![]() |
Template:Adjacent communities is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
![]() | This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
|
|
I am sure this template took effort to make but is it really adding anything useful. A simple map would tell you what cities are next door using less space with a higher degree of accuracy. And if the argument that is a navigation panel then it belongs at the bottom of articles using a third the space it currently occupies. - MarsRover ( talk) 21:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Please look as Newton Regis where there is a large amount of white space, as this template waits until infobox has finished before drawing itself. Though I agree with those who would abolish this template completely, is there anything that can be done to improve its presentation? Jan1naD ( talk • contrib) 16:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotect}}
TFD nom as per Presents a over simplified view of geographic details i.e has no support for town x which is north north west of centre town y with out giving a real context of the towns surroundings. Information better presented in the the article or using a map
Gnevin (
talk)
10:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotect}}
Withdrawn as per
WP:Snow
Gnevin (
talk)
09:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Please sync with the sandbox to remove the links from the arrow icons; they are purely decorative, and clicking them leads to an unexpected result (one might expect to move to a different location article; instead it leads to the icon's image page). Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Any reason not to?
Rich
Farmbrough,
12:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC).
What's the general consensus, if any, about where this article should normally be located in an article? I have normally seen it in the External links section, although I have also come across it in See also and in Geography sections. Is there any guidance on where it should, or more importantly, shouldn't be placed? TIA Atlas-maker ( talk) 23:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
I had used the geography template in the article Fort McKay First Nation but it was removed. The editor argued that "[t]he "geography 8-way template is for communities, not First Nation governments." I have seen it used in other articles about First Nation's communities. It is very useful since the FN's have jurisdiction over areas of land that are not easily defined by a pinpoint or a coordinate. These communities are often remote communities and their stories are inextricably linked to geography and by extension ecology, geology. Knowing their geography is crucial in understanding archaeology and pre-contact and post-contact history. For example almost every FN community has direct ties to in regards to land use of specific lakes, rivers etc for traditional fishing, hunting and gathering. oceanflynn 17:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Fort McKay First Nation is a First Nations government comprising five separate communities (Indian reserves) that are geographically separate from one another. Some are proximate, others are distant in comparison. In my observation, this template has been utilized for Indian reserves/communities and not First Nations governments that comprise multiple unique reserves/communities. I suggest the template be utilized on First Nation government sub-articles for the separate reserves themselves. The problem with using it to cover a group of communities is which one is the reference point? What happens if there is a separate community, independent of the FN, that is located between two of the FN's constituent communities.
An example of this would be the Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation and its constituent reserves Alexis Indian Reserve 133, Alexis Cardinal River Indian Reserve 234, Alexis Elk River Indian Reserve 233 and Alexis Whitecourt Indian Reserve 232. There are over 10,000 km2 (3,900 sq mi) between the four reserves, with a number of towns, villages, hamlets, etc. within this area. What would be the central reference point to use the template on the FN article? Any central reference point would be WP:OR and would be in a different jurisdiction.
Hope this makes sense. Cheers, Hwy43 ( talk) 19:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Besides italics, would it be too much to have waterway link text displayed in blue text and/or with watermarks, such as ~~ Saint Lawrence River ~~ ? Thanks. Gordalmighty ( talk) 03:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
This template does not seem to appear when on the mobile version Wikipedia?-- الدبوني ( talk) 15:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Geographic location has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I recently saw that in some places the parameters where wrongly used: south-east (with hyphen) instead of Southeast (and the three other hyphened variants for NE, NW, SW). So either these variants could be added to the template or a bot has to be called to change these hyphened occurrences. katpatuka ( talk) 04:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please adopt the current sandbox version, which matches the standard navbox and is collapsible. Not sure if these changes should be done in the middle of a deletion discussion, but many of the complaints have been about the template's looks. This may address some of those concerns. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I updated the code to use {{ navbox}} to generate the outer container, which allows embedding in other navboxes. let me know if there are any problems. Frietjes ( talk) 17:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace this line of code:
| title = {{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title|}}}|Adjacent places of {{PAGENAME}}}}
with this:
| title = {{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title|}}}|Places adjacent to {{PAGENAME}}}}
The new wording I am suggesting is much less awkward. CJK09 ( talk) 15:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The previous version of this template specified 17 width for all four arrows. This resulted in 17w×20h up and down arrows, and 17w×14h left and right arrows.
My recent edit reduced the up and down arrows to 14w×17h to match the left and right arrows in size. Alternatively, the left and right arrows could be enlarged to 20w×17h. Let me know if that's preferable. Matt Fitzpatrick ( talk) 04:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved to Template:Adjacent communities. It is template protected, so I will list it at WP:RM/TR for an admin to implement. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Template:Geographic location →
Template:Adjacent locations
Template:Adjacent communities – Template is confusingly named and should match its actual content. Abuse of this navbox as a mid-article crude map (which has inspired repeated attempts to delete the template completely, with about a 50/50 delete vs. keep result) appears to be the direct result of the name of the template, which suggests it is for identifying the location of the subject, rather than the actually intended use, which is navigation to articles on neighboring communities along the eight primary and secondary compass points. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<
00:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
(t)he template provides for a convenient compass-based navigational aid for articles about communities. It allows you to display the communities surrounding the subject of your article.Mojoworker ( talk) 17:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Can you please define the word "communities"? I know this would apply to cities and/or towns...entities that have legal boundaries that are commonly accepted by all parties. But...
What about neighborhoods -- areas that don't have a legal definition and have multiple interpretations? As an example: The City of Los Angeles considers "Baldwin Hills" and "Crenshaw" to be separate and adjacent communities. But the Los Angeles Times newspaper's mapping project combined them both into one neighborhood called "Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw".
If neighborhoods could be used in the template, whose definition of the neighborhood would prevail: The City of Los Angeles or Los Angeles Times newspaper's mapping project? Or Google Maps, since they often have different boundaries. Or Thomas Brothers maps, which often list neighborhoods that don't even have Wikipedia pages?
I could not find a definition of "communities' clearly spelled out on the template page and hoping that can be clearly stated. Phatblackmama ( talk) 20:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I would appreciate your cooperation in retaining the geographic boxes in the logical place where they belong; that is, under Geography. They are not WP:Navboxes as much as they are indicators of where the communities exist in relation to others. Thanks very much. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 04:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Note that there is NO policy that dictates the rules for this template's use. Its application is guided by common practice and/or local consensus of wikiprojects. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
It seems to be agreed in the main discussion above that this template can be used for neighborhoods within city articles but that it should be placed just after the "External links" section. Is this correct? BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
@ Fettlemap, @ P 1 9 9,@ SMcCandlish@ BeenAroundAWhile
Please weight in. I don't want to misinterpret the discussion. It seems that consensus is: The NavBox for adjacent communities can be used for neighborhoods if placed in proper position at the bottom of the page, and does not favor any one set of neighborhood definitions and/or boundaries. In the case of Los Angeles, that means that any NAVBOX showing adjacent communities must incorporate both the the Los Angeles City and the Los Angeles Times boundaries. Is that correct?
References
Please put instructions for all the optional parameters available in what is now the "Title option" section of the template instructions:
Thanks Donama ( talk) 02:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Would like to be able to include a compass rose such as this...
/info/en/?search=Template:NeighbouringCommunities
How to do this? I would use NeighbouringCommunities but it doesn't appear to have state=expanded option.
FOUND IT, put this on the centre/center parameter
{{{TEXTORPICTURE|[[File:Compass_rose_simple.svg|80px]]}}}
Thanks. CoatCheck ( talk) 01:57, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Tucker County, WV does not border Garrett County, MD (see https://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/GUBlock/st24_md/county/c24023_garrett/DC10BLK_C24023_014.pdf ). The template for Garrett County, MD is correct. I just fixed the "Adjacent Counties" section in the Wikipedia articles for both counties. Kevin Lamoreau ( talk) 16:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
Adjacent communities}}
. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned.
Izno (
talk)
16:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The geographic positions of the adjacent communities surrounding Calimesa, California are inaccurate and should be modified. I think the placement of the communities/surrounding features should look something like this:
If there is an editor out there who has a right to make these changes, please do so. Also, if you feel any other changes need to be made (like omitting San Jacinto or Cabazon as adjacent communities), feel free to do this as well. DISCLAIMER: Despite what the notice says at the top, I do not want to modify the master Adjacent Communities template, just the template for Calimesa, California, United States. Cheers, Pf1127 ( talk) 19:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Please disregard this. I found the right section to only edit the template for Calimesa, California, and not the protected Adjacent Communities template.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
NOTE: The County of Monterey and Kern County are NOT contiguous unless you count the occasional dust storm blowing through. There is a mile or so of Kings County that separates the two just referred to. Woilorio ( talk) 11:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "Baldwin Hills-Crenshaw Mall" from template as inaccurate and not really a neighborhood. It is a commercial shopping center. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 16:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "Baldwin Hills-Crenshaw Mall" from template as inaccurate and not really a neighborhood. It is a commercial shopping center. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 23:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
Adjacent communities}}
. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned.
Izno (
talk)
23:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)This template derives from {{
Navbox}}, which is collapsed by default, as makes sense for its usual use at the bottom of articles, where multiple navboxes may be stacked and where they may take up substantial vertical space. But this is typically used as a one-off within an article's content and it takes up limited vertical space. Would it make sense to expand it by default, by adding |state=expanded
to its source?
Largoplazo (
talk)
20:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Adjacent communities has been listed at Templates for discussion ( nomination), but was protected so could not be tagged. Please add:
{{subst:tfm|help=off|1=NeighbouringCommunities}}
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. ActuallyNeverHappened02 ( a place to chalk | a list of stuff i've done) 23:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if it's possible to add a parameter to get the article name to display in lower case on the template, but it would be great if one could be added for the template at qathet Regional District.-- Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 23:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
title=
parameter, i.e. |title = Jurisdictions adjacent to qathet Regional District
will solve this issue. Regards, --
P 1 9 9
✉
12:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)![]() |
Template:Adjacent communities is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
![]() | This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
I am sure this template took effort to make but is it really adding anything useful. A simple map would tell you what cities are next door using less space with a higher degree of accuracy. And if the argument that is a navigation panel then it belongs at the bottom of articles using a third the space it currently occupies. - MarsRover ( talk) 21:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Please look as Newton Regis where there is a large amount of white space, as this template waits until infobox has finished before drawing itself. Though I agree with those who would abolish this template completely, is there anything that can be done to improve its presentation? Jan1naD ( talk • contrib) 16:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotect}}
TFD nom as per Presents a over simplified view of geographic details i.e has no support for town x which is north north west of centre town y with out giving a real context of the towns surroundings. Information better presented in the the article or using a map
Gnevin (
talk)
10:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotect}}
Withdrawn as per
WP:Snow
Gnevin (
talk)
09:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Please sync with the sandbox to remove the links from the arrow icons; they are purely decorative, and clicking them leads to an unexpected result (one might expect to move to a different location article; instead it leads to the icon's image page). Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Any reason not to?
Rich
Farmbrough,
12:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC).
What's the general consensus, if any, about where this article should normally be located in an article? I have normally seen it in the External links section, although I have also come across it in See also and in Geography sections. Is there any guidance on where it should, or more importantly, shouldn't be placed? TIA Atlas-maker ( talk) 23:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
I had used the geography template in the article Fort McKay First Nation but it was removed. The editor argued that "[t]he "geography 8-way template is for communities, not First Nation governments." I have seen it used in other articles about First Nation's communities. It is very useful since the FN's have jurisdiction over areas of land that are not easily defined by a pinpoint or a coordinate. These communities are often remote communities and their stories are inextricably linked to geography and by extension ecology, geology. Knowing their geography is crucial in understanding archaeology and pre-contact and post-contact history. For example almost every FN community has direct ties to in regards to land use of specific lakes, rivers etc for traditional fishing, hunting and gathering. oceanflynn 17:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Fort McKay First Nation is a First Nations government comprising five separate communities (Indian reserves) that are geographically separate from one another. Some are proximate, others are distant in comparison. In my observation, this template has been utilized for Indian reserves/communities and not First Nations governments that comprise multiple unique reserves/communities. I suggest the template be utilized on First Nation government sub-articles for the separate reserves themselves. The problem with using it to cover a group of communities is which one is the reference point? What happens if there is a separate community, independent of the FN, that is located between two of the FN's constituent communities.
