This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the
page of all the approved nominations for the "
Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the second-most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the
post-expand include size limit.
Not really a fan of the hook as unless one understands the significance of the Orchestra in question it's not exactly going to attract attention. Proposing an alternative:
Overall: Thank you,
4meter4, for a very useful and comprehensive article. Although I like ALT1, I don't agree with the reason given for it: there will be a lot of people in Canada who would be offended by people of another nationality suggesting that their orchestra is insignificant, if they had seen that comment. That said, there is nothing wrong with ALT1, and it does the job required by DYK. So - good to go with ALT0 or ALT1, with preference for ALT1.
Storye book (
talk) 09:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
i'm using machine translation, but the source does not mention bribery, just that they were arrested for corruption. also, waiting on qpq. no issues with article, agf on non-english sources.
ltbdl (
talk) 02:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Ltbdl: QPQ added. Re the bribery vs corruption, BBC doesn't mention it yeah, so use the other inline (
[2]).
Juxlos (
talk) 16:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
that only says that anton was arrested for bribery.
ltbdl (
talk) 02:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Yaqut was also arrested for the same case – as recipient instead of giver though. Added a third reference (
[3]) that's more explicit.
Juxlos (
talk) 05:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
good to go.
ltbdl (
talk) 11:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that several 1964 New York World's Fair pavilions were later sent to ski lodges and universities? Source: Multiple in article, including Samuel, Lawrence R. (August 30, 2007). The End of the Innocence: The 1964–1965 New York World's Fair (1st ed.). Syracuse University Press. pp. 85-86; Cohn, Al (June 24, 1967). "What Ever Happened to the World's Fair". Newsday. p. 14W.
Comment: More hooks later. I copied a few paragraphs from the
1964 New York World's Fair article, but that info was
added by me when I completely rewrote that article on June 4, so I think it still meets the newness criterion.
Created by
Epicgenius (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 656 past nominations.
I like ALT1 the best, and the sourcing checks out on it. Article is eligible from newness and is in pretty good shape all around. No evidence of copyvio. QPQ checks out. I think everything here is in good working order!
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 18:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Policy-compliant: yes. Well-written, covers the subject well, reliably sourced, no issues with the text or the image licenses. The sources are almost entirely in Dutch, but Earwig finds no problems in English-language sources.
QPQ: done.
Hook: It tells a compelling story, and the actual words of his speech are clearly sourced.
Other comments: Thank you for an interesting article on a person whose story is important to tell. I made a few minor copyedits to the page. This hook is almost good to go. Before I clear it, I want to check about some of the blue-linking on the page. I think some of the links in the lead section are linked again lower on the page, so I'd like to have the nominator have a chance to check the page once more for (1) any overlinking, and (2) whether there might be any new links to add. I'm not seeing any other issues. --
Tryptofish (
talk) 22:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi
Tryptofish. Per
WP:DL, links may be duplicated in different sections where necessary to establish context. For example, today's FA,
The Spider (magazine), links competing publications and the author in the lede and on first mention in the text. As for other links, I didn't see any that seemed to be contextually relevant and likely to have an article. Blauw doesn't have an article even in Dutch. The sugar station might warrant an article at some point, given how big it seems to have been, but I'd have to see how much is available about it. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 23:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
OK, then, it's good to go. --
Tryptofish (
talk) 23:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
No QPQ needed. Hook is interested, although you really should list the source again here; it's de Crespigny, Rafe (2018). Generals of the South: The Foundation and Early History of the Three Kingdoms State of Wu. This checks out, however. Article seems in decent shape, although might need a round of copyediting; it's presentable, but some of the sentences are phrased a little clunkily.
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 01:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that to encourage the development of Bissau-Guinean cinema, one foreign filmmaker provided the country's film institute with cameras, lights, and a Steinbeck guitar?
Source: Laranjeiro, Catarina (2021), Blum, Françoise; Kiriakou, Héloïse; Mourre, Martin; Basto, Maria-Benedita (eds.), "The Bissau-Guinean Cinema: A Nation", Socialismes en Afrique (in French), Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, pp. 519–535, doi:10.4000/books.editionsmsh.51480., ISBN 978-2-7351-2698-9, retrieved 2024-06-08
ALT1: ... that
Amílcar Cabral sent four Bissau-Guineans to learn film technique in Cuba, hoping to stimulate filmmaking in the country? Source: Arenas, Fernando (2017). "The Filmography of Guinea-Bissau's Sana Na N'Hada: From the Return of Amílcar Cabral to the Threat of Global Drug Trafficking". Portuguese Literary and Cultural Studies: 69. ISSN 2573-1432.
