From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah ( talk) 22:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Salvatore Pais

Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
  • ... that Salvatore Pais's design for a "UFO-like aircraft that uses 'anti-gravity' technology" (pictured) has been patented by the U.S. Navy? (Forbes)
    • ALT1:... that Salvatore Pais's design for a "hybrid aerospace/undersea craft" (pictured) has been patented by the U.S. Navy? (patent)

Created by Philafrenzy ( talk) and Whispyhistory ( talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy ( talk) at 21:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - Struck first hook because this is not an RS
  • Interesting: Yes

Image eligibility:

QPQ: No - TBD
Overall: Notability not evaluated. Second hook ok without picture. Please do not move DYK nom subpages, it leads to unexpected results (if you click the review link, you will see what I mean) b uidh e 22:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, the image is simply there to provide a general impression of one of the possible shapes of the craft. Why isn't the picture suitable for the second hook? It is the thing mentioned in the hook. Forbes source removed from article. QPQ shortly. Philafrenzy ( talk) 23:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Here are a couple of Alts (2nd pic relates to Alt 3):

Giving this a fresh review as it's been some time and there have been over 50 edits to the page since being nominated:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Previous issues have been addressed. This article is good to go. Prefer ALT2 over others, personally find it most interesting. ~ riley ( talk) 21:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

  • @ Philafrenzy:@ ~riley: I came by to promote this with an image. I'm willing to run ALT2 in a quirky slot, but I don't see mention of the U.S. Navy patent in the text. Yoninah ( talk) 21:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Done and see ref 8. Philafrenzy ( talk) 22:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah ( talk) 22:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Salvatore Pais

Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
Salvatore Pais's design for the U.S. Navy
  • ... that Salvatore Pais's design for a "UFO-like aircraft that uses 'anti-gravity' technology" (pictured) has been patented by the U.S. Navy? (Forbes)
    • ALT1:... that Salvatore Pais's design for a "hybrid aerospace/undersea craft" (pictured) has been patented by the U.S. Navy? (patent)

Created by Philafrenzy ( talk) and Whispyhistory ( talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy ( talk) at 21:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - Struck first hook because this is not an RS
  • Interesting: Yes

Image eligibility:

QPQ: No - TBD
Overall: Notability not evaluated. Second hook ok without picture. Please do not move DYK nom subpages, it leads to unexpected results (if you click the review link, you will see what I mean) b uidh e 22:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, the image is simply there to provide a general impression of one of the possible shapes of the craft. Why isn't the picture suitable for the second hook? It is the thing mentioned in the hook. Forbes source removed from article. QPQ shortly. Philafrenzy ( talk) 23:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Here are a couple of Alts (2nd pic relates to Alt 3):

Giving this a fresh review as it's been some time and there have been over 50 edits to the page since being nominated:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Previous issues have been addressed. This article is good to go. Prefer ALT2 over others, personally find it most interesting. ~ riley ( talk) 21:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

  • @ Philafrenzy:@ ~riley: I came by to promote this with an image. I'm willing to run ALT2 in a quirky slot, but I don't see mention of the U.S. Navy patent in the text. Yoninah ( talk) 21:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Done and see ref 8. Philafrenzy ( talk) 22:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook