![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Whoever could have guessed the "subtle" detailing? "Cabalistically esoteric" would be a better description. An encyclopedia is meant to explain, not to have hidden mysteries. The displayed map needs to show the points -- SilasW ( talk) 19:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Now that the full route of HS1 is running services can only call at Ashford iff they divert off the main (HS) line. It isn't the case that fast services just run straight through without stopping (as all at Stratford, many at Calais, etc); they just don't actually go anywhere near Ashford now! To clarify Sladen's point; Ashford may not have moved anywhere, but the line has gone East some miles! -- AlisonW ( talk) 16:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
This is nearly correct but is there possibilty that an additional branch be created to take account of the direct service to Avignon Centre as well as the provence service. I do not know how to add this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.193.51 ( talk) 22:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Seasonal services to Avignon Centre and Aix-en-Provence need to be removed and replaced by additional branch to Lyon-Part-Dieu - Avignon TGV - Marseille - Saint-Charles with best times of 4:41, 5:49 and 6:27 respectively. This diagram is not easy to edit for the everyday user — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven a68 ( talk • contribs) 11:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
@ Nathan A RF: There is not need to show the individual transit lines at an interchange station of an international service: the orders of magnitude and scales are too different. It's like showing full details for an insignificant rural level crossing on a cross-country trunk route (Oh, wait, you do that too). Useddenim ( talk) 03:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Danners430: You complained at [2] that the diagram is too wide, which I agree with. You hid the map, but that contravenes MOS:DONTHIDE so I reverted your change. I propose that the diagram should be simplified by removing all the interchange symbols, some of which are considerably wider than others. I don't think they add much useful to the diagram, which is a visual overview of the Eurostar service, not a travel guide. Do you think this is a good idea? Bazza 7 ( talk) 10:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Whoever could have guessed the "subtle" detailing? "Cabalistically esoteric" would be a better description. An encyclopedia is meant to explain, not to have hidden mysteries. The displayed map needs to show the points -- SilasW ( talk) 19:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Now that the full route of HS1 is running services can only call at Ashford iff they divert off the main (HS) line. It isn't the case that fast services just run straight through without stopping (as all at Stratford, many at Calais, etc); they just don't actually go anywhere near Ashford now! To clarify Sladen's point; Ashford may not have moved anywhere, but the line has gone East some miles! -- AlisonW ( talk) 16:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
This is nearly correct but is there possibilty that an additional branch be created to take account of the direct service to Avignon Centre as well as the provence service. I do not know how to add this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.193.51 ( talk) 22:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Seasonal services to Avignon Centre and Aix-en-Provence need to be removed and replaced by additional branch to Lyon-Part-Dieu - Avignon TGV - Marseille - Saint-Charles with best times of 4:41, 5:49 and 6:27 respectively. This diagram is not easy to edit for the everyday user — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven a68 ( talk • contribs) 11:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
@ Nathan A RF: There is not need to show the individual transit lines at an interchange station of an international service: the orders of magnitude and scales are too different. It's like showing full details for an insignificant rural level crossing on a cross-country trunk route (Oh, wait, you do that too). Useddenim ( talk) 03:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Danners430: You complained at [2] that the diagram is too wide, which I agree with. You hid the map, but that contravenes MOS:DONTHIDE so I reverted your change. I propose that the diagram should be simplified by removing all the interchange symbols, some of which are considerably wider than others. I don't think they add much useful to the diagram, which is a visual overview of the Eurostar service, not a travel guide. Do you think this is a good idea? Bazza 7 ( talk) 10:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)