![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, -- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Some of the case numbers in Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/India medical cases chart do not seem to match what appeared in the MoHFW website.
Here are the case numbers used in the template right now:
2020-03-10;0;4;50;;;50;+6;;+14% 2020-03-11;0;4;60;;;60;+10;;+20% 2020-03-12;1;4;73;;;73;+13;;+22% 2020-03-13;2;10;81;;;81;+8;;+11% 2020-03-14;2;10;97;;;97;+16;;+20% 2020-03-15;2;13;107;;;107;+10;;+10% 2020-03-16;2;13;118;;;118;+11;;+10% 2020-03-17;3;14;137;;;137;+19;;+16% 2020-03-18;3;14;151;;;151;+14;;+10% 2020-03-19;3;15;173;;;173;+22;;+15% 2020-03-20;4;23;223;;;223;+50;;+29% 2020-03-21;5;23;283;;;283;+60;;+27% 2020-03-22;7;24;360;;;360;+77;;+27% 2020-03-23;9;24;434;;;434;+74;;+21% 2020-03-24;9;40;519;;;519;+85;;+20% 2020-03-25;10;43;606;;;606;+87;;+17% 2020-03-26;16;45;694;;;694;+88;;+15% 2020-03-27;18;74;834;;;834;+140;;+20% 2020-03-28;20;80;918;;;918;+84;;+10% 2020-03-29;27;95;1024;;;1,024;+106;;+12%
Here is how these numbers would look if we were to use the updates that appeared on the MoHFW website:
2020-03-10;0;3;50;;;50;+6;;+14% <!-- fixed recoveries to 3 --> 2020-03-11;0;3;60;;;60;+10;;+20% <!-- fixed recoveries to 3 --> 2020-03-12;1;3;74;;;74;+14;;+23% <!-- fixed recovers to 3 and total to 74 --> 2020-03-13;2;10;81;;;81;+7;;+9% <!-- updated increment and growth percent due to fix in previous entry --> 2020-03-14;2;10;84;;;84;+3;;+4% <!-- fixed total to 84 --> 2020-03-15;2;13;110;;;110;+26;;+31% <!-- fixed total to 110 --> 2020-03-16;2;13;114;;;114;+4;;+4% <!-- fixed total to 114 --> 2020-03-17;3;14;137;;;137;+23;;+20% <!-- updated increment and growth percent due to fix in previous entry --> 2020-03-18;3;14;151;;;151;+14;;+10% 2020-03-19;4;20;173;;;173;+22;;+15% <!-- fixed deaths to 4 and recoveries to 20 --> 2020-03-20;4;23;223;;;223;+50;;+29% 2020-03-21;4;23;315;;;315;+92;;+41% <!-- fixed deaths to 4 and total to 315 --> 2020-03-22;7;24;360;;;360;+45;;+14% <!-- updated increment and growth percent due to fix in previous entry --> 2020-03-23;9;35;468;;;468;+108;;+30% <!-- fixed recovers to 35 and total to 468 --> 2020-03-24;10;40;519;;;519;+51;;+11% <!-- fixed deaths to 10 --> 2020-03-25;10;43;606;;;606;+87;;+17% 2020-03-26;16;45;694;;;694;+88;;+15% 2020-03-27;19;67;834;;;834;+140;;+20% <!-- fixed deaths to 19 and recoveries to 67 --> 2020-03-28;19;80;918;;;918;+84;;+10% <!-- fixed deaths to 19 and recoveries to 80 --> 2020-03-29;27;96;1024;;;1,024;+106;;+12% <!-- fixed recoveries to 96 -->
Here are the relevant reference links to support each entry:
By the way, I am maintaining an archive of all the official case numbers from MoHFW at https://indiacovid19.github.io/. Every entry on this page is supported by an archived snapshot of the actual source of the data. The data I have provided above is consistent with what is in this archive as well as what is in the archived snapshots of MoHFW. Please let me know if we can update the case numbers in this chart to make them consistent with MoHFW data.
-- Susam Pal ( talk) 09:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
In particular, the data for 2020-03-13 indicates 3 recoveries both on the PIB website and the MoHFW website.
-- Susam Pal ( talk) 05:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)git clone
https://github.com/indiacovid19/indiacovid19.git; cd indiacovid19; python3 -m py.wiki
--
Susam Pal (
talk)
13:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)It is mentioned as Active cases in the top, it should be Confirmed cases Goswami666 ( talk) 13:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
2020-04-24;723;4814;23452
which indicates 723 deaths, 4814 recoveries, and 23452 confirmed cases. The active cases for the orange bar is then automatically calculated to be 23452 - 4814 - 723 = 17915. Now if we hover on the orange bar for 2020-04-24 for a while, a tooltip pops up that says "17915", thus confirming that the orange bar represents the number of active cases --
Susam Pal (
talk)
18:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)I propose that we remove this column. It is redundant to the graph and the actual figures, which are showing the same data, after all; furthermore, it is making the table so wide that it makes the text next to it hard to read on most screens (ie the average laptop screen). Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Susam Pal and Mayankj429: In case anyone is interested, India turns out to have had a "miraculous" week of very low Poisson noise in the official national statistics just before reaching 10000 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections per day on 12 June 2020. This is presently one of the results in this preprint arXiv: 2007.11779 Zenodo: 3990666 using the WP C19 Case Count Task Force data - for India that means data from this template - as the primary curated data collection. The JHU CSSE data gives almost identical results, except for India, for which it seems to have added up state-level India data instead of using official national data. The low-noise miracle is absent in the JHU data. The daily cases graph at https://indiacovid19.github.io appears to have the "low-noise miracle" present. Here is a pop-science explanation of why low noise is statistically unlikely to be natural. Boud ( talk) 01:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, how about adding the buttons to hide specific months in this template, as done for example here? /info/en/?search=Template:COVID-19_pandemic_data/United_States_medical_cases_chart 2A00:23C6:54A4:E201:F81B:87E6:F769:FC3D ( talk) 13:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
I started a discussion on that topic here Project COVID-19, Medical cases charts - change type. My personal opinion is that absolute change display suits much better in an epidemic's second wave. But also the status quo ante (percentage) should be kept here until some agreement is reached (locally or possibly a consensus in linked discussion). -- Kohraa Mondel ( talk) 15:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
changetype
argument to a
instead of p
(or individually for the two columns by changetype1
and changetype1
). In
Module:Medical_cases_chart/sandbox2 I implemented changetype = c
for active cases among others like 7-day incidence and rolling 7-day average prototypically, but Alexis and I wanted to tidy up the parameter processing before transfering this to the main module, and it got forgotten inbetween. So changetype = a
could be used right away, about the rest I can make no promises. --
Kohraa Mondel (
talk)
09:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, -- Another Believer ( Talk) 18:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Some of the case numbers in Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/India medical cases chart do not seem to match what appeared in the MoHFW website.
Here are the case numbers used in the template right now:
2020-03-10;0;4;50;;;50;+6;;+14% 2020-03-11;0;4;60;;;60;+10;;+20% 2020-03-12;1;4;73;;;73;+13;;+22% 2020-03-13;2;10;81;;;81;+8;;+11% 2020-03-14;2;10;97;;;97;+16;;+20% 2020-03-15;2;13;107;;;107;+10;;+10% 2020-03-16;2;13;118;;;118;+11;;+10% 2020-03-17;3;14;137;;;137;+19;;+16% 2020-03-18;3;14;151;;;151;+14;;+10% 2020-03-19;3;15;173;;;173;+22;;+15% 2020-03-20;4;23;223;;;223;+50;;+29% 2020-03-21;5;23;283;;;283;+60;;+27% 2020-03-22;7;24;360;;;360;+77;;+27% 2020-03-23;9;24;434;;;434;+74;;+21% 2020-03-24;9;40;519;;;519;+85;;+20% 2020-03-25;10;43;606;;;606;+87;;+17% 2020-03-26;16;45;694;;;694;+88;;+15% 2020-03-27;18;74;834;;;834;+140;;+20% 2020-03-28;20;80;918;;;918;+84;;+10% 2020-03-29;27;95;1024;;;1,024;+106;;+12%
Here is how these numbers would look if we were to use the updates that appeared on the MoHFW website:
