This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tsushima Island article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: A, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The name of this article has been chosen to be Tsushima Island. This was after lengthy debates and an approval vote. Please consult the archive 4 for this discussion. |
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
・The population of the islands is about 41,000, consisting mainly of ethnic Japanese, with minority Filipino and Korean populations. There is also a small Christian community, consisting mainly of ethnic Koreans and Filipinos.Other signs of Korean influence include the Korean method of castle construction on Kaneda Castle.
There is such a description. However, I live in North Kyushu, but do not know these facts. Start a Korean and Filipino population and current nationality, the actual situation of religion, the source of information about these information which are in Tsushima. Because it is a too careless description, I delete it.
・Professor Cho Kyeung-dal of Chiba University suggests that the local culture has intermingled Japanese and Korean traditions over time, due in part to Tsushima's proximity to Korea. For example, Korean songs such as " Arirang" (or "Ariran") and "Chingu" are popular on Tsushima Island. This has led to the creation of unique festivals not found elsewhere in Japan, such as the Arirang Festival (established in 1964) and the Chingu Music Festival in August. The local dialect, Tsushima-ben, contains several words with origins in the Korean language, most notably from the Gyeongsang dialect. Many signs on the islands are written in Korean for the benefit of tourists.
This is only a hypothesis of only one scholar. It is not obtained a great number of people's consent. Because this opinion is not known at all.These studies are still unripe things. On this account you should not describe it.
In the Wikipedia context, controversy is sometimes highlighted -- see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight.
In the future, it may make sense to create Tsushima Island dispute. This article could accommodate new additions and outline the dispute's chronology. Will this mitigate a small problem, or will it make things worse?
This practical step was mentioned favorably in a reliable source -- see Hunt, Pete. "China and Japan's Wikipedia War," Foreign Policy (US). February 5, 2013; excerpt, "excessively detailed sections that soon took up the bulk of the article. One editor wisely created a new ' Senkaku Islands dispute' page in October 2010 to accommodate new additions and outline the dispute's chronology." -- Ansei ( talk) 18:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
The following 3 paragraphs were removed from the article. In each, there are questions which need to be discussed.
Arguably, the the municipal holiday and the opinion poll in paragraph 1 are not notable in themselves -- see WP:Notability. Also, the "incidents" described in paragraphs 2 and 3 are not notable.
Does this kind of information belong in Tsushima Island or in Tsushima Island dispute? -- Ansei ( talk) 16:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
search.japantimes.co.jp
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).I do not see any benefit in having Tsushima Island and Tsushima, Nagasaki as two separate articles. There is no clear division of material between the two, and quite a lot is duplicated or overlapping. 86.179.115.158 ( talk) 21:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Article 1 (Purpose): This regulation's purpose is to declare Daemado is a territory of the Republic of Korea and to secure the sovereignty of the Daemado.
— Ordinance of Day of Daemado in Changwon
@ Phoenix7777: I couldn't find Tsushima anywhere in here. So, please stop the edit warring. Thanks. -- Idh0854 ( talk) 11:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Tsushima Island | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Japanese name | |||||
Kanji | 対馬 | ||||
Hiragana | つしま | ||||
| |||||
Korean name | |||||
Hangul | 대마도 | ||||
Hanja | 對馬島 | ||||
|
―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 03:17, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
This is an assignment for my linguistic class to find an article and give a feedback. I found that this article says people in Changwon city in Korea call this island 'Daemado' but most people in Korea call this island as 'Daemado'. An article referenced in this article seems too old. It is from Junganilbo in 2002, over 10 years. Other than these, most of them looks neutral and reliable. -- Irue3 ( talk) 00:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Tsushima have belonged to Korea in history. 2001:4430:41B7:8C31:2AF3:3A75:5A0:B4C6 ( talk) 19:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tsushima Island article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: A, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The name of this article has been chosen to be Tsushima Island. This was after lengthy debates and an approval vote. Please consult the archive 4 for this discussion. |
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
・The population of the islands is about 41,000, consisting mainly of ethnic Japanese, with minority Filipino and Korean populations. There is also a small Christian community, consisting mainly of ethnic Koreans and Filipinos.Other signs of Korean influence include the Korean method of castle construction on Kaneda Castle.
There is such a description. However, I live in North Kyushu, but do not know these facts. Start a Korean and Filipino population and current nationality, the actual situation of religion, the source of information about these information which are in Tsushima. Because it is a too careless description, I delete it.
・Professor Cho Kyeung-dal of Chiba University suggests that the local culture has intermingled Japanese and Korean traditions over time, due in part to Tsushima's proximity to Korea. For example, Korean songs such as " Arirang" (or "Ariran") and "Chingu" are popular on Tsushima Island. This has led to the creation of unique festivals not found elsewhere in Japan, such as the Arirang Festival (established in 1964) and the Chingu Music Festival in August. The local dialect, Tsushima-ben, contains several words with origins in the Korean language, most notably from the Gyeongsang dialect. Many signs on the islands are written in Korean for the benefit of tourists.
This is only a hypothesis of only one scholar. It is not obtained a great number of people's consent. Because this opinion is not known at all.These studies are still unripe things. On this account you should not describe it.
In the Wikipedia context, controversy is sometimes highlighted -- see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight.
In the future, it may make sense to create Tsushima Island dispute. This article could accommodate new additions and outline the dispute's chronology. Will this mitigate a small problem, or will it make things worse?
This practical step was mentioned favorably in a reliable source -- see Hunt, Pete. "China and Japan's Wikipedia War," Foreign Policy (US). February 5, 2013; excerpt, "excessively detailed sections that soon took up the bulk of the article. One editor wisely created a new ' Senkaku Islands dispute' page in October 2010 to accommodate new additions and outline the dispute's chronology." -- Ansei ( talk) 18:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
The following 3 paragraphs were removed from the article. In each, there are questions which need to be discussed.
Arguably, the the municipal holiday and the opinion poll in paragraph 1 are not notable in themselves -- see WP:Notability. Also, the "incidents" described in paragraphs 2 and 3 are not notable.
Does this kind of information belong in Tsushima Island or in Tsushima Island dispute? -- Ansei ( talk) 16:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
search.japantimes.co.jp
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).I do not see any benefit in having Tsushima Island and Tsushima, Nagasaki as two separate articles. There is no clear division of material between the two, and quite a lot is duplicated or overlapping. 86.179.115.158 ( talk) 21:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Article 1 (Purpose): This regulation's purpose is to declare Daemado is a territory of the Republic of Korea and to secure the sovereignty of the Daemado.
— Ordinance of Day of Daemado in Changwon
@ Phoenix7777: I couldn't find Tsushima anywhere in here. So, please stop the edit warring. Thanks. -- Idh0854 ( talk) 11:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Tsushima Island | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Japanese name | |||||
Kanji | 対馬 | ||||
Hiragana | つしま | ||||
| |||||
Korean name | |||||
Hangul | 대마도 | ||||
Hanja | 對馬島 | ||||
|
―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 03:17, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
This is an assignment for my linguistic class to find an article and give a feedback. I found that this article says people in Changwon city in Korea call this island 'Daemado' but most people in Korea call this island as 'Daemado'. An article referenced in this article seems too old. It is from Junganilbo in 2002, over 10 years. Other than these, most of them looks neutral and reliable. -- Irue3 ( talk) 00:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Tsushima have belonged to Korea in history. 2001:4430:41B7:8C31:2AF3:3A75:5A0:B4C6 ( talk) 19:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)