An example of this would be the Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation and its constituent reserves Alexis Indian Reserve 133, Alexis Cardinal River Indian Reserve 234, Alexis Elk River Indian Reserve 233 and Alexis Whitecourt Indian Reserve 232. There are over 10,000 km2 (3,900 sq mi) between the four reserves, with a number of towns, villages, hamlets, etc. within this area. What would be the central reference point to use the template on the FN article? Any central reference point would be WP:OR and would be in a different jurisdiction.
Hope this makes sense. Cheers, Hwy43 ( talk) 19:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Besides italics, would it be too much to have waterway link text displayed in blue text and/or with watermarks, such as ~~ Saint Lawrence River ~~ ? Thanks. Gordalmighty ( talk) 03:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
This template does not seem to appear when on the mobile version Wikipedia?-- الدبوني ( talk) 15:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Geographic location has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I recently saw that in some places the parameters where wrongly used: south-east (with hyphen) instead of Southeast (and the three other hyphened variants for NE, NW, SW). So either these variants could be added to the template or a bot has to be called to change these hyphened occurrences. katpatuka ( talk) 04:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please adopt the current sandbox version, which matches the standard navbox and is collapsible. Not sure if these changes should be done in the middle of a deletion discussion, but many of the complaints have been about the template's looks. This may address some of those concerns. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I updated the code to use {{ navbox}} to generate the outer container, which allows embedding in other navboxes. let me know if there are any problems. Frietjes ( talk) 17:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace this line of code:
| title = {{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title|}}}|Adjacent places of {{PAGENAME}}}}
with this:
| title = {{#if:{{{title|}}}|{{{title|}}}|Places adjacent to {{PAGENAME}}}}
The new wording I am suggesting is much less awkward. CJK09 ( talk) 15:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The previous version of this template specified 17 width for all four arrows. This resulted in 17w×20h up and down arrows, and 17w×14h left and right arrows.
My recent edit reduced the up and down arrows to 14w×17h to match the left and right arrows in size. Alternatively, the left and right arrows could be enlarged to 20w×17h. Let me know if that's preferable. Matt Fitzpatrick ( talk) 04:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved to Template:Adjacent communities. It is template protected, so I will list it at WP:RM/TR for an admin to implement. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Template:Geographic location →
Template:Adjacent locations
Template:Adjacent communities – Template is confusingly named and should match its actual content. Abuse of this navbox as a mid-article crude map (which has inspired repeated attempts to delete the template completely, with about a 50/50 delete vs. keep result) appears to be the direct result of the name of the template, which suggests it is for identifying the location of the subject, rather than the actually intended use, which is navigation to articles on neighboring communities along the eight primary and secondary compass points. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<
00:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
(t)he template provides for a convenient compass-based navigational aid for articles about communities. It allows you to display the communities surrounding the subject of your article.Mojoworker ( talk) 17:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Can you please define the word "communities"? I know this would apply to cities and/or towns...entities that have legal boundaries that are commonly accepted by all parties. But...
What about neighborhoods -- areas that don't have a legal definition and have multiple interpretations? As an example: The City of Los Angeles considers "Baldwin Hills" and "Crenshaw" to be separate and adjacent communities. But the Los Angeles Times newspaper's mapping project combined them both into one neighborhood called "Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw".
If neighborhoods could be used in the template, whose definition of the neighborhood would prevail: The City of Los Angeles or Los Angeles Times newspaper's mapping project? Or Google Maps, since they often have different boundaries. Or Thomas Brothers maps, which often list neighborhoods that don't even have Wikipedia pages?
I could not find a definition of "communities' clearly spelled out on the template page and hoping that can be clearly stated. Phatblackmama ( talk) 20:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I would appreciate your cooperation in retaining the geographic boxes in the logical place where they belong; that is, under Geography. They are not WP:Navboxes as much as they are indicators of where the communities exist in relation to others. Thanks very much. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 04:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Note that there is NO policy that dictates the rules for this template's use. Its application is guided by common practice and/or local consensus of wikiprojects. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
It seems to be agreed in the main discussion above that this template can be used for neighborhoods within city articles but that it should be placed just after the "External links" section. Is this correct? BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
@ Fettlemap, @ P 1 9 9,@ SMcCandlish@ BeenAroundAWhile
Please weight in. I don't want to misinterpret the discussion. It seems that consensus is: The NavBox for adjacent communities can be used for neighborhoods if placed in proper position at the bottom of the page, and does not favor any one set of neighborhood definitions and/or boundaries. In the case of Los Angeles, that means that any NAVBOX showing adjacent communities must incorporate both the the Los Angeles City and the Los Angeles Times boundaries. Is that correct?
References
Please put instructions for all the optional parameters available in what is now the "Title option" section of the template instructions:
Thanks Donama ( talk) 02:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Would like to be able to include a compass rose such as this...
/info/en/?search=Template:NeighbouringCommunities
How to do this? I would use NeighbouringCommunities but it doesn't appear to have state=expanded option.
FOUND IT, put this on the centre/center parameter
{{{TEXTORPICTURE|[[File:Compass_rose_simple.svg|80px]]}}}
Thanks. CoatCheck ( talk) 01:57, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Tucker County, WV does not border Garrett County, MD (see https://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/GUBlock/st24_md/county/c24023_garrett/DC10BLK_C24023_014.pdf ). The template for Garrett County, MD is correct. I just fixed the "Adjacent Counties" section in the Wikipedia articles for both counties. Kevin Lamoreau ( talk) 16:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
Adjacent communities}}
. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned.
Izno (
talk)
16:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The geographic positions of the adjacent communities surrounding Calimesa, California are inaccurate and should be modified. I think the placement of the communities/surrounding features should look something like this:
If there is an editor out there who has a right to make these changes, please do so. Also, if you feel any other changes need to be made (like omitting San Jacinto or Cabazon as adjacent communities), feel free to do this as well. DISCLAIMER: Despite what the notice says at the top, I do not want to modify the master Adjacent Communities template, just the template for Calimesa, California, United States. Cheers, Pf1127 ( talk) 19:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Please disregard this. I found the right section to only edit the template for Calimesa, California, and not the protected Adjacent Communities template.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
NOTE: The County of Monterey and Kern County are NOT contiguous unless you count the occasional dust storm blowing through. There is a mile or so of Kings County that separates the two just referred to. Woilorio ( talk) 11:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "Baldwin Hills-Crenshaw Mall" from template as inaccurate and not really a neighborhood. It is a commercial shopping center. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 16:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "Baldwin Hills-Crenshaw Mall" from template as inaccurate and not really a neighborhood. It is a commercial shopping center. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 23:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
Adjacent communities}}
. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned.
Izno (
talk)
23:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)This template derives from {{
Navbox}}, which is collapsed by default, as makes sense for its usual use at the bottom of articles, where multiple navboxes may be stacked and where they may take up substantial vertical space. But this is typically used as a one-off within an article's content and it takes up limited vertical space. Would it make sense to expand it by default, by adding |state=expanded
to its source?
Largoplazo (
talk)
20:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Adjacent communities has been listed at Templates for discussion ( nomination), but was protected so could not be tagged. Please add:
{{subst:tfm|help=off|1=NeighbouringCommunities}}
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. ActuallyNeverHappened02 ( a place to chalk | a list of stuff i've done) 23:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if it's possible to add a parameter to get the article name to display in lower case on the template, but it would be great if one could be added for the template at qathet Regional District.-- Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 23:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
title=
parameter, i.e. |title = Jurisdictions adjacent to qathet Regional District
will solve this issue. Regards, --
P 1 9 9
✉
12:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)