- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Allen3
talk 14:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
893 Dvin earthquake
- ... that the 893 Ardabil earthquake is a 'fake earthquake', created due to a misreading of the original Armenian reports for the 893 Dvin earthquake?
Created/expanded by Mikenorton ( talk). Self nom at 22:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Reviewed Carl Rettenmeyer [1]. Mikenorton ( talk) 12:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- I will be without internet access for the next few days, so it might be a while before I respond to any questions. Mikenorton ( talk) 20:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
. New enough, large enough. Sources check out and random check reveals no issues with close paraphrasing. Hook is appropriate length, cited and certainly caught my attention.
Reso
lute 23:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Allen3
talk 14:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
893 Dvin earthquake
- ... that the 893 Ardabil earthquake is a 'fake earthquake', created due to a misreading of the original Armenian reports for the 893 Dvin earthquake?
Created/expanded by Mikenorton ( talk). Self nom at 22:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Reviewed Carl Rettenmeyer [1]. Mikenorton ( talk) 12:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- I will be without internet access for the next few days, so it might be a while before I respond to any questions. Mikenorton ( talk) 20:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
. New enough, large enough. Sources check out and random check reveals no issues with close paraphrasing. Hook is appropriate length, cited and certainly caught my attention.
Reso
lute 23:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)