The result was: promoted by
Desertarun (
talk) 18:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Daniel Case ( talk). Self-nominated at 23:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Overall the article is in great condition and I have only minor questions on ALT0 and ALT1. Five fold expansion began on June 8 and article was nominated within seven days. Article length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism was detected. All photos used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons. The image in the nomination is used in the articleand clear at a low resolution. QPQ requirement is complete. ALT0 is hooky, but the wording in the hook is inconsistent with the wording used in the "Canadian asylum law" section. Specifically the hook seems fine, but I cannot verify the wording "Since most refugees are taken to customs". The cited source mentions no number of refugees which are taken to customs, so I find this confusing. ALT1 is interesting, but I cannot find any similarly worded statement such as "contrary to public perception" in the Roxham Road article. Have I missed it somewhere? ALT2 is interesting, properly mentioned and cited in the article and would be approved. Flibirigit ( talk) 00:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Desertarun (
talk) 18:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
5x expanded by Daniel Case ( talk). Self-nominated at 23:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Overall the article is in great condition and I have only minor questions on ALT0 and ALT1. Five fold expansion began on June 8 and article was nominated within seven days. Article length and sourcing are adequate. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism was detected. All photos used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons. The image in the nomination is used in the articleand clear at a low resolution. QPQ requirement is complete. ALT0 is hooky, but the wording in the hook is inconsistent with the wording used in the "Canadian asylum law" section. Specifically the hook seems fine, but I cannot verify the wording "Since most refugees are taken to customs". The cited source mentions no number of refugees which are taken to customs, so I find this confusing. ALT1 is interesting, but I cannot find any similarly worded statement such as "contrary to public perception" in the Roxham Road article. Have I missed it somewhere? ALT2 is interesting, properly mentioned and cited in the article and would be approved. Flibirigit ( talk) 00:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)