The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 07:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
new enough, long enough at 1665 characters, neutral, hook is sourced and QPQ done. Hook is only mildly interesting but it's ok. Good to go.
BletheringScot 17:21, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Yeah I know, there really doesn't seem to be anything else obviously "hooky" at all in the article, unless
Martinevans123 can drag something up.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 17:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Was hoping to get some trivial shellfish mileage out of MP's name, but can't contrive anything, alas.
Martinevans123 (
talk) 17:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, interasting. But I'm sure "Old Rambler" would demand that such a claim was
fully tested before it got to main page.
Martinevans123 (
talk) 08:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Too bad there's not more information in the article to work with. How about just tweaking ALT0?
Great. Since I just tweaked the last two words of ALT0, which was approved by another editor, I'll go ahead and approve this. Hook ref verified and cited inline. ALT4 good to go.
Yoninah (
talk) 11:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 07:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
new enough, long enough at 1665 characters, neutral, hook is sourced and QPQ done. Hook is only mildly interesting but it's ok. Good to go.
BletheringScot 17:21, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Yeah I know, there really doesn't seem to be anything else obviously "hooky" at all in the article, unless
Martinevans123 can drag something up.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 17:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Was hoping to get some trivial shellfish mileage out of MP's name, but can't contrive anything, alas.
Martinevans123 (
talk) 17:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, interasting. But I'm sure "Old Rambler" would demand that such a claim was
fully tested before it got to main page.
Martinevans123 (
talk) 08:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Too bad there's not more information in the article to work with. How about just tweaking ALT0?
Great. Since I just tweaked the last two words of ALT0, which was approved by another editor, I'll go ahead and approve this. Hook ref verified and cited inline. ALT4 good to go.
Yoninah (
talk) 11:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)