ALT2: ... that much of the early cinema of Guinea-Bissau was lost after the
country's 1980 coup? Source: Cavoulacos, Sophie (June 8, 2024). "MoMA Presents: Filipa César's Spell Reel". MOMA. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
Reviewed:
Created by
Lbal (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Well done! Nominator is exempt from QPQ. The article was created within a week at the time of nomination and exceeds the minimum length for DYK. The article is generally within policy; I did make a copyedit to fix some typos and linkage issues. A basic copyvio check found no concerns. Sourcing is sufficient and high-quality. All of the hooks are cited and mentioned within the article, and I believe they pass our standards for interesting hooks.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 20:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that despite specializing in literature and serving as a senior editor of the
Zhonghua Book Company, historian Zhang Zhenglang never published a single book of his own?
Source: Lu, Zongli (2007). "A Short Biography of Professor Zhang Zhenglang". Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR). 29.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25478409
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Good to go! But, out of curiosity, where was "My Ten Years at the Institute of History and Philology" published in 1998? In a journal, or somewhere else? Thanks, A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
A Thousand Doors: in 新學術之路: 中央研究院歷史語言研究所七十周年紀念文集, Volume 1 (1998) [A New Academic Road: Collected Works Commemorating the 70th Anniversary of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Volume 1]. But the version I use was from the Peking University website - I'm kind of unsure how to cite it in this case.
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 21:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Source: Ballas, Teeka; Bodry, Catherine; Bowman, Jessica; Coffman, Linda; Heller, Carolyn; Kernaghan, Sue; McBeath, Chris; Moure, Celeste; Readicker-Henderson, Edward; Reale, Tom; Schoenbohm, Laurel; Wyatt, Sarah (2009). Kealy, Kelly (ed.).
Fodor's Alaska Ports of Call 2009. New York:
Fodor's. p. 167.
ISBN978-1-4000-0707-3.
ISSN1520-0205. Retrieved 2024-06-08 – via
Google Books.
The book notes: "We don't recommend it if you're looking for authenticity, but the Great Alaskan Lumberjack Show is a 60-minute lumberjack contest providing a Disneyesque taste of old-time woodsman skills, including ax throwing, buck-sawing, springboard chopping, log-rolling duels, and a 50-foot tree climb that ends in a free fall."
Article was moved to mainspace today, so is new enough. At over 3000 characters, it is long enough. The article reads neutrally and properly uses in-line citations. The copyvio detector finds no issues. Both hooks are interesting and are cited in-line. No QPQ is required (though will be on your next one, have fun with that!). Everything looks good to go!
SilverserenC 23:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Review ongoing: Promoted to GA on 9th and nominated here for DYK on 10th June. Article is long enough. 2 free images in article from Commons and 2 medias uploaded on enwiki with rationale. No apparent copyvios other than quotes. All the 3 hooks are verifiable as per the sources; but none of them appear in the article as have been presented here in the hook. "Horn line" should be linked or explained. I suggest rephrasing the article words to include these lines. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 11:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dharmadhyaksha I have fixed the issue for two of the hooks by using more words directly from the article (I opted not to do ALT1 as in retrospect it seems less interesting than the other two).
Koopastar (
talk) 19:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Both original and ALT2 hooks are ok. However i prefer ALT2 more as it is unique for this particular article. All good to go now! §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Article is long and new enough as well as well written and copyvio-free. However, I would prefer that you cite another reliable, independent source for the critical reception instead of using Rotten Tomatoes, which, while reliable on its own, is not an arbiter of critical consensus; you can still report on the RT scores, though. Hooks are cited both in this page and article, but I prefer ALT1 (that is, with another independent source as I've said) for obvious reasons but with some minor alterations:
ALT0 seems dull and reliant on readers' knowledge of award-giving bodies. Title card image, which is freely-licensed, seems more decorative than encyclopedic within the context of this DYK, so I seriously doubt it's gonna make it to the main page. Since QPQ has been given, this should be good to go once the issues are addressed.
