The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
... that the Cummer Gardens are the only gardens in
Florida that have preserved their original layout and planting schemes for over one hundred years?
[1]
Improved to Good Article status by
Mooeena (
talk). Self-nominated at 17:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC).
Recent GA. The hook is referenced. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. Image is properly licensed. QPQ is not needed. But there are a bunch of uncited sentence and parts of paragraphs. Please go back and cite all those sentences or remove them. See
[2]..--
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 21:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Returned from prep. The hook fact about being the "only gardens in Florida" does not appear in the cited source. It would also enhance the hook to say that they are flower gardens.
Yoninah (
talk) 10:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
You're right, that isn't the correct source. I've done some digging and believe that the original page I got that information from has disappeared. The only reference to it is an intern's notes on a proposed video series.
[3] I will suggest a new hook. This new source mentions in multiple places that the gardens retain their original design since 1919 and 1931, respectively.
ALT1:... that the Cummer Gardens have preserved their original layout and planting schemes for over one hundred years? Source:
[4] — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mooeena (
talk •
contribs) 02:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to check ALT1.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 17:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I came to approve, but sorry, don't find it easily, only in the lead.
I suggest you word a new hook. I'd like to see the full name
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens. You could mention one of the early designers and a year. Some of this might make a hook: "The Cummer Gardens were selected for the National Register of Historic Places because they represent the history of American landscape design in the first four decades of the twentieth century."
If you want to go with ALT1, please get the year 1910 sooner in the "English Garden" section and specifically say that layout and planting scheme were not changed. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 18:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, much better. How many of our general readers will know the designers? I think we create more curiosity when we don't mention them, and we want readers to click on the museum, not the others, no?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
... that the Cummer Gardens are the only gardens in
Florida that have preserved their original layout and planting schemes for over one hundred years?
[1]
Improved to Good Article status by
Mooeena (
talk). Self-nominated at 17:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC).
Recent GA. The hook is referenced. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. Image is properly licensed. QPQ is not needed. But there are a bunch of uncited sentence and parts of paragraphs. Please go back and cite all those sentences or remove them. See
[2]..--
KAVEBEAR (
talk) 21:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Returned from prep. The hook fact about being the "only gardens in Florida" does not appear in the cited source. It would also enhance the hook to say that they are flower gardens.
Yoninah (
talk) 10:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
You're right, that isn't the correct source. I've done some digging and believe that the original page I got that information from has disappeared. The only reference to it is an intern's notes on a proposed video series.
[3] I will suggest a new hook. This new source mentions in multiple places that the gardens retain their original design since 1919 and 1931, respectively.
ALT1:... that the Cummer Gardens have preserved their original layout and planting schemes for over one hundred years? Source:
[4] — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mooeena (
talk •
contribs) 02:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to check ALT1.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 17:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I came to approve, but sorry, don't find it easily, only in the lead.
I suggest you word a new hook. I'd like to see the full name
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens. You could mention one of the early designers and a year. Some of this might make a hook: "The Cummer Gardens were selected for the National Register of Historic Places because they represent the history of American landscape design in the first four decades of the twentieth century."
If you want to go with ALT1, please get the year 1910 sooner in the "English Garden" section and specifically say that layout and planting scheme were not changed. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 18:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, much better. How many of our general readers will know the designers? I think we create more curiosity when we don't mention them, and we want readers to click on the museum, not the others, no?