used in any namespace, so your edit threw a whole lot of redirects into Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 14:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Template:R from related word → Template:R from related term – "Word" is too narrow; this template (or one of many redirects to it) is used on a massive number of multi-word redirects (I wouldn't be surprised if they actually accounted for a majority of the redirects using this template). "Term" is broad enough to include both multi-word and single-word terms, by definition. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the Requested move template from the top. Thanks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 16:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC) ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 16:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from verb tense. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 4#Template:R from verb tense until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 18:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. This will break a far greater number of redirects than it will potentially fix
, and this should be the main concern when renaming templates.
No such user (
talk) 12:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Template:R from related word → Template:R from related term – "Word" does not capture that this rcat applies also to related phrases, so "term" is a much better descriptor. The proposed move target currently redirects to Template:R from related topic, but "term" refers to a word or phrase, not necessarily a topic, and could serve as a better differentiation between the similar rcats ("topic" for words or phrases that could be separate articles, "term" for words or phrases unlikely to warrant separate treatment and are not alternative names). The previous requested move above was withdrawn due to fear of miscategorization of redirects, but many redirects are already improperly categorized as {{ R from related topic}} which would be fixed by this move. In any case, the affected redirects have been boldly retargeted between the two several times over the years apparently without any issue. This move will improve categorization of redirects going forward. Mdewman6 ( talk) 02:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 21:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from related concept. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Template:R from related concept until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The template still includes the notice about a move discussion, even though it ended on 14 July. Kleinpecan ( talk) 16:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
The redirect Template:Redirect to related has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 21 § Template:Redirect to related until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 16:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Template:R from related word is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Redirect Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was listed on templates for deletion, but there was no consensus to delete. See the log. ( archive entry) Courtland 02:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC) |
In a recent efit, User:Instantnood added this template to the redirect Rail gauges and power supply of Hong Kong rails [1]. Which leads me to wonder if this template is applied to the most ridiculous cases. What exactly will the intent of this category or template be, if anything practically long enough to be a sentence still appears here? A look at Category:Redirects from related words shows up a lot more dubious entries. Is this what the template/category is really for?-- Huaiwei 11:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
{{
Edit protected}}
Please change 'alternate' to 'alternative'. It is currently incorrect grammar and should be 'alternative' like is used in every other redirect template. McLerristarr / Mclay1 15:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
To editor Sangdeboeuf: had to revert your good faith retargeting to {{ R to related topic}} because that rcat can only be used in mainspace. This rcat, the {{ R from related word}} template, can be used in any namespace, so your edit threw a whole lot of redirects into Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 14:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Template:R from related word → Template:R from related term – "Word" is too narrow; this template (or one of many redirects to it) is used on a massive number of multi-word redirects (I wouldn't be surprised if they actually accounted for a majority of the redirects using this template). "Term" is broad enough to include both multi-word and single-word terms, by definition. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the Requested move template from the top. Thanks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 16:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC) ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk 16:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from verb tense. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 4#Template:R from verb tense until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 18:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. This will break a far greater number of redirects than it will potentially fix
, and this should be the main concern when renaming templates.
No such user (
talk) 12:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Template:R from related word → Template:R from related term – "Word" does not capture that this rcat applies also to related phrases, so "term" is a much better descriptor. The proposed move target currently redirects to Template:R from related topic, but "term" refers to a word or phrase, not necessarily a topic, and could serve as a better differentiation between the similar rcats ("topic" for words or phrases that could be separate articles, "term" for words or phrases unlikely to warrant separate treatment and are not alternative names). The previous requested move above was withdrawn due to fear of miscategorization of redirects, but many redirects are already improperly categorized as {{ R from related topic}} which would be fixed by this move. In any case, the affected redirects have been boldly retargeted between the two several times over the years apparently without any issue. This move will improve categorization of redirects going forward. Mdewman6 ( talk) 02:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
reply to|Qwerfjkl}}
on reply) 21:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:R from related concept. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Template:R from related concept until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The template still includes the notice about a move discussion, even though it ended on 14 July. Kleinpecan ( talk) 16:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
The redirect Template:Redirect to related has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 21 § Template:Redirect to related until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 16:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)