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (
talk) 07:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Just clump those sources in the article while also rewriting the sentence into, Some critics described the show as necessary comic relief from the activities of the Trump administration., and then remove The fourth season was generally well received from Critical reception and leave the Rotten Tomatoes bit as a standalone sentence.
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (
talk) 12:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Drive-by nomination, as it's been around 6.875 days since this was converted from a redirect and I want to get this in under the wire. I have a small amount of work to do, starting with the excision of those ugly
WP:CLUMPs. Note that I've included 'credited' because, as can quite clearly be seen in the image in the cited source, series 4 winners Spelbound also contained women. Also noting that the majority of this article was created by an IP.
Created by
Launchballer (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 234 past nominations.
Review: Newly expanded article from a redirect meeting the required length size of prose. BLP is notable to exist as a standalone article now passing
WP:ARTIST. No apparent copyvios. QPQ done. Rest article seems fine. Problem comes with only the fact that this is a synthesis and hence not perfectly verifiable. Do we have any another source mentioning her to be the first woman winner without a dog? Or else, do we have anything else from the article to a new hook? §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
It's in
HuffPost, which I've added back to the article.--Launchballer 08:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
New enough - promoted to GA same day as nomination;
Long enough - 10,948 characters;
QPQ Check - not needed;
Hook is referenced to a secondary source clearly cited in the article, and source has a clear editorial policy;
Hook is interesting - remarkable number of musicians and instruments;
Article is presentable;
Copyvio is clear "Violation Unlikely", most comparison hits are in quotes;
The picture is clear and in the article;
However - while the picture states it is freely licenced, it has been sourced to a facebook post by two people (who retain ownership of the intellectual property per
[4]). It is therefore not wholly clear it is freely licenced per
WP:IUPC;
Also - the hook needs the rather subjective text "no less than" removed to something more neutral - e.g. "features contributions from", and the article has 2-3 sentences that need citations.
This can nearly be approved without the picture. Alternatively to approve this nom for the main page with the picture, I recommend proof "that the copyright holder has released the image under an acceptable free license". Furthermore please resolve the (relatively minor) hook and citation issues. Resonant
Distortion 16:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your comments! This picture was sourced from the comments of a Facebook post in
a fan community for the Cat Empire. In that post, I requested images of the band on tour, making it clear that I was to use them in a Wikipedia article. Would a screenshot of this post and some of the comments be sufficient proof that this image is freely licensed?
SupremeLordBagel (
talk to me) 04:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks - that's good but I suggest we get this tighter if the image is to go on the main page. Please see this section in the commons VRT
[5]. Resonant
Distortion 05:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I'll work on contacting the original photographers and get back to you when I can.
SupremeLordBagel (
talk to me) 09:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry that I haven't replied for a while! I think it's more hassle than it's worth to include the image. We'll go ahead without it.
SupremeLordBagel (
talk to me) 10:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Understood and noted, though the licencing on the respective images in the article evidently still need resolution. To get this approved for the hook only can you please (a) create an ALT1a without the "(pictured)" text, and (b) resolve the uncited statements within the article, i.e. "It is also the band's first release since The Cat Empire (2003) to be produced by Andy Baldwin" and "The song debuted at No. 1 on the AMRAP Metro Charts, and stayed in that position for two weeks." Resonant
Distortion 14:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Donereply
for ALT1a. Note: picture not approved. Resonant
Distortion 23:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Converted from a redirect by
Cavarrone (
talk). Nominated by
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Article new and long enough at the time of nomination. Length and referencing adequate ("Plot" isn't but that's MOS). No copyvio per Earwig aside from the block of interview quote. Hook interesting, cited inline. Good to go.
Juxlos (
talk) 16:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that
Tyla(pictured) delayed her debut album's submission date in order to collaborate with
Tems? Source:
ref: One of the most powerful tracks is "No. 1," featuring Nigerian R&B star Tems. Tyla even pushed back the deadline to turn in the album so she could lock in the collab.
