The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: This has been open for more than a month without objection, hence moved. There was no discussion at all on Joseon vs. Korea, so I'm doing the minimum possible change and moving to Korea, but since nobody cares anybody who wants to move to Joseon can do so boldly. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

United Kingdom–Korea Treaty of 1883 → Korea–United Kingdom Treaty of 1883 – To my understanding these types of treaties are usually named alphabetically. For example, Joseon–United States Treaty of 1882. Alternatively, should we rename this to "Joseon–United Kingdom Treaty of 1883"? toobigtokale ( talk) 11:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  – robertsky ( talk) 10:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  Natg 19 ( talk) 17:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: WikiProject Korea has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 16:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: WikiProject United Kingdom has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 16:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment Are you suggesting "Joseon–UK" or "Korea–UK"? The statement above contradicts itself. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 08:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

? I'm asking which of the two options people think is better. "Joseon" or "Korea". toobigtokale ( talk) 10:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply