Skeleton panda sea squirt is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) at 23:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Species of ascidian |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Skeleton panda sea squirt appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 25 March 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle
talk 12:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Created by Chaotic Enby ( talk). Self-nominated at 11:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Skeleton panda sea squirt; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: ALT 1 seems ok as well, reviewed primary. Geardona ( talk to me?) 00:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 23:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Vortex3427 ( talk · contribs) 14:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Weird name. Weirder appearance. Initial comments (will take a closer look tomorrow):
ascidian (sea squirt)instead. Also, should the alternative name skeleton panda ascidian (Hasegawa & Kajihawa 2024, p. 53) be mentioned, either in the lede or Etymology?
anchored to the substrateJust say surface
currents, in colonies"currents. It lives in colonies". Also with the last sentence: "The researches formally described it three years later."
formally undescribedreplace "not formally described"? I can't put my finger on why I find this weird. Also, link to undescribed taxon.
Thanks to crowdfunding effortsis colloquial. Maybe "Supported through crowdfunding" instead?
the tunicateReplace with a simple pronoun, as most readers don't know what a tunicate is.
only accessible
Four specimens were collectedYou don't have to specify this, because there is always only one holotype (link holotype and paratype in the next mention). Also, does one colony count as one specimen?the holotype and three paratypes,in colonies ranging from one to four individuals.
morphologicaland
spiracles.
Clavelina ossipandae wasThe first can just be replaced with identified, sister species can be linked, and doesn't the last bit belong in the article for the genus instead of this one?more precisely recoveredidentified as the sister species of C. australisinside the genus Clavelina (found by the authors to be paraphyletic to Nephtheis)
known from Kume IslandBy "known from", do you mean "discovered in" or "living in"?
phytoplankton.
Clavelina ossipandae,
C. ossipandae, or
Skeleton panda sea squirt?
ascidian ( sea squirt)to avoid MOS:SOB. Alternative name is mentioned in the lede, I'll add a sentence in the Etymology section
morphological traitswas linked to morphology (biology), but there is no article for spiracles in tunicates ( spiracle is a disambiguation leading to spiracle (vertebrates) and spiracle (arthropods)). Should I link to the tunicate morphology section?
Skeleton panda sea squirt is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) at 23:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Species of ascidian |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Skeleton panda sea squirt appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 25 March 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle
talk 12:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Created by Chaotic Enby ( talk). Self-nominated at 11:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Skeleton panda sea squirt; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: ALT 1 seems ok as well, reviewed primary. Geardona ( talk to me?) 00:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 23:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Vortex3427 ( talk · contribs) 14:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Weird name. Weirder appearance. Initial comments (will take a closer look tomorrow):
ascidian (sea squirt)instead. Also, should the alternative name skeleton panda ascidian (Hasegawa & Kajihawa 2024, p. 53) be mentioned, either in the lede or Etymology?
anchored to the substrateJust say surface
currents, in colonies"currents. It lives in colonies". Also with the last sentence: "The researches formally described it three years later."
formally undescribedreplace "not formally described"? I can't put my finger on why I find this weird. Also, link to undescribed taxon.
Thanks to crowdfunding effortsis colloquial. Maybe "Supported through crowdfunding" instead?
the tunicateReplace with a simple pronoun, as most readers don't know what a tunicate is.
only accessible
Four specimens were collectedYou don't have to specify this, because there is always only one holotype (link holotype and paratype in the next mention). Also, does one colony count as one specimen?the holotype and three paratypes,in colonies ranging from one to four individuals.
morphologicaland
spiracles.
Clavelina ossipandae wasThe first can just be replaced with identified, sister species can be linked, and doesn't the last bit belong in the article for the genus instead of this one?more precisely recoveredidentified as the sister species of C. australisinside the genus Clavelina (found by the authors to be paraphyletic to Nephtheis)
known from Kume IslandBy "known from", do you mean "discovered in" or "living in"?
phytoplankton.
Clavelina ossipandae,
C. ossipandae, or
Skeleton panda sea squirt?
ascidian ( sea squirt)to avoid MOS:SOB. Alternative name is mentioned in the lede, I'll add a sentence in the Etymology section
morphological traitswas linked to morphology (biology), but there is no article for spiracles in tunicates ( spiracle is a disambiguation leading to spiracle (vertebrates) and spiracle (arthropods)). Should I link to the tunicate morphology section?