2020-03-10;0;3;50;;;50;+6;;+14% <!-- fixed recoveries to 3 --> 2020-03-11;0;3;60;;;60;+10;;+20% <!-- fixed recoveries to 3 --> 2020-03-12;1;3;74;;;74;+14;;+23% <!-- fixed recovers to 3 and total to 74 --> 2020-03-13;2;10;81;;;81;+7;;+9% <!-- updated increment and growth percent due to fix in previous entry --> 2020-03-14;2;10;84;;;84;+3;;+4% <!-- fixed total to 84 --> 2020-03-15;2;13;110;;;110;+26;;+31% <!-- fixed total to 110 --> 2020-03-16;2;13;114;;;114;+4;;+4% <!-- fixed total to 114 --> 2020-03-17;3;14;137;;;137;+23;;+20% <!-- updated increment and growth percent due to fix in previous entry --> 2020-03-18;3;14;151;;;151;+14;;+10% 2020-03-19;4;20;173;;;173;+22;;+15% <!-- fixed deaths to 4 and recoveries to 20 --> 2020-03-20;4;23;223;;;223;+50;;+29% 2020-03-21;4;23;315;;;315;+92;;+41% <!-- fixed deaths to 4 and total to 315 --> 2020-03-22;7;24;360;;;360;+45;;+14% <!-- updated increment and growth percent due to fix in previous entry --> 2020-03-23;9;35;468;;;468;+108;;+30% <!-- fixed recovers to 35 and total to 468 --> 2020-03-24;10;40;519;;;519;+51;;+11% <!-- fixed deaths to 10 --> 2020-03-25;10;43;606;;;606;+87;;+17% 2020-03-26;16;45;694;;;694;+88;;+15% 2020-03-27;19;67;834;;;834;+140;;+20% <!-- fixed deaths to 19 and recoveries to 67 --> 2020-03-28;19;80;918;;;918;+84;;+10% <!-- fixed deaths to 19 and recoveries to 80 --> 2020-03-29;27;96;1024;;;1,024;+106;;+12% <!-- fixed recoveries to 96 -->
Here are the relevant reference links to support each entry:
By the way, I am maintaining an archive of all the official case numbers from MoHFW at https://indiacovid19.github.io/. Every entry on this page is supported by an archived snapshot of the actual source of the data. The data I have provided above is consistent with what is in this archive as well as what is in the archived snapshots of MoHFW. Please let me know if we can update the case numbers in this chart to make them consistent with MoHFW data.
-- Susam Pal ( talk) 09:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
In particular, the data for 2020-03-13 indicates 3 recoveries both on the PIB website and the MoHFW website.
-- Susam Pal ( talk) 05:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)git clone
https://github.com/indiacovid19/indiacovid19.git; cd indiacovid19; python3 -m py.wiki
--
Susam Pal (
talk)
13:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)It is mentioned as Active cases in the top, it should be Confirmed cases Goswami666 ( talk) 13:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
2020-04-24;723;4814;23452
which indicates 723 deaths, 4814 recoveries, and 23452 confirmed cases. The active cases for the orange bar is then automatically calculated to be 23452 - 4814 - 723 = 17915. Now if we hover on the orange bar for 2020-04-24 for a while, a tooltip pops up that says "17915", thus confirming that the orange bar represents the number of active cases --
Susam Pal (
talk)
18:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)I propose that we remove this column. It is redundant to the graph and the actual figures, which are showing the same data, after all; furthermore, it is making the table so wide that it makes the text next to it hard to read on most screens (ie the average laptop screen). Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Susam Pal and Mayankj429: In case anyone is interested, India turns out to have had a "miraculous" week of very low Poisson noise in the official national statistics just before reaching 10000 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections per day on 12 June 2020. This is presently one of the results in this preprint arXiv: 2007.11779 Zenodo: 3990666 using the WP C19 Case Count Task Force data - for India that means data from this template - as the primary curated data collection. The JHU CSSE data gives almost identical results, except for India, for which it seems to have added up state-level India data instead of using official national data. The low-noise miracle is absent in the JHU data. The daily cases graph at https://indiacovid19.github.io appears to have the "low-noise miracle" present. Here is a pop-science explanation of why low noise is statistically unlikely to be natural. Boud ( talk) 01:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, how about adding the buttons to hide specific months in this template, as done for example here? /info/en/?search=Template:COVID-19_pandemic_data/United_States_medical_cases_chart 2A00:23C6:54A4:E201:F81B:87E6:F769:FC3D ( talk) 13:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
I started a discussion on that topic here Project COVID-19, Medical cases charts - change type. My personal opinion is that absolute change display suits much better in an epidemic's second wave. But also the status quo ante (percentage) should be kept here until some agreement is reached (locally or possibly a consensus in linked discussion). -- Kohraa Mondel ( talk) 15:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
changetype
argument to a
instead of p
(or individually for the two columns by changetype1
and changetype1
). In
Module:Medical_cases_chart/sandbox2 I implemented changetype = c
for active cases among others like 7-day incidence and rolling 7-day average prototypically, but Alexis and I wanted to tidy up the parameter processing before transfering this to the main module, and it got forgotten inbetween. So changetype = a
could be used right away, about the rest I can make no promises. --
Kohraa Mondel (
talk)
09:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)