This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anybody else think that Kamen Rider Blade is improperly categorized? I think it should be in Mystic Arms. ````
I think they make it on purpose, because the Wild Beast team is the smallest, and in need of more members. In my opinion, Gekiranger also should be in Mystic Arms, since their powers are not given by the beasts, but come from their fighting style.
The listing of all the cards or characters (I can't even tell from context which it is, or if its both) seems too cumbersome. If it is not cleaned up and presented in an encyclopedic fasion (so that everyone can understand what it is saying) it will be removed. This article also needs to state wheter this game has only been printed in Japanese, or if its been printed in english as well. Mathman1550 ( talk) 17:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I came here due to a request on the Wikipedia:Third opinion page. I personally have no problem with the lengthy lists, especially since most of the items appear to have their own Wikipedia articles, it's appropriate.
What I don't like is that when I come to this article, unfamiliar with the subject, I can scroll halfway through it and still have absolutely no clue what the article is about or why I should care! It's hardly what I'd call compelling prose.
The short lead paragraph neither summarizes the game nor explains why it's notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. A reader who wants to know more is immediately confronted with lists that haven't been given any meaning or context.
I suggest the authors approach this article from the viewpoint of someone unfamiliar with this game (or even this type of game). Expand the lead with relevant facts (not the irrelevant relationships shown now), and re-organize the article so that a reader gains an understanding of the object of the game and its basic rules (without getting into too much detail) before getting into the minute details of the lists. Just changing the order of the sections would help, for starters. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 22:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
So, back to my very first comment here, was the game only produced in Japanese, or in English as well? If both, when in each language? Also, please fill in the infobox. Mathman1550 ( talk) 22:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does anybody else think that Kamen Rider Blade is improperly categorized? I think it should be in Mystic Arms. ````
I think they make it on purpose, because the Wild Beast team is the smallest, and in need of more members. In my opinion, Gekiranger also should be in Mystic Arms, since their powers are not given by the beasts, but come from their fighting style.
The listing of all the cards or characters (I can't even tell from context which it is, or if its both) seems too cumbersome. If it is not cleaned up and presented in an encyclopedic fasion (so that everyone can understand what it is saying) it will be removed. This article also needs to state wheter this game has only been printed in Japanese, or if its been printed in english as well. Mathman1550 ( talk) 17:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I came here due to a request on the Wikipedia:Third opinion page. I personally have no problem with the lengthy lists, especially since most of the items appear to have their own Wikipedia articles, it's appropriate.
What I don't like is that when I come to this article, unfamiliar with the subject, I can scroll halfway through it and still have absolutely no clue what the article is about or why I should care! It's hardly what I'd call compelling prose.
The short lead paragraph neither summarizes the game nor explains why it's notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. A reader who wants to know more is immediately confronted with lists that haven't been given any meaning or context.
I suggest the authors approach this article from the viewpoint of someone unfamiliar with this game (or even this type of game). Expand the lead with relevant facts (not the irrelevant relationships shown now), and re-organize the article so that a reader gains an understanding of the object of the game and its basic rules (without getting into too much detail) before getting into the minute details of the lists. Just changing the order of the sections would help, for starters. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 22:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
So, back to my very first comment here, was the game only produced in Japanese, or in English as well? If both, when in each language? Also, please fill in the infobox. Mathman1550 ( talk) 22:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)