![]() | Categories | |||
|
I agree with SPUI's edit - making this less vote-like is good. TheGrappler 19:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
This template isn't making the little bullet before the Delete, reason. ~~~~ part (like {{ cfm2}} does, for instance). Picky, I know, but it's bugging me. 8). Recury 15:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I recently added a link here which, indeed, is a duplicate. That wasn't really the aim though, the idea was to have the template contain a [[:Category:Name]] so that this could easily be copy/pasted into the CFD/W page when closing nominations. The CFR2 tag has one like that, and it's pretty useful. I was wondering if people had suggestions on how to put that here. >Radiant< 07:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
And the {{ lc1}} template doesn't. The problem is that we want to be able to use What links here to find discussions. Otherwise we're just lost in the fog. -- Prove It (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} On the template where it has [[:Category:{{{1}}}]], before this it should have Proposed deletion. Simply south ( talk) 14:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Can i direct people to Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion? Simply south ( talk) 02:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
{{ Editprotected}}
Please create a doc subpage, move the categories, and add the documentation template. Thanks. -- Thetrick ( talk) 15:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the colon after "Propose deleting". This would standardise this template with other CFD templates, which lack such a colon. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
full has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think this template should natively support bulk nominations, like the otherwise similar {{
tfd2}}. {{
Cfm2}} and {{
Cfr2}} would likely be affected as well. This simply entails adding more optional numbered parameters similar to the first, e.g. {{#if:{{{2}}}|:* '''Propose {{{type|deleting}}}''' {{lc|{{{2}}}}}}}<br />
and removing the options of number parameters for other entries. An alternative would be making it more similar to {{
rfd2}}, by adding the option to omit the nominator's rationale and header so that multiple {{
cfd2}} templates can be stacked atop each other; this approach fits better with {{
cfm2}} and {{
cfr2}}. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
19:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The leading colons (i.e. indents) break the Reply tool, and don't seem to have a particular purpose. Would there be any objection to their removal? I have TE rights so I can carry this out myself, I'm just checking for objections. User:GKFX talk 21:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
<div style="margin-left: Nem">
.
Izno (
talk)
21:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
<div style="margin-left: 1.6em">
at
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_31#Category:Baronies_in_Fingal, and I think it looks right. May I copy this into the seven nomination templates? –
Fayenatic
London
17:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first parameter for {{
block indent}} should be named, like {{block indent|1=* '''Propose
. While that seems to possibly break the bullet point, it's much better than
breaking completely. If a bullet point is needed (is it?), maybe use •. (•). — Alexis Jazz (
talk or ping me)
22:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
illegal. If you are referring to Izno's comment, then I agree it's not ideal to use
:
for indentation, but think trying to suppress that usage on a discussion page in which many comments will themselves be indented that way is putting the cart before the horse.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
20:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC){{template|<span style="CSS">X</span>
then the template receives an argument called <span style
with a value of "CSS">X</span>
, and no first parameter, so it won't work.
User:GKFX
talk
17:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add {{
FCL|type=section|alt=none}}
per
User talk:Alexis Jazz/Factotum#BCL and some potentially bad news, so
Factotum will work on CfD. This should also be done to the various other templates for creating CfD nominations.
Qwerfjkl
talk
20:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
The {{ FCL}} template would need to be template protected
the complications that can arise from adding this template
the benefits to the number of users using the userscript
Also adding blank spans to each nomination on the cfd page could have unintended consequences.
userscript should realistically be able to operate on their own to reduce maintenance for people who don't understand each specific script.
![]() | Categories | |||
|
I agree with SPUI's edit - making this less vote-like is good. TheGrappler 19:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
This template isn't making the little bullet before the Delete, reason. ~~~~ part (like {{ cfm2}} does, for instance). Picky, I know, but it's bugging me. 8). Recury 15:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I recently added a link here which, indeed, is a duplicate. That wasn't really the aim though, the idea was to have the template contain a [[:Category:Name]] so that this could easily be copy/pasted into the CFD/W page when closing nominations. The CFR2 tag has one like that, and it's pretty useful. I was wondering if people had suggestions on how to put that here. >Radiant< 07:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
And the {{ lc1}} template doesn't. The problem is that we want to be able to use What links here to find discussions. Otherwise we're just lost in the fog. -- Prove It (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} On the template where it has [[:Category:{{{1}}}]], before this it should have Proposed deletion. Simply south ( talk) 14:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Can i direct people to Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion? Simply south ( talk) 02:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
{{ Editprotected}}
Please create a doc subpage, move the categories, and add the documentation template. Thanks. -- Thetrick ( talk) 15:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the colon after "Propose deleting". This would standardise this template with other CFD templates, which lack such a colon. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
full has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think this template should natively support bulk nominations, like the otherwise similar {{
tfd2}}. {{
Cfm2}} and {{
Cfr2}} would likely be affected as well. This simply entails adding more optional numbered parameters similar to the first, e.g. {{#if:{{{2}}}|:* '''Propose {{{type|deleting}}}''' {{lc|{{{2}}}}}}}<br />
and removing the options of number parameters for other entries. An alternative would be making it more similar to {{
rfd2}}, by adding the option to omit the nominator's rationale and header so that multiple {{
cfd2}} templates can be stacked atop each other; this approach fits better with {{
cfm2}} and {{
cfr2}}. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
19:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The leading colons (i.e. indents) break the Reply tool, and don't seem to have a particular purpose. Would there be any objection to their removal? I have TE rights so I can carry this out myself, I'm just checking for objections. User:GKFX talk 21:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
<div style="margin-left: Nem">
.
Izno (
talk)
21:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
<div style="margin-left: 1.6em">
at
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_31#Category:Baronies_in_Fingal, and I think it looks right. May I copy this into the seven nomination templates? –
Fayenatic
London
17:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first parameter for {{
block indent}} should be named, like {{block indent|1=* '''Propose
. While that seems to possibly break the bullet point, it's much better than
breaking completely. If a bullet point is needed (is it?), maybe use •. (•). — Alexis Jazz (
talk or ping me)
22:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
illegal. If you are referring to Izno's comment, then I agree it's not ideal to use
:
for indentation, but think trying to suppress that usage on a discussion page in which many comments will themselves be indented that way is putting the cart before the horse.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
20:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC){{template|<span style="CSS">X</span>
then the template receives an argument called <span style
with a value of "CSS">X</span>
, and no first parameter, so it won't work.
User:GKFX
talk
17:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add {{
FCL|type=section|alt=none}}
per
User talk:Alexis Jazz/Factotum#BCL and some potentially bad news, so
Factotum will work on CfD. This should also be done to the various other templates for creating CfD nominations.
Qwerfjkl
talk
20:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
The {{ FCL}} template would need to be template protected
the complications that can arise from adding this template
the benefits to the number of users using the userscript
Also adding blank spans to each nomination on the cfd page could have unintended consequences.
userscript should realistically be able to operate on their own to reduce maintenance for people who don't understand each specific script.