This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe this article should be named
Yodo River in accordance with
Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers#Rivers with multiple names, as other language versions do. The rule states that:
In my view, the Seta-Uji-Yodo River is famous under the name Yodo, which is applied to the longest portion (from the three-river confluence point in Kyoto to the river's mouth in Osaka). Seta does not match any of the criteria above. -- Sushiya 20:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Seta River to Yodo River as the result of a move request. -- Stemonitis 06:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
OhMyDeer's comment:
Uji is an alias of the main stream of the Yodo, but the Katsura is a branch of the Yodo. So, I suppose there is no reason to merge Katsura River article to Yodo River article. As for Uji River, we can merge if it is better or recommended to do so, but I'm not sure whether we should do. -- Sushiya 03:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe this article should be named
Yodo River in accordance with
Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers#Rivers with multiple names, as other language versions do. The rule states that:
In my view, the Seta-Uji-Yodo River is famous under the name Yodo, which is applied to the longest portion (from the three-river confluence point in Kyoto to the river's mouth in Osaka). Seta does not match any of the criteria above. -- Sushiya 20:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Seta River to Yodo River as the result of a move request. -- Stemonitis 06:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
OhMyDeer's comment:
Uji is an alias of the main stream of the Yodo, but the Katsura is a branch of the Yodo. So, I suppose there is no reason to merge Katsura River article to Yodo River article. As for Uji River, we can merge if it is better or recommended to do so, but I'm not sure whether we should do. -- Sushiya 03:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)