The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 15:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Article length, check, hook length check, sourced, check. The MIT website as a source is perfect. Yep, it's all good to go! --
Rsrikanth05 (
talk) 18:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Sorry, just realised that the last para is unsourced. I'll let someone else review this. --
Rsrikanth05 (
talk) 19:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
New reviewer needed per above. (Edits have subsequently been made to article.)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 17:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The following has been checked in this review by Maile
QPQ not required, not a self nom
Article created by Saltandpepperson on March 8, 2014 and has 2,932 characters of readable prose
Every paragraph sourced online
Hook is stated in the article and sourced online
Duplication Detector check of online sourcing found no copyvio
Disambig links tool found no issues
External links tool found no issues
Good to go for Women's History Month.
— Maile (
talk) 14:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 15:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Article length, check, hook length check, sourced, check. The MIT website as a source is perfect. Yep, it's all good to go! --
Rsrikanth05 (
talk) 18:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC) Sorry, just realised that the last para is unsourced. I'll let someone else review this. --
Rsrikanth05 (
talk) 19:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
New reviewer needed per above. (Edits have subsequently been made to article.)
BlueMoonset (
talk) 17:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The following has been checked in this review by Maile
QPQ not required, not a self nom
Article created by Saltandpepperson on March 8, 2014 and has 2,932 characters of readable prose
Every paragraph sourced online
Hook is stated in the article and sourced online
Duplication Detector check of online sourcing found no copyvio
Disambig links tool found no issues
External links tool found no issues
Good to go for Women's History Month.
— Maile (
talk) 14:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)