Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen ( talk) 09:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

(
)
Josi in 2017
Josi in 2017

5x expanded by HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Roman Josi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice expansion! Appears to meet all the criteria, expect there's a few spots needing citations (I've marked them) and a qpq has not been provided. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 00:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC) reply


GA Review

Passed. 123Writer talk 15:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Roman Josi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 1TWO3Writer ( talk · contribs) 11:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Part of August 2023 backlog. Good luck.

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Huge paragraphs. I suggest creating subheadings for each season so breaking those paragraphs down will not ruin the flow of the article.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Lead should be expanded with info about international career and possibly his personal life. Some words like "disappointing", "outstanding", etc. are used; I've deleted what I could find, look out for other words to watch.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. CS1. No issues.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). See below
2c. it contains no original research. Every statement seems backed by a citation.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Statistics Earwig false positive. No issues.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Is there anything notable that happened since March?
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). No issues.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. See 1b.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No editwarring. Just general fixes recently.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. All own work by Wikipedians, shared on Commons.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. All photos of the subject in relevant sections.
7. Overall assessment.

Spot-check

1, 12, 16, 25, 39, 48, 54, 69, 73, 87, 92, 101, 116, 123, 139, 142, 158, 168

Discussion

  • Thanks for the review 1TWO3Writer! Since the Preds did not make the 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs, nothing really has happened since the season ended. However, I will add a couple sentences about how he finished (ie. pts). I will also add refs in the refs section of the awards table. I will also work on expanding/tweaking the lead. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 15:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
No problem, my main issue really though is the big paragraphs, so if you also work on that with all other improvements that'd be great! 123Writer talk 15:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
@ HickoryOughtShirt?4 Pinging just in case. 123Writer talk 15:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
1TWO3Writer, will do! HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 15:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
@ HickoryOughtShirt?4 I've taken the liberty to break down the paragraphs for you. Are you happy with those changes? 123Writer talk 13:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply
1TWO3Writer, yes thank you! I'm still not happy with the lead and I realized the international section also needs some work. Is there anything else you have come across? HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 15:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply
No, not at least from a quick re-read. I'll pass the article but feel free to make any further improvements. Good job. 123Writer talk 15:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Roman_Josi&oldid=1224220652"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen ( talk) 09:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

(
)
Josi in 2017
Josi in 2017

5x expanded by HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Roman Josi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice expansion! Appears to meet all the criteria, expect there's a few spots needing citations (I've marked them) and a qpq has not been provided. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 00:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC) reply


GA Review

Passed. 123Writer talk 15:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Roman Josi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 1TWO3Writer ( talk · contribs) 11:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Part of August 2023 backlog. Good luck.

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Huge paragraphs. I suggest creating subheadings for each season so breaking those paragraphs down will not ruin the flow of the article.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Lead should be expanded with info about international career and possibly his personal life. Some words like "disappointing", "outstanding", etc. are used; I've deleted what I could find, look out for other words to watch.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. CS1. No issues.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). See below
2c. it contains no original research. Every statement seems backed by a citation.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Statistics Earwig false positive. No issues.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Is there anything notable that happened since March?
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). No issues.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. See 1b.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No editwarring. Just general fixes recently.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. All own work by Wikipedians, shared on Commons.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. All photos of the subject in relevant sections.
7. Overall assessment.

Spot-check

1, 12, 16, 25, 39, 48, 54, 69, 73, 87, 92, 101, 116, 123, 139, 142, 158, 168

Discussion

  • Thanks for the review 1TWO3Writer! Since the Preds did not make the 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs, nothing really has happened since the season ended. However, I will add a couple sentences about how he finished (ie. pts). I will also add refs in the refs section of the awards table. I will also work on expanding/tweaking the lead. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 15:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
No problem, my main issue really though is the big paragraphs, so if you also work on that with all other improvements that'd be great! 123Writer talk 15:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
@ HickoryOughtShirt?4 Pinging just in case. 123Writer talk 15:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
1TWO3Writer, will do! HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 15:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
@ HickoryOughtShirt?4 I've taken the liberty to break down the paragraphs for you. Are you happy with those changes? 123Writer talk 13:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply
1TWO3Writer, yes thank you! I'm still not happy with the lead and I realized the international section also needs some work. Is there anything else you have come across? HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 15:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply
No, not at least from a quick re-read. I'll pass the article but feel free to make any further improvements. Good job. 123Writer talk 15:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Roman_Josi&oldid=1224220652"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE