![]() |
Template:Casenav is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
I love this template. It really helps a lot with navigation. The only drawback was that the drafting arb just switched during a case, and I had to update 8 pages. Can parameters be sub-templated to allow easier updating when clerks and arbs change during a case? hmwith ☮ 15:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
-moz-border-radius: 1em;
should be changed to:
border-radius: 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em;
in order to support any browser that supports the straight CSS3 syntax (currently none;), Firefox and other Gecko-based browsers, and Safari and Chrome (webkit-based). At some point -o-
might be supported by Opera, but it's not currently. See {{
round corners}} for moar glam you could add. Cheers,
Jack Merridew
06:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Decision posted" in second line section to "Proposed decision" to be consistent with T:AC
Nobody Ent 13:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There's a verb missing from this line: "Only items for which an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators will pass into the final decision." I'm guessing it should say "Only items for which an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators vote will pass into the final decision." or (deleting "for") "Only items which an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators support will pass into the final decision." I request that someone add the missing word. Cheers, -sche ( talk) 16:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
I propose moving this template to a clear English title such as Template:Arbitration case navigation. The current name will still work as a redirect. Any comments? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 08:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:RFARcasenav has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add |date=February 2013
to the {{
Deprecated template}} part in the code of
Template:Casenav.
Debresser (
talk)
21:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
{{
casenav}}
. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
22:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
If you go to e.g. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute or Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tree shaping/Evidence (today I learned that "tree shaping" exists, wow; and it's contentious enough there was an arbitration case about it, double wow), you will notice that when there is more than one case clerk or drafting arbitrator, the final closing parenthesis of the second person's parenthetical "(Talk)" link is not as small as the rest of the link. I.e., it looks like this:
-sche ( talk) 06:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
</small>)
to )</small>
.
-sche (
talk)
19:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
The template supports a parameter "case name". However the implementation is incomplete, presumably because the template grew, rather than was designed. This means that shortcut, schedule and staff are not working with the "case name" parameter.
I have implemented a fix in the {{
Casenav/sandbox}}
, illustrated here (you may need to scroll down):
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
If there are no objections I will request this change be implemented.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 00:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per above. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 00:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC).
The above change was implemented and reverted as "box now renders inconsistently". I have asked the reverting editor, Village Pump (Technical) and the arbitration Clerks for help in identifying the issue (i.e. what renders inconsistently, and in what circumstances?), with no success to date. It has been suggested I ask here too, so if anyone has any clews please ping me. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 00:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC).
Note; This has been raised in four places
It would seem to me that if the "box renders inconsistently" it would be a moments work to say "on page X compared with page Y" (and preferably say which box) instead of creating unnecessary disruption. Failure to use the D of WP:BRD means that despite WP:AGF I have to make a working assumption that there is in fact no inconsistent rendering, and resubmit the correction to the template. Of course if anyone does discern a significant issue, either before are after the changes are live, please feel free to stop the process or revert the changes, and please let me know.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 22:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Correction for parameter case name
, as described in previous section.
Note: code is in Template:Casenav/sandbox, which includes the edit proposed by Technical13 below. For just this change (and the spelling correction "routing" => "routine") see Template:Casenav/sandbox2.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 22:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace:
<noinclude>{{Ivory messagebox
|1=<span class="plainlinks">'''Did you mean to go to [[Template:Casenav/data|Template:Casenav<u>/data</u>]] ([{{fullurl:Template:Casenav/data|action=edit}} edit])''' or [[Template:ArbComOpenTasks]]?
Edits to this template are rarely required during routing clerking duties, so you may be in the wrong place. If you've created a shortcut for a case (e.g. [[WP:ARBPIA]] for [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles]]) and wish for it to be automatically displayed in the case's casenav box, you are looking for [[Template:Casenav/shortcut]].</span>
|bg=salmon
|border=black
}}</noinclude>
with:
<noinclude>{{#if:{{REVISIONID}}|{{#ifeq:{{REVISIONID}}|0||{{Editnotices/Page/Template:Casenav}}}}}}
</noinclude>
This is so that the template will have cleaner code and it will make the "Preview" more useful to look at without something that isn't included clouding the example display. Thank you. — {{U| Technical 13}} ( e • t • c) 16:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the second line "Proposed decision posted" should be "Proposed decision posts" or "Proposed decision to be posted" to bring the tense in line with the other information listed. BMK ( talk) 14:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
MSGJ changed this template to an mbox a couple days ago. I reverted, unsure if they meant to change the appearance, and he responded to my talk page message saying that yes, they intended on changing the template to standardize it with other Wikipedia header templates. I'd like to discuss that change. These are my personal views, but the new mbox squashes the box (on the horizontal axis) quite a bit, causing many more runs onto new lines; e.g. try previewing the template on WP:ARBGMO. The ivory background is also useful for making the template stand out from other boxes. I suppose a lot of my hesitance comes from sentimentalism, but there's also a distinct tinge of "if it's not broken, don't fix it". I understand the urge to standardize the template, but the current design is more useful, in my personal opinion. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Currently, data relating to open requests is maintained at Template:Casenav/data. It seems when cases are closed, the template calls are then hard-coded with the required parameters, and the data is deleted from Template:Casenav/data (presumably to prevent that page becoming too large). This seems far from the simplest solution. Why don't you keep all data relating to a particular request in a subpage of this template, e.g. Template:Casenav/Arbitration enforcement. This can remain there perpetually, so there will no need to update the template when closing cases. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 20:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Since the parent template invoking this is protected, recommend that this be also. Anybody could inject "funny stuff" in the Arbcom headers right now. ☆ Bri ( talk) 15:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
User:Jonesey95 and anyone else interested: This template has two <p>
tags missing corresponding end tags. The precise placement of said closing tags is left as an exercise for the reader. See, for example,
Template:Casenav/testcases, which has a missing end tag for <p>
resulting from this template. —
Anomalocaris (
talk)
09:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:RFARcasenav has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In {{
RFARcasenav}}
, The last two <small>
tags are each closed with two </small>
tags, each extra causing a stripped tag lint error. In each case, please remove the extra </small>
tag, you figure out which one is extra.
Xeno, you put them there in your first edit of the template;
AGK and
Redrose64, you have also edited the template. —
Anomalocaris (
talk)
04:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:RFARcasenav has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I nominated Template:RFARcasenav for discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 October 22. Please add the TfD notice to the page. ({{subst:TfD}} if done today, otherwise you'll have to change the date). -- Trialpears ( talk) 13:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Given that not all the arbitrators use he/him or she/her pronouns, please replace Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after his or her time-stamped signature.
with Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after their time-stamped signature.
. Thanks.
GreenComputer (
talk)
02:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since preliminary statements are now going to a /Preliminary statements page, that should be added to the nav links. Thanks.
2602:243:2007:9990:FC12:23ED:462:65F4 (
talk)
00:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
I would normally be WP:BOLD and just do it, but I'm aware that ArbCom and its clerks don't like anyone substantively touching templates that pertain to cases.
ArbCom cases have WP:ARBFOO shortcuts; this format is meaninginfully clear, predictable, and also avoids new cases using up WP:FOO strings that might be more appropriate for something else at some point.
All of them are already shortcutted this way in Template:Casenav/shortcut except three, and I ask that those pointless outliers be changed to match the rest, as follows:
|Arbitration Enforcement sanction handling=WP:ARBAESH |Eastern European mailing list=WP:ARBEEML |Antisemitism in Poland=WP:ARBAPL
All of those WP:ARBFOO shortcuts already work (two for a long time, one recently created because it had been skipped for some reason). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 05:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Casenav/data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
In the phrase "Public evidence is preferred whenever possible, private evidence is allowed", the comma should become a semicolon.
Diff: Not sure which transcluded component contains the given text, but the nature of the change is such that testing probably isn’t required, unless there is something critically buggy with the backend engine. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 16:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Template:Casenav is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
I love this template. It really helps a lot with navigation. The only drawback was that the drafting arb just switched during a case, and I had to update 8 pages. Can parameters be sub-templated to allow easier updating when clerks and arbs change during a case? hmwith ☮ 15:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
-moz-border-radius: 1em;
should be changed to:
border-radius: 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em;
in order to support any browser that supports the straight CSS3 syntax (currently none;), Firefox and other Gecko-based browsers, and Safari and Chrome (webkit-based). At some point -o-
might be supported by Opera, but it's not currently. See {{
round corners}} for moar glam you could add. Cheers,
Jack Merridew
06:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Decision posted" in second line section to "Proposed decision" to be consistent with T:AC
Nobody Ent 13:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There's a verb missing from this line: "Only items for which an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators will pass into the final decision." I'm guessing it should say "Only items for which an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators vote will pass into the final decision." or (deleting "for") "Only items which an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators support will pass into the final decision." I request that someone add the missing word. Cheers, -sche ( talk) 16:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
I propose moving this template to a clear English title such as Template:Arbitration case navigation. The current name will still work as a redirect. Any comments? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 08:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:RFARcasenav has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add |date=February 2013
to the {{
Deprecated template}} part in the code of
Template:Casenav.
Debresser (
talk)
21:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
{{
casenav}}
. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
22:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
If you go to e.g. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute or Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tree shaping/Evidence (today I learned that "tree shaping" exists, wow; and it's contentious enough there was an arbitration case about it, double wow), you will notice that when there is more than one case clerk or drafting arbitrator, the final closing parenthesis of the second person's parenthetical "(Talk)" link is not as small as the rest of the link. I.e., it looks like this:
-sche ( talk) 06:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
</small>)
to )</small>
.
-sche (
talk)
19:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
The template supports a parameter "case name". However the implementation is incomplete, presumably because the template grew, rather than was designed. This means that shortcut, schedule and staff are not working with the "case name" parameter.
I have implemented a fix in the {{
Casenav/sandbox}}
, illustrated here (you may need to scroll down):
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
If there are no objections I will request this change be implemented.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 00:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per above. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 00:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC).
The above change was implemented and reverted as "box now renders inconsistently". I have asked the reverting editor, Village Pump (Technical) and the arbitration Clerks for help in identifying the issue (i.e. what renders inconsistently, and in what circumstances?), with no success to date. It has been suggested I ask here too, so if anyone has any clews please ping me. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 00:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC).
Note; This has been raised in four places
It would seem to me that if the "box renders inconsistently" it would be a moments work to say "on page X compared with page Y" (and preferably say which box) instead of creating unnecessary disruption. Failure to use the D of WP:BRD means that despite WP:AGF I have to make a working assumption that there is in fact no inconsistent rendering, and resubmit the correction to the template. Of course if anyone does discern a significant issue, either before are after the changes are live, please feel free to stop the process or revert the changes, and please let me know.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 22:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Correction for parameter case name
, as described in previous section.
Note: code is in Template:Casenav/sandbox, which includes the edit proposed by Technical13 below. For just this change (and the spelling correction "routing" => "routine") see Template:Casenav/sandbox2.
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 22:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace:
<noinclude>{{Ivory messagebox
|1=<span class="plainlinks">'''Did you mean to go to [[Template:Casenav/data|Template:Casenav<u>/data</u>]] ([{{fullurl:Template:Casenav/data|action=edit}} edit])''' or [[Template:ArbComOpenTasks]]?
Edits to this template are rarely required during routing clerking duties, so you may be in the wrong place. If you've created a shortcut for a case (e.g. [[WP:ARBPIA]] for [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles]]) and wish for it to be automatically displayed in the case's casenav box, you are looking for [[Template:Casenav/shortcut]].</span>
|bg=salmon
|border=black
}}</noinclude>
with:
<noinclude>{{#if:{{REVISIONID}}|{{#ifeq:{{REVISIONID}}|0||{{Editnotices/Page/Template:Casenav}}}}}}
</noinclude>
This is so that the template will have cleaner code and it will make the "Preview" more useful to look at without something that isn't included clouding the example display. Thank you. — {{U| Technical 13}} ( e • t • c) 16:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the second line "Proposed decision posted" should be "Proposed decision posts" or "Proposed decision to be posted" to bring the tense in line with the other information listed. BMK ( talk) 14:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
MSGJ changed this template to an mbox a couple days ago. I reverted, unsure if they meant to change the appearance, and he responded to my talk page message saying that yes, they intended on changing the template to standardize it with other Wikipedia header templates. I'd like to discuss that change. These are my personal views, but the new mbox squashes the box (on the horizontal axis) quite a bit, causing many more runs onto new lines; e.g. try previewing the template on WP:ARBGMO. The ivory background is also useful for making the template stand out from other boxes. I suppose a lot of my hesitance comes from sentimentalism, but there's also a distinct tinge of "if it's not broken, don't fix it". I understand the urge to standardize the template, but the current design is more useful, in my personal opinion. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Currently, data relating to open requests is maintained at Template:Casenav/data. It seems when cases are closed, the template calls are then hard-coded with the required parameters, and the data is deleted from Template:Casenav/data (presumably to prevent that page becoming too large). This seems far from the simplest solution. Why don't you keep all data relating to a particular request in a subpage of this template, e.g. Template:Casenav/Arbitration enforcement. This can remain there perpetually, so there will no need to update the template when closing cases. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 20:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Since the parent template invoking this is protected, recommend that this be also. Anybody could inject "funny stuff" in the Arbcom headers right now. ☆ Bri ( talk) 15:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
User:Jonesey95 and anyone else interested: This template has two <p>
tags missing corresponding end tags. The precise placement of said closing tags is left as an exercise for the reader. See, for example,
Template:Casenav/testcases, which has a missing end tag for <p>
resulting from this template. —
Anomalocaris (
talk)
09:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:RFARcasenav has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In {{
RFARcasenav}}
, The last two <small>
tags are each closed with two </small>
tags, each extra causing a stripped tag lint error. In each case, please remove the extra </small>
tag, you figure out which one is extra.
Xeno, you put them there in your first edit of the template;
AGK and
Redrose64, you have also edited the template. —
Anomalocaris (
talk)
04:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:RFARcasenav has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I nominated Template:RFARcasenav for discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 October 22. Please add the TfD notice to the page. ({{subst:TfD}} if done today, otherwise you'll have to change the date). -- Trialpears ( talk) 13:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Given that not all the arbitrators use he/him or she/her pronouns, please replace Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after his or her time-stamped signature.
with Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after their time-stamped signature.
. Thanks.
GreenComputer (
talk)
02:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since preliminary statements are now going to a /Preliminary statements page, that should be added to the nav links. Thanks.
2602:243:2007:9990:FC12:23ED:462:65F4 (
talk)
00:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
I would normally be WP:BOLD and just do it, but I'm aware that ArbCom and its clerks don't like anyone substantively touching templates that pertain to cases.
ArbCom cases have WP:ARBFOO shortcuts; this format is meaninginfully clear, predictable, and also avoids new cases using up WP:FOO strings that might be more appropriate for something else at some point.
All of them are already shortcutted this way in Template:Casenav/shortcut except three, and I ask that those pointless outliers be changed to match the rest, as follows:
|Arbitration Enforcement sanction handling=WP:ARBAESH |Eastern European mailing list=WP:ARBEEML |Antisemitism in Poland=WP:ARBAPL
All of those WP:ARBFOO shortcuts already work (two for a long time, one recently created because it had been skipped for some reason). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 05:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Casenav/data has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
In the phrase "Public evidence is preferred whenever possible, private evidence is allowed", the comma should become a semicolon.
Diff: Not sure which transcluded component contains the given text, but the nature of the change is such that testing probably isn’t required, unless there is something critically buggy with the backend engine. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 16:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)