This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roseanne Barr article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 60 days

	Roseanne Barr was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 16, 2011 Good article nominee Listed May 23, 2018 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Comedy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Television / Colorado / Utah Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us! This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance). Jewish Women Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Autism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Another Roseanne controversy here: this time courtesy of an interview with Piers Morgan. In particular, she seems to be falsifying her own family history, claiming that her grandparents and their siblings were all marched into the woods and buried alive in Ukraine. But according to this Wikipedia article, her maternal grandparents were from Lithuania and Austria-Hungary (not Ukraine!), while her paternal grandfather (described as Russian here) changed his name from Borisovsky to Barr after immigrating to the USA. It would have been awfully hard for him to do that if Ukrainian Nazis had buried him alive! So it seems like she’s pulling a George Santos here. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:BCC8 ( talk) 08:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I think you’re failing to understand here. Ukraine was part of the Russian empire at that time. Her Grandfather may well have been marched through and there is no mention of his wife or partner, Roseanne’s paternal Grandmother - why do you think Roseanne’s paternal grandparent and her father fled Russia and changed their surname? Fear. The kind of fear that makes you hide even when you’re out of the country, the kind of fear that makes you afraid to speak about what has happened to you for years. 185.69.144.199 ( talk) 13:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Borisovsky is a Russian, not Ukrainian, surname. And I've seen no evidence of Roseanne actually having any Ukrainian ancestry like she claims. Should she really be in the "American people of Ukrainian-Jewish descent" category? — Red XIV ^{( talk)} 03:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC) reply

My comment was archived out of view for being "too old" despite only being posted 2 months ago, I'm posting it again here: "Roseanne made an appearance on Info Wars in March of 2023 where she was interviewed by Alex Jones. In it she espoused numerous false conspiracy theories including but not limited to an illuminati of elite individuals who have heart attack and earth quake machines used to assasinate celebrities and destroy cities via fake hurricanes. There are multiple news outlets that reported on this interview, and it's one of her most recent public appearances in several years. I believe this is relevant to be mentioned in the article." Roseanne has gone on to have many more appearances on Info Wars since this March, and has also appeared in similar controversial interviews, so it is more relevant to the discussion of her current state of affairs than ever. 2601:602:900:7910:8DD:4B6B:2EF7:2A35 ( talk) 13:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Yep, I’d say that’s relevant. Especially because she described herself as a “ targeted individual” in her most recent interview with Piers Morgan (see Ukraine section above). It’s highly likely that her comments about “assassinating celebrities” reflect an underlying fear that she could be next. It doesn’t justify any of the outrageous stuff she’s saying, but it likely explains it. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:BCC8 ( talk) 13:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC) reply