Reviewed:
Created by
Dxneo (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Overall: Image isn't appropriate; as per
Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines, the image used for DYK must be in the article. It is also pending a review to see if it's free... I can't help there, as I've been unable to find where YouTube is keeping its licensing information ever since it was redesigned. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 01:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
dxneo, having it in the article would fix the first issue. I've also been able to confirm the CC-BY license with
this archive, so the second part isn't an issue. Once the image is in the article, we're good to go. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 10:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
(An aside - Apparently the license doesn't show up when I'm logged in and using Premium, but it does when logged out. Good to know). —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 10:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Chris Woodrich Done, and I can see the license either logged in or not. dxneo (
talk) 12:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ not needed. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 21:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Aszx5000 and
Gonzo fan2007: Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook.
Bruxton (
talk) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
"Considered" and "one of" make this less bold. I think the article supports both assertions, but if the nominator wants to add an additional source to back it up, it wouldn't hurt. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that the vocalist on the
dance song "Music Sounds Better with You" was in a punk band that disapproved of his collaboration with electronic musicians?
Overall: Since I am a relatively new user (est Dec2023), I am not sure if ALT0 violates NPOV. But regardless, I prefer ALT1
JuniperChill (
talk) 22:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
ALT1: ... that the relation "being a sibling" is irreflexive because no one can be their own sibling? Source: [2]
ALT2: ... that in the 19th century, philosophers changed their understanding of relations in response to developments in logic, mathematics, and science? Source: [3]
MacBride, Fraser (2020).
"Relations". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
Improved to Good Article status by
Phlsph7 (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.
Freshly promoted GA, looks quite solid, not copyvio. ALT0 and ALT1 are good hooks, correctly sourced and interesting. For ALT2, the sources could be a bit more explicit about the 19th century, but I agree this is correct. I am not sure it is as interesting as the other two. QPQ has been done. Approved. —
Kusma (
talk) 11:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Overall: I am assuming in good faith that the Dutch refs adequately support the text and that there is no plagiarism. I've done a general search myself as to the subject of the bio in English sources. There were some deletions made to the article of the word Nazi
here; restoring the word would help make this properly neutral in accuracy, and I would be happy then to pass this final item of the qpq.
2603:7000:2101:AA00:FD8F:5C17:CABB:9E61 (
talk) 20:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the
page of all the approved nominations for the "
Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the second-most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the
post-expand include size limit.
Not really a fan of the hook as unless one understands the significance of the Orchestra in question it's not exactly going to attract attention. Proposing an alternative:
Overall: Thank you,
4meter4, for a very useful and comprehensive article. Although I like ALT1, I don't agree with the reason given for it: there will be a lot of people in Canada who would be offended by people of another nationality suggesting that their orchestra is insignificant, if they had seen that comment. That said, there is nothing wrong with ALT1, and it does the job required by DYK. So - good to go with ALT0 or ALT1, with preference for ALT1.
Storye book (
talk) 09:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
i'm using machine translation, but the source does not mention bribery, just that they were arrested for corruption. also, waiting on qpq. no issues with article, agf on non-english sources.
ltbdl (
talk) 02:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Ltbdl: QPQ added. Re the bribery vs corruption, BBC doesn't mention it yeah, so use the other inline (
[2]).
Juxlos (
talk) 16:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
that only says that anton was arrested for bribery.
ltbdl (
talk) 02:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Yaqut was also arrested for the same case – as recipient instead of giver though. Added a third reference (
[3]) that's more explicit.
Juxlos (
talk) 05:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
good to go.
ltbdl (
talk) 11:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that several 1964 New York World's Fair pavilions were later sent to ski lodges and universities? Source: Multiple in article, including Samuel, Lawrence R. (August 30, 2007). The End of the Innocence: The 1964–1965 New York World's Fair (1st ed.). Syracuse University Press. pp. 85-86; Cohn, Al (June 24, 1967). "What Ever Happened to the World's Fair". Newsday. p. 14W.
Comment: More hooks later. I copied a few paragraphs from the
1964 New York World's Fair article, but that info was
added by me when I completely rewrote that article on June 4, so I think it still meets the newness criterion.
Created by
Epicgenius (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 656 past nominations.
I like ALT1 the best, and the sourcing checks out on it. Article is eligible from newness and is in pretty good shape all around. No evidence of copyvio. QPQ checks out. I think everything here is in good working order!
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 18:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Policy-compliant: yes. Well-written, covers the subject well, reliably sourced, no issues with the text or the image licenses. The sources are almost entirely in Dutch, but Earwig finds no problems in English-language sources.
