This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I created this template as a faster and easier way for making the graphical depth charts for college football teams. I wrote it specifically for the 1981 Clemson Tigers article, so it is initially setup for a 5-2 defense and option offense. I am working on programming the tables to support several other offensive and defensive schemes (3-4, 4-3, Run & Shoot, Power-I, etc).-- CobraGeek The Geek 17:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorely tempted to make the category link a "noinclude". Is there any reason to add this category to every page that uses the template? De Fault Ryan 15:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
The template, for the "Safety", "S", or "S Starter" position (whatever it's called—you get the point) links to the disambiguation page " Safety (American football)", or at least it does here, when it should link to Safety (American football position). As a result of an RfC, Safety (American football) was moved to Safety (American football position), and Safety (football score) was moved to Safety (American football score). I'm not familiar enough with the code to change the link in the template, could someone else? – dff gd 15:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
The footnotes created by this template in 2012 Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens football team (and in this template's documentation) don't contain the text from the reference. In fact, they don't contain any text at all. Could someone please update the template so the reference text is displayed properly? Thanks! GoingBatty ( talk) 02:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
|DefenceRef=
and |OffenseRef=
now require the use of <ref>...</ref>
and allow use of <ref name="foo">...</ref>
and <ref name="foo" />
. I've also added |DefenceRefRAW=
and |OffenseRefRAW=
which allow for the references to be added without wrapping in <ref>...</ref>
(actually, it's required that they are not), but will only work if |DefenceRef=
and |OffenseRef=
don't exist respectively. I hope that is not too confusing and I'm going to try and update the template documentation as well. Happy editing
Technical 13 (
talk) 12:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:CFB Team Depth Chart/doc has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please Add under values accepted a 4-1 defense scheme. * 4-1. 2601:648:8105:46B0:595:EC86:9313:883 ( talk) 04:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I came across an issue after looking into
this issue at the Help Desk. Doing some basic searching there appears to be at least 42 other articles using 4–3
(with an en dash) rather than 4-3
(with a hyphen) in |DScheme=, and so have tables that don't display correctly. I have looked into the other articles with other formations, but I would guess they are similarly effected. Some, as with the issue at Help Desk, may have been setup incorrectly. But I checked and couple of others and they were corrected using AWB to a broken state. The issue is that editors in good faith are going to change hyphens to en dashes between numbers. Could this template be changed to accept either hyphens or en dashes, so whatever the setup the table displays correctly? -- LCU
ActivelyDisinterested ∆
transmissions∆ °
co-ords° 21:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I created this template as a faster and easier way for making the graphical depth charts for college football teams. I wrote it specifically for the 1981 Clemson Tigers article, so it is initially setup for a 5-2 defense and option offense. I am working on programming the tables to support several other offensive and defensive schemes (3-4, 4-3, Run & Shoot, Power-I, etc).-- CobraGeek The Geek 17:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorely tempted to make the category link a "noinclude". Is there any reason to add this category to every page that uses the template? De Fault Ryan 15:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
The template, for the "Safety", "S", or "S Starter" position (whatever it's called—you get the point) links to the disambiguation page " Safety (American football)", or at least it does here, when it should link to Safety (American football position). As a result of an RfC, Safety (American football) was moved to Safety (American football position), and Safety (football score) was moved to Safety (American football score). I'm not familiar enough with the code to change the link in the template, could someone else? – dff gd 15:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
The footnotes created by this template in 2012 Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens football team (and in this template's documentation) don't contain the text from the reference. In fact, they don't contain any text at all. Could someone please update the template so the reference text is displayed properly? Thanks! GoingBatty ( talk) 02:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
|DefenceRef=
and |OffenseRef=
now require the use of <ref>...</ref>
and allow use of <ref name="foo">...</ref>
and <ref name="foo" />
. I've also added |DefenceRefRAW=
and |OffenseRefRAW=
which allow for the references to be added without wrapping in <ref>...</ref>
(actually, it's required that they are not), but will only work if |DefenceRef=
and |OffenseRef=
don't exist respectively. I hope that is not too confusing and I'm going to try and update the template documentation as well. Happy editing
Technical 13 (
talk) 12:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:CFB Team Depth Chart/doc has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please Add under values accepted a 4-1 defense scheme. * 4-1. 2601:648:8105:46B0:595:EC86:9313:883 ( talk) 04:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I came across an issue after looking into
this issue at the Help Desk. Doing some basic searching there appears to be at least 42 other articles using 4–3
(with an en dash) rather than 4-3
(with a hyphen) in |DScheme=, and so have tables that don't display correctly. I have looked into the other articles with other formations, but I would guess they are similarly effected. Some, as with the issue at Help Desk, may have been setup incorrectly. But I checked and couple of others and they were corrected using AWB to a broken state. The issue is that editors in good faith are going to change hyphens to en dashes between numbers. Could this template be changed to accept either hyphens or en dashes, so whatever the setup the table displays correctly? -- LCU
ActivelyDisinterested ∆
transmissions∆ °
co-ords° 21:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)