QPQ: done.
Hook: It tells a compelling story, and the actual words of his speech are clearly sourced.
Other comments: Thank you for an interesting article on a person whose story is important to tell. I made a few minor copyedits to the page. This hook is almost good to go. Before I clear it, I want to check about some of the blue-linking on the page. I think some of the links in the lead section are linked again lower on the page, so I'd like to have the nominator have a chance to check the page once more for (1) any overlinking, and (2) whether there might be any new links to add. I'm not seeing any other issues. --
Tryptofish (
talk) 22:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi
Tryptofish. Per
WP:DL, links may be duplicated in different sections where necessary to establish context. For example, today's FA,
The Spider (magazine), links competing publications and the author in the lede and on first mention in the text. As for other links, I didn't see any that seemed to be contextually relevant and likely to have an article. Blauw doesn't have an article even in Dutch. The sugar station might warrant an article at some point, given how big it seems to have been, but I'd have to see how much is available about it. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 23:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
OK, then, it's good to go. --
Tryptofish (
talk) 23:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
No QPQ needed. Hook is interested, although you really should list the source again here; it's de Crespigny, Rafe (2018). Generals of the South: The Foundation and Early History of the Three Kingdoms State of Wu. This checks out, however. Article seems in decent shape, although might need a round of copyediting; it's presentable, but some of the sentences are phrased a little clunkily.
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 01:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that to encourage the development of Bissau-Guinean cinema, one foreign filmmaker provided the country's film institute with cameras, lights, and a Steinbeck guitar?
Source: Laranjeiro, Catarina (2021), Blum, Françoise; Kiriakou, Héloïse; Mourre, Martin; Basto, Maria-Benedita (eds.), "The Bissau-Guinean Cinema: A Nation", Socialismes en Afrique (in French), Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, pp. 519–535, doi:10.4000/books.editionsmsh.51480., ISBN 978-2-7351-2698-9, retrieved 2024-06-08
ALT1: ... that
Amílcar Cabral sent four Bissau-Guineans to learn film technique in Cuba, hoping to stimulate filmmaking in the country? Source: Arenas, Fernando (2017). "The Filmography of Guinea-Bissau's Sana Na N'Hada: From the Return of Amílcar Cabral to the Threat of Global Drug Trafficking". Portuguese Literary and Cultural Studies: 69. ISSN 2573-1432.
ALT2: ... that much of the early cinema of Guinea-Bissau was lost after the
country's 1980 coup? Source: Cavoulacos, Sophie (June 8, 2024). "MoMA Presents: Filipa César's Spell Reel". MOMA. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
Reviewed:
Created by
Lbal (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Well done! Nominator is exempt from QPQ. The article was created within a week at the time of nomination and exceeds the minimum length for DYK. The article is generally within policy; I did make a copyedit to fix some typos and linkage issues. A basic copyvio check found no concerns. Sourcing is sufficient and high-quality. All of the hooks are cited and mentioned within the article, and I believe they pass our standards for interesting hooks.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 20:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that despite specializing in literature and serving as a senior editor of the
Zhonghua Book Company, historian Zhang Zhenglang never published a single book of his own?
Source: Lu, Zongli (2007). "A Short Biography of Professor Zhang Zhenglang". Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR). 29.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25478409
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Good to go! But, out of curiosity, where was "My Ten Years at the Institute of History and Philology" published in 1998? In a journal, or somewhere else? Thanks, A Thousand Doors (
talk |
contribs) 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
A Thousand Doors: in 新學術之路: 中央研究院歷史語言研究所七十周年紀念文集, Volume 1 (1998) [A New Academic Road: Collected Works Commemorating the 70th Anniversary of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Volume 1]. But the version I use was from the Peking University website - I'm kind of unsure how to cite it in this case.
Generalissima (
talk) (it/she) 21:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Source: Ballas, Teeka; Bodry, Catherine; Bowman, Jessica; Coffman, Linda; Heller, Carolyn; Kernaghan, Sue; McBeath, Chris; Moure, Celeste; Readicker-Henderson, Edward; Reale, Tom; Schoenbohm, Laurel; Wyatt, Sarah (2009). Kealy, Kelly (ed.).
Fodor's Alaska Ports of Call 2009. New York:
Fodor's. p. 167.
ISBN978-1-4000-0707-3.
ISSN1520-0205. Retrieved 2024-06-08 – via
Google Books.
The book notes: "We don't recommend it if you're looking for authenticity, but the Great Alaskan Lumberjack Show is a 60-minute lumberjack contest providing a Disneyesque taste of old-time woodsman skills, including ax throwing, buck-sawing, springboard chopping, log-rolling duels, and a 50-foot tree climb that ends in a free fall."
Article was moved to mainspace today, so is new enough. At over 3000 characters, it is long enough. The article reads neutrally and properly uses in-line citations. The copyvio detector finds no issues. Both hooks are interesting and are cited in-line. No QPQ is required (though will be on your next one, have fun with that!). Everything looks good to go!
SilverserenC 23:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Review ongoing: Promoted to GA on 9th and nominated here for DYK on 10th June. Article is long enough. 2 free images in article from Commons and 2 medias uploaded on enwiki with rationale. No apparent copyvios other than quotes. All the 3 hooks are verifiable as per the sources; but none of them appear in the article as have been presented here in the hook. "Horn line" should be linked or explained. I suggest rephrasing the article words to include these lines. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 11:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Dharmadhyaksha I have fixed the issue for two of the hooks by using more words directly from the article (I opted not to do ALT1 as in retrospect it seems less interesting than the other two).
Koopastar (
talk) 19:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Both original and ALT2 hooks are ok. However i prefer ALT2 more as it is unique for this particular article. All good to go now! §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Article is long and new enough as well as well written and copyvio-free. However, I would prefer that you cite another reliable, independent source for the critical reception instead of using Rotten Tomatoes, which, while reliable on its own, is not an arbiter of critical consensus; you can still report on the RT scores, though. Hooks are cited both in this page and article, but I prefer ALT1 (that is, with another independent source as I've said) for obvious reasons but with some minor alterations:
ALT0 seems dull and reliant on readers' knowledge of award-giving bodies. Title card image, which is freely-licensed, seems more decorative than encyclopedic within the context of this DYK, so I seriously doubt it's gonna make it to the main page. Since QPQ has been given, this should be good to go once the issues are addressed.
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (
talk) 07:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Just clump those sources in the article while also rewriting the sentence into, Some critics described the show as necessary comic relief from the activities of the Trump administration., and then remove The fourth season was generally well received from Critical reception and leave the Rotten Tomatoes bit as a standalone sentence.
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (
talk) 12:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Drive-by nomination, as it's been around 6.875 days since this was converted from a redirect and I want to get this in under the wire. I have a small amount of work to do, starting with the excision of those ugly
WP:CLUMPs. Note that I've included 'credited' because, as can quite clearly be seen in the image in the cited source, series 4 winners Spelbound also contained women. Also noting that the majority of this article was created by an IP.
Created by
Launchballer (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 234 past nominations.
Review: Newly expanded article from a redirect meeting the required length size of prose. BLP is notable to exist as a standalone article now passing
WP:ARTIST. No apparent copyvios. QPQ done. Rest article seems fine. Problem comes with only the fact that this is a synthesis and hence not perfectly verifiable. Do we have any another source mentioning her to be the first woman winner without a dog? Or else, do we have anything else from the article to a new hook? §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits} 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
It's in
HuffPost, which I've added back to the article.--Launchballer 08:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
New enough - promoted to GA same day as nomination;
Long enough - 10,948 characters;
QPQ Check - not needed;
Hook is referenced to a secondary source clearly cited in the article, and source has a clear editorial policy;
Hook is interesting - remarkable number of musicians and instruments;
Article is presentable;
Copyvio is clear "Violation Unlikely", most comparison hits are in quotes;
The picture is clear and in the article;
However - while the picture states it is freely licenced, it has been sourced to a facebook post by two people (who retain ownership of the intellectual property per
[4]). It is therefore not wholly clear it is freely licenced per
WP:IUPC;
Also - the hook needs the rather subjective text "no less than" removed to something more neutral - e.g. "features contributions from", and the article has 2-3 sentences that need citations.
This can nearly be approved without the picture. Alternatively to approve this nom for the main page with the picture, I recommend proof "that the copyright holder has released the image under an acceptable free license". Furthermore please resolve the (relatively minor) hook and citation issues. Resonant
Distortion 16:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your comments! This picture was sourced from the comments of a Facebook post in
a fan community for the Cat Empire. In that post, I requested images of the band on tour, making it clear that I was to use them in a Wikipedia article. Would a screenshot of this post and some of the comments be sufficient proof that this image is freely licensed?
SupremeLordBagel (
talk to me) 04:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks - that's good but I suggest we get this tighter if the image is to go on the main page. Please see this section in the commons VRT
[5]. Resonant
Distortion 05:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I'll work on contacting the original photographers and get back to you when I can.
SupremeLordBagel (
talk to me) 09:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry that I haven't replied for a while! I think it's more hassle than it's worth to include the image. We'll go ahead without it.
SupremeLordBagel (
talk to me) 10:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Understood and noted, though the licencing on the respective images in the article evidently still need resolution. To get this approved for the hook only can you please (a) create an ALT1a without the "(pictured)" text, and (b) resolve the uncited statements within the article, i.e. "It is also the band's first release since The Cat Empire (2003) to be produced by Andy Baldwin" and "The song debuted at No. 1 on the AMRAP Metro Charts, and stayed in that position for two weeks." Resonant
Distortion 14:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Donereply
for ALT1a. Note: picture not approved. Resonant
Distortion 23:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Converted from a redirect by
Cavarrone (
talk). Nominated by
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Article new and long enough at the time of nomination. Length and referencing adequate ("Plot" isn't but that's MOS). No copyvio per Earwig aside from the block of interview quote. Hook interesting, cited inline. Good to go.
Juxlos (
talk) 16:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that
Tyla(pictured) delayed her debut album's submission date in order to collaborate with
Tems? Source:
ref: One of the most powerful tracks is "No. 1," featuring Nigerian R&B star Tems. Tyla even pushed back the deadline to turn in the album so she could lock in the collab.
Reviewed:
Created by
Dxneo (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Overall: Image isn't appropriate; as per
Wikipedia:Did you know/Guidelines, the image used for DYK must be in the article. It is also pending a review to see if it's free... I can't help there, as I've been unable to find where YouTube is keeping its licensing information ever since it was redesigned. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 01:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
dxneo, having it in the article would fix the first issue. I've also been able to confirm the CC-BY license with
this archive, so the second part isn't an issue. Once the image is in the article, we're good to go. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 10:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
(An aside - Apparently the license doesn't show up when I'm logged in and using Premium, but it does when logged out. Good to know). —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 10:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Chris Woodrich Done, and I can see the license either logged in or not. dxneo (
talk) 12:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ not needed. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 21:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Aszx5000 and
Gonzo fan2007: Comment: Seems like a bold claim. I wonder if we should attribute this claim or bolster it with more robust sources. Or explore a more verifiable hook.
Bruxton (
talk) 15:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
"Considered" and "one of" make this less bold. I think the article supports both assertions, but if the nominator wants to add an additional source to back it up, it wouldn't hurt. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
... that the vocalist on the
dance song "Music Sounds Better with You" was in a punk band that disapproved of his collaboration with electronic musicians?
Overall: Since I am a relatively new user (est Dec2023), I am not sure if ALT0 violates NPOV. But regardless, I prefer ALT1
JuniperChill (
talk) 22:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
ALT1: ... that the relation "being a sibling" is irreflexive because no one can be their own sibling? Source: [2]
ALT2: ... that in the 19th century, philosophers changed their understanding of relations in response to developments in logic, mathematics, and science? Source: [3]
MacBride, Fraser (2020).
"Relations". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
Improved to Good Article status by
Phlsph7 (
talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.
Freshly promoted GA, looks quite solid, not copyvio. ALT0 and ALT1 are good hooks, correctly sourced and interesting. For ALT2, the sources could be a bit more explicit about the 19th century, but I agree this is correct. I am not sure it is as interesting as the other two. QPQ has been done. Approved. —
Kusma (
talk) 11:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Overall: I am assuming in good faith that the Dutch refs adequately support the text and that there is no plagiarism. I've done a general search myself as to the subject of the bio in English sources. There were some deletions made to the article of the word Nazi
here; restoring the word would help make this properly neutral in accuracy, and I would be happy then to pass this final item of the qpq.
2603:7000:2101:AA00:FD8F:5C17:CABB:9E61 (
talk) 20:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply